Jun 16, 2014 2:46 AM
UncleGus
2477
18
3
Omamba
So... creepy is the highest form of cuteness?
RoyBrentJr
http://www.pbfingers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/puss-in-boots.png
J2383
It's the uncanny valley of eye sizes
kangaimgur
this seems more like a peak of creepiness
IcedBrews
Am I alone in thinking the 'diameter of eyes' should be on the x-axis instead of the y....
baroncognito
No, I think you're right, but because I'd change the graph like this: http://imgur.com/Hc8aDxO
Also because creepy seems more like a function of eye diameter and not a function of cuteness.
Without changing the axes, the graph would have to look like this: http://imgur.com/9JkChQg
Include a 'creepy' label, and I think you have it
Shoot, it had a creepy label, I guess moved the top layer and the label became a lower level. I'm new to GIMP.
Omamba
So... creepy is the highest form of cuteness?
RoyBrentJr
http://www.pbfingers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/puss-in-boots.png
J2383
It's the uncanny valley of eye sizes
kangaimgur
this seems more like a peak of creepiness
IcedBrews
Am I alone in thinking the 'diameter of eyes' should be on the x-axis instead of the y....
baroncognito
No, I think you're right, but because I'd change the graph like this: http://imgur.com/Hc8aDxO
baroncognito
Also because creepy seems more like a function of eye diameter and not a function of cuteness.
baroncognito
Without changing the axes, the graph would have to look like this: http://imgur.com/9JkChQg
IcedBrews
Include a 'creepy' label, and I think you have it
baroncognito
Shoot, it had a creepy label, I guess moved the top layer and the label became a lower level. I'm new to GIMP.