Sep 17, 2015 1:11 PM
SaveTheBlobFish
62
88
19
the_more_you_know
BluBoxx
What if I told you the Earth being 4.5 billion years old isn't a belief, it's empirical fact based on reproducible observations & analysis..
hatbeard
so do you believe the bible is allegorical not literal?
DroppinBombsOnYourMoms
The Bible was written by men, inspired by God. Perhaps what a day is to God is quite different than what we consider/define as being a day.
Janlando
Some parts are to be taken literally others not so. Depends on the context.
AlexDuos
The church actually founded some of the first universities and heavily encouraged scientific endeavors. The young earth thing is fairly new.
HecallsmePunkinator
Then I would say you are not a Fundamentalist.
ExtremistSatire
*shhhh* this is OP remember. he'd gut his own child for an upvote
OccasionallyResortingToSarcasm
Evolution is not incompatible with Christianity. The method of creation is never defined. There are a lot of scientists who are Christians
IgnisAurumProbat
Evolution isn't bio-genesis. Two different things and AFAIK neither is incompatible with the Christian creation myth.
Cambino
So you're not a Young Earth Creationist and you fall under another part of the massive umbrella of Christianity. k. Why make a post about it
Cryolith
No one is saying you can't be. Believe what you will. Just don't expect everyone else to take you seriously.
thrillerellirht
I don't believe you because all Christians are the same.
killermenpl
So basically you are not from USA? Atl east mentally
HomelingRazor
There are dozens of us!
HashtagDadJokes
Multiple floods, people.
HankTheCat
BLASPHEMY...
HowCanIJoinTheEvilLeagueOfEvil
Bold move Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
Halfwrong
What i never understand is why people assume an omnipotent being can't create something that already has a history
JadawinUK
Yes, a benevolent God creates fake things to fool the people he supposedly loves. Sure.
But then again, humans were so bad, he sent his son to be killed, so he can forgive us....
melwil
Last thursdayism.
Oh excellent, i didn't know that line of thinking already had a name
Hehe, the more you know! Vsauce has a nice video on this subject; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2jkV4BsN6U
MASTER0Fimgur
I would call you a liar, as the bible says that god made the world in 6 days. Or do you only believe the parts that work well for you?
jonnyroquette
I see you skimmed the first few pages, read the rest of it and maybe you'll get a better understanding.
I know your bible better than you do, more than likely. Perhaps you should make a timeline, or science a bit.
lol, no valid arguments, just downvotes. Blind faith is amazing.
I was taught that the words were originally "generation days" or time periods
Agree. Days were not meant as 24 hour period, but epoch of time.
by that scenario, he is still resting, as man has been on the earth less than 1/100th of the earths age (being generous here).
That being the case, he was still resting when all the events of the bible happened.
that was what I heard when I was in the church. all the time. multiple denominations. not that I am an authority of any kind
and this makes sense to you?
dooky710
Atheist here. The big bang actually came from a catholic priest - Monseigneur Georges LemaƮtre. There can be room for both.
Yes, but he kept cosmology and his beliefs seperated.
kharybdis
Yes!
halfpriceoilchange
The big bang came from my GF last night .
PristinePompousPoo
You killed her?
Crested10
Lets hope there's room for more than those two cause I ain't buying either Divine beings or Big Bang Theory.
Yeah, it will be thousands of years before we are capable of understanding the very basic principles of the paradox which is our existence.
ilartalot
Thank you for being someone that makes fellow atheists look less grouchy. Believing in your own truth doesn't mean demeaning others! Rock on
I don't believe in god, but was raise catholic. I think they provided good morals and I don't need the threat of hell to be a good person.
That's exactly how I feel. It's like fairy tales - they are a good basis on how not to be an asshole, but they're fantasy.
LeMaitre wasn't "a priest". He was Ph.D Astronomer, who also was an ordained priest.... there is a real and serious difference.
so whats the difference? I thought ordination made someone a priest which - to me - symbolizes a strong faith in god.
The difference is that scientists who are actually scientists (such as LeMaitre) do science in absentia of god and religion. He didn't 1/?
scientists who are religious operate, they seperate their science from their religion. Steven J. Gould reffered to this as stemming from 3/?
consult the bible to discover the big bang, he used a telescope and scientific method and never once cited the bible. This is how all 2/?
religion and science occupying non-overlapping "magesteria" 4/4
I dont understand how someone can do that. On one hand, you believe god created everything and in the other, big bang. It seems like 1/?
those are different ideas of how the universe was created. Being a priest, I think he'd put some more weight in the god stuff. 2/2
is not theology 3/3
Sorry you don't understand. Read Gould's books (they're really good). Also it's how it must be done. The biblical account of the universe 1/
is wholly incompatible with the observed one; which is why the bible is neither history nor science (it's only theology) and why science 2/
BluBoxx
What if I told you the Earth being 4.5 billion years old isn't a belief, it's empirical fact based on reproducible observations & analysis..
hatbeard
so do you believe the bible is allegorical not literal?
