It will have to walk that back in his usual incoherent 9 year old's vocabulary word salad. Trouble of some sort if he does not. He might be forced to read a hostage script instead - who knows?
The excuse they will use against this will be, "he means at protests. There is no reason to be armed at a protest." Even though MAGA has been openly armed with rifles at their protest, and even though it would still be a violation of the 2nd ammendment to suggest carrying at a protest is punishable by death, but as we all know, it is all double speak.
It is, and had always been, about making sure their political side is armed and ready to threaten to overthrow the government when they aren’t in power.
the second exists for average people to be the last line of defense against enemies of democracy. nobody can forbid this, especially not an enemy of democracy. i am from germany and even i understood it.
Considering the NRA is a Russian asset and military historian Sarah Paine has already said Putin isn’t making it out alive now and likely not for very long. Diaper Donny is starting to lose his cognition each day and the one group that they’re supposed to defend just went mostly left. We shall see
TheWeebleWobler
Too soon
Neferium
So curious as to where the NRA is. This statement by another Dem President would be near impeachable according to them.
TheVillageGrouch9000
It will have to walk that back in his usual incoherent 9 year old's vocabulary word salad. Trouble of some sort if he does not. He might be forced to read a hostage script instead - who knows?
Cthulhuonabike
The excuse they will use against this will be, "he means at protests. There is no reason to be armed at a protest." Even though MAGA has been openly armed with rifles at their protest, and even though it would still be a violation of the 2nd ammendment to suggest carrying at a protest is punishable by death, but as we all know, it is all double speak.
OperatorWay
FaithAlone
It is, and had always been, about making sure their political side is armed and ready to threaten to overthrow the government when they aren’t in power.
SMarkt
the second exists for average people to be the last line of defense against enemies of democracy. nobody can forbid this, especially not an enemy of democracy. i am from germany and even i understood it.
mychesthairlookslikeacatsass
Considering the NRA is a Russian asset and military historian Sarah Paine has already said Putin isn’t making it out alive now and likely not for very long. Diaper Donny is starting to lose his cognition each day and the one group that they’re supposed to defend just went mostly left.
We shall see
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/27/764879242/nra-was-foreign-asset-to-russia-ahead-of-2016-new-senate-report-reveals
pandemicpolemic
“The conclusions of the Senate investigation could have legal implications for the NRA, Wyden says.”
No, no it won’t.
Let’s stop with this.
Is accountability key to a civil society? Yes. Would a functioning democracy demand justice? Yes.
Do we have either? No.
Is research like this important? Yes. To history. For now, it’s in the dustbin.
Today, let’s dispense with the illusion - the delusional belief - that there will be “legal implications” for… most anything.
mychesthairlookslikeacatsass
^we’ll see what happens
horseman05
testzero
Is that Kyle Rittenhouse the murderer?
horseman05
That is THE murderer Kyle Rittenhouse whom was deified by the right for his actions.
Schlumpfi
Oh, you must have very good eyes! You identify Kyle Rittenhouse the murderer directly, without problems!
DeepThought42
Close. It is Kyle Rittenhouse the dramatic crybaby double murderer
v
sochilln
I'm here to updoot this specific (& expected) comment.