Heard you like facts...?

Jan 11, 2013 9:36 PM

titsandbeer

Views

40430

Likes

5319

Dislikes

76

No jokes. Pretty eye opening, actually. Thanks, OP.

13 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 2

I am the 7%

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I hope that the one guy with AIDS, the lonely guy in Australia , and the starving guy aren't all the same person :c

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Forever Alone Level: Australia

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Only 7% of the world's population have computers? Hogwash! Another report says 75% has cell phones, of which 40% are smart phones.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In this world of 100, I don't want to play unless I can choose which people I can be.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The starvation thing worries me :(

13 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Yes, it ought to. Big problem.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Asians"? Indian (south Asian) are more related to European ("Caucasian") than to East Asian. And South East Asia again is quite different.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Look, I'm not an idiot, I know how percentages work.

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

With my luck I would be one of the people who have a computer, but doesn't have electricity.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

48/52 are men.... 48/52 can't speak, act according to their faith or conscience...

13 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 10

Those 48 are married

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I came down to post it, since that was the first connection I made. xD Beat me to it!

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The only options for gender are male and female? I'm so triggered right now.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

52% women? I like those odds...

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's actually kind of depressing for me.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

TIL Russians are Asian.

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

No, they're Eurasian.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

argh. This map is oversimplified.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

technically they are caucasian.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you're silly: how much of Siberia's in Europe?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

lolwut?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(Siberia is like 80% of Russia)

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Overweight doesn't necessarily mean that the person has a lot of food, they may not have food always available and eat the wrong ones.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

TIL percentage is looking at things like in a 100 person village

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Feeling grateful for my college education.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All those people without Internet...without Imgur ;_;

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Really hits you hard, until you think about statistical accuracy...

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 out of 4 people are bad with math. I'm definitely one of those 5.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm the other.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

TIL Oceanians went to college and have HIV

13 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 2

And with the mindset of a small village, would likely be hunted down with pitchforks/torches.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

AND are dying of starvation.

13 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Tomorrow's lesson, interpreting statistics =)

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

7 have computers, none of which are macs

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

The White/Non-White thing is stupid. Because, if you actually went scientifically, there would be three; Caucasians, Mongoloids, Negroids.

13 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 21

Exactly. This looks like it's only from one perspective. "People who look like me, and those who don't."

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And now I have a Devo song in my head.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think this whole chart is problematic. It compartmentalizes the variety of people in the world!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

13 years ago (deleted Jan 10, 2015 11:50 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

even if you would divide human kind into 2 different groups, you'd have 1 group with only blacks and one with blacks, whites, asians,.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The white/Non-white thing is stupid fullstop. It seems to suggest "White" is the only race worthy of note.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is only one race. The human race. And we display an infinite variety of melanin content.

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Race is more than melanin. Skeletal differences can be used to determine race & these terms are still used in anthropology, esp. forensic.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And in that event, there wou;d be more Mongoloids than Caucasians or Negroids. People need to change their social conceptions.

13 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

if it went by population it would be mongoloids,caucasians,negroids.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Yerp.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Also, race is a social construct, not a scientific one. Outdated scientific terms are irrelevant.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You know those terms are antiquated right? Just as a rule of thumb, anything with the prefix, "Neg" is an obvious no go.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

The prefix "neg" has nothing to do with race/color/racism. Apparently you just decided it did.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

What subject of science do you study? The terms mentioned are not used today, that was my point.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You made two points. The first is correct, the second is not. If I showed you a can of beans labeled "frijoles negros," would you be upset?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, that is different. I only have 140 characters to express my thoughts. The negro point is english only, more specifically usage in the US

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The negr- prefix comes from Latin and was never intended as derogatory. The "neg" prefix is used in the scientific names of many species.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

As a Latin scholar, I don't know why this was downvoted.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because people are more concerned with appearances than facts. =P

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually, if it were truly scientific, they wouldn't be in any of those.

13 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Did you know that Indians (the ones from India) are also Caucasians, despite their darker skin tone?

