Let the monarchy die with the queen!

Sep 9, 2022 12:03 AM

dasklaus

Views

2469

Likes

87

Dislikes

17

I know people are grieving and I'm not begrudging anyone that - for all that she represented an antiquated institution, she was a remarkable woman. But there's not really a reason to keep it going without her, is there?

The quote is from James Connolly, Irish republican, socialist and trade union leader, about King George V, and embodies my feelings about monarchy well.
See the rest of the quote here: https://www.marxists.org/archive/connolly/1911/xx/visitkng.htm

the_queen_is_dead

long_live_everybody

current_events

queen_elizabeth

/a/iP8wRq9

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is really well put.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The opposition to UK royals seems to have stronger options on this than the DK ones. But UK royals seem less chill than the DK royals.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

here's the thing the royal family by law owns a lot of land that they basically rent to Brittan. giving it back would bankrupt the nation

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

How so?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

/a/iP8wRq9

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

the royal family owns about 1 percent of English soil. including famous landmarks like big Ben that they rent to England for very little1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 if England stopped renting these landmarks from the crown then your talking about a lost revenue in the billions over a 10 yer span

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, if England stopped paying rent for these lands it would bankrupt them? What?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The King/queen at this point are basically a fancy mascot, and one that is supported by an easy majority of the UK's citizens. If they want

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Fancy mascots that got wealth from brutilizing entire nations, starving millions out of spite, slavery, and all kind of other fun stuff.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

I mean most wealthy families are like that.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Not to the same level. Her family has had generations of awful.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This feels like a conflation of everything the British govt has done with the monarchy. The monarchy's been subordinate to parliament for a

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Long time. But yes, they've historically done bad things. It's still the UK citizenry who gets to decide whether to keep them or not.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The whole commonwealth, actually. And, okay, I don't get a say, sure, but tons of people on imgur do. UK citizens are on the internet, too!

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Sure, they are, but broadly the monarchy is more popular in the UK than any president in the US has been.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To keep it, that's their business.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

How is it only “their” business?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Usually the affairs of countries are determined by its own citizens, no? If you're telling me I get to pick heads of states for other

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Countries, hot damn! Never have to worry about Trump getting elected again. And I'll send Putin packing too.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, I misread your comment.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dyslexia gets my toof in my mouth again… I thought you meant that it was only the Royal family’s business.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0