I don't like SPSS, MathLab and Math in general!

Feb 15, 2016 7:01 AM

KarlVonMoor

Views

4402

Likes

17

Dislikes

5

I don't like SPSS, MathLab and Math in general!

I started studying psychology to explore human thoughts and other meta-things but this, this is wrong!!!

psychology

students

university

funny

MathLab? Do you mean MATLAB? Or are you talking about the educational tool? Just plug on through this part of your studies, you can do it!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

At school I pondered if I should go study psychology or computer science. I think I chose right, since as psychologist, I would have been...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...more interested to see all the ways how brain can do wrong, rather than trying to make it do right.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What are the mathy things you have to do as a psychologist?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Lots of statistical tests. Depending on on the research design you can run anything from student t tests to ANOVAs

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A LOT of stat analysis goes into psych. In fact, quantitative survey methodology courses are frequently taught in ed and psych departments.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

He's making a program to reach into your mind and reprogram you to do his bidding

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'll never...Here's an upvote because I don't know why.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Matlab and Maple are both rotten pieces of shit. Use an actual programming language instead with a math library.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

C is where it is at. But I have a fondness for Mathematica and Maple after "numerical solution of DEs" in final year of college

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was thinking something like like python with Ssympy (for DEs and solving other stuff) and matplotlib (for data visualization).

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Python is happiness.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True that. Touché- but Python can be rather unapproachable for lots of folk.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah yep, if you want performance do go with C as you said.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you hate all of the above - hit up R: statistical programming language. Open source, good community. And less sucky than SAS and SPSS.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like R and agree, but I think OP's gripe is that he is forced to apply mathematics at all.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True, but little you can do to avoid it- maybe make the best of a bad situation

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I suspect that he is in classes and is forced to use a particular program.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't study psyc specifically. If you're interested in it then study as a minor while getting a BS in something else that's better for you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If psyc is still the road you want go down after your bachelors. Master programs don't require a bs is psyc.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Meh. I'm a psychologist and it worked out very well...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How recent was your BS?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2000. Experimental psychology.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Different works than now; majority won't high anyone with just a bs in any psyc- that's why a bio/psyc minor or anything else is better

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You think it's wrong that your field is finally catching up with the rest of the scientific community?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Psych is catching up with the rest of science? I guess you know nothing about psych.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Perhaps it's more appropriate to say that the scientific method wasn't universally applied until Skinner, so circa 1950.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you think it's wrong to try to apply science to the insane variability of the human experience? No... Not wrong. Stupid, that's the word!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Psychology (noun) - The scientific study of the human mind and its functions.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But to compare it to the more concrete, the actual measurable sciences. That's dumb

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually, phenomenon which are less measurable require more intense statistical analysis. "Concrete" sciences have easy stats.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh yeah... That's My point... it's difficult (near impossible) to apply the same rules of science to something that you can't measure

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0