pretty much sums it up.

Jan 6, 2016 9:33 PM

karmap0lice

Views

7221

Likes

9811

Dislikes

1536

pretty much sums it up.

ciclejerk

just_one_big_ole_jerk

shut_the_hell_up

current_events

Can I just get a main chick? I don't even want a second, just a first would be great.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

http://imgur.com/m5T4JYK

10 years ago | Likes 304 Dislikes 14

Perfect.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Finally someone said something about the side chick

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Is it a real thing? Like, not an internet thing? I only see the term "side chick" when reading /r/blackpeopletwitter.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All I know is cheating is a real thing, and the "side chick" stuff glorifies it. Some of it makes me chuckle but it's actually pretty gross.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"MY OPINIONS ARE RIGHT!" -OP

10 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 10

See you on the front page, OP. v

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 20

Have my up vote for Starship Troopers.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And being Bisexual is a real thing & does not mean your just a wishy washy slut

10 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 2

Bisexuality is by far the most common sexual orientation according to the Kinsey Institute. Actual sexual activity levels notwithstanding.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I get sad that Biphobia can come from people who define as gay :(

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I think it's honestly worse from gay people than straight people. At least for guys it is.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Gotta love living the bi-life <3

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Moses did a better job.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

GET OUT OF MY MIND

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 19

With you on most of this. All except like two lines, but whatever.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

We all have different opinions....We should be free to think and feel what we like,just dont be a stuck up self centered prick about it

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

The problem is that with some of these things, having an opposing view means you're a stuck up prick. Not all views are created equal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Circle jerk?

10 years ago | Likes 136 Dislikes 26

Yes have some.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Circle jerk.

10 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 9

It's always a circle jerk...

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Jircle cerk

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'll get the lube

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

"Gays deserve basic human rights" - This looks like an agreeable opinion until you realize that "Gays deserve equal rights" is more correct.

10 years ago | Likes 598 Dislikes 29

Let's keep the basic human rights thing in there. I'd rather not face a world where both straights and gays are equally enslaved by someone

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

He knows what he said

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Coming from a non western Nation the Boner you guys have for worshping and glorifying someone for the sex they like is so fucking funny

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 35

Sound like mindless drones that repeat whatever your TV says, I guess this is why the West is so economically stagnate, so much stupid

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 35

You forgot to mention the most developed and highest quality of life. Equal rights does that as you don't simply squabble over oppression.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Haha! Rekt! :D The "mindless drones" part is especially rich coming from someone perpetuating conservative values.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How is giving someone equal rights "worshipping and glorifying" them?

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

Equal isn't quite right, I prefer equivalent rights. Blindly making everything the same doesn't always make things fair.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 12

Profound shit you just said. Not everyone realizes this.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Though to me, "equivalent rights" opens up the idea of separate but equal. I don't want an "equivalent" of marriage, I want marriage.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

that mattered specifically for gay couples. It's hard for me to think of an example.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"equal" would for example giving same access to birth control, whereas "equivalent" would be taking that effort and placing it somewhere 1/

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Same access to birth control... for homosexual couples... What?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Exactly. It would be worthless to them. Hence where equivalent would be giving them something of similar value that is useful.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Equality means that gay and straight people are equally allowed to get married heterosexually. Fair equivalence allows for gay marriage.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the hell does "married heterosexually" mean?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Marriage between a man and a woman. Gay and straight people equally have the right to have a heterosexual marriage in most cultures.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a gay guy, I want rights that benefit a male/male marriage, not rights tailored to the assumption that one of us is female.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How are marriage rights tailored to the assumption that they are between a man and a woman?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait are people actually against Breast Feeding??

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

In public. As I understand people want women to cover themselves while breastfeeding. Like at restaurants.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have a feeling it's meant to mean breastfeeding in public... someone correct me if I'm wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Though that isn't much more rational argument either.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In public or when the kid's in gradeschool, yeah. There are some opposed to it under certain situations.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I have problems with several of those. So to me this does not sum it up.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

Ooohhhh... Which ones?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Abortions, planned parenthood, and non binary gender stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Do you mind elaborating a little? I'm curious on why you disagree.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Non binary gender makes no sense to me, switching your sexual identity back and forth is not a legit thing. And I think abortion is murder.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Okay, I get those two but why PP? They're really helpful for a lot of other things to prevent anyone getting unplanned pregnancy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

TL;DR the world is NOT black and white & don't be an asshole.

