“Wage theft is no accident”

May 4, 2021 5:55 AM

FosterMomForKittens

Views

91616

Likes

2771

Dislikes

67

Already battered by long shifts and high infection rates, essential workers struggling through the pandemic face another hazard of hard times: employers who steal their wages.

When a recession hits, U.S. companies are more likely to stiff their lowest-wage workers. These businesses often pay less than the minimum wage, make employees work off the clock, or refuse to pay overtime rates. In the most egregious cases, bosses don’t pay their employees at all.

Companies that hire child care workers, gas station clerks, restaurant servers and security guards are among the businesses most likely to get caught cheating their employees, according to a Center for Public Integrity analysis of minimum wage and overtime violations from the U.S. Department of Labor. In 2019 alone, the agency cited about 8,500 employers for taking about $287 million from workers.

Major U.S. corporations are some of the worst offenders. They include Halliburton, G4S Wackenhut and Circle-K stores, which agency records show have collectively taken more than $22 million from their employees since 2005.

Their victims toil on the lower rungs of the workforce. People like Danielle Wynne, a $10-an-hour convenience store clerk in Florida who said her boss ordered her to work off the clock, and Ruth Palacios, a janitor from Mexico who earned less than the minimum wage to disinfect a New York City hospital at the height of the pandemic.

Companies have little incentive to follow the law. The Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division, which investigates federal wage-theft complaints, rarely penalizes repeat offenders, according to a review of data from the division. Public Integrity obtained the records through a Freedom of Information Act request covering October 2005 to September 2020.

The agency fined only about 1 in 4 repeat offenders during that period. And it ordered those companies to pay workers cash damages — penalty money in addition to back wages — in just 14% of those cases.

On top of that, the division often lets businesses avoid repaying their employees all the money they’re owed. In all, the agency has let more than 16,000 employers get away with not paying $20.3 million in back wages since 2005, according to Public Integrity’s analysis.

“Some companies are doing a cost-benefit analysis and realize it’s cheaper to violate the law, even if you get caught,” said Jenn Round, a labor standards enforcement fellow at the Center for Innovation in Worker Organization at Rutgers University.

The federal data provides a revealing — though incomplete — look at a practice that pushes America’s lowest-paid workers further into poverty. The data doesn’t include violations of state wage-theft laws or cases where employees sued. And it misses all the workers who don’t file complaints, either because they’re afraid to or are unaware of their rights. But some economists say wage theft is so pervasive that it’s costing workers at least $15 billion a year — far more than the amount stolen in robberies.

Companies are more prone to cheating employees of color and immigrant workers, according to Daniel Galvin, a political science professor and policy researcher at Northwestern University. His research, based on data from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey, shows that immigrants and Latino workers were twice as likely to earn less than the minimum wage from 2009 to 2019 compared with white Americans. Black workers were nearly 50% more likely to get ripped off in comparison.

Through much of the Jim Crow era, the federal government ignored racial disparities in pay. It wasn’t until the Great Depression that Congress first tried to establish a national minimum wage and overtime pay for workers. To get Southern Democrats to vote for the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Northern Democrats agreed to exclude agricultural laborers, nannies and housekeepers from the law’s protections. In the South, most of those workers were Black. Out west, a large number were Mexican American.

Congress amended the act during the 1960s and 1970s to cover most of these excluded workers, but their employers often flout the law anyway. Galvin reports in his forthcoming book, “Alt-Labor and the New Politics of Workers’ Rights,” that the lowest-paid workers lost roughly $1.67 per hour — about 21% of their income — to wage theft from 2009 to 2019.

Yuri Callejas, a 40-year-old single mother, cleaned hotel rooms at a Fairfield Inn & Suites franchise in Pelham, Alabama. Callejas complained to her boss that he was paying her only $9 an hour when she was hired at $10 an hour, according to a lawsuit filed in January 2020 in federal court. Though she said she was working more than 40 hours a week, she wasn’t getting paid overtime, either, according to the complaint.

Her boss refused to change her pay rate, the complaint said, so she quit. Her accounting of how much she was owed: $1,272.

