Better breakdown of EA's bs.

Nov 15, 2017 9:35 PM

elShiz

Views

159939

Likes

3277

Dislikes

149

From the DICE AMA

EDIT:
It appears DICE hated the AMA.

Source:
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/star-wars-battlefront-2-controversy-we-hated-it-di/1100-6454992/

Just trying to help others understand the underlying issue with what's going on, and if things don't change, EA and other publishers will only continue down this ridiculous path of...bullshit.

Source (arsonbunny):
https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsBattlefront/comments/7d4qft/star_wars_battlefront_ii_dice_developer_ama/dpvdfvb/

Thank you 1001111001 and Aokiji for putting this out there. It seems some don't have context to how microtransactions and the gambling setup translates to real world time and money. This is beyond insane. 
Source:
https://m.imgur.com/gallery/yZ9nC

EDIT 3:
I was mistaken in saying Aokiji crunched the numbers. Here is a link to the FULL breakdown by Soeren Kamper

Source: http://www.swtorstrategies.com/2017/11/it-will-take-4528-hours-of-gameplay-or-2100-to-unlock-all-base-game-content.html

EDIT 1: 
Testing? Never been here before guys... Hope this works and if it does WOOOO this is pretty awesome!
No but seriously, this is bigger than we realize and some are trying to downplay the severity of what the Publishers are doing, not to mention how it impacts the future of gaming in general.

Just today the Gambling Authority of Belgium announced it will be investigating EA for possibly violating gambling laws/regulations. That's kind of a big deal and certainly more important than simply educating our kids about the dangers of this type of system. Gamers of all ages are affected.

Sources:

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/battlefront-2-overwatch-being-investigated-by-gamb/1100-6454989/

http://fortune.com/2017/11/15/star-wars-battlefront-gambling-disney-electronic-arts-loot-box-crate/

EDIT 2:
Now that this has picked up steam from major online gaming or other "news" sites, it's becoming quite apparent the sheer ridiculousness

https://www.polygon.com/2017/11/15/16656478/star-wars-battlefront-2-content-unlock-time-cost

Lastly, I'm asking for a friend, does asking for boobs really work?

current_events

star_wars

star_wars_battlefront_2

gaming

They deleted the Reddit comment.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

don't pre-order games, no amount of shitposting will change as much as just not buying products before release

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was just about to give up and Google what was wrong with the new Star Wars EA game so I could get the jokes. Thanks for the concise post!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

EA is like the Harvey Weinstein of gaming. We've known for a while that they are greedy, and now we are finally dealing with it. +1

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Are we dealing with it? Or will this just blow over like everything other EA release

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe it will just blow over, but I do feel we are talking about it in a different way this time, and the whole reddit thing is crazy :p

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I honestly hope that more BS will come out in the open and be dealt with.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They've also added an arbitrary limit to the amount of credits you can earn in arcade in a time period for no reason 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Son’s been playing the first one since it came out. He has the basic players and some that he finds along the way and he is happy as can be

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is so sad I want to return to the days of playing a game with everything none of this lootbox bullshit.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I dont mind Blizzard's implementation of loot boxes in OW or decks in HS...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Game development budgets have exploded since then. Crash Bandicoot cost $1.7M to make. Half-Life 2: $40M. Destiny: $140M

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Doesn't mean it's impossible to make money, but publishers see that big budget games are required to attract attention in the market

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and with massive budgets, they need more revenue streams. Microtransactions are a pretty reliable way to make a lotta money.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, no. The whole microtransaction-based bullshit we're heading towards has nothing to do with offsetting costs. It's pure greed.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'll stop you there. 100% of businesses operate on Greed. maybe 99.9%, but no company says "Oh, that's enough profit. No more profit please.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It still doesn't give them the right to fuck gamers over.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Cites sources, has math, psychological context rundown. Outstanding work good folk! +1!

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

Has the post deleted by the mods.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the same principle used by Imgur to make you press or swipe to the the next post.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please be this passionate about Internet Neutrality. Its EA for the entire internet. PLEASE.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

And the post is now deleted.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've been playing League of Legends on and off since 2010. And I still haven't come close to 4000+ hours of game time.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't get all the hate. Just play 31 hours a day.