10 years ago | Likes 490 Dislikes 36

Thats why I think abortion is bad

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The world isn't, but this post is.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That is a good thing to read instead of the actual post, but has nothing to do with this list.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's African American and White. Gawd Becky!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But all of these are absolutes that depict the answers to issues in a black and white manner...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's yellow too

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

TL;DR OP is an angsty Neckbeard Goth who just repeats shit he hears on Tumblr.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

I'm almost exactly the opposite ;)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So this post which gives the 'correct' answer to all the 'problems' is saying there are shades of grey?

10 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 4

I hope there aren't 50 shades of them...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This guy or gal gets it :)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You said what I was thinking, except you said it a lot better than I could have.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

there's about 50 of them.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

My side chick knows all about that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Beat me to it. Good show chap.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What an odd mix of left and right values.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

It's almost as if neither side has it right and we need to meet in the middle to be most effective

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 15

This made me lol

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

But what about vaccines!!!!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Are you crazy? Mentioning vaccines causes autism!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Opinions. Everyone's got some.... Definitely not all facts.

10 years ago | Likes 172 Dislikes 17

Opinions. If you don't have your owns, you're a slave.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one and they all stink.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Do we need to link to stories about babies born lacking anuses again?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not to be that guy, but gays tend to have basic human rights. Everyone usually does.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 12

In parts of the world yeah, but not in Africa or the Middle East.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Considering the post is set in western first world standards, those don't really count to the topic.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I was reading it as more of a global thing

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well a lot of the topics are only really relevant in the US, such as Trump, US isn't a christian nation, breastfeeding, guns, etc. etc..

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We're suprizingly backwards for a nation that's so proud of itself

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Not in the muslim world they don't! Neither do women. But don't tell OP

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Marriage was classified as a human right by the Supreme Court decades ago without allowing it for gays.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Herein lies the problem. Some of these are fact and some are opinion. Presenting it this way makes tries to validate opinion by association.

10 years ago | Likes 1325 Dislikes 80

ooo

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It was never stated as fact. Apparently an item or two offended thee?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Damn good opinions, though.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm wondering as to what points of the list made you speak up

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Agree

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

True, but I find that often people don't necessarily "believe in" every fact

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Will it help to mentally preface the whole thing with, "I think that..."?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

These facts and opinions look so similar!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Like most, OP no doubt thinks these are all immutable facts.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was thinking the same thing

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well OP just came from Tumblr what do you expect? all those were what people on tumblr with an IQ of 80 think on a daily basis.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 31

perfectly well said

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Some of these are great, but people can't will society to conform to what suits their needs, they need to grow up and accept the truth.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Thank you, I was hoping to find this comment.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

which ones?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The nonbinary thing is awfully vague.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They're talking about non-binary gender/genderqueer people.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

IMO some of those people are crazy. They've got a fucked up mentality of what gender is with relation to their day to day emotional state.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Humans can be healthy on a vegan diet

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Humans are omnivores. And humans are in general, weaker when on a vegan diet.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Vegan cavemen couldn't be healthy, but humans have reached the point where we can take supplements and have enough types of food to be fine.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're right about the omnivore. Generally weaker? I don't know if it's proven. But small portions seems like a good medium

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But trump is a shitty choice...

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 20

Maybe, maybe not. He might be the chosen one to end SJW circlejerking and white guilt / Western self-loathing. But I could be wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Shitty choice is an opinion, no facts there.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

would have been better as "Trump isn't racist... but he is a shitty choice"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 54

He is racist though.

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 10

People keep saying it... but his comments aren't racist in context.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

He literally called Mexicans criminals and rapists. When called out he said he was sure "some of them are probably okay."

