MythConceptions

Jun 19, 2024 6:20 PM

the_more_you_know

The one about Einstein spread by not knowing that 6 was the highest possible grade in the Certificate of Maturity:

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Again, some misleading things are based on ignorance and bigotry.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

And backfire effect. Some people just prefer their comfortable ignorance.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I hate that at least three of these were taught as factorinos when I was wee.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ned Flanders, is this you?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Buenos Diddly Ding Dong Dios

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Vomitorium was actually the exit, not the entrance (though it would have been used for both). It was named for its size and design allowing it to rapidly "vomit" huge numbers of spectators from all levels of the seating back out onto the streets when the event was over.

2 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

It stems from the Latin word "vomere", which itself stems from "vomo", which originally meant to go forth, to discharge or emit / emerge and is the proto root of all of the "romance" language terms for "go" such as va(It.), vamos(Sp.), vai(Fr.) etc.. But the Romans absolutely used the term vomitus to mean to puke your guts out in their own time, and the term "vomitorium" came from the idea expressed above, to vomit large quantities of people quickly.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The whole story of there being rooms for vomiting though was made up by later people, most likely tour guides. I heard it several times on tours, it always got a few gasps from the tourists.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol funny that some of my school teachers told me some of these growing up

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

we learned a lot of these, the tongue thing was printed in our text books

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It was printed in neurology text books, and medical students here were required to show it was so in lab assignments -- which several generations of doctors have all either faked the results of or messed up badly enough to get the incorrect but acceptable result.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah I'm not gonna take any of these at face value...

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Another Biblical one: Adam and Eve didn't eat an apple. The Bible only refers to it as "the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge". No where does it say what kind of fruit it was. Could have been a banana... Ah wait, that's not from a tree, apparently!

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

A durian.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apple comes from a Latin pun. Malus = Apple, Malus = Evil.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

While jihad may mean struggle or striving and describe struggles to be good and the best version of self a Jihadist almost exclusively refers to a Sunni extremist. English literal translation vs colloquially accepted usage by those who speak the language.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yes, Fatwa and jihad have a different definition than how it is used, but it doesnt make how the word is used a misconception. This is why words are descriptive, not prescriptive.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fact: A Stork does not bring babies to your house. But the Swallow prevents babies from being conceived. 👍🏻😉

(Fav Dad joke)

2 years ago | Likes 211 Dislikes 3

If you really believed in the Swallow theory though you wouldn't be a dad to make the joke

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

You don’t call for the Swallow every time. Jeez. I love my son, granddaughters and (so far) two great grandchildren. 😄👍🏻🤪

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Arent dad jokes ones a dad says to their kids? You would say that to your kids?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Yes I would. And I’m known as fun dad, fun grandpa and my great granddaughter (calls me Baba) adores me.

You should walk a mile in my shoes. Then you’d find out how nice it is to be a mile away from you. 🤪

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A dad might say that to older kids. An uncle would say that to very young pre-speech kids.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are correct. 👍🏻😄

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My dad told me that the best part of me ran down my mother's leg.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thay's horrible no matter your age

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fun fact about Dinosaurs:

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Man... It's crazy to think of how long dinosaurs existed with just how long we have.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Time on this scale is almost incomprehensible. You know the Devils Tower in Wyoming? It is the central core (phonolitic rock formation) of an extinct volcano.
To create this monument, a volcano appeared, built up with a magma chamber over earth’s surface and erode away to give the core free!
The tower is not even close as old as the extinction of the dinosaurs!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow. Didn't even know that's how it was formed.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Vomitorium is an exit, not an entrance

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: there's no such thing as a "tree".

Botanically, there's no distinction between "tree" and "not tree". "Tree" is simply a strategy for growth optimization some plants have adapted to as opposed to others (such as bush or rhizome)

We typically use the word "tree" to refer to any plant which may be harvested for workable lumber, but palm trees produce lumber and are a monocot - ie they're more like a large shrub than a maple tree.

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

I'd correct your last point to say that we think of trees as producing wood. Other plants that produce usable "lumber", such as palms and bamboo, are not wood.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I may regret this, but why is bamboo and palm not wood?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Jun 20, 2024 5:49 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Eh, well that answer was wrong. It's been many years since my forestry class. It's the way the cellulose and lignin are aligned in a matrix that is different. Bamboo is technically grass

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm going to start calling trees "sparkling growth optimization strategies".

