Socialist Jokes

May 2, 2016 1:49 AM

SottoFrotto

Views

38382

Likes

1433

Dislikes

171

funny

Laughed so hard i got the Trotskys

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This country's economy will crash... Then can socialism be destroyed. The road to hell is paved with central plans.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How old is this photo? Where are his wrinkles?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Bernie Is a jew, he doesn't want to give thing to anyone

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

CONFESSION: I'm voting for Bernie, but I downvote every post that involves him because I hate his online fanbase

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'd imagine this gets an average donation of 27 upvotes

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Participation trophies for everyone!!!

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 3, 2018 5:50 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That would be communism. Socialism would be about making sure no Imgurite was Forever Alone, which in the majority of cases is only 1 upvote

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Communism would be no upvotes or downvote at all

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's just redistribute all the points the spambots have accumulated.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The 0.1% who own the spambots will arrange for the media to start a huge anti-redistribution hysteria immediately.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's because socialist aren't funny. I know some and they don't have a sense of humor.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yuge numbers of up votes are being funneled to the dankest among us.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Are you sure? Did you pinky swear a secret?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Clever.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fuckin spam bot

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

There's a difference between socialism and democratic socialism. They're two different things

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Yeah, the difference is that socalism was meant to be democratic, now people have to add democratic. Still the same thing though

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

? Do you have an actual argument?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, one you vote for and the other is forced upon you. It's the same system.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I like how now that his chances of victory are growing ever closer to impossible we're back to making fun of him.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I worked on his campaign in a state he won. This is an unfortunate side effect of a grassroots campaign. The media won't help us, so we (1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have to make our own news. People really drive it into the ground and get burnt out from is. I just hope it doesn't take away his message.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we redistribute the imgur points people earn from these jokes?

10 years ago | Likes 205 Dislikes 11

I don't want to share mine. What now!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No worries, we can just PRINT MORE IMGUR POINTS. #AuditTheImgurFederalReserve

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

Nope! +1 for you! :)

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Just take points from the top 1% and give them to the lurkers.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Pfff I earned my points, why should I have to share ?!!?!? I'm keep all these useless points

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

take your hate speech off my webstie!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't get it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I got this joke at least, thanks Imgur. Thought it was pretty funny too. Still voting for Bernie.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's amusing that people put down socialism... except for public schools, EMS, police, accept medicare.. a wee bit hypocritical

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

And the US Military. The single largest socialist program on earth, ever.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The knee jerk cons are not willing to accept the term "socialist" as anything good. They've been Pavlovian trained to associate it with bad.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not socialism. And I'd like less government involvement in all those areas

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

If they aren't then we hick towns teaching old testament elementary school in public schools & poorly regulated EMS. Neither are acceptable

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It's weird how the term socialism has grown to be fundamentally misunderstood as involving literally anything the government does.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

maybe not so much as short lived but the monopolies that we saw last century that stifles an economy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You mean that century where standards of living rose faster than at any other point in human history.... THAT century? O.o

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

LOL. slightly before that :-) Before unions held conglomerates to giving workers a living wage.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not pure socialism but we're no where near a pure capitalist society either. Pure in either is short lived.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There is no such thing as pure capitalism/socialism. Socialism ≠ welfare, Free uni, social services.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sweden has no inheritance tax and is in the middle of privatizing parts of it's healthcare and telephone systems. Socialism almost killed it

10 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 22

I'm sure a massive influx of immigrants that require tons of services has made the system hard to fund

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

Do you have any sources or are you just full of shit?