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Trump is actually illegal-grade racist in most developed countries except ours. For this and many other reasons, he is a shitty choice.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 9

Racism is wrong, let's start with that...but there are developed countries where it's illegal to think a certain way?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

P.S. If he's actually taking actions that are illegal, not just saying things, that's different.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thinking it and saying it in private is fine as far as I know. Preaching hate is not, especially in France and Germany.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, we're not talking some racist uncle spewing bullshit at xmas dinner. This is an "official" source with a national audience. Its cray

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People often forget that public hate-speech is a huge part of genocides/ethnic conflicts/civil wars. It is no light thing by any means.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If only he was merely "thinking" it. His hate-speech towards Mexicans and Muslims could get him in trouble in UK, France, Germany, Canada...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As in women should have a choice to abort, men should also have a say, and if they say they don't want a kid, they shouldn't require to pay

10 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 53

What to do with the kid after birth is a whole 'nother discussion, but no way a man should have a say in a woman's choice to abort or not.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I disagree for many reasons that would take more than 140 characters to talk about. Simply put, it isn't fair.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Hey fucknut. Child support isn't a lottery win for the woman. It's to support the child which is half the man's.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 19

Angry person. Pls read my comment on your other angry post

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

That's ridiculous. There are men out there with like 20 illegitimate kids. You help create a life? You help raise that kid. Just wow...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

The thought process is that if a woman has the right to not be a part of the child's life one way or another, moral grey areas be damned,

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Why should a man have no say at all and have to be financially responsible if he didn't want anything to do with the kid? You feel me?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 23, 2016 4:49 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Did you rhyme on purpose? It's like a rap

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Longfellow

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol no, I didn't notice until you pointed it out, I just had to cut words for the 140 characters

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It isn't that black and white. Both people are responsible for a pregnancy, but women get more say in the matter because it's THEIR body.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

And the guy didn't want to have it? So what? There is a baby now & both the mother & the father have legal obligations to care for it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's only a baby if the mother wants it. If she doesn't, it's not a baby and can be disposed of

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Fine. True. But if the mother does want it (or, doesn't want an abortion) then it's a person that two people are responsible for.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That comment isn't about the pregnancy, it's about the man not having say whether they support the kept child or not.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

If they took a risk and had unsafe sex, it's both their problems - only time nonpayment should be considered is failed birth control, maybe.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 46

She took the risk of unsafe sex, she should be forced to carry to term... see how dumb this logic is?

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 6

When birth control is available? Abortions should not be birth control - "whoops, I got knocked up, silly me - better abort it."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Leo said people shouldn't get free abortions, opner argued that abortions should be legal. Nicely sums up why I don't vote.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

char limit makes things difficult... thought we were both talking about child support, not payment for abortions.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think you actually got the point of what either said.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not what I said. Meant nonpayment insofar as child support - abortions should be for health reasons, not as substitute birth control.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't abortion potentially harmful to the mother? If so, then to what extent should the father have a say?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

I don't know the answer to those questions. *But as to my knowledge*, abortion is not harmful to the mother. Plan B and/or Birth Control is

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Pregnancy/deliver carries much greater risk to the mother than abortion.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

No, abortion is not harmful, just like anything you do it could have risks if something were to go wrong. I've had an abortion so 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I had the conversation and procedure done, but states that don't support pp require that the doctor tell you about "potential risks" of 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Abortion that actually have no factual data behind it. It's a scare tactic. the doctor tells you that if they are kind and understanding 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yes they should. This is a case of 'tough shit' because life isn't fair.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 70

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Apr 23, 2016 5:09 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

If you want to boil someone else's kettle and not drink the tea they have every right to ask you to repay them the value of the tea-bag.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then don't put your dick in the kettle, man.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Apr 23, 2016 5:09 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Can't they just sign their rights away and not pay?!

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

That's what I was wondering too.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not that simple. Even guys that aren't the biological fathers can be forced to pay for kids sometimes if it's in the kid's "best interest."

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I never thought about that. I've never even heard it mentioned before. This warrants further thought.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Yeah, there is so much thought and points that I defiantly haven't thought about myself

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No it doesn't. It's already hella easy for a man to abandon his kids.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Such as how?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Please explain? Because im definitely calling bs.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sorry, I only have anecdotes for you but it's how I feel after watching single mothers toil every day to afford a pediatrician because 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The father doesn't send shit to help despite court orders. I hope shit has changed for the better because that's not right. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

IT'S NOT THE MAN'S BODY, DAMMIT! I shouldn't have ANY say or manipulative influence on what procedures she may choose.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 23

It may not be the mans body but it is the mans kid.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

