ConsumerOfStories
112165
1163
46
It just makes my skin crawl is all.
Jan 28, 2023 8:04 PM
ConsumerOfStories
112165
1163
46
It just makes my skin crawl is all.
unluckyandbored
Count the fingers. Count the knuckles.
EveryUsernameIsTaken4
AI messing up hands might be the most human thing about it.
ArkoneAxon
AI art is now on par with that of Rob Liefeld!
freckledkink
Lol, that was my first thought seeing that it can't get hands and feet right
cybermage256
Been doing that with newborns for decades.
RocMage
the T-600s had rubber skin, we spotted those easy.
Fauxcused
But these are new. They look human. Sweat, bad breath, everything.
RocMage
ReallyFastSloth
The key is to suck at art.
williewest12
Gonna become an artist that specifically adds extra fingers/toes just to mess with people. They'll know it's mine if I record drawing it.
somnif
Teeth, shadows, bookshelves, any place where things are meant to line up neatly, things can get odd...
CrazyViruss
userfriendly19777
AI must figure out to draw the correct number of fingers eventually.
astromoondoggie
BEWARE THE FAE!
zombiebatman
We meet at last Count Fingers! Our battle will be legendary!
tumantorak
The AIs have already taken over and just given us false things like numbers of fingers and skin translucency to obsess over and distract us.
Ryukee
They will master hands soon. I saw art of a woman the other day and the hands look almost fully human. The main issue was just a bad nail.
TicklishOwl
Knees, belly buttons, elbows, especially the ears. Anywhere skin can 'fold'. Those are huge give-aways. Also teeth sometimes...yikes.
isetprettygirlsonfire
I finger the count whenever I see digital art now
nojustsayitdont
cONSENSUAL i HOPE.
IdiotSavantTinker
1! Ah ah ah! 2! Ah ah ah! 3! Ah Ah AH! 4! Ah AH AH! FIST! AH aha ah!
sgnight13
https://youtu.be/B-Wd-Q3F8KM
Madchant
For the record (and as a traditional artist) there is nothing wrong with AI art. I am enjoying playing with AI art. It's just new tools.
HistoriesOfXandY
https://youtu.be/tjSxFAGP9Ss
notacobra
Exactly right. The argument that they are fed data from artists is so funny. Your first year of art school is 90% absorbing other art.
arcgap
lonelyrangerofthedreams
Hello…
PutItInNeutral
Someone was looking for you.
LokiOnTheCouch
@BotDrawA 6 fingers on your right hand
BotDrawA
@LokiOnTheCouch Here's your (experimental extra) drawing of a "6 fingers on your right hand, in style of
RollToSaveAgainst
I think this bot has been dropping acid
BotDrawA
@LokiOnTheCouch Here's your drawing of a "6 fingers on your right hand"
UristImiknorris
those are all left hands tho
Boksha
Are they though? Both the palm and the nails are facing this way... I'll tell you what they are. Not good is what.
Rufferstuff
SaveitforQueenDoppelpoppolus
Madchant
I have always drawn discordant forms and figures with extra limbs and digits, and now my art gets dismissed as AI art. smh
redexodus
feel ya friendo
YouAreTheInsultMaster
Are you sure you haven't been an AI this whole time? How many stop lights am I holding up?!
sleepinggreenidea
You're in a desert, walking along when you look down and see a tortoise. It's crawling toward you. You reach down & flip it over on its back
Aezoren
Been drawing abstract & always used mild blurring in my backgrounds, now the same is happening
Varenvel
could i see your art?:o
Madchant
I sketch in several overlapping concepts then detail those into a finished product, which appears to be the same process AIs use. =(
LifeIsADanceOfMinds
Only thing I can suggest: Add a caveat in your description about the artwork...
sleepinggreenidea
Sounds like ya missed the big r/art drama a month or two back when a mod permabanned someone for submitting AI art and/or drawing AI-ish art
sleepinggreenidea
(As in, the artist had and offered to submit WIP files demostrating their process on the piece but the mod told 'em they needed a new style)
iDrinkDrano
Doesn't work. My friend got banned from FA cause they thought his work was generated
Varenvel
could i see your art too?
CrazyViruss
IdiotSavantTinker
*Confused mod noises*
TCGView
I look at the teeth if visible. Seriously, look at the teeth and see how weird they look. It's eerie.
DaggettOFlannigan
@botdrawa normal anime human with 40 fingers on each hand
BotDrawA
@DaggettOFlannigan Here's your (experimental extra) drawing of a "normal anime human with 40 fingers on e
BotDrawA
@DaggettOFlannigan Here's your drawing of a "normal anime human with 40 fingers on each hand"
DaggettOFlannigan
Excellent thank you.
Molvanian
I count fingers when I'm trying to find the six fingered man who killed my father.
Illithidbane
JacaByte
Unexpected uzumaki
dart223
Its sad when you see an original artists signature warped when its used for ai "art"
OnlyWantToSayOneThing
crazy that the AI trainers were even able to find art with watermarks when they get cropped or photoshopped out by most reposters.
NibblonianNibbler
It would have been funny if confession bear had wrong amount of fingers
ThisIsYourLifeNow
That would have required actual work from the OP. But now he ranted using someones digital art, about people using someones digital art.
nojustsayitdont
Bruh.
Vergenbuurg
That was the first thing I looked for.
Nizedk
Same ^2
CooCooCaChew
only with digital art?