8 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 1

Right?! That way it'll only take just under 5 months. Easy peasy amirite?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Your sarcasm is outta control

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

YOu need to play more like 300 hours per day to unlock all of that in a fortnight.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well written, my experience to a tee. Please share

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All this on what is just a rerelease of battlefront with ''new features'', and which is just a retexture of battlefield to be star wars

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Not true. Looks much better than battlefield visuals

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That last part is objectively wrong

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I remember when microtransactions first started taking over online games as payment instead of subscriptions and I said then this is where

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Games that tried to push the boundaries of technology and impress us with the adventure of the game, instead of attempting to become a cash

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would end up. I miss my online games. I miss EQ2 before microtransactions were a thing. I miss looking forward to games like Vanguard.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cow for the developer.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#disney

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I just dont care anymore. "EA's..." you and your mother and your mothers unborn children's chrildren have already told me already

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Well, this is just how our capitalist world works? Why not stop supporting materialism altogether then as we wake up to how things are run?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Anyone with half a brain has seen this coming for years. It’s gamers who are to blame for this.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 6

Not hardcore gamers. Casuals. The ones that mostly play mobile games and dabble in real ones. Almost all mobile games are like this.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Truth. But I still think it's the lower age brackets in combo with clueless parents who are the biggest "problems" Keeping this going

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Hey, fancy seeing someone from my Steam friendlist here. An old steamgifts member. Luckily, most of us have a brain.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh hey shinobi!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Repent! Repent you sinners! For we have wrought doom upon ourselves! Repent and the Gods of Gaming might have mercy on our souls!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thank you so much for addressing this. The Star Cards were the biggest problem in my opinion. Fucking fuck, I wanted this game so badly.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

... You shouldn't have in the first place. STOP GIVING MONEY TO HORRIBLE COMPANIES. Is this really so hard to understand?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like I can't morally buy it now.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You and me both. Cannot let my money support this garbage ass system.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I miss mods! I remember free community built mods on games like BF 1942 that expanded online titles dramatically. I'll stick with BF1.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Get the original BF2. Tons of mods.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tons of servers?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha, I have all the BF games on PC or PS4 now. I would love to host a retro BF 1942 or BF2 server! I miss being able to host!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dunno. Haven't played since they brough online back recently.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Am I the only person on the internet that isn't outraged by this whole ordeal? You are not obligated to play this game.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

If you go to Disney land you pay for a ticket at the door then you pay to ride the rides. No one is forcing you to go to Disneyland.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's an economic theory/experiment. It will get pushed to its extreme limit and then either collapse or retract. That's what the market do.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Collapse or retract based on consumer response. This is our response, we're voicing our opinion that we won't support this business model...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The more people who speak up the less likely that other games will have this kind of manipulative systems design in the future.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, but the principle behind this issue is scummy, and no one wants it to spread to more and more games.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

1)It's the predatory, gambling-esque nature of a product which is largely played by minors,

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2)coupled with the fact that consumers are unable to play the game in it's entirety without massive investment.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3)This marks a broader market shift towards unethical, consumer-unfriendly business practices that warrants pushback.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's worth noting that the success of this model in the mobile market has made it the overwhelming default there for the last several years.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They also dont have a $60 cost at the beginning. And most of them aren't random loot boxes. You know what you are buying beforw hand.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't HAVE to play any of them, but it's become almost hard to find new mobile games that aren't flashy skinner boxes at this point.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Its a shame they've gone this direction. The beta was so fun and promising. I just hope the game will be relatively playable at launch.

8 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 19

Been playing the early access the game is amazing literally no signs of any of the negatives yet and ive already unlocked all the heroes

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

... Seriously? DON'T BUY IT. This fucking company needs to fuck off already. Mass boycott is in order. Did you even read any of the OP?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why are you still buying it?

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

IT wont be. Its already unplayable and it hasnt come out. No hyperbole either. Let's give an example.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's entirely playable. The only thing different from the beta is that some people will have a small advantage over others.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 42

I guess so. I'm still planning on playing the game for the story though

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

... Congratulations. Your lack of insight into the broader issues at play here are helping ruin gaming year by year. Thanks.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was going to be the first game purchase in months, but I refuse to let my money support such a garbage system.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Stop buying any EA games whatsoever, let them bleed. Otherwise, they will continue aggressively taking over dev studios and killing gaming.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On some heroes you are literally invincible while using abilities. That's not a small advantage

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Not one hero is invincible because of their abilities. Plus the hero aren't even a postbox issue.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 15

/a/uaOvv the card shown in this picture makes your hero take 100% less damage when fully upgraded. Yes this is an issue.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It says 50%, you cannot get a fully upgraded card from a lootbox,

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

YouTubers have proven that is more than a small advantage check levelcapgaming's YouTube page

