Phone dump

Jun 22, 2023 9:20 AM

nightwindkleshya

Views

95415

Likes

1888

Dislikes

63

Cat tax, this is Cleo

#43

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 *sight (Also, I'd declutter them right back, with equal strength. "Honey, didn't we hide this at your parents' house not two weeks ago?" "I think you're right ... and never call me honey again. Also, where did this painting of a moose come from?")

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

#19 Top bunk's monster becomes bottom bunk's sleep paralysis demon. This is how they're assigned, and why it's usually the older child that has sleep paralysis.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#5 Not a specialist, but why would frozen oxigen be more flammable than liquid oxygen? It's about as dense, but slightly less reactive due to it being bound in a crystal lattice? (side note: Plenty of YT video's of people pouring liquid oxygen on fires)

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Guessing the phase transition from solid to gas also adds a significant amount of mayhem. "Ooh, the death Rock that lights things on fire by just looking at them is also now jet-propelled".

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

#1 i moved into my ex's house that way. Every time I stayed over I brought an overnight bag, and left with it mostly empty, until he noticed, and cleared out some wardrobe space for me

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#7 nope. Image compression has long since destroyed most colours in between with lossy compression. That's what generational loss means, you take picture that was already compressed, upload it again and it's compressed again... So you get generational loss. JPEG2000 was invented to fix this issue. Jpeg has this issue. PNG is lossless compression. Why? Because I took colour picker tool to this image, it doesn't have any hidden colours and many adjacent ones have become 1:1 the same...

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

I'm also suspicious that an RGB display can even properly show a tetrachromal image, pretty much by definition.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

#38 hexapoda

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#7 What's 42 colours, sextrachromia?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's only if you suffer from a very sexy eye disorder

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#7 i count 40

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't claim to be? Just saying how many colors i see there.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#7 TIL I'm a tetrachromat, maybe

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, I said maybe, didn't I? I have no quarrel with you

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#11 New idea... Petition to replace the entire USA Congress with wombats. No term limits.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

#14 yeah I don’t buy it. My coriander got absolutely wrecked by aphids this spring. If anything, they protected my other plants by being so attractive to the aphids that they literally didn’t want anything but the coriander.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#4 Schrodinger's razor: when you're not sure which option is more convenient so you just pick one and think about the other option longingly every time there's even a minor setback.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Chekov's Gun: the number of guns in the trailer park doubles every 18 months

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#5 Christ Almighty, look up dioxygen difluoride. "FOOF." https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2010/02/23/things_i_wont_work_with_dioxygen_difluoride

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Two words: Chlorine Trifluoride; an actual candidate for a rocket fuel oxidizer. “It is hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water—with which it reacts explosively.”

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Chlorine binding with fluorine makes no sense chemically. I can imagine such a compound having the stability of an entire sorority during PMS.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

XeF6 SHOULD ALSO NOT EXIST. The sheer amount of energy needed to oxidize a noble gas is unsettling to think about.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fluorine is so desperate for an electron that it can steal one from a noble gas. Takes 6 fluorine to pull it off tho. Gotta gang up on the nobles. Strength in numbers and all that…

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Clarification: fluoride chemistry is terrifying, FOOF is hand-designed by Satan His-Goddang-Self, but the idea of SOLID GODDAMNED MOTHERFUCKING OXYGEN is *horrifying*

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You malign Disco INFERNO (rage) ...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#9 In defense of Waititi's take, these people are effectively immortal unless very specifically murdered. A) After a while they've almost certainly experimented with every kind of sex, if only out of sheer boredom. B) Putting up with humans for a few centuries has GOT to be a mind-numbing experience.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#38 unless centaurs suddenly gained exoskeletons, among quite a few other things, they are not insects.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

An argument could be made that they are morphologically segmented, but they would still be distinctly mammalian.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#9 What the fuck??

