Just so people know

Sep 17, 2015 1:11 PM

Just so people know

the_more_you_know

What if I told you the Earth being 4.5 billion years old isn't a belief, it's empirical fact based on reproducible observations & analysis..

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

so do you believe the bible is allegorical not literal?

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The Bible was written by men, inspired by God. Perhaps what a day is to God is quite different than what we consider/define as being a day.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some parts are to be taken literally others not so. Depends on the context.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The church actually founded some of the first universities and heavily encouraged scientific endeavors. The young earth thing is fairly new.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then I would say you are not a Fundamentalist.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

*shhhh* this is OP remember. he'd gut his own child for an upvote

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Evolution is not incompatible with Christianity. The method of creation is never defined. There are a lot of scientists who are Christians

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Evolution isn't bio-genesis. Two different things and AFAIK neither is incompatible with the Christian creation myth.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So you're not a Young Earth Creationist and you fall under another part of the massive umbrella of Christianity. k. Why make a post about it

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No one is saying you can't be. Believe what you will. Just don't expect everyone else to take you seriously.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I don't believe you because all Christians are the same.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

So basically you are not from USA? Atl east mentally

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are dozens of us!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Multiple floods, people.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BLASPHEMY...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bold move Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What i never understand is why people assume an omnipotent being can't create something that already has a history

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Yes, a benevolent God creates fake things to fool the people he supposedly loves. Sure.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

But then again, humans were so bad, he sent his son to be killed, so he can forgive us....

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Last thursdayism.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Oh excellent, i didn't know that line of thinking already had a name

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hehe, the more you know! Vsauce has a nice video on this subject; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2jkV4BsN6U

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would call you a liar, as the bible says that god made the world in 6 days. Or do you only believe the parts that work well for you?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

I see you skimmed the first few pages, read the rest of it and maybe you'll get a better understanding.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I know your bible better than you do, more than likely. Perhaps you should make a timeline, or science a bit.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

lol, no valid arguments, just downvotes. Blind faith is amazing.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was taught that the words were originally "generation days" or time periods

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Agree. Days were not meant as 24 hour period, but epoch of time.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

by that scenario, he is still resting, as man has been on the earth less than 1/100th of the earths age (being generous here).

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That being the case, he was still resting when all the events of the bible happened.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

that was what I heard when I was in the church. all the time. multiple denominations. not that I am an authority of any kind

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and this makes sense to you?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Atheist here. The big bang actually came from a catholic priest - Monseigneur Georges LemaƮtre. There can be room for both.

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Yes, but he kept cosmology and his beliefs seperated.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The big bang came from my GF last night .

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You killed her?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Lets hope there's room for more than those two cause I ain't buying either Divine beings or Big Bang Theory.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it will be thousands of years before we are capable of understanding the very basic principles of the paradox which is our existence.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you for being someone that makes fellow atheists look less grouchy. Believing in your own truth doesn't mean demeaning others! Rock on

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't believe in god, but was raise catholic. I think they provided good morals and I don't need the threat of hell to be a good person.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's exactly how I feel. It's like fairy tales - they are a good basis on how not to be an asshole, but they're fantasy.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LeMaitre wasn't "a priest". He was Ph.D Astronomer, who also was an ordained priest.... there is a real and serious difference.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

so whats the difference? I thought ordination made someone a priest which - to me - symbolizes a strong faith in god.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The difference is that scientists who are actually scientists (such as LeMaitre) do science in absentia of god and religion. He didn't 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

scientists who are religious operate, they seperate their science from their religion. Steven J. Gould reffered to this as stemming from 3/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

consult the bible to discover the big bang, he used a telescope and scientific method and never once cited the bible. This is how all 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

religion and science occupying non-overlapping "magesteria" 4/4

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont understand how someone can do that. On one hand, you believe god created everything and in the other, big bang. It seems like 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

those are different ideas of how the universe was created. Being a priest, I think he'd put some more weight in the god stuff. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is not theology 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry you don't understand. Read Gould's books (they're really good). Also it's how it must be done. The biblical account of the universe 1/

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is wholly incompatible with the observed one; which is why the bible is neither history nor science (it's only theology) and why science 2/

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0