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

~30% more damage and increased health from star cards is not a small advantage

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE if you dont pay to unlock characters to join a game and NOT BE ABLE TO SELECT A CHARACTER TO PLAY because the 4 free

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Only in the Heroes and Villains game mode, which is based around unique characters.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

its still a humongous issue. "Oh, you didnt buy stuff yet? Well, say goodbye to a chunk of the game you paid for."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was just trying to correct your misinformation-based wording, not defending the core action.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

fair point. It's not exactly easy to write a fully-informed, coherent post sometimes. I mean we only have a total of 140 characters to w

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

ones were already picked by other players. Games dont start 'til you got 6 people minimum.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this will get downvoted but yeah it is. they made a beautiful, enjoyable, and true star wars game, but the progression system SUCKS

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Will it still be enjoyable when 24/7 and better off gamers grind/buy the better gear, and a matchmaking system puts them against the 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

non-equipped regulars that get curb stomped every round till they pay up? 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correction - the entire publisher behind it sucks, and will make all future games worse, unless we fully boycott them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So... Just spitballing here. Doesn't magic the gathering work on this same principle?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

MTG you can trade/buy/sell/gift the cards you get. Cards can't be improved by grinding.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes, except people willingly put rules like "no cards over 10 bucks" or "commons/uncommons only" etc. BF2 is "you pay or you lose lol."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In a way yea, but with magic at least you physically get something that has actual value to other people.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

This. In MTG, you get something physical in exchange for currency. That item has value, which allows it to be be bought, sold, and traded.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

With mtg you can spend hundreds to create an incredible deck. However, I can make a deck that will beat it 40% of the time for only $15.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No. Most tournaments (as well as FNM) are draft. $20+ entry fee and you can trade/gift your draft cards as desired. Pre-built can 1>

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2> get expensive, but most hobbies can get as expensive as you want them to.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The same is true for most collectible card game. You do gamble on pack content, but skill, deck construction, and draw luck determine winner

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except you don't have to pay $60 first before you start to play the game.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

What's a starter deck worth? $30 or so?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You need to buy the cards. And Magic is notoriously expensive to keep up with the new expansions. EA isn’t the only company that likes $

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Using CCGs as a strawman argument. Interesting.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an example of similar practice, not an argument. I'm not defending ea simply pointing out shit ain't New or exclusive to them.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You don't have to pay $60 first to even have the right to buy the cards.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

... what? That doesn’t even make sense. You need to buy a deck before you can play the game. Then buy boosters to keep in the game.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're right, you convinced me. Magic is also trash that relies on exploiting addiction to leech money out of people.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

those are additional cards from other sets. This is like buying a deck then you can't play all yours cards without playing hours/buying

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't need boosters or fat packs at all. Just buy individuals.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years and 51 days of 3 hours a day average per week. Lol.

8 years ago | Likes 308 Dislikes 1

By that time there will already be 2 more games they pumped out.

8 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 0

Not to mention that most people can't play games 24/7...

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Why do people think it's wrong to point out that unless you pay to play most people don't have a hope in hell of unlocking everything!?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"3 hours a day average per week"

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But even 3 hours a day is more than the free time some people have to spare on anything, let alone a single game.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You got a shit bucket?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or 2 hrs a day, 5 days a week, for more than 8 years...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep. I don't even manage that most days in my busy life either....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

speaking of lol, League takes more than 3 years to unlock every champ. At least its a free game

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is complete bullshit the prices are nowhere near that high in fact they are more than fair don't spread lies it hurts the cause

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 38

So what exactly is your position at Electronic Arts?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Don’t bother with them they’d rather be angry than question the “facts” that support their arguments

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If Im guity of anything it us of MATHS. I dont know nor do I care about the accuracy of @OP's claims. I dont play EA or Disney titles and no

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

You need to check your figures you can grind out a new hero once a week with that amount of playtime they are only 15k at the most expensive

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

1. I never looked up the figures. I was translating @OPs into hours, weeks, and years. 2. I dont care.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

So you didn't do any research you just started spouting numbers because you want anger seems legit

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 20

one ever listens to what I say about anything anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Ya, that's an entirely new level of ridiculousness even by gamer standards.