Which is why the male must help support the kid unless giving up rights to someone that accepts.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes.... You shouldn't. I agree, it's not their body, but why should the guy have to pay child support for a kid that he didn't want to have

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

what, exactly, are you referring to when you say who's "body" it is. are we referring to the fetus, or the impact carrying the fetus implies

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

oops, replied to the wrong comment, soz, meant to reply to the guy you replied to

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was gonna say... That's a whole different story that I don't know the answer to haha

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

condoms.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You stopped reading the comment when you reached the second comma.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As did you. Forcing the woman to pay for a kid he produced too creates EXTRA hardship on the woman and the kid. That's undue influence.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I am a father, because I chose to be a father. I wanted to be a father. I love being a father. I am not obligated to be a father.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Either way child support is for the kid, not the mom. The kid belongs exactly as much to the father as the mother.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

This is not true in America. If the parents are not together, the mother has far more rights and it is not even close to equal.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Source: I'm a father fighting a 4+ year custody battle to maintain 50/50 custody of my son. I have the better environment, but I'm a guy.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even when the father is clearly the better parent, our system and society believes a mother is the more important parent.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Final note: if you don't agree with some of this, that's totally okay too!

10 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 8

Unfortunately if you do not agree with this you are a "Bigot"

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 13

I don't know if I agree with binary person thing. ..is that an android? I really don't know what a binary person is.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Binary meaning 2 gender system. As in male/female. A nonbinary person is someone who does not want to be labeled male/female.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, it's not transgender. Which is when a male identifies as a female or vice versa. It's people who don't identify as either male or female

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A reminder. They still have a sex. Which will always be male/female. Gender can be different and they see it as a social construct.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In some cases, you are. Like, saying someone doesn't deserve equal rights for the sex they have, for instance, is p bigoted.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Orientation is a state of being, not necessarilly action. I was hetero LONG before I got to touch the boobie, for example.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, yeah, I agree. I only worded it as I did to make it seem as mundane as possible.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While others are more subjective.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If I live in a country where guns are strictly controlled & gun violence is rare, and think guns are unnecessary for a society, I'm a bigot?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

He's just jumping on the South Park anti-SJW bandwagon, regardless of context or applicability.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(Side-note: there are lots of hunting weapons here in Finland, but getting a license for a people-shooter is quite difficult)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How do you feel about people who think guns are necessary for society? (Side-note: Pretty sure hunting weapons can be just as lethal)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Necessary for society" is of course eminently debatable, but all in all, I'm happy to live in a society demonstrably not needing many guns.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(Side-note: certainly as or even more lethal, but for some reason, hunting weapons don't get used as much for shooting people as handguns)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Muslim culture is for the most part peaceful but the religion of Islam itself is extremely violent.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

Judaism and Christianity are guilty of this as well. God regularly has people killed or severely punished in the OT for stupid bullshit like

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

worshipping him the wrong way (incense) and also condones things like letting a mob fuck your daughters to save a stranger.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Source is the Quran where it literally says if they do not share the same faith do not hesitate to kill them.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But the bible also mentions that 'anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the priest who represent God must be put to death'

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Levitical law no longer applicable. It must be read in context.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Forgive me. However, exchange 'bible' for Torah and my point stands.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huh? I assume by that you mean the Torah is no longer applicable?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's also the fact that even 1% of 1.7 Billion people is still a lot of people.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Is "1%" the number of Muslims that are radical/terrorists? Or did you just make that up?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I've heard anywhere from 1-30+.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yea the "not even a lot" statement is bullshit. Just cuz its not even close to half, does not mean its a small number. Millions is a lot.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So is christianity. The thing about most of the Christian world, is that it is getting to be less religious and thus less fundamentalisitic.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Christianity is not extremely violent. One of the ten commandments is thou shalt not kill lol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Breastfeeding is as natural as eating. Or defecating.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

So we should be allowed to poop in public?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But not for an 5-8year old child (or adult)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Most of the motherfuckers here are adults who effectively breast feed from cows so think about that. (i agree only babies should breastfeed)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Well udder feed but i get the joke :p

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes downvote away because what you do with cows' milk is so much different than a human mother pumping milk for her adult offspring.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What I pay prostitutes to do is nobody's business but my own

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I would also include Dogs are better than cats

10 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 42

I like both.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Most North Koreans agree.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

No, don't ruin it.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

slow down mr woof.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now now no

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And can live vegan. Cats however, need the meats

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

No!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Any dog less than 30lbs is a cat and cats are useless. J/k I love cats!