With help from an attorney at Adelante Alabama Worker Center, Callejas sued the owner of the hotel, AUM Pelham LLC. The company denied that Callejas was hired at $10 an hour or that she worked overtime, but it agreed to a settlement. Company owner Rakesh Patel did not respond to requests for comment.

Callejas walked away with $2,500 in back wages and damages. But that didn’t wipe away the memories of her struggle.

“Every time I paid my bills,” she recalled, “I never had enough money.”

Isaac Guazo, an economic justice organizer for Adelante Alabama, said fewer workers have reported wage theft during the pandemic, but that doesn’t mean it’s happening less.

“It’s the opposite, actually,” he said. “Workers will tolerate a lot more abuse right now because it’s so hard to find another job and they need to pay rent.”

Ruth Palacios and Arturo Xelo, a married couple from Mexico, disinfected COVID-19 patient rooms at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. They worked seven days a week for months, Palacios said, but weren’t paid overtime. At the start of the pandemic, they earned the local minimum wage of $15 an hour, she said, but after a few months, their boss lowered their pay to $12.25, she said.

“The little guys have to speak up because people — the bosses — are taking advantage of their workers,” Palacios said in a video call from her home in Queens.

Palacios, Xelo and two of their former co-workers filed a federal lawsuit against the contractor that hired them, BMS Cat, in January. The company did not respond to requests for comment. In court records, it denied that it paid the cleaners less than the minimum wage or that it owed them overtime pay. The hospital did not respond to requests for comment, either.

___

Danielle Wynne rang up customers at a Circle-K gas station in Brevard County, Florida, during shifts that started at 4:30 a.m. and ended in the early afternoon. Before and after clocking in, Wynne said, her manager made her work for free, according to a lawsuit she filed in federal court in February 2020. She counted cash in the register, brewed coffee, cleaned the store, set out condiments and refilled the lottery machine — all while off the clock.

The unpaid work added up to about $1,250 in one year, according to the court filing. For someone earning $10 an hour, that’s about three weeks of pay.

Wynne said in court records that she didn’t complain at the time because she was scared of her “vindictive” boss.

Circle-K Stores denied the underpayment allegations in court filings, though it ended up settling the case for $2,500 in October. But data from the Labor Department shows that the company repeatedly takes wages from its employees, with few repercussions.

Federal investigators caught Circle-K stores underpaying employees 22 times since 2005, most recently in February 2020. The total: $54,069 taken from 120 employees. But the Labor Department only fined the company four times and ordered it to pay damages to employees in two cases. In six cases, the company didn’t pay all the money it owed employees, known as back wages. The agency closed those cases anyway without further action.

Circle-K Stores did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Public Integrity found that Labor Department investigators are just as lenient with other repeat offenders.

The oilfield services company Halliburton illegally withheld $18.7 million from 1,050 employees, Labor Department records show, but staff investigators never ordered the company to pay cash damages on top of the back wages. The department fined Halliburton in only three of eight cases it brought against the company.

Halliburton declined to comment on the cases. But in a 2015 statement to Inside Energy, a spokesperson for the company said it had misclassified employees as exempt from overtime pay.

“The company re-classified the identified positions, and throughout this process, Halliburton has worked earnestly and cooperatively with the U.S. Department of Labor to equitably resolve this situation,” wrote Susie McMichael, a public relations representative for Halliburton.

G4S Wackenhut and its subsidiaries, which provide security services to companies and courthouses, illegally denied nearly $3.3 million to 1,605 employees. Federal investigators never ordered the company to pay damages to employees and only issued a fine in nine of 47 cases, totaling less than $41,000. Though G4S Wackenhut later repaid employees in nearly all the cases, it didn’t pay full back wages on two occasions, and the Labor Department closed those cases anyway.

Sabrina Rios, a spokeswoman for the company, said most of the money owed involved G4S subsidiaries that were under independent management. She added that the claims do not reflect the company’s business practices and that some of the cases date back more than 22 years.

“The company worked with the DOL in order to investigate each case and made appropriate payments to the individuals totaling about $3.3 (million),” she wrote.