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Western games for sure. Korean MMOs though man. 4.5k hours is something they would sneeze at. They scare me sometimes. In a bad way.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Their accounts are tied to their socials, so hacking them is a "federal" crime over there. Which i can get behind.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, from what I know of games design there is actually a reasonable defence. But no one wants to consider it. Theyre too busy witchhunting

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 22

It's a payable game sure, however the issue still lies with the publisher pushing gambling and addictive behavior

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Indeed? I know someone whos been doing it for decades.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I'm not sure that's the issue at all. The real issue is that they are charging ridiculous amounts for content that should be standard.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Interesting. I'd like to know what it is.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

At -1 Im disinclined. But Ill say this much. World of Warcraft started the fine tradition of including gambling systems in games. EA isnt

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

breaking new ground so much as adding to it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

But you didn't buy upgrades with cash in WoW. You grind. Only thing you can buy are cosmetic items.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Are you 12? Missed Diablo 2? Not they started random equipment. Not that it takes 40 hours to get a certain boss drop either.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's the 12-16 age group which is the most vulnerable to this system. At least adults understand the pitfalls and spend consciously

8 years ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Mar 1, 2018 7:14 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

And the next thing you find is that you wasted $80 on a game your teenager played for 4 hours.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You clearly don't understand the power of psychological addiction to something like a skinner box.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

That’s why we have to spread this message. Apart from a gamer aspect, there is is a serious moralistic human aspect we have to consider. >>

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

I've played free to play mmos and seen exactly this. No they don't.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

>>What kind of a message will you get generations be taught about this? This isn’t an argument against video games, but against these >>

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

No, they don't. Adults can also fall prey to dopamine addiction. Look at social media and smartphones, and the culture of "notifications".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You have clearly never ventured into the mobile game environment. That's where this shit came from, and it's fucking everywhere.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except the ones who don't, are predisposed to gambling addiction, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

>> types of schemes. Parents should know what their children are getting into. So it’s our job to break it down for them so they know.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

Possibly breaking gambling laws, there's def a bigger issue than simply not allowing our children access to said game

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

So the game itself isnt bad, only the rewards and economy?

8 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 5

Chess is a pretty good game, but it would suck if 1000 hours of grinding or paying a fee let you play with an extra bishop.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

not an extra one... just the second one.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You get King for free, but the 'castling' ability costs extra. Oh, and for 600 Chess Points you can get a loot-box that might give you...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

access to the new Premium 'Queen' piece, or an extra Elite 'Knight' piece.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I played the beta and found ground game play rather basic and generic. If you're looking to shoot then this is the game for you. The game

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

really shined during space combat. Much smoother but still had basic game play of "protect/destroy target"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the campaign is a laughable 5 hours long, then you get schooled by people who paid, no matter how good you are for the remaining 2095 hours.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I mean, imagine if you play D&D and gain 1 level per year. It may be fun, but if the progression is shit, people will get tired.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's been described as an "above average shooter" with a tacked on, hollow-feeling single player campaign.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Game would suck either way. Boring and ugly and void of anything fun or original.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would be willing to wager the game isn't spectacular either

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some people don't think they get the expected content for what they paid for, as additional content cost money. For example, you have to

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

pay to play Vader or Luke Skywalker, whom are a core aspect to the game

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As stated above though, it's only part of the issue whereas the overall problem is how publishers exploit automatic addiction responses 1

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

I studied psych and I can verify that the description is dead on and that Skinner's studies are the basis of modern video gambling machines.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But that's not EA's crime here. Almost all modern titles exploit those responses. People are mad at... the extent of it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a difference between respecting psych principles to create an engaging game and exploiting it to force joyless grinding.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*looks left. looks right* Have you played it? Has anyone? Most people I see playing it like the game. Just not the $$ part.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I enjoy opening loot boxes and randomised reward crates and can confirm that what was said about addictive gambling was probably right

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thus creating a game where 4k hrs or $2100 is required to unlock nearly basic aspects, not super special limited items or anything

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

Halo reach despite some flaws had imo the best customisation system ever, cosmetics only, full armour customisation and all by your choice

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No microtransaction and only using in game currency that was earned by playing and doing well/challenges. No bs

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and those are just items in the base game, not those that will be added by DLC and future patches.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

By basic aspects, you mean, Every aspect.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya pretty much.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The game is actually fantastic. The gunplay is great, the space combat is exciting, and the cherry on top is the graphics are GORGEOUS.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

yeah but.... its EA, so fcuk em. Get Destiny instead.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The whole progression/crate thing is not representative of the artists/programmers from the 3 studios that worked on this. Its really sucks.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All the reviews I've read say the same. "This is an awesome game... ... 'cept for the microtransactions."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/Can confirm. I tried unsuccessfully to get a refund before launch. I started playing and actually really enjoy the game, except when I get

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

2/slaughtered by someone that bought Vader or Luke.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I mean, I played the campaign and two multiplayer missions then bought Vader.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Vader and Luke are "cheap" now, I played for a few hours and could afford to unlock both if I wanted to; didn't as have played both in BF1..