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Any dog less than 30lbs is not a dog. It is certainly not a cat, but equally certainly not a dog. It is a... a... glooff!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gloofs are like, so lame.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've never owned a dog less than 60 pounds

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I've never owned a man less than 130lbs

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But seriously....

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

pho sho

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It really depends on the dog tho. I’ll take a cat over a chihuahua or a Schnauzer any day.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Depends on the dog. One of my favorite dogs when I worked in a shelter was one. Sweetest little thing that loved everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah probably. I’ve just got the stereotypical idea of them being nasty spoilt brats, which really is a problem of the owner rather than (1)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's my opinion on it. Just like how people that assume pits are aggressive murder dogs. Depends how they are raised.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But breeds definitely do have "personalities". Pits have a lot of energy and chihuahuas are anxious. (not always the case for either)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

than of the dog. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Breastfeeding is natural. So is urination. For that matter, so is an early death. An appeal to nature is always a bad argument.

10 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 33

I was born lactose intolerant. Such natural actions would have killed me. I'm not a fan of that bitch nature.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm opposed to babies being in public. Keep those things in your own homes I say, and off my lawn.

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

I'm with you. Some kids were in my yard yesterday. I fucking hate kids. My partner pounded on the window and they spooked & ran. Hilarious.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's always the terrible go-to stoner argument too. "It's from the earth man, it's good for you." Okay. Like this place is allll good stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Humanity has spent the last 10,000 years trying to modify the Earth to suit itself better. Nature is overrated.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, eating and urinating isn't same thing. one is okay fro public, other isn't.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I think OP might be referring to the backlash against breast feeding in public.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

There's no good argument for or against. We don't piss or shit in public either.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 61

Next time you decide to eat some shit and drink your piss go hide somewhere then dimwit. Not even remotely comparable

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

I wasn't making a comparison, I was refuting the appeal to nature.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

You said there are no good arguments for breastfeeding. Not just the "it's natural" one because you consider it a bad argument.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

We eat in public, you fuckwit

10 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 11

This comment^ needs more upvotes

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

So? Babies have different rules from adults.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 29

Why do you have a problem with breastfeeding?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which is why they are allowed to eat from breasts in public. There is literally no argument against breastfeeding wherever necessary.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

That's bs. Nobody gets upset when a baby is fed from a bottle, it's just that people get pissy when they see boobs being used for food.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

So you want to build breastfeeding rooms everywhere? How is that practical?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Perhaps you should read the comment in question, this time for comprehension. "Theres no good argument for or against ."

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

You said "we don't shit in public." We don't shit in public because there are private places everywhere to do that. Unless you are

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

suggesting that we build private places for breastfeeding to happen, I don't see how the two can be compared.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I was fucking a girl from behind at the mall and got in trouble for it...fucking is natural.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 23

Except you don't need to fuck because you can control your sexual urges. But a baby's gotta eat.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Baby's gotta eat" is exactly what she said before I stuffed her face.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

See? That's a good pont. "Breastfeeding is natural" is not.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Devil's advocate: Couldn't you pump and bottle feed while outside? Or get a cover so you do not expose yourself?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah...black people offend me too. They can eat, but not where I can see them. They have to use the back entrance and eat in the kitchen

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are tons of ways to feed a baby without exposing your breast at a socially inappropriate time.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Of course global warming is real, so is global cooling, and they've been real for billions of years.

10 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 38

Totally agree with you!!! My Dad is a geologist and we always talk about how the Earth has done this since it first existed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's cool

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm a comedic genius, I know.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*anthropomorphic climate change is real. Happy?

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 15

"s-senpai, stop, you're warming me up too much! ah, there's CO2 all over me!" - anthropomorphic climate change

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Baka.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is it true that a volcanic eruption can release more co2 into the atmosphere than humans have?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Sure it can, but that hasn't happened in an extremely long time.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Co2 should take a back seat imo. The agricultural business is doing much, MUCH more harm to the environment.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying Co2 reduction isn't important, but a lot of people don't know that the biggest harm right now is livestock.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. They're included in the normal background CO2 fluctuation. https://www.skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming.htm

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Cool. Thanks!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It can during large eruptions but on average, volcanoes release CO2 under 1% of what humans emit.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I agree with some of these, but not all. I guess that's why issues like these aren't always easy to resolve. People have different views.

