I like facts....

Apr 30, 2013 2:36 PM

I like facts....

Yes, I'm sure the only reason Honduras has more crime than Switzerland is because the Swiss own more guns.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Polled felons don't have horns.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Do a study on Australia, that will fuck your numbers!

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

what about uses for funsies? I like to go up to a shooting range for target practice. Not self defense, not murder, just fun.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, most people forget that your right to own a firearm might include other such pursuits besides violence on one another.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how silly of them!

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

pffft republicnas

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

You should check my username...

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Downvoted cause you can't read....very mature

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bad Title: I should have said something like, I like debatable statistics that cause overly emotional reactions in mass groups. Apologies.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Comparing homicide rates with Honduras and Ivory Coast doesn't really say much. Thats like saying we're freer than N.Korea.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Australia set very strict gun ownership laws and now experiences next to no gun violence. Conveniently omitted from this "study."

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Case and point that stats can prove anything http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22275280

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

In Australia, annual homicides by any means total

2010: 217
2009: 261
2008: 251

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Post percentages, not actual numbers. THEN we'll compare notes.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Follow the link

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So per 100,000 people, the UK is more violent. Doesn't surprise me. Go to any town centre in the UK on a Friday and Saturday night, 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and you will see lots of violence, mostly drunk people. 2/2

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you put it like that, the argument of "let's give them all guns" seems a lot less like a good idea.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

keep your guns, ill buy popcorn for your next mass shooting

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

That's a poor statement considering the average number of deaths per mass shooting where armed, law abiding citizens are involved

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sweet post, lots of good facts with sources. Too bad the libs on imgur are going to downvote it into oblivion. Not so open minded, haha

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Research and critical evaluation makes much of this chart dubious. Comparing us to the Ivory Coast, for example, and omitting Australia.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sorry, mind closed due to overstuffed with fact.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being the LiberalInTX...I am receiving an inordinate amount of flack for this...

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol, no. Guess again.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um...what? This literally makes no sense. Guess what again, my username?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oy, you're a dumb one, arntchya. You're not getting flack for being liberal, you're getting flack for this completely bias infograph.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

FUCK YOU. You're word choice (we call that diction) in your response made no sense. I can't jump up your ass and read your mind.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe next time try putting an entire thought down instead of some half-assed insult.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Down voting doesn't make it less true.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Nope, but it does mean more people doubt it's true.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You may want to look into what a "violent crime" is here in the UK . We cover far more, which makes direct comparison totally useless.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Really? I was not aware of this. What are some of differences? Serious question, here.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We record *any* crime against a person as a violent crime. I could pick your pocket without you feeling it, and it's a violent crime.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Really!? I can see how that would skew things. Any justification for that, or just the way it is done there? +1 for the knowledge.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How figures are recorded are more about government being able to twist them than being used for anything useful. Same with any statistics.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hate when people downvote reason....

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a valid point of contention.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

+1 for well-researched arguments about a serious issue.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Aside from the bit with the highest murder rate vs highest gun ownership. Those stats are just bad.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The general correlation there wasn't really a focal point. They focused a bit better shortly after on comparing European states.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US vs UK bit was far more helpful.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shirley, you can't be serious. This is misleading as balls.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Also, don't call him Shirley. ;) Sorry, had to point out the LN refernece.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*reference...just, wow

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're stats to prove a point- OP admits that. I genuinely haven't seen anything as well sourced from the other side of the debate.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The bit comparing the top 4 countries for gun ownership and homicide rates was ridiculously pointless. There are FAR too many variables.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I specifically called out that bit for being crap because it was. The rest was good.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have specifically agreed with Studoku about that point, elsewhere. It is a broad rebuttal to the "guns increase violence" argument.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You also cite John Lott multiple times, who has been discredited multiple times as a researcher.

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

This is not my study so I can't say for sure, but reviewing the sources I don't see that name anywhere....

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Source 12. Also anything that says more guns=less crime

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, the more guns=less crime bit came from a Harvard Law Journal study, I don't know if Lott was involved, but I'll check it out

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Found it...that study is officially reference 1 time and I will look into this guy and his validity. Thanks for pointing it out. +1

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In the years since the Vietnam war more Americans have been killed from gun violence than in all our wars combined.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Source? Also, is population a consideration in that?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Where does it say that?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm willing to bet more Americans have been killed in car accidents too. Should we ban cars?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So if you can't eliminate all deaths, why bother trying to eliminate any?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, what I think we should do is moderate who can drive a car and have strict laws on how to drive them. Oh... wait...

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like America does with guns.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The regulations on guns are laughable, don't kid yourself.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

more people drive than own guns.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

His argument is to increase the amount of guns and decrease crime. If you increase cars, more people die. You cannot compare the two

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That is not my argument, or the argument of this post. It is that gun ownership is not directly responsible for increases in crime

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

gun violence, or gun deaths? because around 2/3rds of gun deaths are from suicide, which should not be counted as gun violence IMO.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/3rds of homicides are committed by guns

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes, but people love throwing out the 30-40K number, which is only deaths, and is 2/3rds suicides

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

you are absolutely correct

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How many of those are suicides? Homicide is a pretty broad term...

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Killing of a human being by another human being. Thats the difference between homicide and suicide.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok, that was a dumbass statement by me. I retract that.... I should know better. Maybe got caught up in being blasted by so many at once

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why don't you add some Australia statistics?

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Because quoting statistics from Australia is just as biased as the statistics up top.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

part 1 of 3 (rest after vid) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pOiOhxujsE

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why don't you? This isn't my study, but is all cited at the bottom...refute it if you can.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You realize I have already posted a study showing violent personal crimes (assault, rape, robbery) have gone up in that same time, right?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That doesn't prove correlation. Regardless, fewer guns = fewer homicides. That challenges your original thesis.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The post is about gun ownership and violent crime...not just homicide. My thesis is that gun ownership does not increase violent crime.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What it does say though, is that criminals are more likely to offend if they know you are unarmed. What % of all crime in Australia (1)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does homicide make up? Also, this study says gun deaths, which include suicide. That is a big difference when talking about crime rates

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Statistics are not facts. Take a college level stats class and you will realize that. #s can be made to say anything you want.

13 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Heck, even my High School statistics class taught me that.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

no they are not, but they often indicate trends. it seems like you are being intentionally dense here

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

My point is that you can present these statistics, and I can present that of UK, ZAus, NZ where there are virtually no guns. Low Crime Rates

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I'd like to see the stats on ALL violent crime from those countries, not just homicide.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They classify dif things as violent crime than here in America. Here attacks against another person physically (assault, battery) 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are violent, there anything that is a crime against another person, physical or not can sometimes be classed as a violent one.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, so I have an MA in Security, a BA in Political Science, and a BS in Criminal Justice....basically, FUCK YOU

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

*Security Studies

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Since when does having ANY of THOSE degrees make you an expert in Stats? I did not say anything about your background, I simply said 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What do you think Social Scientist do? It is literally all stats

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

that statistics lie. Not just your stats, but all stat.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, you said take a college class. I literally have compiled stats just like this before.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Then you would know that stats can be made to say really whatever the person wants them to say.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If that is your goal, yes. But as someone who looks for truth, that is NEVER my goal. Some of these comparisons are not the best. (1)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But others, say Police vs Armed citizens (in America) are very telling.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0