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The game is great, you can actually play it and not spend any extra cash... this is a ridiculous post, I never unlock everything in a game..

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

no matter how much I play it. You earn credits, and can buy the stuff you want most first, leave all the other shit. No problem.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

I found the EA employee.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I found the sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I haven't bought an EA game in years, buddy. Good job being a corporate shill though. Way to be an apologist for really shitty business.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

+1 for opposing viewpoint. I never use any money in-game so I review games if they didn't even have that option. Is multiplayer offbalanced?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's pay-to-win with $2100 worth of gambling and random chance. Figure it out.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I'm only interested about the game as if buying stuff is not even considered as an option. Rewards aren't rewards if u buy them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But are you saying that the multiplayer is much easier for players who have all the fancy gear/characters? Vanilla is no good?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's exactly what I'm saying. The game is designed with the intent that you will become demoralized and resort to paying for loot boxes.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah. From what I've heard, it's great. Just so hard to progress.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Unless you allow yourself to become addicted to a skinner box.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Campaign seems to be meh

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I played the first chapter (I don't own a One or good enough PC, sonI tried it out with a friend). I liked it, and I may buy it just-

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To play the campaign, then try to return it later. Maybe keep it if theybget their shit straight by then...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I only wanted it for the campaign. I don't play multiplayer games. However now I feel a moral obligation not to purchase this game.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly. The poor devs must have been brought to tears at whay EA is making them do. An amazing game ruined by their greed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some of you might find it amusing that Belgium might be banning Battlefront II for violations with gamble-regulations.

8 years ago | Likes 1029 Dislikes 2

Nah, gambling should be legal. Just cause EA's is cunts doesn't mean adults can't make decisions about gambling without government.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The problem is that most of the people subject to gambling in video games are not adults.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It essentially is, since almost all of the money comes from parents. There's a very narrow band made of non-adults with their own money.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I DO find that amusing!

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

"I am amused" "I THOUGHT YOU SAID YOUR NAME WAS KIETH"

8 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Before anyone gets their hopes up: Belgium is just looking at it due to complaints. They'll probably find it's not technically gambling.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Usually the existing laws hinge on getting cash back as to exclude packs of baseball cards and grab bag kind of things.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And if Belgium does, the other EU nations will follow. That's half a billion potential customers lost.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

we need that shit in america

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes that IS a fun fact.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The UK is investigating gambling in video games which could lead to legislation against these things. It could just up age ratings though.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Knowing the Belgian government. They just want to be able to get a piece of that income

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Altough as a belgian i think it probably wont go trough( or how it is written). Because they already had a discussion like this and said 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lootcrates are not gamblin because you always get something. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope a lot of countries do that. NZ is particularly against gambling

8 years ago | Likes 227 Dislikes 2

Our most famous building is literally a gambling beacon owned by a Casino...what gives you that idea???

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

The giant hypodermic needle

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the government that let that atrocity happen was more about selling NZ out to chinese casino companies than anything Kiwis considered good.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

^^this

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Are pokemon, mtg and other trading cards banned?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The casinos were removed from pokemon games because of international issues like this. Idk about card packs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MTG is definitely pay to win. I remember a week 1 tournament, the regulars, some of whom participated in state or national tournaments

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

already copied the pro MTG player deck builds that were worth $300+. I was able to find the exact decks of 3-4 players online in a pro list.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I never played a tournament again. I can't spend $300+ every few months to remain competitive and I hate copying decks. That's why I love

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"LCG" Living Card Game. Take MTG and remove the random boosters and replace with a set 60 card expansion.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't play MTG, are pro decks in MTG the type of thing you're really destined to lose against? I play PKMN:TCG(well, the online) and-

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-you see people copy pro decks, but since it goes on luck and deck building, creativity pays off more than laziness. Since there's always-

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(I also know that MTG cards are waaaaay more expensive, yes.)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hopefully they follow suit with Overwatch, Hearthstone, Magic The Gathering, Pokemon, and the others

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

I don't think killing every card game is much of a solution.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My point was just that it’s all just as much gambling when you buy a pack as a loot box and may be worse since most are directed at kids

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dislike the lootboxes, but it's not much different from random loot drops in other genres and don't mind it as long as it's for cosmetics.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

MMORPGs have much, much, much higher grind values for actual beneficial stuff, so can't just blanket-apply the gambling rules to everything.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Overwatch got caught in the crossfire. I wonder whether this leads to a whole domino situation that kills RNG in games.