10 years ago | Likes 304 Dislikes 30

"rape is never the victim's fault" can be pretty bullshit, some people fake that they got raped. Obviously not all

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

But if they fake it, there IS no victim of rape. Cuz it didn't happen. It should read: When rape happens, it's never the victim's fault.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't *disagree* with any of them per se, but some of them are more complicated than that.

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 7

Which ones don't you agree with? I'm curious.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I agree with this statement.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Doesn't the one about racism and how a person looks is really really specific?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Rape is never the victim's fault. But getting drunk and making bad decisions doesn't give someone the excuse to claim rape either.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The abuse one confuses me because it sounds like it is saying the abusee is also an abuser. The rest are pretty good with me

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I think what it's trying to say is that women can be abusive too, not just men

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They just mean either person in the relationship can be abusive, or both of them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In some locations guns are needed (shooting wolves that are trying to eat your sheep is srs bsnss), but not handguns/assault rifles. Yeesh.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

I already can't own an automatic weapon. (Assault rifle is a made up term to describe scary looking guns)

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Yeah, here's a great illustration of that point: http://imgur.com/j85rp2U Same gun, same capabilities; one just has a black kit w/ rails

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think the big difference is the magazine. Take that off and I'm significantly less worried.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not the same, the one on the bottom has a big magazine, doesn't have to be reloaded as often, you can kill more people in a mass shooting

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All guns look scary in the possession of someone you don't trust or know.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

To some people. Not to everyone. I've seen strangers with guns and it didn't bother me in the slightest.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And what about them made you feel "safe" and not fearful?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ya its pretty liberal

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 16

Which one is liberal? I mean...In the US these look center/center-left. In Europe this looks center/center-right. In Russia this is liberal.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm not very fond of liberals.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For seriousl. Global warming!? A scientific conspiracy! Equal rights for gays and women!? Damn them to hell. Legal guns!? Those bastards!

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 12

Well you took it to the extreme, I was just making an observation how most of those views are towards the leftist side

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

A more 'rational' side you mean..

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Reality has a well-known liberal bias. - Stephen Colbert

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

like the good old liberal "islam is a religion of peace and if you try and prove otherwise you're a bigot and a racist"

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yeah. The nonbinary gender thing...I just don't buy it.

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 29

That's one I've got to be neutral on, it seems suspicious to me, but I don't live in their head so what right have I to 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

dismiss what they may actually feel. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I have no mental gender, so the very concept of it is unfathomable to me. I just don't care and find it weird that so many go nuts about it.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Who gives a shit? As long as you're not an asshole about it, you can think they're wombats for all we care. Just don't hurt them.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

You don't have to buy it. All they're usually asking of you is a different pronoun. That costs you literally nothing and can save them (1)

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 13

I think you can only expect people to play along so far.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

A lot of needless emotional pain

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

I don't think they care what you think neither are they asking for your permission.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 26

Well someone's a sensitive little bitch today

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Sure. Or acceptance and caring towards other humans and asking others for the same is not that hard. But sure, if you feel that way.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

They kind of are. Constantly asking for acceptance requires third party opinion. Tolerance is another thing

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

I think we all care to be treated with respect. Oh, but because one guy doesn't buy it? Well then, I'll just have to conform.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

You're asking for the conformity of everyone else by asking for acceptance though. How is that any difference. I'm not saying it's okay /1

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

to be disrespectful but that doesn't mean a person should have to agree that a guy wearing makeup and a dress is suddenly a woman. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

But that's more of an issue you have with science. I was amazed that an entire lecture in forensic anthro was dedicated to telling ppl that

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

sex =/= gender, and that gender was a social construct, but I am constantly reminded that people still have issues with that fact.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

This was important in forensics because people who don't get that fact constantly misidentify gender in remains because of objects at burial

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

- Disclaimer - As per US standards. Opinions may change across countries.

10 years ago | Likes 980 Dislikes 46

Not much, chum. +1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*opinions may change across individuals

10 years ago | Likes 336 Dislikes 8

*opinions may change across neurons

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I for one would never feel safe about people running around with guns. Swords on the other hand...