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Being monocots, I prefer to think of palm trees as just really big grass... but I guess it's a touch reductive, haha.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It honestly isn't that reductive, though. When you cut it open and compare the cross section to a giant fern or other vascular "leafy" plants with large stems, you really just have that moment of ".....okay, yeah, I get it. I don't like it, but I get it."

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I blame the Flintstones on that people think humans and dinosaurs coexisted.

2 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

I blame religion

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Yeah there’s a whole book in the Bible about dinosaurs, how could you have missed that. Damn everyone on imgur is 4 years old apparently.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If people are getting their information about prehistory from The Flintstones, that's on them.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Mastodons were the very first industrial dishwashers. [SCIENC]

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Losing most of your body heat from your head -- I've read that it comes from a US Military study, but is sorely lacking context. Snow testing full cold weather gear except hood = lose 90% of your heat through the head.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well, if you are all bundled up, and the only thing exposed is your head, I'm 100% sure most of your heat loss is going to be through your head. I do believe the source behind this one is moms bundling up their kids and telling them to keep their hats or hoods on.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Technically humans and dinosaurs do coexist. The dinosaurs are not extict, all avians (birds) are part of the dinosaur family. Only the non-avian dinosaurs went extinct.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Don't forget the aquatic creatures, we still co-exist with crocodiles and sharks too.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

And the coelacanth. That's one old ass fish!

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

None of those are dinosaurs though which is what the myth is.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

They existed beside them and they're still here, virtually unchanged by evolution after millions of years

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I don't know why we're talking about sharks, though. Crocodilians are archosaurs, the last remaining ones along with birds (avian theropod dinosaurs). Dragonflies are still here, too, but that's besides the point.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*politicians (Goldfish remember!)

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

The MSG one is interesting, because suddenly it doesn't happen when eating doritos.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Wasn't that partly started by a hoax paper about "Chinese takeaway syndrome" or something? Like of course you feel ill after eating a lot of greasy food (such as you might get from a takeaway, Chinese or otherwise) and the paper's author thought it wouldbe funny to write about how he always felt ill after getting takeout and maybe someone should look at that because it _obviously_ wasn't that he ate too much, no sir. And then people took him seriously (also probably some racism too)

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't think I've ever NOT eaten too much Chinese takeaway

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, MSG occurs naturally in many foods including all meats and tomato. It's no more "chemical" than the sugars and starches fermented to produce it.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Just a dose of ol'fashioned anti-Asian racism at play with the MSG myth. Still persists to this day, annoyingly.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I get throat burns from MSG tho😕

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That can be caused by too much sodium, or it might be a glutamate intolerance. Do you get similar soreness or inflammation from other salty foods, or foods that have glutamate like tomatoes, Parmesan cheese, or starchy veg?

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I work 911. Whoever made up that 24 hour missing person rule for television/movies is a bastard. People fucking die because of this troupe. If you can't build tension without this made up rule you're a shit writer. Fuck you. Also fuck any parents that tell their kid they will go to jail for accidently calling 911. People don't call us when they need to because of that too!

2 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 1

Oh yikes. That's a bummer.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every year it does improve. More people have access to the internet and education. But those dumb csi/NCIS law and order SUV crap shows need to get more grounded.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Be sick to see the 24h thing mentioned in a show/film, and then that person shut down and the people dying thing etc explained to them.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

I'm all for it! People will remember that.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It does actually happen though - even still today. An informed and well staffed PD will be on the case immediately, but podunk town, over worked, uninformed, or lazy bastards will try to tell parents that their kid probably ran away and let's wait a day to see if they come home. If you are black or brown, you are way more likely to get that response.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I work for a podunk (for now) town and the laziness here is trying to find them before they have to be put into NCIC or a report written. They just have 2 hours per our state law. But I will point out some states are stuck in this 1960s era of laws and it's CRIMINAL.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cop shows have created so many horrible misconceptions: the CSI Effect (every crime has useful and determinative forensic evidence), the idea that roughing up detained people is good, the idea that criminal defense attorneys are all scumbag liars, that major cases are solved (actually less than 50% are), etc etc

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Mother of God I hate cop shows. The normal person thinks we'll break out the DNA analysis during a fraud investigation. And the academy is full of people that thought every call would be a fight or a chase. No man, get ready to write and talk to people and write more. Imgur would flip if they saw the sort of people the certification academy weeded out.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank God then. They should make the academy even more boring to weed out even more.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good thing dogs can't speak or they'd call 911 constantly, just a few minutes after we walk out the door. "My owner has been missing FOR-E-VER!"