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The current concept of race doesn't make any sense. Typically, it's just used as a surrogate for skin color.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ayran...Iran anyone?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you went by race it would be Human/Not human. Which is how it should be.

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

But that's not race, that's going by species. It's okay to point out the differences in people, as long as it's not malicious.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Race is a made up social construct. We are all humans and we are all the same species/race. There is no biological/genetic difference.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

True, but some people like to be a part of that racial group though. Like I said, race and ethnicity don't have to be bad things.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um...there are actually quite a few differences, both biological and genetic, between races. A little research would serve you well.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

2/2 Biological races like Negroid and Caucasoid simply do not exist.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

[D]espite the prevalent belief in biological races, overwhelming evidence proves that race is not biological. 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

http://academic.udayton.edu/race/01race/race.htm first paragraph of first result on google.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I've been seeing a lot about this on Imgur lately... Its almost like we're supposed to feel guilty for being white? (If you're white)

13 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

I never thought I'd say this sentence, but, I agree with you TittySacks.

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

That's not at all what I was talking about. But I do (sort of) agree with you.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

First time I've seen that here. But as a white person, I thought the white+black only graph was lacking.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

*White+Non-White

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

looks like math. white+non-white = non

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd think it puts it more in perspective: we white people aren't as important as we may think.

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

That was the dumbest shit I have ever heard. Nobody in this thread said anything about white people being more important than anyone.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

That feelings of guilt is what racism feels like for non white citizens. As a white male, you should reflect on social reality, not guilt.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

This is nothing like that. Not at all. I have no clue how you came to that conclusion, and apparently neither does anyone else.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Yes, if you feel guilty it is because you don't understand. Just because something is downvoted does not make it true or false.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stop projecting. I've got all the "good stuff" in the stats (college grad, food, elec, HIV neg, freedom etc) & I'm a black, African female.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't feel guilty about it. I haven't seen white guilt posts on Imgur, just Rent-a-nigger, Tyrone & that American chicken/melon nonsense.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm not sure what you mean by "projecting", but good for you! I don't really care what race or gender you are, which was my original point..

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I hate those words. Caucasian implies the Caucasus Mtns, and I'm from nothing like the Caucasus Mtns. My ancestors are Irish, not Russian.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yes, but the Irish and Russians share a common ancestral group that came from, yep, the Caucasus Mountains. ;)

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

1) Well, if we're talking about common ancestry, we're all fucking Mesopotamians. It's silly to decide we're going to go with

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) the Caucasus when the Fertile Crescent is more historically important. Why do we care about people in SW Russia when we have Egypt and

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3) the Sumerians?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For argument's sake, they were somewhere else before that. What makes that location so special?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It marks a differentiation point. It's partially arbitrary but more or less accurate, though imprecise.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The education thing hit me pretty hard. I don't think I'll skip a class ever again...

13 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This would be quite the village, that's for sure.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"__ haven't" ... The statistic hit deep, but this odd grammar is getting to me :(

13 years ago | Likes 229 Dislikes 18

Ever heard anyone say, "I haven't a clue"? Now it's "I haven't a computer."

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I took it as darkly optimistic. Like they havent. Yet. But if it said dont, it seems more definite like they will not

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you. I like this take. This kind of hope is enough to make a difference.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have got/ haven't got

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"_ don't"?

13 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Technically it's grammatically solid-- however antiquated it may sound. A minor difference between UK (et al) and US English.

13 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

76 have electricity, 24 haven't. It's not that hard to grasp tbh.

13 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

no, I understand exactly what its trying to say, but it takes an extra second to read through that part.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm just glad I haven't the only one.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was also stuck on that for a while.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think it was a joke, because they don't have an education.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I could be wrong, but I think that's just a more Britishy way to go about it. I would have said "don't," but "haven't" makes sense too.

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

'Cept with only 100 people you could teach the others to read and share your food pretty quick

13 years ago | Likes 1009 Dislikes 21

Exactly. Maybe should try to be self-reliant and operate as such, and then we'll all be fed.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yea well if there were 100 people 6 of them would own 50% of the currency.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If we all pitched in, it would take a lot less from each and even less time. Its those that refuse to part with their uneccissary riches.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Common sense FTW!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not if their resources where limited, then they would make a caste system or similar to explain why someone is worth more than others.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yeah, until they start breeding.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So let's do it.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nah everyone is too selfish. thats why poverty still exists

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

so why don't we do it now????

