Jan 12, 2015 7:23 PM
Genetta
106
42
10
news
faux_news
demaniak
It is important to be consistent when dealing with the news.
loshea
cognitive dissonance
WWWWaltJJJJunior
They mean ground action. Everyone knows we've been bombing them from the air.
neverknownuthin
Omg breaking news: fox news doesn't give a shit about facts!
ButtersTheGreat13
Don't they know we are recording this?
DPHENS
youdontwantthesecards
*Faux News
neuHampster
It's pretty obvious they mean no ground offensive yet. I don't like fox either, but let's not stoop to their level to insult them.
DaveYanakov
If that's the case they need to say so rather than trying to weasel public opinion with misdirection
They certainly should, I think the ISIS situation has a lot of weaseling going on, from both sides of the aisle. I'm just saying let's not >
become fox to fight fox.
Also, the only one insulting FOX in this post is FOX. Calling them out on it isn't an insult
Yes, but knowing full well what the meaning is and choosing to interpret it in the worst way is not something rational people should do.
Here's the thing, it is not obvious to many people that they are talking about ground troops instead of military action in general >
and pointing out where they say one thing and also the complete opposite thing using the exact same words is entirely rational
It should be obvious to anyone who genuinely criticizes fox, rather than doing it because it is cool, that ground troops was their meaning.
demaniak
It is important to be consistent when dealing with the news.
loshea
cognitive dissonance
WWWWaltJJJJunior
They mean ground action. Everyone knows we've been bombing them from the air.
neverknownuthin
Omg breaking news: fox news doesn't give a shit about facts!
ButtersTheGreat13
Don't they know we are recording this?
DPHENS
youdontwantthesecards
*Faux News
neuHampster
It's pretty obvious they mean no ground offensive yet. I don't like fox either, but let's not stoop to their level to insult them.
DaveYanakov
If that's the case they need to say so rather than trying to weasel public opinion with misdirection
neuHampster
They certainly should, I think the ISIS situation has a lot of weaseling going on, from both sides of the aisle. I'm just saying let's not >
neuHampster
become fox to fight fox.
DaveYanakov
Also, the only one insulting FOX in this post is FOX. Calling them out on it isn't an insult
neuHampster
Yes, but knowing full well what the meaning is and choosing to interpret it in the worst way is not something rational people should do.
DaveYanakov
Here's the thing, it is not obvious to many people that they are talking about ground troops instead of military action in general >
DaveYanakov
and pointing out where they say one thing and also the complete opposite thing using the exact same words is entirely rational
neuHampster
It should be obvious to anyone who genuinely criticizes fox, rather than doing it because it is cool, that ground troops was their meaning.