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are LOTS of instances of real life police telling people to wait 24 hours, which later turns out to be a mistake. That's probably where it comes from : Cops being lazy.

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Oh, you think that cops are actually trained and educated by something other than cheap movies? Bless your heart.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've been through it, and yes there is some training. Believe it or not. Some but not a lot, and movies don't even come close

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dunno, I can't say one way or the other for how it used to be, but at least here in Florida is taught multiple times during certification and post certification. And my personal experience is people telling me they saw it on TV

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*being ignorant.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

*being assholes

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

¿Por que no los dos?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Black hole" is neither myth nor falsehood--it's a misnomer.

2 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 4

Not even a misnomer. It is a description of what scientists thought it would look like.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Not only that but there are many types of black holes. Who knows, maybe they are all different on the inside?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

However, physics tells us that they're the same on the outside.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Brownholes, however are very real.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Brownnotes, on the other hand, are not.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

My understanding is that if gravity is seen as a "well", the gravity of a black hole can be seen as a "hole" in the fabric of space-time. Or maybe only in the gravity field.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This list is a myth!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'll bet you THEY thought so too! Whatta ya think they think about it now?!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think the idea is that people (kids mostly) think of black holes as like a wile e coyote pit

2 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 10

Tbf if using a fabric or malleable plane to visualize gravity, it does make pretty deep holes.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, "pit" would be more accurate, but it's deep enough to resemble a hole.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Our understanding of the internal physical structure of a black hole is a pretty big gap in our knowledge, we don't really know what matter does at those densities or if it can exist at all. As far as spacetime goes however, gravity describes a pit, and past the event horizon that pit becomes a hole where everything unavoidably falls into it. It basically does describe a hole in spacetime.

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

I came to comment this. Good work team nerds. ❤️

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean if these are the same kids that grew up with these adults thinking the dinosaurs coexisted with humans, I could understand. I don't recall ANY child old enough to even think about it during my own childhood believing such, however, and I interacted with a fair few both then and as a teen and young adult. However, since most sourcesI know that even MENTION black holes also immediately explain they're basically super-heavy gravity objects that even light can't escape from, I'm skeptical

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Don't be skeptical, just check out the movie "The Black Hole". In the movie it was indeed a "hole".

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, like a tunnel that leads somewhere, with an opening in the middle of space. It's more like a "3D hole" though. And doesn't "lead" anywhere.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That sucks things in, differently somehow to anything else with gravity.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's something that gives off no light and everything around it falls into it. It's a pretty apt name while being mostly metaphorical

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Critical thinking would rule out loads of these, eg: thicker hair - there would be medical photos of grossly thickened hair from people who shaved a lot. Great Wall of China - if bigger structures aren't visible from space, why would an especially long one be more visible?

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Aye it's more that very short hairs are stiffer, so they can feel "thicker".

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well its reasonable to think some sort of stark dividing line would be obvious, but so far as I know it mostly follows natural curves and ridgelines so that wouldn't really work much for this example.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

medieval stained glass windows are thicker at the bottom, not because they are badly made, but rather by deliberate action on the part of the glass makers. it's just how they fitted. they knew how to make flat glass if they wanted.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank you. I stopped reading after that, but my bullshit detector was already going off beforehand.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So as far as the theory one goes, the conjecture would be a hypothesis? "I THINK this is what is happening." And if some evidence was found to support that hypothesis, it would then become a theory? Then if irrefutable evidence is found, and proven then that theory becomes fact? Just trying to remember the steps here. Been a long time since mah schoolin days.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

My understanding is that a "theory" is "the hypothesis that is currently considered as the most plausible". I don't think there's such a thing as "fact" in science.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"Facts as we currently understand it"?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A theory is the theoretical framework to describe a certain phenomenon. It will contain models, equations, that kind of things. It can be used to explain why the facts are the way they are, or to predict what will happen in which circumstances

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Black Belt one is misleading at best. There are way more martial arts than Judo, and some of them do use the black belt to denote the highest rank within their fighting style. Karate is one such example. If I can point at one of that facts I do know and say "no that's wrong." then I have a hard time trusting the ones I don't know as much about.