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Hate to be the smartass, but the world is not a village of 100 people and the comparison breaks down once you try to extrapolate it further.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A much better idea would be to render the earth as 100 villages of 100 people, then indicate where in the world these people would be 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 and which percentages of the population would occupy each. I imagine the village representing north america would be pretty fatty, etc.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We could easily feed everyone in the world, if we wanted to.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

we have enough food. the problem is distributing it.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who is we? The corporate world certainly doesn't want to do that.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

giving food to billions is different than giving food to that one guy down the street, that was my joke

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And everyone would eventually get HIV

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or spread HIV to a friend.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like how 1 of the reasons the 48 can't speak is death... that's surely not 100 people then?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Threat of death is what they're getting at.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...and a little banishment would render HIV non existent!

13 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 5

or that person could start spreading HIV and it wouldnt take too long to get maybe 1/4 of the people to have it :P

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Or just a little bit of not having sex without protection and being a bit more careful with them getting hurt and shit.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SO THAT'S AGAINST THE RULES AND YOU CAN'T SIT WITH US!!!!

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The amount of hate on here for HIV+ people saddens me. You're living in the fear of the past.

13 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 6

bullfuckingshit. there is no hate for HIV people on imgur.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Just so you know, my comment was entirely facetious. But there is definitely a bad stigma with HIV because it is scary.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I take it back, skeetersteve has convinced me.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't get us wrong, we're not saying they're bad people. We're just not so open-minded to getting it ourselves.

13 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Then don't have unprotected sex. The person doesn't have to be banished.

13 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Actually, yeah, they would. If the entire world were condensed to 100 people, banishing the one person with HIV would wipe out HIV forever.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

or just simply kill the HIV person...

13 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 7

With only one college degree, it is less than likely that one would be a doctor. They would probably die.

13 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

32 upvotes for a joke about killing someone for being HIV+? Imgur...

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Yay! Eugenics!

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or just don't sex him and if he bleeds he better bandages himself.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

too bad we can't do this in the real world...

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 14

Cuba has an HIV sanatorium where they exile HIV+ folks.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Despite the way I feel about communism, Cuba seems to have its shit together when it comes to the health of its citizens.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

You... are a bad human being.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trollalarm

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exiling people with HIV is having your shit together?

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

...yeah cause that worked so well with the lepers

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would be a king in that hypothetical village.

13 years ago | Likes 214 Dislikes 8

Long live the king.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everything the light touches belongs to you?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have a college education. I AM THE ONE PERCENT.

13 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Me too! Would you like to add a salad to your meal?

13 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No thanks. A glass of red, good ser?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I might assassinate you for that position. Just sayin'.

13 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Why not THE king?!

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I didn't know "non-whites" was a skin color. Or even a race, or culture, or anything really.

13 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 9

It's one of the two categories of laundry.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

This was my comment until I read that you posted it first.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Simply put there are just too many different races to mention. If non-black had been used people would still moan.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

White is a pretty distinct race.. non-whites all have the same hair/eye colour, and there are many variations, but it could say Asian/Black.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

ridiculous and not true at all. you cant tell me that Chinese people look like West Africans who are identical to peruvians.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No but they look more alike than white people does to ANY other race, and you can't deny that. White people have unique hair and eyes

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So do other ethnicities, the differences are just more subtle, and we aren't used to looking for them.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My point is that when a crowd of people all have black hair and eyes they look a lot more alike than a crowd with all shades of colours..

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

White people are the only people who matter. Didn't you get the memo?

