Aug 8, 2019 10:50 AM
BeanMugged
818
44
14
A quick duckduckgo search: https://nypost.com/2019/07/08/feds-found-vast-trove-of-nude-photos-in-jeffrey-epsteins-safe/
https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2019/07/12/report-theres-steel-safe-epsteins-pedophile-island-no-ones-allowed-enter-room-contains/
UnriskyBusiness
Link to relevant news source otherwise, you're not helping.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/evidence-against-financier-epstein-is-growing-federal-prosecutors-say
ShitpostsAndLotsOfThem
alwaysupvoteprincessbride
there's like a couple of facts in here and then a bunch of 'smart money' bets and suppositions
totallyspambox
v
AttorneyAtBirdLaw
For a “current list of facts” that sure is a long list of “possibilities.”
AvgWhiteShark
They'll keep him out of site till everyone has forgotten and moved on.
Or they'll kill him so..... Oh, wait - shit.
I am shocked to the core.
Melondwarf
Just as a dilligent source-checker, is there a source to these facts other than facebook? I don't want to sit around quoting a facebook post
cyberjazz
Start here https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/evidence-against-financier-epstein-is-growing-federal-prosecutors-say
Cool, thanks. Now we're cooking with fire
IsaacNuetron
As a dilgenct source checker, I'm sure you aren't passive and have other ways.....
I always go by the standpoint that the person making the claims should supply the source
As it should be. If you’re making a claim, it’s up to you to provide your sources, not others to prove you right/wrong.
Hey. Guess I was wrong, huh.
It's a tedious game. You've bagged the initial "source" (understandably). Rather than needing to dismiss subsequent sources in wack-a-mole >
run around, if you still have doubts, and are keen, you need to look yourself. It's not like it's an obscure claim that 20 seconds on a >
search engine would unearth. So spare yourself the agro, and do it yourself. It's not rocket surgery.
BeanMugged
A quick duckduckgo search: https://nypost.com/2019/07/08/feds-found-vast-trove-of-nude-photos-in-jeffrey-epsteins-safe/
BeanMugged
https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2019/07/12/report-theres-steel-safe-epsteins-pedophile-island-no-ones-allowed-enter-room-contains/
UnriskyBusiness
Link to relevant news source otherwise, you're not helping.
BeanMugged
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/evidence-against-financier-epstein-is-growing-federal-prosecutors-say
ShitpostsAndLotsOfThem
alwaysupvoteprincessbride
there's like a couple of facts in here and then a bunch of 'smart money' bets and suppositions
totallyspambox
AttorneyAtBirdLaw
For a “current list of facts” that sure is a long list of “possibilities.”
AvgWhiteShark
They'll keep him out of site till everyone has forgotten and moved on.
BeanMugged
Or they'll kill him so..... Oh, wait - shit.
AvgWhiteShark
Melondwarf
Just as a dilligent source-checker, is there a source to these facts other than facebook? I don't want to sit around quoting a facebook post
cyberjazz
Start here https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/evidence-against-financier-epstein-is-growing-federal-prosecutors-say
Melondwarf
Cool, thanks. Now we're cooking with fire
IsaacNuetron
As a dilgenct source checker, I'm sure you aren't passive and have other ways.....
Melondwarf
I always go by the standpoint that the person making the claims should supply the source
totallyspambox
As it should be. If you’re making a claim, it’s up to you to provide your sources, not others to prove you right/wrong.
BeanMugged
Hey. Guess I was wrong, huh.
IsaacNuetron
It's a tedious game. You've bagged the initial "source" (understandably). Rather than needing to dismiss subsequent sources in wack-a-mole >
IsaacNuetron
run around, if you still have doubts, and are keen, you need to look yourself. It's not like it's an obscure claim that 20 seconds on a >
IsaacNuetron
search engine would unearth. So spare yourself the agro, and do it yourself. It's not rocket surgery.