2 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

Isn't red belt actually considered to be a true master in several martial arts?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In many martial arts, a black belt on its own is far from the highest rank, as there are "degrees" you can earn on it.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Black belt may be the highest rank but doesn't mean you can kick anybody's ass, it just meant you had the knowledge and skill to perform those moves/feats. (At least from my time in taekwondo)

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

It was black pants in my study. And there was only white, brown and black belts. No rainbow colors.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But did the karate black belt exist before 1880? I think the misconception the post addresses is about the origin and supposed ancient-ness of the belt system, and not the modern usage

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Colored belts/gi have existed for millenia to show competency in eastern martial styles. It's very important to know how good someone is before you spar with them, otherwise you could end up, at best, humiliating yourself or them. At worst you or them could die or be maimed.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I mean the following with every possible bit of respect: are you absolutely positive that the "colored belts denoting rank" thing being ancient is not a misconception?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Much of my college education was for East Asian language and history. At the very very least, gi/coat customization denotes some form of rank, even in uniform arts like Shaolin Kung Fu, where everyone is expected to know rank and mastery. Karate is a more modern thing, and it was made by poor people. Belts and colors aren't really a Japanese thing historically, but gi changes, like adding a black hakama, are very much ancient forms of showing rank/mastery. Black DOES mean mastery to an extent.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Otherwise, Chinese art styles are characterized mostly by military rank uniform, completely eliminating a need for some class system in training. Karate and Tae Kwon Do are similar in that poor-ish people created them, though Tae Kwon Do became a cultural art long before Karate existed and was practiced martially and by the elite similarly to Chinese arts deriving from India. Again, military rank uniform supersedes necessary belts or gi changes. Japan is the almost sole user of black hakama.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

please tell me that 41% of Americans don't actually think that humans lived with dinosaurs. Where did this number come from? a daytime phone survey in the south?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

America is a borderline theocracy, where denialism of this particular science is an important part of the theology.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Interestingly it was a poll given when 'Jurassic World' came out. It's mostly about the movies but asked other things like if they existed together, and if we have the technology to create dinosaurs from bone dna.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is a particularly bad question because both the most wrong and most correct answers are "yes"

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Roughly 35% of Americans are functionally illiterate, so that figure tracks.

You sincerely don't want to know how stupid the average American is.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The "electric fan at night" myth exists as a way to avoid the deep social stigma associated with suicide; Johnny didn't kill himself, he went to sleep with his fan on and never woke up.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I've heard it was that it put too much strain on the fledgling power grid of post-war South Korea.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

havent heard that explanation before. Do you have a source for that? It sounds super plausible.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The last part of Media Coverage from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_death briefly explains how it's used as a euphemism, beyond that I can only find anecdotes alleging that it's used to avoid the topic of suicide in SK culture, which pushes mental health far outside the lens of acceptable conversation.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The Bulls and red thing, that has been said for years, but the recent "Party Bus" escape incident from Oregon, it was a rodeo bull, not trained to the red cape, and that got outside and went for a red trash can then tossed a woman in a red shirt. This video below, from a bullfight, bull seems to go for guy in red shirt more than once, fuck that particular shade of grey I guess, but I ain't gonna wear red around bulls...