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

well technically there are only different nuances of black and white

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Not really. There are different base skin tones that completely change a person's appearance, and even what colours they can wear. For (1/2)

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

example, ethnic Italians tend to have an olive undertone, whereas ethnic "white", or northwestern Europeans, tend to have a peach tone.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? You're saying "white" is a diverse group? No, that can't be. That goes against anything the US government has ever taught me.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fact, I know some Mediterranean types who /don't consider themselves white at all/.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I said technically, it's all about how many black pigments you produce, you don't produce olive pigments. every one of us is a little black

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel bad for that 1 guy out of 100 with HIV, where did he get it?

13 years ago | Likes 1286 Dislikes 13

a monkey

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

He won't be alone for long

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

totally born with it

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I guess you will find my comment rude but if there is one who has in such a small community it will spread FAST!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Directions unclear, dick stuck in monkey.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Your mom.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

TIL: Bad Luck Brian lives in that village.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

From the same source where the real first person with HIV has got it

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was "please be it, please be it". I<3U

13 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Monkey brains!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there used to be more than 100 people in the world, but this guy kept giving everyone else aids, you see, he is only a carrier

13 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

damnit steve

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

sex with animals

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck yea! I'm the 1%.

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

FINALLY!

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

monkeys.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He/she is a good guy though, doesn't give anybody AIDS

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

actually odds are it was a girl... jus sayin

13 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 11

agreed, if sexual transmission, being the only person it's more likely patient 0 scenario - killed gorrilla as busmeat exposed to mutant SIV

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and lives in australia, alone,the poor thing

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Whyso? Are women more likely to eat bushmeat than men?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no...there are just more women in the village than men

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i also feel bad for the 99 people he could give it to

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The monkey! http://gifb.in/NvsV

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Freddie Mercury

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Australia oc.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

he started it

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Simple. Obama.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I dunno, but we can rid the world of HIV pretty quickly now.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Knobbing a monkey

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't know... but kill him... kill him quick!

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

The unfortunate effects of viral mutation and evolution.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Government

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From a monkey?

13 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 7

Yupp. From a bone marrow transplant. Baboon to human.

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

+1 for Oceanian instead of Australian! Geography FTW!

13 years ago | Likes 1021 Dislikes 20

Oceania is like Australasia: Vague and meaningless. It's not official. No one knows what it includes and it may as well not exist at all.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Geography? I think you mean Geopolitics.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Has anyone else thought how would s/he breed? xD

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I like that term, oceanian, it almost sounds mythical :)

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, fer sure! We were just talking about this tonight too!

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fuck yea! Statistics, Bitch!

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Found on random, have to say, I'm Indonesian and I can't tell if I count as Oceanian or Asian

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is still not universally agreed whether the continent is Australasia or Ocenia.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So... if Oceanian = Australian, where do Polynesians fit?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Polynesia.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oceanian does not equal Australian. Oceania is the entire region, in which Australia is just one country. Polynesia fits too.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good. It made me sad that someone said it like that. .___.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apparently it depends on who is describing Oceania. Generally it's Australia, New Zealand and all South Pacific nations.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

kiwi.

13 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I upvote this so I'll look smart -truth is, the closest I came to knowing abt this is from the show LOST, because the airline name: Oceanic.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

At least you're honest. I reward your honesty with upvote.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the first time I've ever heard this word and I'm 31. Hooray for America.

13 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

I heard that word for the first time when I was 10. Hooray for America. Goddamn 'murrika teach everyone the same shit already

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In America, there are only two countries. 'murika and Not'murika.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Teach everyone RELEVANT shit already. Even the relevant stuff is taught in such a way as to make it as irrelevant as possible. And I'm (1/2)

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

from Canada. We've (apparently) got a better education system than you. (2/2)

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well I'm from New Zealand and I learnt it as 'Australasia' but Oceania works too...

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why did I learn it as Australasia? not Ausiealiens...

13 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

That's another geopolitical term. Geopolitics is the branch which considers Europe and Asia separate continents but not Antarctica.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 for Ausie+aliens XD

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Kiwi's FTW

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

*Kiwis

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I met a buff New Zealander on the train one time with an American friend. I called him a Kiwi. My friend said, "Did you call him a fruit?"

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Haha did you know that they are named after a flightless bird?!

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did. My American friend did not.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Americans knowledge of other countries is laughable at times.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0