*Cries in blaming mental illness*

Jun 13, 2022 11:06 PM

abundanceofcreation

Views

137261

Likes

1939

Dislikes

127

*cries in blaming mental illness*

awesome

memes

politics

funny

current_events

It's a weapon. That is it's purpose.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

propaganda shills protect your fucking rights or you will regret it

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're a cooking tool. /s

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

a tool for starting engines?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I use mine for competition shooting and to collect historical firearms

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A major issue is that too many gun guys have turned guns into a macho thing and lost respect for what they really are, a killing tool.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I own three pistols. I enjoy shooting at paper targets at my local range a few times a year. Other than that, they don't leave my house.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

OP's argument intentionally tries to associate firearms with murder, and ignores defensive and recreational use.

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 11

Thank you for being logical.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

When i started driving a car i was told that it was a weapon and to treat it as such. Some people have seemed to lost respect for the 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Of weapons. Be machines or guns or their damn mouth haha

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 152 Dislikes 13

Cartoon from 2017... sad that there have been so many since then including MSD HS, Santa Fe HS, El Paso, Oxford HS, Buffalo, Uvalde, & more

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

A gun can be a recreation item, many countries allow you to buy a gun for sport, it is the rules around it that are important.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I love target shooting. I'm good at it. I still keep in mind what these things are designed for.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Here in the UK we use .177 air rifles for our target shooting, there are bigger. 22 rim fire, but you need a license. Thoroughly enjoy it.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have big caliber guns. I love plinking with my .22lr. You still practice the same skills. The big guns are more...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Monkey brain: "flip switch go boom"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Then I’ve killed a lot of paper and steel targets back in my day. Does this also make me mental?

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

Guns do have specific uses the same way tools do. Different ammunition for specialized jobs too. Geese hunters will use a shotgun with

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

bird shot. The same way bird hunters use special guns murders use special guns that are created for killing as many people as possible as

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

efficiently as possible. The guns made for killing people efficiently are the guns to ban, ie assault rifles.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Nobody uses assault rifles in crimes, you're thinking of assault weapon instead. Also, handguns cause vastly more deaths than AR-15s.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yep, ban the Saturday night specials too. Good suggestion. Over 400,000 guns stolen from cars last year, pistols mostly.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

FWIW gunning down children is a crime.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And an assault rifle was not used in the committing of that crime.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I like to use it as a finishing touch to my Ramen

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A tool for killing is still a tool. A lot of tools can be used to kill. But, an insane person with a crowbar can only do so much damage.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Hunted all my life. Shoulder arms should be bolt or pump action. Handguns, max 5/clip. If that’s not enough, ya don’t need to be shooting.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Jun 14, 2022 5:30 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As Kahless teaches us: "A thousand throats can be cut in one night by a running man." Or to put it in more Earthly terms...

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

...don't underestimate what a mob armed with 500 tons of machetes can do to an unarmed minority.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

A crowbar is meant to pry open things, but can be used for harm.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s also a place for Corvids to have a beer or two.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IDK, if I had a crowbar long enough, and a place to stand...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tbh I only have guns in case dumbasses like the Patriot Front actually gain power.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gun lobby: "Everything but the gun is at fault."

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Anyone who's had gun training KNOWS they are only for death. First rule: don't point at anything you don't intend to destroy.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Exactly.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, first rule that I've always had hammered in me is treat every gun as if it's loaded. The pointing thing came second, but...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...not necessarily less important.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep. Treat it as a tool. "Do not plug in the saw until you're ready to cut. Do not put anything near the blade you do not want to cut."

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 8

This. Mocking the idea of "a good guy with a gun" obscures the fact that guns empower people who AREN'T "big manly ubermensch." There's a>

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Ah, so you are for rules that only allow women, oppressed minority group members to have them? That white men have to give them up?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

"God created man, Sam Colt made men equal", or depending on your political views: "Marx defined the classes, Kalashnikov made them equal".

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

reason why gun control in the U.S. was originally conceived to keep guns out of the hands of blacks (hell,similar laws applied to feminists)

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Means you can have storage/capacity safetystandards for your recreational and hunting weapons without idiots complaining about self defence?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Nicely ignores the fact that bigots exist everywhere, yet other countries have far more gun control laws, fewer guns , fewer deaths.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

What happens when those bigots gain power and no one has the power to oppose them? When those bigots decide that your ethnic group needs to①

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

be exterminated or brought to heel you get the streets of Bucha. My Grandma's family came from that land, fleeing the last time those②

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

same bigots decided her ethnic group needed to be conquered and their farms stolen. Never again.③

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Standard laughable circular argument that pretends it is for the poor oppressed groups while ignoring actual events. Horde your guns Trumper

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's actually kinda the point of the statement. So long as that violent hateful bigot can legally own guns, then so will I.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's like the argument that the Civil War was about state's rights. Okay, the right to do what, exactly....