Nahnahyeah
Someone has a toe finger
pettingmycatwhileipoo
I like this and don't feel like I need to explain it. Sorry, not sorry. :-P
DaveSamsonite
Headcase444
Which Simpsons character are you?
DaveSamsonite
DaveSamsonite
satanslittleposter
Unrelated to the picture but 60s, 70s, or Coheed and Cambria?
SoylentDean
https://imgur.com/kPD772L.jpg
UsedToBeAPilotButNowImJustSomeGuy
Thanks, I hate it.
itypewerdsonline
are you a cartoon character come to life?
corgimas
Those are digits too!
SoftKleenex
AI photos are getting advanced
jwillustrat
That’s a weird looking hand
HighSorcerer
@BotDrawA totally normal human foot
BotDrawA
@HighSorcerer Here's your drawing of a "totally normal human foot"
BotDrawA
@HighSorcerer Here's your (experimental extra) drawing of a "? totally normal human foot in the style of
psugab
waeraj
Your ai art disgusts me.
DaveSamsonite
straha242
Looks like a proper footograph to me.
qyrriqat
Those do appear to be digits.
nocommennts
This little piggy went to market?
magewareinc
Well, someone stayed home.
ILovedUnicornsFirst
Lol This is a cute comment. I like it.
HELIOSOLOS
I would absolutely love to post my art online. However what's been happening with the artist Sarah Andersen is a cautionary tale.
HELIOSOLOS
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/31/opinion/sarah-andersen-how-algorithim-took-my-work.html
idiotsonfire
Got a source that isn't begging for money?
loldongs10000
https://archive.is/UBidB
RaytheForgetful
Got a non subscription based article? That one won't let me read unless I pay
loldongs10000
https://archive.is/UBidB
HELIOSOLOS
Those bastards. I found other articles about the article. But no, I don't see any other version of the article
RaytheForgetful
Tsk... Damn!
SteveMND
I had a nice bit of artwork I was going to share for RHM/Fetish Friday, but then realized it was AI. So sad.
OnlyWantToSayOneThing
AI artwork flourished because art is posted without proper credit, no one cared about the artists so it bein AI didnt matter.
DarthBorks
Why sad? I love all art.
SteveMND
I do not consider AI-generated images "art" any more than I consider a well-worded Google search the literature that it brings back to me.
DarthBorks
I love ai generated art and so do a lot of other folks. Evolve with ai art… or don’t, your choice.
SteveMND
It can generate an attractive image, but that doesn't mean, to me, that it's art.
ahorseelbowdeepinme
matshelge
Well, copyright is very spesific that you can't copyright style. This image is a horrible argument for the copyright argument.
ahorseelbowdeepinme
Yes it is. That's why neither my comment or this image use the word copyright.
SoylentDean
Oh don't get me started. The asshats that make some of these "tools" train the AI on copyrighted works then they have the balls ...1/2
SoylentDean
2/2... to say that they own the copyright to the AI output (unless you pay them).
BlastFX
Complains a guy visiting a site whose entire business model is built around copyright infringement on a massive scale.
ahorseelbowdeepinme
Explain.
BlastFX
I don't know what's unclear. The overwhelming majority of content here is stolen. Imgur relies on copyright infringement to generate profit.
SoylentDean
Imgur is built around storing user images for users. As far as I can tell they do not claim to own the images that users post here.
BlastFX
I never said they did. But in 99% of cases, the users don't own the copyright or even have a license to post the pictures they post. 1/2
ahorseelbowdeepinme
Well, with opinions like those I can see why certain people replying to me already have me blocked. I love the "it's just a tool" argument,
idiotsonfire
Copy and paste is a tool. If I copied and pasted from 200+ different papers, its still plagiarism or outright theft.
ahorseelbowdeepinme
Like tools can't possibly be used for bad purposes. Card skimmers and key loggers are tools too. Would love to get sauce on that photo thing
notacobra
You miss the point. You can use a paintbrush to paint a nazi emblem and you can use AI to create a unique, serene landscape. It's a tool.
idiotsonfire
Oh yeah, one tool just requires you to steal from hundreds or more artists and harvest their work, to create a soulless, vacuous, vapid copy
notacobra
Have you not been to an art school? That's literally 90% of your work in the first couple of years. Lmao.
ahorseelbowdeepinme
Oh yeah, no, I get it. You can use card skimmers to make copies of important cards, you can use keyloggers to make sure computers aren't
ahorseelbowdeepinme
Being used inappropriately. Nefarious tools can have legitimate uses, it's just they end up screwing people over which I for one am against.
notacobra
So you're saying the internet is a force for evil because of the damage it's done to trans people? Or are you saying you're a cherry picker?
ComcastLover
I think the technology is a tool. Did you know when photography was new pretty much everyone said "Fuck photography!"?
GoliathSkittles
It certainly is just a tool, a tool you're sucking. That robot dick ain't gonna make your parents proud of you.
idiotsonfire
False equivalence. Photography does not require theft from hundreds of painters.
nojustsayitdont
Referencing thousands of artworks to create a new artwork isn't theft. LOok how much 'fanart' there is copying from 1/
nojustsayitdont
actual copyrighted work with no real new ideas added. Yet it's still 'art' because someone used a mouse or stylus 2/
idiotsonfire
Those fanartists actually DREW THAT WITH THEIR FUCKING SKILL AND HANDS. They didn't plug it into Microsoft Theftpoint and have THAT do it
nojustsayitdont
to initiate program commands rather than words.