8 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 3

Good.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We can only hope.

8 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

RNG can be done properly. As along time player of Monster Hunter games, the RNG reward factor is a positive part of what drives the game 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It's making sure it's balanced properly, built to positively reward gameplay & unavoidable. Jim Sterling just did a bit on MH & RNG even 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

RNG keeps MMOs alive though, so they can't completely get rid of it.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I think it’s dumb to wrap Overwatch in the same boat. Overwatch’s loot boxes are cosmetic only and not gameplay advantages

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Its still gambling you aren't paying for something specific you are paying for random stuff its like a slot machine.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sure but the progression system in overwatch grants you many ways to get loot boxes, for every level you rank up and some arcade /1

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Modes give you a loot box for 1 win, so you constantly feel like you’re progressing quickly. Not to mention duplicates go to credits /2

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It ain't gonna kill RNG, just RNG from paid stuff

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It'll kill every kind of loot box system, but not, say, random damage values, because those don't cost money

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rng with monetary connections Maybe but not just rng

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rng you pay for*** rng you pay for is cancer anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But my thing is, at least in Overwatch, the crates are for pure aesthetics, not for determining competitive edge like this game

8 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 28, 2017 1:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not at all. Cosmetic loot boxes have been around for years, Overwatch actually did it better than TF2 or CSGO

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm more than willing to support the Overwatch team for all the content they have given us and will continue too

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not to mention they're always adding new maps, game modes, and characters for free

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And there are cases where even though the item for sale is cosmetic (see CSGO lotto sites), the gambling system is sketchy as fuck.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Similar to Siege and it's operators in the base game. Had a very fair unlock system honestly. Everything else purely cosmetic

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And honestly, even the most expensive skins are cheap. I launch the game a few times a week and I more or less own everything in the game

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Not the seasonal ones. That's where they get you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*everything that I want anyway. Never bought any boxes either, all from just playing

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I have like 10k credits and no new skins to buy

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

then it's time to get the voice lines, highlight intros and victory poses

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the thing though: even if it's only aesthetic, I paid $60 to get items advertised to me. Items that I can't unlock without paying 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Since there are so few free loot boxes. Even if there's no gameplay edge, if I want my characters to look cool, I have to spend money, 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and if I don't, I have to stare at all the people who, through luck or payment, got the skin I wanted. It's not as shitty as loot boxes 3/4

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even then, if it's reasonable to get the edge with a little gameplay (see league of legends, where even the most expensive champs take >

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A few hours to unlock if you really want them), I'm fine with the game selling a competitive edge.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I wouldn't call LoL pay-to-win, the champs are expensive but it's also a F2P game... Battlefront 2 is not F2P, everyone paid for it already.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think pay to win eliminates the enjoy-ability of the game's primary feature, which is multiplayer. Paying for the game, then not being>

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bit too general: RNG is in pokemon games as well.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nintendo like

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True. But it doesn't cost you $2100 or 4k hours to get all the pokemon, even with rng.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

RNG? no, but it will probably mean that any games that use paid lootboxes will be 18+ regardless of other content

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The thing with the Overwatch is it's all aesthetics. If someone wants to make their gun a different color, they can pay extra imo. /1

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

It doesn't change the base game or give an unfair advantage over others. /2

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I'm not arguing against RNG or OW loot crates, but it feels like if OW can get hit with an investigations (#thanksea), you can follow that

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

logic to a lot of aspects of other games. Like someone commented before me - Magic: the Gathering booster packs, for example.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

M:tG gets a pass because physical cards don't become useless if EA turns the servers off

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They've already pretty much deemed OW a non-issue due to the fact that the boxes in OW do not give people unfair gameplay advantages.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My buddy wants to know what RNG means... can you tell him this time?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm assuming Random Number Generation which is lootboxes. Have a good night.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lootboxes utilize and exploit RNG. RNG is NOT lootboxes. It's it's own thing that applies to many things, not just videogames, or lootboxes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Random number generator

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Random Number Generator. To expand, it's what players call the random aspects of games, like loot tables.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

RNG is just the process, it doesn't actually reference what is being produced. They use a random number generator to dictate if an item's 1/

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Item/s* will drop as part of a loot box or reward

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0