4 years ago | Likes 346 Dislikes 17

Amusingly, even that falls flat. They wanted to force states to make slavery legal. Just the usual "we want freedom, you do what we say."

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's just a lie. SC complained about New York not allowing slave transport in their state. About letting black men vote. About not 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2/2 cooperating with the Fugitive Slave Right. "States rights" was code for you cant tell us what to do but we can tell you what to do.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So the classic GQP handbook?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh boy, don't tell Apu.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Slavery it is, sir!"v

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...to own...very specific... property? My state (Arkansas) made it blatantly clear in a written document the exact reason.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It wasn't states rights though, since no state had the right to make any laws on slavery. It was in the confederate constitution.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The whole confederacy copy-pasted the constitution with one obvious change "no state shall pass a law limiting rights to own slaves"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

To my brother-in-law: I'll give you that it was about states rights if you acknowledge that the right was to own people.

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

The fun thing is the states couldn't even decide on that. The confederate constitution had slavery in it, therefore states had no right.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Do we have the same BIL? Are we related?!

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, I think a lot of BILs have the same infection. Faux News syndrome.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Mine pulls the "I'm a libertarian that doesn't pick sides but I'm only going to shit on democrats and deflect when I get called out"sybdrome

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yea man. I was following Libertarian circles for a few years when I noticed that many of them are just diet Rs, and barely at that.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 1

I get what you're saying - fascists are always hypocrites - but it's also perfectly okay to make a system where

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

no one has the right to say, own a human being. Or block health care, human rights, etc. for stupid bigot reasons.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think you missed the point of the comic. Its just sayingthe "states rights" dog whistle is complete bullshit, since states rights were 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Being limited by their new constitution. That's basically it. It's historical revisionism and systemic racism by entrenched racist. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It also says we the people, not I the person. People don't care about compassion or morality if it inconveniences them even a little bit.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

For putting holes in things from a distance. It's not even the most dangerous thing you can legally purchase.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

v

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Koro Sensei was the best teacher EVER. Prove me wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Onizuka.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hoped I'd see this.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As did I, I was not disappointed, muahaha

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dumb Libertarian ex-coworker was found of this. "They are just tools for putting holes in things".

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

If I took your guns and replaced them with hole punches would you be happy with that? No. because those are designed to make holes in 2/

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

paper in your hand. I have an air rifle, it is designed to put holes in paper, or in animals under 2-3 pounds from a couple dozen 3/

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

yards away. It takes 20-30 seconds each time I want to do this. Your rifles are designed to put holes in human-sized animals, from many 4/

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

dozen yards away, once or twice a second. You tell me that they are for putting wholes in paper with your smarmy ass grin, but my 5/

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

hole puncher and air rifle are tools for putting holes in paper. Yours is for killing human-sized animals, primarily literally humans.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Guns have a singular design. Anyone who tries to deflect with “what about cars or knives” are just distracting from the actual issues.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 11

When someone does build up this straw man, always respond with what a gun is specifically designed for and never entertain the fallacy.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Some guns are specifically designed for competition

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

What's the problem with Americans just admitting they fucking love guns, stop hiding behind the constitution and admit your hobby is more

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Important than the safety and lives of others.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

While my hobby is important, so is safety. That is why I train. That is why my guns are secured.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, as an American with multiple guns who enjoys target shooting, my hobby is not at all more important than the lives of others.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've hated watching Texas gun laws become more and more lax over the last decade. I'd rather it go the other way.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And the same legislators keep blaming things like mental health and then defunding things to actually do something about that.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

America seems like a cluster fuck atm and I feel sorry for the normal Americans just trying to enjoy themselves

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm more for the "inflicting damage" description since shooting an inanimate object isn't killing, etc.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Why would you shoot objects tho? I guess you could shoot a door lock, but that's not what the locksmith does when you've locked yourself out

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

By inanimate object they very clearly mean target shooting at a range, so either steel target plates or paper stapled to a wood 2x4 frame.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do you shoot at a range? To train to become a better killer. If it's just for the sport of it, great. Use an airsoft gun. No need for...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

a target shooting enthusiast to own guns and ammunition that are capable of and designed for killing people.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would be irresponsible to risk ricochets or harming s.one behind the door.Guns aren't reliable tools for anything other than maiming/killing

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And even if the intent is to maim rather than kill there's a non-negligible risk of death,so they're arguably terrible at incapacitating ppl

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A tool for self-defense.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Unfortunately self defense with a gun is statistically rare. A big part of that is lack of training. The public isn't trained for it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think it should fall to Joe Shmoe to play judge, jury and executioner for a desperate junkie or a guy trying to steal Joe's TV.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

