It seems self evident that....

Jan 29, 2026 8:38 AM

Timpani

Views

10024

Likes

645

Dislikes

11

current_events

politics

Serge Brin has payed $20 million to a political group to fight California's effort to place a one-time tax on billionaires. He could have used the money to pay his share of the tax and slept better at night. How greedy are these people that want to enjoy all the benefits of the state, but not pay their fair share?

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fact that billionnaires CAN pour millions into fascist movements is already proof that you're not in a functional democracy. The fact that bribery is legal in the US is something that has always blown my European mind.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The problem is WHERE their wealth exists. They don’t have billions of dollars in their bank accounts. It exists in stocks and shares that are “unrealized” so can’t be taxed, but in our deeply corrupt system, they can be traded or used as collateral to buy and fund whatever they want.

Don’t get me wrong, taxing them will help greatly, but it will do near nothing to affect the massive wealth disparity.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 months ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Eat the rich

6 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Fascism begins the moment a ruling class, fearing the people may use their political democracy to gain economic democracy, begins to destroy political democracy in order to retain its power of exploitation and special privilege." -Tommy Douglas

6 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

In the same vein, Trotsky described fascism as "the most extreme imperialist reaction" to signs of a beginning proletarian revolution (such as the Occupy Wall Street movement or the popularity of a self-described socialist like Bernie Sanders). He believed it fell to the "petty bourgeoisie" (middle class) to side with either the proletariat or a counter-revolutionary fascist movement promising anti-communist and anti-union actions. Where they turned, large parts of the proletariat would follow.

6 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The key is removing the 'even slightly' part of that statement. Kill Citizens United and tax the billionaires until they are extinct.

6 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If it fails, we could try the ultra-wealthy, too. It's a cost I'm willing to sacrifice.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

history may not repeat itself, but it often rhymes

6 months ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

@Timpani Have you got a date for that post? I know that I'm curious about whether it was edited yesterday, on January 1st, or at some other time.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, best take on taxing billionaires that I've read. +1

6 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

My hot take on this is that most if not all billionaires are actually worth a LOT less than they appear to be worth on paper, because the vast majority of it is unrealized assets in the stock market, which itself is propped up by a lot of accounting hoodoo, and if we were to ever tax billionaires at what they should be taxed at given their supposed wealth the entire ruse would come crumbling down around their ears and they know it. Hence, the insane response to any kind of taxation.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's no part of that scenario that doesn't sound entertaining as hell. AMC Theaters could make a special popcorn bucket for it. Maybe a big mug that says "Rich People Tears" on it or something.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rich should be in quotation marks on the mug.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a billionaire faced with taxes, must be in want of fascism.

6 months ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

what a great opening line in the right-wing classic novel: Prejudice and Prejudice

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TBH I've never actually read it, only watched Lizzie Bennet Diaries. Is it notably right wing for the tim? or is it just old?

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's just old.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The 1% would pour money into an authoritarian political movement whether there was a threat of them being taxed fairly or not.

6 months ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 1

Thiel and Vance are Curtis Yarvin stans. They want democracy replaced with techno feudalism.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They used to build universities with their names on it. This generation of billionairs is shovkingly immoral.

6 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So happy for him he got exactly what he voted for

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As is evident by what's already happening - if anything, billionaires pay even less, and they continue to put more money into fascists

6 months ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

That’s called a return on investment.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean... yeah, their end goal was always to bring back the days of the Robber Barons. They got a small taste of what it was like to be the new world's nobility before strict regulation and a strong labor movement stripped that from them.

Ever since then, everything they've done has been in service of getting that back.

6 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0