Wedriftdeeper
76248
1616
111
The Tweet is referenced in the article
Feb 6, 2017 10:07 PM
Wedriftdeeper
76248
1616
111
The Tweet is referenced in the article
JohnyWhooof
2020 and my dude, how well does this shit still apply. Relativization of the truth is heinous.
LADEEANNE
The comments were better than the article.
AngryGroundhog
Highly recommend following Kasparov on twitter. in response to trump on o'reilly:https://twitter.com/kasparov63/status/828347191626461184
km9v
Pretty much
GeorgeLucasWillBurnInHellForEpisodeOne
This
FloppyFingers
but there is no such thing propaganda here in the U.S.A. that only happens elsewhere (._. )
[deleted]
[deleted]
Camelspotting
Nope. Or in this case yes, as it it labelled opinion
whocaresdotcom
Lol you mean what NYT has been doing this entire time?
DudeDuderDuderino
Ain't nobody got time for that!
donkypuncharello
NY Times, in a rare move, explains the motives and tactics in their reporting.
Camelspotting
This is an opinion piece. And also, what?
nonamejanie
Well consider my thinking completely exhausted. Not just the critical area.
TwoManyPuppies
It's working. It hurts to put much thought into what these fools are up to
wadatahmydamie
See, that's why I like the Richard Spencer solution, only with rolled-up newspapers
madetheaccountjustforyou
Yes the president is lying. As was the last one. What do we make of your sudden caring now that it's not "your team"?
AngryGroundhog
A little perspective? Trump's administration makes up terrorist attacks to justify banning people from 7 nations; this shit's another level.
madetheaccountjustforyou
And the last one lied about how many human beings he murdered in those 7 nations.
skaroreg
I care
evostars
just stop watching all the TV channels, news papers, etc... and focus on what is present in your life. on what you are responsible for.
ggerwitz
New York Times.... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Irony anyone?
Wedriftdeeper
Regardless of the source it's a reasonable argument in the article. We have to read everything on merit, regardless of source
Wedriftdeeper
Regardless of the source it's a reasonable argument in the article. We have to read everything on merit, regardless of source
BoobiesMeow
Yep sounds like Fox and CNN.
IronicUsername
The fact that people equate the two tells me truth has already lost.
Genini
Yeah, but CNN has a chance to turn around I think.
macklunn
Just to linkify things for mobile: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/04/opinion/sunday/why-nobody-cares-the-president-is-lying.html
Wedriftdeeper
Thanks man
CaptCraazy
Drag0nF1RE
Da real MVP
[deleted]
[deleted]
MoccaFruit
Why not?
sharon838
It's worse now. They really are trying to form popular opinion instead of presenting facts.
Drewpowers
Because Trump.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Drewpowers
Hopefully this will help you. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20160823-how-modern-life-is-destroying-democracy
UrKungFuNoGood
lol Kasparov is one to talk.
godofboredum
Is what he said ironic?
UrKungFuNoGood
Well for starters, look at the way Kasparov tried to create his own chess federation and the bribes. He tried to compete with FIDE.
Camelspotting
He's russian. That's the only way to get anything done there.
midsongnipplerub
Iliyumzhinov bribed delagetates more than Kasparov did, which is why Kasparov lost the election. In some cases delegates were bribed 1/?
midsongnipplerub
First by The Kasparov/Karpov campaign, then bribed more by the Iliyumzhinov campaign. And voted for the latter. He didn't want to bribe 2/?
midsongnipplerub
Anyone, but Iliyumzhinov has maintained his stranglehold on fiddle with bribery, so bribery was the only way forward. Source: my dad was 3/4