A Labor Department official said the agency orders companies to pay damages when appropriate, determined on a case-by-case basis. Fines are usually assessed when a company repeatedly, or willfully, breaks the law. The department tries to resolve cases administratively to avoid taking employers to court.

“The department exercises its prosecutorial discretion in determining whether to litigate specific cases, based upon careful consideration of our priorities, resources, and mission,” Jessica Looman, principal deputy administrator for the agency’s Wage and Hour Division, wrote in a statement.

Nancy Leppink, former head of the Wage and Hour Division during the Obama administration, said the agency doesn’t have enough lawyers to take every employer to court when they don’t pay up. Although the division hired 300 new investigators during her tenure, it had only about 787 to enforce wage theft laws as of February.

That’s about one investigator per 182,000 employees covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act, far below the one investigator per 10,000 workers recommended by the United Nations’ International Labour Organization.

Leppink, now commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, said she pushed investigators to demand cash damages for workers in every possible federal case. For example, if an employer took $1,000 from an employee, the agency could demand that amount in back wages and an extra $1,000 in damages.

“If all you do is collect wages, why would a company bother complying until (an investigator) walks through the door?” she said.

While the percentage of cases with damages jumped during Leppink’s tenure, it has never surpassed 15%, the data shows. The agency’s decision about whether to pursue damages sometimes is dictated by the strength of the evidence, the urgency in getting workers their back wages, and the level of noncompliance by the employer, Leppink said — and sometimes simply by a lack of staff resources.

Last year, in response to the coronavirus pandemic, the Trump administration ordered federal investigators to stop seeking damages in most cases for workers. In April, the Biden administration reversed that decision, Looman said.

Lawyers who represent workers in wage theft cases say they often discourage clients from filing a complaint with the Labor Department because they rarely get paid damages or see quick results. The typical case took 108 days to investigate, according to the agency’s data.

___

At a 2015 hearing in Philadelphia, a law professor from Temple University told the City Council that employers stole wages from tens of thousands of Philadelphia workers every week. The professor, Jennifer Lee, was pointing to findings from a study by the university’s Sheller Center for Social Justice.

“This tells us that wage theft is no accident,” Lee told city lawmakers. “It’s not a few bad apple employers or a few new businesses that don’t understand the law, but rather a calculated approach by employers to maximize their profits on the backs of their workers.”

The hearing helped launch a local wage-theft law that allows workers to get their money back more quickly than they would by filing a complaint with the state or federal government.

The ordinance, which went into effect in 2016, sets a 110-day limit for city staff to investigate and close a wage theft case. It also gives workers three years to file a complaint with the city, compared with the two-year statute of limitations under federal law. And the penalties are steep. The city can revoke or deny local permits and licenses to companies that steal wages.

Legal experts and community groups point to strong local wage theft laws as an effective way to get around lax enforcement at the federal level and in some states. Chicago passed such a law in 2013. Minneapolis followed in 2019.

But other workers’ rights advocates want to see federal reforms, considering that the Labor Department protects the largest number of workers. They want Congress to boost funding to the Wage and Hour Division so it can double the number of investigators, hire more attorneys and take on additional wage theft cases. They also want lawmakers to extend the federal statute of limitations beyond two years.

Leppink, the Minnesota labor commissioner, said the federal government could revoke franchise licenses and federal contracts from companies with a history of wage theft.

At the very least, the Wage and Hour Division can order employers to pay damages in every possible case, said Jennifer Marion, a former policy adviser with the division.

“If you know you are likely to pay double than what you owed,” she said, “that changes everything.”

___

This story is a collaboration between The Associated Press and The Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit investigative newsroom in Washington. https://apnews.com/article/6c5364b4f9c69d9bc1b0093519935a5a

corporate_bullshit

wake_up_sheeple

enough_already

If it's cost effective to break the law rather than paying people, the penalties are nowhere near steep enough.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hahaha yes keeps working ! Don't stop now .never stop !