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#7 um so i can count 41 distinct and can infer 43 by spacing, what does that make me? 🤔

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It means that this image isn't a reliable test as it's been saved and uploaded so many times to have artifacting and colour degradation, not to mention it highly depends on what screen you're viewing it on.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Good cuz I was going crazy thinking 54 is too many colors and I must be insane

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#7 damn. 34 maybe that explains a few things?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

hahahaha, well done. I didnt take it too seriously but this is very nice to read. Saved. Ta muchly

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#7 I feel like the color one is a setup to make people feel special. Does anyone not see at least 39 colors, who isn’t colorblind. By the way if you are colorblind how many colors do you see in it.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

nine, maybe ten hundred colors. your mom saw colors. shut up. leave me alone

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#7 uhh... How did I get 40

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Are you actually a bee?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I wish

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#3 Dr Irene Pepperberg is a physicist... and founder of the Avian Learning Experiment. ALEx was their first African Gray Parrot superstar and I think Gryphon is still making YouTube videos

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

lol I phrased it as if the parrot is uploading YT content. ho, he's just the research subject/charismatic star

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nononono, don't ruin the image of a parrot plugging in a camera USB cable with his beak and typing "Gryphon growls at toy" by hopping on the keyboard.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that IS a cute image hehehe

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a phd physicist but my ID badge at work says "Neurology". We get around!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#7

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#7 i've been over this several times and i see between 34 and 36 depending on how my eyes decide to focus

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#2 The party about the meaning of "Audio, video, disco" is completely true. The party about "disco inferno" is described as a "stretch" in the source linked below. Based on the explanation in the source, it almost seems like something that would be slang or a colloquialism if Latin was still spoken. https://lacommunarde.wordpress.com/2018/08/16/i-just-read-a-tumblr-post-that-says-in-latin/

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*part, not party. Stupid autocorrect.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a linguist (but not one with much experience in Latin so take with a grain of salt), I can confirm. I believe at best, "disco inferno" can translate "I learn; I suffer." and that's still a reach.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#7 oh internet science.... it could also mean that your monitor is able to display all of those colors, you don't have to have special eyes right away

3 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 2

There are four lights

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aziz, more light ! Then, there are five lights. Problem solved.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

or if the monitor is not able to, you could still have special vision without knowing...

3 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

I saw 32 colors on my secondary monitor, moved the image over to my primary monitor and saw 36. Definitely not an internet-compatible test.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Don't take this lame super power away from me! I am 39-Man!

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure this is just a trick to make me sit here counting 30-40 strips of annoying similar colors.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So am I being misinformed? On the i internet? Naah...

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

There's about 10 stripes I don't see that my husband sees, on the same screen. Doesn't mean whatever the pic says it does, but it's still fun to see the difference.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you aren't naturally tetrachromatic, store bought is fine.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I also saw 34 colours (there are supposed to be 39). I did a little bit of research to learn more about it and yeah... it's fake https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/people-4th-retinal-cone/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I see 34 even though I'm colorblind, so something's fucky here.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I am Colorblind. I see 5-7 different colors in ~20 different bands. Many are the same "color" just different shades. Everything from roughly the middle (where I see 2 bands of "white") to the left is some form of blue. Some I can see some variance in the bands, some are just wider bands of identical color. Then hits the "I can't tell if it's yellow, orange or light green" section that is about 30%. Then 3-4 bands of "not sure if green or brown", then the last 15% of "various shades of red"

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Allow me (to cite this person who actually did the work here): https://unreasonablydangerousonionrings.com/2015/03/03/you-are-not-a-tetrachromat-and-this-graphic-is-bullshit/

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

This was both educational and debunking of the bullshit. +1 good Imgurian, thank you on behalf of science.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks that was a random read

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

fantastic read - tldr only 2 women have ever been proved to be TETRACHROMATS, and it can't be tested without special equipment ( ie not a normal computer monitor )

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I saw 34 colors despite being a man. Only some women should be able to do that, according to the meme

3 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

I counted 34, then recounted and got 32.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I got up to 42... But like another person said, a man should not be able to be a Tetrachromat...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Strictly speaking, the genetics behind classical tetrachromacy require two different copies of a gene normally located on the X chromosome. There's various ways that could happen even for a man.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh, that’s actually interesting! >.>

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Turns out color detectrum, along with color, is also a spectrum!

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'm not correcting "detectrum" to "detection" and you can't make me.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’d make you go back to detecrum if you tried!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0