How do you know that person is only there to steal a TV? What do you do when they suddenly pull a knife and start trying to stab you?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Seems unlikely unless you confront them instead of calling 911. Even then, burglars typically run when you so much as make some loud noise.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Burglaries happen in all countries. People almost never get stabbed in the process. Only in the US, these incidents often turn deadly and...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's anyone's guess if it's the burglar or the home owner who gets killed in the process. Why? Because there are guns everywhere. Sometimes…

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's a presumed burglar who gets shot and it turns out it was a drunk neighbor kid or a spouse who came home at an unusual hour. Or the ...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Desperate people can act irrationally, and if they are armed with something lethal, you should be able to defend yourself. This isn't being

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

judge, jury, and executioner, which is why self defense is a defense in court.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a bad faith argument. You know full well we're not talking about someone charging you with a lethal weapon in 99.9% of cases where …

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"...and if they are armed with something lethal..." does not imply they always do. And you can't always tell, either. If a desperate person

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, you can never tell. Anyone you meet in the streets could potentially pull a weapon and try to kill you. Shoot them all preemptively?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

breaks into my house at night and all I see is a shadow of that person because it's dark, I'm not going to ask if he's armed or not.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

people murder another person and claim self-defense. Gun owners fantasize about shooting anyone who breaks into their home or so much as ...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My belief is anyone who buys a gun with the intention for self defense is a person who fantasizes about killing, and those are the ones to

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sets a foot on their property uninvited. Some threaten protesters who walk on public property past their house. Some shoot black teenagers …

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Self-defense uses an appropriate amount of force to protect yourself from harm.There are remarkably few situations that justify lethal force

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Often, one cannot know what that appropriate amount is until after the fact. Hesitation to act can result in a failure in self defense.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's exactly it. Joe Shmoe doesn't know how much force is appropriate to deal with a burglar, so he had better dial 911 & call the experts

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But then he has to survive and keep the burglar there for however long it takes 911 to show up.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why would you keep the burglar there? If they leave, great. Danger averted. That's the second best possible outcome.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Joe Shmoe thinks it's justified to shoot through the door because someone tries to open it & then it turns out it was a drunk neighbor kid

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You COULD change your oil with a gun. I wouldn't recommend it though.

4 years ago | Likes 427 Dislikes 7

Preety sure you can steer gumbo as well

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dunno, if someone came in for an oil change JUST before closing, I just might.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

apparently you can also use it to remove headrests

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Just blast that oil cap to shreds amirite, if you do that you don't even have to change your oil anymore.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can also perform a root canal with a gun, wouldn't advise it though.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Clearly you have never seen the "Kitchen Gun" video-- I'm sure that line of products has an "Oil Change Gun"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

HA HA HA HA! I LOVE YOU, KITCHEN GUN!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd watch that video.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Just hold it while draining, flushing, fitting filter/gasket, tightening and refilling? Guess I could use it to get a free oil change...

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

you could stir gumbo as well. kind of the same issue

4 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 3

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And fix the gutter, just fire a few holes in it and problems solved

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

One problem solved at least, you'll need to come up with ingenious ways to use guns to solve your new problem after that.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*gunbo

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

As a Louisianan I laughed.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If a kid was running around hitting people with a stick, I'd blame the kid, but I'd still take the stick away.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

but would you try in a futile attempt to ban sticks?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Untwist your panties. No one is "banning" guns. They're trying to limit access and require licensing. Not unlike driving a car.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A ban on firearms will never happen. A ban on those not specified for hunting/protection could. Only a national law would work though.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

2/3 gun deaths are suicides. Of the rest very nearly all are with handguns. Ar15s are a scary red herring.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

AR-15s account for something like 1% of firearm deaths annually, yet they're almost always the *only* type that politicians go after.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ok and? A tool still doesn't do anything unless a person uses it.

4 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 57

The Axon corporation is trying to correct that oversight.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nuke is just a tool. Let's sell nukes at wallmart. It's just a tool after all.

4 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 9

Jeff: "Look man, it's just a tool. I'm not doing anything with it."

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The 2A people literally talk about taking over the government and killing the politicians. Anytime someone invokes 2A, that's why.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 11

Depriving you of your right to a representative democracy, you can run for office and vote as long as some gun nut doesn't ice you.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

But what did you make the gun for? A hammer I'd use to hammer a nail into the wall. A gun is... Well...

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

yeah, idk why everyone's so worried about it. like, so North Korea wants to get some nuclear tools, so what? /s

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I guess the dude muted me, but NK didn't even have nukes until 2006. The reason people don't fuck with NK is because they have a shit ton -

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

- of artillery pointed at SK cities, not just cuz nukes. Also, "giving bad guys nukes so they can keep terrorizing their own people AND -

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

- other nations is actually a GOOD thing" is a weird take but you do you, TexasUberAlles.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Explosives too. But for some reason that is heavily regulated.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

When said tool is specifically designed to make killing (anything) easier, it's a weapon.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Semantics aside, a gun is designed to kill. That is its purpose. You can target shoot, etc, but it is a killing tool.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And we need to seriously regulate who can own them. Making them available to the general public is silly because the general public...

