TheOneFreiman
1547
43
8
I'd bet the graphics would be better, though.
Oct 5, 2017 2:02 AM
TheOneFreiman
1547
43
8
I'd bet the graphics would be better, though.
Whitebromyalgia
Pretty much.
Moose1991
ThesePipesAreClean
AddictiveTendancies
Then It'd be exactly how the crazy far right Evangelical base wanted it when they voted Trump yaayyyy https://youtu.be/7PLIWZj5Buk
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
bloatedplutocrat
You think people don't know a well known thing? Didn't realize you had an imgur account as well Mr. President, thought you were twitter only
[deleted]
[deleted]
bloatedplutocrat
TIL comparing a statement commonly used by one person to another is attacking them. Neat!
bloatedplutocrat
Given China's reaction to having multiple incoming ICBM's towards them I think the simulation would be more:
TheOneFreiman
The point here is best Korea firing at a US city, even though failing at it. China wouldn't defend them if they did that.
bloatedplutocrat
So they'll be ok w/ the fallout of several nuclear tipped ICBM's which will drift into their country & water
justherefortheshitposting
China will 100% retaliate if we start nuking the Korean peninsula. For the same reason we would if someone dropped nukes next door to us.
justherefortheshitposting
The U.S. plan for renewed war between the Koreas has always hinged on S. K. holding on long enough for a conventional expeditionary force.
justanothercarmechanic
Not to be "that guy" but it's not quite that simple they have a few thousand missiles pointed at Seoul, with God knows what in the warhead 1
bippityboppitybuttsex
Actually is the 10,000+ tubes of artillery in range of Seoul, at a slow rate of fire (1 RPM), Soeul is rubble in less than an hour.
justanothercarmechanic
Some of which they could fire off killing tons of people in s Korea. Plus we don't want to kill a bunch of thier civvies either
sweetfeetpete
They would be able to cause massive casualties in Seoul just with mortars
TheOneFreiman
I think for this specific reason is why Obama started programs to make some of our nukes smaller. More precise, still very destructive.
justherefortheshitposting
That does fuck-all to stop DPRK artillery from killing millions of South Koreans before our response arrives.
DoubleSunMoonMoon
Very true. But still, a more appropriate kind of nuke for a world where everyone is hiding their guns among their civvies.