Election security

Nov 15, 2024 9:35 PM

repost - because

Checked 1 source to see what kind of information is there. I think it's at least worth doing the hand count. My state had no problem voting blue but as a whole way more red came through than I would have anticipated.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Snoopes says “unsupported by concrete evidence”

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/21/stephen-spoonamore-letter-harris/

https://www.factcheck./">https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/21/stephen-spoonamore-letter-harris/
o">/">https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/21/stephen-spoonamore-letter-harris/
<br>https:/"><">o">/">https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/21/stephen-spoonamore-letter-harris/
<br>https://www.factcheck.org/2024/11/both_sides_distort_incomplete_vote-counts_to_falsely_suggest_election_fraud/

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/11/trump-won-the-popular-vote-contrary-to-claims-online/

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-won-states-requiring-voter-id-2024-election-2024-11-13/

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This seems like a big deal?

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Not, really no. It has zero evidence of any issues. It's saying, maybe there's an issue, at best. Would take it more seriously if it had proof of one issue, just one. But it has none. This is called denial.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They would have to manually recount at least one state’s ballots to obtain any evidence.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats what the Trump people kept saying in 2020. "There would be evidence if this was actually investigated". In summary, they had zero evidence, but wanted to go on a fishing expedition.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The difference is whether these folks can demonstrate to a judge that the suggestions they make are legitimate i.e. bad characters had access to the software and machines. That's probable cause to investigate. If it proves true, that's probable cause to select random counties and recount. If there are problems, that's probable cause to recount a state. Etc.

Trump's people didn't have any facts regarding access to machines or software. They had rumors they made up and then claimed were true.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

These people can't demonstrate it. If they could, they would. And they haven't. Like I said, they want to go on a fishing expedition. A judge would toss this, which is why they didn't even try. They just sent a letter to Kamala. I'm sorry, this is all just a joke really. At least Giuliani etc tried to go to court. These people aren't even doing that. We shouldn't be wasting our time or attention on this. Trump won. Better to just accept this and start to move forward.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0