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Impressive jump!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure Mythbusters tested this and bull in a China shop. Both were false. It was the movement that attracted the bull. And they avoided all the shelves in the China experiment

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ah finally, found the Oregon incident, /gallery/even-bull-was-feelin-free-4w6zJMO

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oil definitely stops pasta from sticking, though. I make spaghetti about every week, and if I don't stir in a bit of oil, they stick.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Stirring the pasta is what prevents it from sticking. The oil will just rise to the surface of the water.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As I found out from another comment, I fundamentally misunderstood the meaning of this - I add oil to the pasta after draining. I don't add oil to the water. That would be silly.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah. Don't feel silly. Many people have heard and followed that rumor. Even when I began cooking I did. Then I thought about it and realized how silly that sounds. Then watch an Italian guy get angry and say to just stir the pasta.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not being facetious. I've literally never heard about adding oil to the water during boiling. Only after the pasta's drained. My grandma used to add a spoonful of butter, I use oil because it doesn't change the flavour as much as butter.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It depends what I'm making/what sauce I'm using. If just a regular ol spaghetti the oil doesn't let the sauce adhere to the pasta and just runs off.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You use a nonstick pot? I never use oil and basically never stir and my pasta doesn't stick. It does bubble however.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's the pot got to do with it? The pasta sticks in the pot, it sticks in the colander, it sticks on the plate, it sticks no matter what you put it in, unless you stir in some oil.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Are you adding the oil to the pasta(drained) or the water? The oil will prevent the gelatinized starch on the outside of the pasta from clumping. But the oil will not properly encapsulate in water.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Theoretically if you added Emulsifying Agent & a lot of oil it could work. Its still polar so it would likely still be a colloid, but that's close enough to solution.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To the pasta after draining, obviously. Wait, this is about adding oil to the water? What kinda nonsense is that?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Salted water does boil HOTTER however - salt in solution increases the boiling temperature. Not significant for a pinch of salt, though. 58g/Kg is needed to raise boiling point 0.5 C.

2 years ago | Likes 323 Dislikes 6

I was going to say... It takes 8 min for my plain water to boil and like 12 for salted water. I know this because I setup timers so I could speed shit and cook at the same time.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Salt chemically binds to the starches that are released from the food to reduce the "gluey" residue in the water and on the surface of your food. Good for starchy veg, great for pasta and rice (unless you're going for a gluey texture like risotto or sticky rice)

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Boiling temp changes significantly with altitude as well

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But putting salt in hot water adds nucleation which causes bubbles to form making it look like the water is boiling harder/at all.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I always tell that to my friends but some people won't listen

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was taught to add it because it makes thing like eggs float better and thus, cook better.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It technically makes the water take longer to boil (in significant enough quantities), because it needs to reach a higher temperature.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You're forgetting about the change to the specific heat. Salt water is ever so slightly faster to boil from room temperature even though it needs to reach a higher temperature because it takes less energy to raise its temperature.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also lowers the specific heat so the energy needed to boil salt water is still lower than non salt water even though it needs to reach a higher temperature. For sea water it's ~300J/kgK difference. So ~20kj more for the pure water to boil even though it boils at 2K less than the seawater.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It modifies the freezing temperature too, that's why we dump a fuckload of salt on the roads every winter here.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

With beet juice in some places

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a very inefficient way to make pasta, though.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

aw man, so I got this giant lasagna noodle press for no reason then.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

That's twice as salty as seawater my friend, and it would definitely make the water boil more quickly.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To those who don't know what 58g of salt looks like, that would be a 1.5" cube of salt for a liter of water. For a 0.5 degC change. That's not only not a pinch, that's a whole palm full.

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Yeah a palmful is what all the old Italian ladies always tell me to use.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I prefer to put a whole salt lick in my pasta water.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I just cook my pasta in molten salt ...

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oooo... that's a good idea. Plus I can use the leftovers to cool my nuclear reactor.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I've literally never heard the saying salt makes it boil faster, the opposite I've heard my whole life.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This. Salt raises the boiling point of water, not lowers it. Adding salt will literally only make it boil slower.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

No, because it also changes the specific heat. When heating from room temperature salt water needs to reach a higher temperature to boil but it takes less energy to reach the boiling temperature.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is shockingly complicated, and counterintuitive to everything I've seen and heard my whole life, but I guess I've never tested it in laboratory conditions, pots, heating elements etc, all have irregularities in a home, and I've found at least one article verifying what you said. So then the real question is does the starting point matter? because in a practical setting, I've never seen tap water come out at room temperature. It's either cool/cold, or you crank the hot water.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes the starting point does matter. I'll use seawater because while too salty to cook it's easier to find numbers. Let's look at the extreme case of starting at 99°C. Water would need to be heated to 100°C taking 4184J/kg; sea water would need to reach 102°C taking 11550J/kg. The break even point would be ~77°C/~171°F for a starting point below sea water boils faster. Interestingly my cool water is pretty much room temperature but thanks to its specific heat and conductivity it feels cool.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right, so the infographic is ridiculous then, even if it was never significant, at least raising the temp is realistic.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No the infographic is still right. It increases the booking temperature but decreases the energy needed to raise the temperature by 1°. The latter has a greater effect when bringing water from room temperature to a boil. So salt ever so slightly lowers the energy needed and thus the time needed.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But still add it because like most things, salt makes the pasta taste better.