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The more money you have the less anyone try’s to get it from you-the less you have the more they wanna take. 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What will happen when the rich finally take ALL of the poor’s money? Building can’t stand if the foundation is on top right?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How is anyone still living in the US? :/

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We're trapped. Too poor to leave, always beholden to the "rent" scam.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who works for G4S, I was not shocked in the least to see them on the list of worst offenders

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I ve said it before, I say it again, the US of A is gaslit on a national all encompassing level and its time the spread of your shit stops

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Please help us…

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

the USA is completely broken and will not be repaired easily unless the whole justice system and ‘employees protection’ system are replaced.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Worker rights werent given by the bosses out of kindness, they were taken back by force. Shooting needs to start again.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We are already back to the cops working for the bosses to harass and attack union organizers. Fuck the pigs, pick up the guns.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ruby Ridge 2 point 0 baby

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"cheaper to break the law even if you're caught". Likelihood of being caught, almost never. SMH. Corporate will always go with bottom line

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

UPS never paid me at all for a week's worth of being a Christmas delivery driver

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My son worked for ProEm doing parking lot control for ASU football games for 3 wks & was never paid. They acted like they had no info on him

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same kind of situation. The shift manager screwed up and didn't properly record details. They fired him and then just decided not to pay us

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Their answer to this is "salary". You get paid the same if you work less than 40! But you'll never work less than 40.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And if you do you're fired. Also yhere are no shifts anymore, you work whenever needed.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is also the only way to make more than $17hr. Why you ask? bEcAUse tHeY cAnT aFfOrD tO pAy oVeRtImE

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Apparently this made sense enough to become legal...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Rather, the law makers protecting their pockets by exploiting people that want to live above poverty.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No shit it's cheaper if they don't even get penalized when they're found out. 2xwages + EXTRA fines and G-men would have incentive to work.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think southpark made an Amazon episode about this

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's just capitalism as intended. It's the free market babyyy

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yeah employers/companies are absolute shit and care about nothing but money

5 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 3

the part that is most egregious is "It's cheaper to steal and pay a fine than to actually pay A GODAAMNED MINIMUM WAGE"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean for real. If they only pay $1 million in damages/theft of wages but made $20 million off of it, the choice is clear.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shareholders want capable ceos. Ceos want bonus. Something gotta give.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Can't wait for computers to replace CEOs

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Robot CEO- "replace everyone"

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

No no no there's supposed to be a difference.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

$1.67 at 21% means their hourly rate was meant to be $7.95 and they were only getting $6.28 for 10 years. At 38hrs a week, 52 weeks a year,

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

let's assume no holidays, for 10 years, means they lost $32999. 20 of wages rightfully owed to them. Let's not even get started on how

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

pitiful a rate of only $6.28 an hour is. I say again, jesus FUCKIN christ. So glad to be Australian.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 239 Dislikes 3

If you had it in you, you would have done it already.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"cheating their employees" is an interesting way to say "stealing". Say it like it is, or nothing will change.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

If they refuse to give us the food we work for then we will simply have to seize it.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

And maybe the means of production while we're at it.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"It's cheaper to violate the law." Capitalism in one sentence.

5 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 3

If the penalty for a crime is flat fee, that means it's legal for the rich & corporations. Proportional fees are what we need.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We knew this from Fight Club in '98. Probably before that but I can't cite the movie.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Impose double late pay and ten-fold penalty and watch them make sure they pay their workers in full. But you can't, cos they write the law.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 258 Dislikes 0

And police steal more money from people (civil forfeiture) than burglars. https://wapo.st/3uppsSM

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could honestly see fox saying "Look at this, it's disgusting" then zooming in on the purple square and blaming immigrants.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fuck these imigrants robbing all of america. They steal 340M!!!!! /s

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Also fighting wage theft would probably decrease the other theft types as people would be less desperate to commit crime.

5 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

But that means you'd have to punish rich people and not poor people.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And this is not uniquely American either. My employer stole $65k from me over the course of 10 years. Statute of limitations says I can 1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only get 3/10 years of stolen wage back. As the theft has been escalating, 3/10 is actually $30k. If I were to get my money, tax law says 2/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"for that fiscal year you were a 1%er, therefore you pay twice the tax" so I'll be left with $20k in pocket. Lawsuits like these cost 3/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$10-30k in slam dunk cases like mine. $65k they took and I'm seriously considering not suing them even though I know I would win. 4/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even if I win I could lose. All companies know this. This is a calculated risk for them. I live in Norway and we have some of the 5/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I worked at k circle. Realized the clock in system only worked in 15min increments. So if you have 8h07m you only got paid for 8h.