DroppinBombsOnYourMoms
The Bible was written by men, inspired by God. Perhaps what a day is to God is quite different than what we consider/define as being a day.
Janlando
Some parts are to be taken literally others not so. Depends on the context.
AlexDuos
The church actually founded some of the first universities and heavily encouraged scientific endeavors. The young earth thing is fairly new.
HecallsmePunkinator
Then I would say you are not a Fundamentalist.
ExtremistSatire
*shhhh* this is OP remember. he'd gut his own child for an upvote
OccasionallyResortingToSarcasm
Evolution is not incompatible with Christianity. The method of creation is never defined. There are a lot of scientists who are Christians
IgnisAurumProbat
Evolution isn't bio-genesis. Two different things and AFAIK neither is incompatible with the Christian creation myth.
Cambino
So you're not a Young Earth Creationist and you fall under another part of the massive umbrella of Christianity. k. Why make a post about it
Cryolith
No one is saying you can't be. Believe what you will. Just don't expect everyone else to take you seriously.
thrillerellirht
I don't believe you because all Christians are the same.
killermenpl
So basically you are not from USA? Atl east mentally
HomelingRazor
There are dozens of us!
HashtagDadJokes
Multiple floods, people.
HankTheCat
BLASPHEMY...
HowCanIJoinTheEvilLeagueOfEvil
Bold move Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
Halfwrong
What i never understand is why people assume an omnipotent being can't create something that already has a history
JadawinUK
Yes, a benevolent God creates fake things to fool the people he supposedly loves. Sure.
JadawinUK
But then again, humans were so bad, he sent his son to be killed, so he can forgive us....
melwil
Last thursdayism.
Halfwrong
Oh excellent, i didn't know that line of thinking already had a name
melwil
Hehe, the more you know! Vsauce has a nice video on this subject; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2jkV4BsN6U
MASTER0Fimgur
I would call you a liar, as the bible says that god made the world in 6 days. Or do you only believe the parts that work well for you?
jonnyroquette
I see you skimmed the first few pages, read the rest of it and maybe you'll get a better understanding.
MASTER0Fimgur
I know your bible better than you do, more than likely. Perhaps you should make a timeline, or science a bit.
MASTER0Fimgur
lol, no valid arguments, just downvotes. Blind faith is amazing.
ExtremistSatire
I was taught that the words were originally "generation days" or time periods
HowCanIJoinTheEvilLeagueOfEvil
Agree. Days were not meant as 24 hour period, but epoch of time.
MASTER0Fimgur
by that scenario, he is still resting, as man has been on the earth less than 1/100th of the earths age (being generous here).
MASTER0Fimgur
That being the case, he was still resting when all the events of the bible happened.
ExtremistSatire
that was what I heard when I was in the church. all the time. multiple denominations. not that I am an authority of any kind
MASTER0Fimgur
and this makes sense to you?
dooky710
Atheist here. The big bang actually came from a catholic priest - Monseigneur Georges LemaƮtre. There can be room for both.
JadawinUK
Yes, but he kept cosmology and his beliefs seperated.
kharybdis
Yes!
halfpriceoilchange
The big bang came from my GF last night .
PristinePompousPoo
You killed her?
dooky710
Crested10
Lets hope there's room for more than those two cause I ain't buying either Divine beings or Big Bang Theory.
kharybdis
Yeah, it will be thousands of years before we are capable of understanding the very basic principles of the paradox which is our existence.
ilartalot
Thank you for being someone that makes fellow atheists look less grouchy. Believing in your own truth doesn't mean demeaning others! Rock on
dooky710
I don't believe in god, but was raise catholic. I think they provided good morals and I don't need the threat of hell to be a good person.
ilartalot
That's exactly how I feel. It's like fairy tales - they are a good basis on how not to be an asshole, but they're fantasy.
BluBoxx
LeMaitre wasn't "a priest". He was Ph.D Astronomer, who also was an ordained priest.... there is a real and serious difference.
dooky710
so whats the difference? I thought ordination made someone a priest which - to me - symbolizes a strong faith in god.
BluBoxx
The difference is that scientists who are actually scientists (such as LeMaitre) do science in absentia of god and religion. He didn't 1/?
BluBoxx
scientists who are religious operate, they seperate their science from their religion. Steven J. Gould reffered to this as stemming from 3/?
BluBoxx
consult the bible to discover the big bang, he used a telescope and scientific method and never once cited the bible. This is how all 2/?
BluBoxx
religion and science occupying non-overlapping "magesteria" 4/4
dooky710
I dont understand how someone can do that. On one hand, you believe god created everything and in the other, big bang. It seems like 1/?
dooky710
those are different ideas of how the universe was created. Being a priest, I think he'd put some more weight in the god stuff. 2/2
BluBoxx
is not theology 3/3
BluBoxx
Sorry you don't understand. Read Gould's books (they're really good). Also it's how it must be done. The biblical account of the universe 1/
BluBoxx
is wholly incompatible with the observed one; which is why the bible is neither history nor science (it's only theology) and why science 2/