2 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 1

What about MSG water?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the real reason. Boiling pasta in salt water allows the salt to penetrate through the entire noodle, making it a tastier bite all around instead of the sauce on the surface having to do all the taste-making.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I often toss a dash of pepper and whatever Italian seasonings I want to bring out into my pasta water when I start it heating. I end up putting pasta into a seasoned tea, and it turns out quite nice!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tangential, but you reminded me of a thing called "pindi chole" which is chickpeas boiled in black tea and spices. And now I want it.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've never even heard of it! I'll have to look it up - thanks for the comment!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You said what now?! That sounds amazing!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

41% of… oh, US adults. That tracks. Wonder what the world wide average for that would be, not taking the US’s hopefully slightly higher curve into account.

2 years ago | Likes 121 Dislikes 8

Canada had a lot of American textbooks that were just converted to metric. That's how I thought the tongue had sections too.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A quick Google search indicates that according to Gallup poll in 2019, roughly that amount of US adults buy in creationism. So the results are being misrepresented. While there are certainly creationists that DO believe that, there are also those who do not. However, it is still HIGHLY alarming that creationism has as much traction as it does in the States, whatever the exact nature of that figure is.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I'm going to need a fact check on that. The US education system is pretty backward... but 41%?

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

"...hopefully slightly higher curve into account." I see your Fat American joke.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ok I don’t know ANY one stupid enough to think humans and dinosaurs were even close to the same time period, but nice jab at the Americans. You’re right, we are all idiots, and where ever you are from is far superior.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@ ruinously underfunded U.S. education

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

It's not just finding problems. It's also a lack of oversight to prevent states from teaching their children fucking GARBAGE. Revisionism and anti-scientific sentiment (among other things) are HUGE problems in deeply red states. Texas and Florida are prime examples.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's my understanding as well. This whole situation is embarrassing on an international level.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“No, too busy burning them”

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I've never met someone who believed humans overlapped with dinosaurs. I have met a few who didn't believe in dinosaurs at all, though.

2 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 1

Me neither, but I've worked with several human dinosaurs.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's taught as fact by large swathes of evangelical and literalist Christian churchs. They even use references to dragons in the Bible as confirmation.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The fundamentalists in my hometown taught that fossils were put there by god to test peoples' faith. They did not want us learning about dinosaurs in school. I prefer the version where humans and dinosaurs coexist.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I worked for a Chesapeake energy for many years, working the oil fields in tx. I had a boss(he was a superintendent) who was a creationist. He literally believed the earth is only 6000 years old. Also there are many people in the oil patch who think humans and dinosaurs lived together.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I thought birds are a type of dinosaurs just like humans are a type of primates

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

They are. It would've been more precise to say non-avian dinosaurs, which is what people mean when they repeat the myth.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

also naming birds dinosaurs is problematic and adding that into their names was probably unnecessary and confusing with little gain regardless of the evolutionary lineage

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Why is it problematic?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Birds arose in the triassic as part of the diversity of dinosaur types. They're not just descended from dinosaurs. They were and are dinosaurs. Calling them what they are is necessary and helpful for understanding not only birds, but the other dinosaurs, and just generally understanding how evolution and life work. Many things are confusing when first encountered, but coming to understand them is how you learn, you know?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

you may be correct. Aside from this specific example, it's important to note that naming and classification conventions have always been fraught due to the basis on how we choose to classify things. We are fitting vague distinctions into boxes that we created, and as such, specieciation has changed significantly, from taxonomy to now genetics. Even with genetics it may be tough to call out different species. It's important to remember that a species is only that because we made it so.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1