4 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 15

I'd agree IF we tackled car ownership first. I'm serious - where I live, vehicular deaths and DUIs are a MUCH more serious issue than guns.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 19

Guns killed more kids/teens than cars in 2020 in the US: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2201761

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This says vehicle accidents surged by 10% to a total of 42,915 in 2020. In the same year, firearm deaths surged by 15% to 45,222:

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We have been tackling that issue. Vehicular deaths have been decreasing for decades.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

You mean the things where you have to have a license, insurance, registration, and demonstrate proficiency with to have?

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Im fairly certain hitting another vehicle when the aim is to never hit anything would prove most of the world shouldn't drive either

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean the things that STILL cause massive death tolls every year. Where I live, we have at least one crash per DAY.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Where do you live, just give me the sate or whatever the equivalent is if you don't live in the US

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But cars aren't designed to be killing machines. How can they possibly have more kills than something specifically made to kill people?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

....doesn't have a need to efficiently kill anything

4 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 6

If the MAGA and Qtard crowd is gonna be armed, then I'm going to be armed. The police are useless and/or MAGA themselves.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What about people protecting themselves on the street and rising up over a bad gov? I agree more regulations are needed. It's harder to buy-

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A car than a gun rn. So I agree with regulations, but I do think any informed, and educated persons should have the right to own.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Whenever people bring up the "bAd GoVeRnMeNt" bullshit.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you're more likely to use a gun on yourself or a loved one than stop a crime. Being told you need one "fOr PrOtEcTiOn" is NRA propaganda

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I will agree we need more regulation but we kill 250k wild hogs a year and we need to kill 1.8 mil to cap their pop growth. They do 1.5 bil-

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

lion in damage to agriculture a year and we have a major top soil problem in the US right now.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The general population does not need to kill wild hogs. That's a very area specific problem

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"Very area specific" usually doesn't mean it spreads across thousands of miles of territory and costs BILLONS in damages A YEAR

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except when you're poor like me and have to literally hunt for food. Only people are safe because they don't taste good

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

I always imagined a typical fast food fed American would be like fatty pork. It's the medicated ones that would be metallic and weird.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Go get your groceries. Others need to stop misusing guns.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And people in the US need a car to get places (I'm not talking about what it should be only what is), but you still need to demonstrate 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Proficiency and provide insurance if things go wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Or lived in a bad neighborhood like me and got one for self defence.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Which would be safer once guns are off the streets.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are other ways to hunt and government assistence programs. If you absolutely need a gun, then you can apply for a license

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Assistance programs? Yeah sure, rely on the same people that lost my family's paperwork to get on the program, and the people that ARE

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bow hunting rules are different, don't need a license for a hunting rifle, and not everyone is murderous.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Real hard to accidentally kill someone with a hammer.

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 26

my father was, I shit you not, very nearly accidentally killed with a hammer.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Fuck me imgurians are stupid, y'all know this is an argument for gun control right?

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Yes. And it is a stupid ass argument.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

That's the point.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

No...no it's not. Why do you think folks have to wear hard hats at construction sites? Little tip it's not because of falling beams.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Because they look cool. Right?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just because it CAN happen doesn't mean it's anywhere comparable to accidental gun deaths

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

It's a weapon, not a tool.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

Its a weapon only when its used as one. A hammer is a hammer till its used to kill someone, then its a weapon.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

A hammer is a tool used for construction etc. A gun is a weapon specifically designed to make killing easier. Period.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You use guns as hammers?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I use them for target practice, competition shooting, hunting. Lots of things I use them for.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

target practice to hunt better. AKA kill. 2/3 of your hobbies involve being efficient at killing. Not that theres anything wrong with that

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A tool has a use outside being a weapon. A gun has no such use. Its only use is to kill.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Man I have killed soooo many clay pigeons I tell you what.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"a tool has a use outside of hitting things. A hammer has no such use." No, a weapon is a specialized tool, just like a hammer and a ?.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Weapons are an extremely specific category of tools so wholly divorced from the rest that they may as well not be defined as tools.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It is a tool for killing. Any object that is designed to make a task easier is a tool. A gun is a tool designed to make killing easier.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's a weapon. Period. Everything else is semantics.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yes, that means someone thought to themselves "killing other human beings is too hard, how can we fix that?"

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The purpose and use of tools throughout history has changed many times, just like guns can be used for recreation or sport shooting.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can use a knife like a screwdriver, but that does not change it's purpose.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0