5 years ago | Likes 315 Dislikes 2

Where I used to work they expected you to clock in 15 minutes early to do your tool prep, but you weren't paid for that time.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bill? Shitty things are afoot at the K Circle.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its actually Circle K.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know. The comment I replied to said K Circle.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I worked at a place that gave you day shift pay if you clocked in early for night shift.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Had to clock out to finish shutting down a restaurant. Couldn't get paid past 28 hours a week because I'd be eligible for insurance.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We get paid by the second now

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is how ours works as well... my old GM wants us to come in 6 early and leave 6 early to allow cross-talk between shifts.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol, EB Games had something similar, so I'd constantly show up at 7 past the hr. Fucked me when Gamestop bought them out and system changed

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My job counts 7 minutes to 15 minutes as 15 minutes. So you clock out at 8:07, you get paid for 8:15

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it was Target that had the same system, you be your ass I clocked in 8 minutes early and 8 minutes late every day.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

So for six years I was the only person I knew smart enough to count the clock in vs clock out and always be on the positive side so I -

5 years ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 1

wouldn’t get robbed by their system. They also would start new hires getting pay via an outside company debit card that would make -

5 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 0

erroneous charges constantly. We always told new people to get direct deposit ASAP and always pull out your money on payday or they will -

5 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 0

charge you continually. One time, all non management employees weekly hours were individually cut by 20% with no reason. Or extra staffing.

5 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 0

All us making 20% less while having no coverage was fun. Then there were unpaid meetings. Unannounced raise and vacation freezes.

5 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 0

And they're owned by a Candian company. The clock thing is actually common at a lot of places, too to make it 'easier' on payroll. I just

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Learned to clock out at 8 after the qrter & in at 7 or less.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why most of my guys clock in a 9:06 and leave at 5:23.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

This is common practice. They told me bc it's easier to calculate. Maybe back when it was manually done but it's done through the system now

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

CEO actually wanted to switch time actually worked bc of too many people playing the system and gaining hours. Honestly a better decision.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not to stop people benefiting from the time clock system, but if you're a little late or leave early then you don't get docked extra.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You’re spot on. It’s called quarter hour rounding. Iirc, companies schedule staff around this calculation

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lmao, it's funny that you believed them.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You justification they gave you doesn't match up with the actual facts of reality my dude. They just robbing workers cause it's easier

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And they easily get away with it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's why y'all need unions. Go join now. https://iww.org

5 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 6

Fun fact- the $15 hr mw passed in many cities in Cali excludes union workers. That's why unions backed the initiatives. Companies now want

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

People to unionize so they can pay them less, factor in union dues & being a mw worker is a net loss. I was in a union that took 20% of our

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Check & still required a $120 a mth due. Most of the members were lowly construction workers barely making $12 hr.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

According to the department of labor, the average annual cost of union dues is $400.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This only works if you do math like jeff Bezos

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You all can downvote me but the union backing of $15 hr MW is fact. When it got to SD they took out the union exemption before passing, &

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But that's communism

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Actually that's anarchosyndycalism

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have to learn another word!?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Communism is the answer

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ya unions are great. I've never had a job where this happened, but I have had jobs where you get paid for the -started- 15 minutes.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Mind you, this is in Norway, we've had strong unions since...forever. But this is definitely possible in the US as well!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It would be if companies actually didnt use policies to actually stop unionizing. Especially with these low paying jobs. They would rather >

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

fire everyone at the site. Close the site and open a new one on a different city. It happens more often then u think here.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably since around the mid 1890s, like here in sweden. Keep up the good work dear neighbour!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You've never heard of the Pinkertons have you? Look up the Battle of Blair Mountain. The US is VOILENTLY anti union.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If your boss wants you to work off the clock... refuse. ALWAYS refuse.

