DarkAngelWarlord
564
23
25
There is literally videos of these assholes posted all over social media of them at airports, buses and trains , nobody is stopping them nobody is arresting them
Jan 9, 2021 3:48 PM
DarkAngelWarlord
564
23
25
There is literally videos of these assholes posted all over social media of them at airports, buses and trains , nobody is stopping them nobody is arresting them
Randomice
Because a lot of them were heavily armed. It could have ended up a bloodbath. Now the FBI is picking them up one-by-one.
ShellDiabl0
White privilege. That’s why.
TheOnlyCanadianWhoDoesNotLikeHockey
Because it's far cheaper and less of a pain to just arrest them when they get home?
mooseablethenok
https://youtu.be/Liyvr0rlNVw might be illustrative why you don't want hundreds of criminals in the same place as innocents.
mooseablethenok
You don't give an army that want's a siege a chance to build one. You let them escape, then you chase them down and end them rightly.
Xecryo
My understanding is that their primary concern was getting the reps out and because the national guard was delayed it was a while before>
Xecryo
Shaows
Your front page tag shows what really matters for you in this post.
jetflight
Hey, it wasn't a bad bet otherwise. This kind of spam gets to the front page all the time.
aChungusAmongUs
AzgarOgly
Because people you don't like and have habit calling "terrorists" and real terrorists are different kinds of people.
wadeissupercool
English and politics are both hard, aren't they?
AzgarOgly
Foe someone who knows English as 3rd language and US politics as an overseas viewer... meh. Just taking notes of some trends. //
AzgarOgly
Back in 1950s they labeled anyone they disliked a communist. Then in 1960s smth like nigalover. Then each time has it's provisional label //
AzgarOgly
to mark your opponent with when you want to smear them with something stinky.
ratfaceddog
I also don’t like terrorists.
AzgarOgly
But not all people you don't like are actually terrorists. Necessary vs sufficient.
ratfaceddog
I’m not talking about all people I don’t like, and never said I was.
AzgarOgly
We are talking about people who broke into the Congress building. Don't you dislike them?
ratfaceddog
Yes, but I never said those particular terrorist constitute “all people I dislike.” That bizarre straw man is yours alone.
kevinbaken
Only a racist cunt would believe that. This was pure domestic terrorism. Don't make excuses for them.
AzgarOgly
I see you are talking in TV clichés. Try to pause feeding on propaganda and use brain of your own. But be careful, you might like it.
kevinbaken
If those people were Muslim you'd call them terrorists. Don't lie. Everyone in that building feared for their lives.
kevinbaken
and it cost lives. Don't pretend to be a rational cunt. You deserve the attitude.
AzgarOgly
Maybe you would. I won't. For the reasons I stated in a comments before.
AzgarOgly
BTW, that is exactly the shit I am talking about: You disagree with a statement I made and instead of argument all you can produce is //
AzgarOgly
labeling a person who made a statement with completely unrelated labels. Way to go.
kevinbaken
You mean, what Republicans have done for the past 4 years? Yes, I'm giving you a dose of your own medicine.
AzgarOgly
No, I am talking about you. And the people who broke into congress building. I live in EU and frankly give very little fucks about both //
MrSpookywasagoodboy2
Sorry but they've stepped way past the line of being people we don't like at this point
AzgarOgly
Still not worth being called "terrorists".
TheOnlyCanadianWhoDoesNotLikeHockey
I'm sorry, what would you like to call those who violently broke in to a government building to try and overthrow a legal democracy?
AzgarOgly
Let me think... hooligans would be the word. Terrorism would it be if they would blow up a building together with the representatives.
TheOnlyCanadianWhoDoesNotLikeHockey
. . .are you unaware of the fact that there were multiple pipe bombs diffused and even more seized?