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/08/sweden-not-a-socialist-standard-bearer-a written by a Swede. Late 20th century socialism was a fail.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh so you are talking about actual socialism and not what most Americans think that socialism is(which is actually social democracy)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sweden is a social democracy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

tell me simething I don't know

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trust me, i live there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't wait to see how that works out for the average Swede ... oh wait. Probably as badly as it has every time other 1%ers did it.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

Bernie Sanders is getting millions of votes across the country because capitalism is killing the majority of the USAs citizens.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Bernie Sanders is losing because a majority of Americans know that Socialism does not work. Capitalism is the foundation of the modern world

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Then the majority of Americans are ignorant. Socialism is the foundation of the modern world.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Socialism is a failed experiment. Look at how the application of stringent socialist and collectivist policies have wrecked many countries

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Capitalism is a failed experiment. 62 people having the same wealth as over 3 billion people is a failure. It's wrecked many countries.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

as the deep water horizon and the Nestle baby milk scandal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Look at how corporations exploiting the workers for profit keeps the poor poor and makes the rich richer, not to mention the disasters such

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sweden is comparable with the US in terms of GDP per capita, it is not suffering due to economic policies. Norway is even better, so.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Actually, yeah it is if you read the economic analysis of what they're doing now, also, look up yearly gdp as a percentage of yearly deficit

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There a very big and scary difference there son.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I must have missed something, those figures suggest both Sweden and Norway are in very strong short/longterm economic positions.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes that's correct. Because of various economic reasons. Look at the USA and imagine us EXPANDING our social programs while in the situation

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sweden's deficit proportion to gdp -0.8 in 2015, Norway 10 (surplus), US -4.6. Net government debt/gdp: Sweden -17, Norway -165%, US 87%.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Norway has oil and the profits benefit the whole country through investments and pension funds.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep, and a fitting way of using the proceeds.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What? Are you saying buying a dozen gold plated Boeing 747s for private use à la gulf state princes is not good use and benefit the people?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're also the rape capital of the Western world

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

I guess people downvoting this are fact-averse.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Swedens definition of rape is way broader than most other countries though

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Their definition is "forced sexual intercourse initiated against a woman by one or several men without her consent". That doesn't seem broad

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So you mean you can't rape a man in Sweden then? Apart from that, "sexual intercourse" is pretty broad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With the rise of automation capitalism cannot possibly function. Within the next 20 years 70 million jobs will be lost in transport jobs.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 12

I've seen automation devices that people wouldn't believe. Over the next 20 there won't be many industries untouched. Ideas need to change.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Exactly. Coffee is better made with a machine than a person, transport is safer and easier, Fast food is quicker and overall nicer etc etc

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't that a cruel twist? You'd think life would improve as we move closer to post-scarcity.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Post-scarcity is a sci-fi pipe dream. Demand will always expand to exceed a limiting factor. Only which factor changes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not really. Life is improving as eventually no one will be working which is the ultimate goal.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

And jobs will be created elsewhere. It's what capitalism does. Always has. Creative destruction.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Enough net losses and eventually we don't have people working. That is the goal of automation

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're a fool if you honestly think automation has ever resulted in a net gain of jobs. The whole point is it always results in a net loss

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Give me one example. Because I've got the spinning jenny, car manufacture automation, back office automation.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lets take retail in UK shops. When self service took over in Tesco Expresses they only had to hire 1 person to do the job of 5.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It results in a net loss to the one automating. It results in gains elsewhere in the economy. Always has. Frees people up for useful work.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

You cannot create 70 million jobs from this. At most we're projecting 60,000 jobs created in Europe.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

and as everyone knows more minds working on software != more productivity. There are only a limited amount of jobs you can have there

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Just like the millions of jobs that were lost and never replaced by the industrial revolution, right?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 3, 2016 1:16 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1 Humanity will always be useful to itself. A fully autonomous society is science fiction, and implying that Capitalism can't survive

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jun 1, 2016 12:54 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

2 the innovations that it has created itself doesn't really make sense to me.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Whenever people say idiot shit about capitalism, it usually shows they just don't know what it means. Better ask them to define the term.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sources? And you do know that doesn't mean shit, as in a capitalist economy those jobs can be replaced.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I work in the industry developing trucks on the UK roads.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Oh yeah, anecdotal evidence. Should have seen that one coming

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

backed up with 6 years of higher education and copious amounts of experts saying that this will result in a net loss of jobs?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

manufactured by existing jobs. At most we are predicting 60,000 jobs created watching over the bots. Which is 1 per platoon of trucks.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Please explain how you can possibly create 70 million jobs when the technology has already been developed, the cars already get 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3