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

I had a job just two years ago that told me, "YOu need ot clock out and chill for a few hours in case it gets busy and we need you back." 1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tell your boss you need a video of him telling you that, so that you won't forget. Then refuse anyway.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

And then you'll get fired because in most of America they can fire you for any reason or no reason at all.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ "Will I be paid for the few hours?" Nope. "Then why would I stay?" It got a LOT more miserable for me after that, and I had to quit

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. My kids both worked at Circle K at some point & when told that said No. Their boss wouldn't push it, probably finding another sucker.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They weren't fired either, probably figured they also knew that was an instant lawsuit.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Companies should not be doing cost-benefit analyses for *breaking the law* Holy fucking shit it’s so off the rails it’s not even funny.

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

I have a saying: People are only as loyal as their options. Can be applied to companies too.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Chris Rock said the same thing about men

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2: Laws should be adjusted to match reality. I did some work for a company that dig major digging. The fine for digging without a >

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

2/2: permit was much smaller than the cost of the permit, so naturally the company never even tried to get permits.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

One would think that there would be a mechanism to punish repeat offenders more severely and meaningfully, like drunk driving laws

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'm sure the companies make the right "donations" to keep the laws in their favor.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The construction mentality is "it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission". I have been in construction for nearly 20 yrs & its

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bad. Cities are catching on and creating tougher penalties or straight up banning companies from their city.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 122 Dislikes 4

translation?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Italian bit is something along the lines of "Do it yourself Justice" or "Make your own justice". Søkkømb is just 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A weird way to write "Succumb" with Norwegian/Swedish letters :)

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I dont like jokes that doesnt work or are made by the ignorant

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 26

Worker rights were taken back by force the first time cupcake.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That wasnt the point. The letters used are Danish and Norwegian not Swedish

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Yeah we dont need an IKEA guillotine we need one that's gonna last! The IKEA one will break by the 100th politician!

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Politician? Aren't we going after the corporate magnates first?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hmm I guess I thought we would work our way up. Your way is better!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you seen the necks on some of them? Might need to double drop.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Y'all need a revolution...

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

We're dying, I mean trying.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe they just tried that and most of them are getting arrested. you know, the trumpee's who surged into the white house.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

It was the Capital building and they were only there to overthrow the election for a guy who has probably committed a lot of wage theft.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Probably" ? Dude's on record as admitting that he did it, and that he did it to save money for himself.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only a Sith deals in absolutes. Sorry

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ya that wasn't a revolution, it was a bunch of paranoid racist dumbasses who wanted to break shit for not having things turn out their way

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Yes, and now that's going to make a proper revolution look bad. DAMMIT!!!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that was my take as well, it should be stormed and taken over, but was by the completely wrong people.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The travesty of January 6th wasn't "Oh no, my precious federal government!" It was the fact that it was being done for the absolute most ...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

dumbfuck reason imaginable. Who the fuck storms a government facility demanding more authoritarianism?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Indeed, that is an advanced level of stupid.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Another reason why I will not checking emails at home as per my bosses request. No pay, no way.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My new boss was complaining about someone at his old job not checking an email at 8pm. Said he had a work phn. I said but he wasn't being

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I got fired once for being a no-show when Boss changed the schedule on my days off and told me it was my job to "call in" and ask if there

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

had been any changes to the schedule. On my day off?? Who does that? She just needed an excuse to fire me.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In HS I got in trouble for not showing up twice when I was scheduled. But it was Thursday night & I never worked then. Boss wrote the

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

schedule in pencil & someone was changing it so they could be off w/o asking me. Finally I started making a copy of it, to prove to him I

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Paid to read said phn when at home.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Rightly so. Same with the ‘if you get a chance can you have a quick scan through these this evening.’ No I can’t.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep, new boss said that to me once, too. I said "I will be home enjoying home time, tomorrow when I'm here during work time I will do it".

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t understand how anyone can not realise that it’s so fucking simple. I’ll do work if you pay me. If you want my time, it will cost you

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I also had to snap at him after he tried to make me stay late, after I already put in 9.5 hrs. 1 was a friday, I was at 46 hrs & was leaving

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

town that night. Then he offered to do the work & told me just to leave my laptop on & give him my passwords. Instead I took it home w/ me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0