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Except Trump. He's still shitty.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So are the alternatives.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate when some idea is presented and someone freaks out because they assume its presented universally, when its meant in a certain context

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

As per the founding of the US (as a confederacy AND later as a republic), each state was intended to have its own culture, laws, and norms.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 13

They do.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not so much...not since Lincoln fucked it all up.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Ehh, there's only like 4 different cultures in america.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

SHOTS FIRED!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Disclaimer -- He solely means guns cuz that's a recipe for destruction of civilization. Like how all americans kill each other cuz guns.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 35

My gun must be broken. Sniper rifle hasn't jumped out of its cabinet and shot any middle schoolers across the street yet.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

"I haven't killed anyone with my gun, therefore shootings must be a myth."

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Respond to a sweeping generalization, get criticized with another sweeping generalization. We've gone the full circle of stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see you sarcasm and raise you three more sarcasm!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

How is any of this negotiable (except, mayyybe, the gun one)???

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 22

Because morality and personal standards vary just as much as snowflakes.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

Some snowflakes can piss right off.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Whoa whoa now, what happened to tolerance?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who said anything about tolerance? Tolerance can piss right off! Acceptance, or nothing. Own your hate!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is it still a "side chick" if you're doing ethical non-monogamy (i.e. everyone knows and is cool with it)?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure the French think the whole "side chick" thing is perfectly normal.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Actually .... No we don't

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Personally it's the gun part, the non-binary part and the trans part. There is a reason behind all three of them.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 8, 2016 5:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Oh, great, found the dude who likes black and white camps.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

You should have the right to defend yourself from criminals and criminal governments. I'm not from the US btw.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

And what may I ask is wrong with pointy sticks? Hmmm?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We don't have guns in the UK and no one has ever needed one to "defend" themselves. Guns are for killing, nothing else.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I don't want to be that asshole, but right now a certain 1400 young females come to mind...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You have guns in the UK.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Not really, level of gun ownership is pretty much limited to hunting. Not self defence.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sure no one in the UK could ever have benefitted from having a gun in the history of your very old country. Just the people you conquered.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think some of them are negotiable in degree. For example, a lot of people feel there should be certain limits on abortion. For the muslim

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

They're wrong, imvso.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

So there should be absolutely no limi on abortion whatsoever? How about third trimester without medical indication

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I honestly support post-natal abortion. Wrong person to argue with about 3rd trimesters. You'll have to pull me back from the 4th first.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

How do you limit abortions? Women should have the rights to their own body and their choices.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

the most common is term limits. Abortions after the fetus is viable are generally not permitted worldwide except in medical emergencies

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"viable" generally meaning around the 24 week mark, when a baby could be delivered and survive

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

one, "a lot" is vague and negotiable. Like is 200 a lot? Are supporters who don't specifically commit the acts themselves terrorists?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The statement in the OP is clearly being made through the context of a billion Muslims. Also, no. That's why we have definitions.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Exactly. It's not a lot when you talk percentage. But seeing as 1 is too many terrorists, I could see it as "a lot" in that sense.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, there are better systems than "planned parenthood" in other countries, so the funding could potentially be better spent. Feminism is

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

PP is what we have right now. OP says nothign about not developign somethign better.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

a broad movement and there are certain radical feminist groups that expressly advocate female superiority. Having a "side chick" is not

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Saying no to gun control is saying yes to school shootings

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 20

Saying yes to gun banishment means the only people with guns are the shooters themselves. Fuck off and stop buying into political propaganda

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

That's such bullshit. You fucking moron. Gun control prevents ANYONE from obtaining firearms. Look at all the countries in the world (1)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

with gun control like the UK. We don't ever have any gun whatsoever. NEVER. Your argument is demonstrably wrong. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

People who obtain them illegally would still have them. Normal people who just lose it and take there guns to school/work/public place 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

would have less access to them as they would have to attempt to get them illegally. I think more support for mental health care is better.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No it's not. I don't mean to offend you, but you are an idiot.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

No, he's right. You're an idiot.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

So, if I say I don't want gun control I am saying I want people to shoot kids in schools? It's really that simple in your head?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Who said anything about no gun control?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0