Butane9000
137
9
14
This gentlemen wrote a lovely (sarcasm) piece defending Brock Turner the rapist.
Now his article is specifically citing the mob that's sprung up outside Brock Turners home. Honestly I don't condone that because he's "served his time" however short it was. I blame the judge for the short sentence as should we all. But double jeopardy means he can't be tried for the same crime twice.
Now I'm not advocating attacking this man covertly or overtly. But by all means, share your opinions with him and avoid his news website gotnews if he's going to defend a rapist with the arguments against radical feminism. Honestly, while radical militant feminism is a problem that doesn't excuse a real rapists actions.
Article in question: http://gotnews.com/analysis-lynching-brock-turner-brockturner/
General site: http://gotnews.com/news/Gotnews "about page": http://gotnews.com/about/
Site about schmuck pictured above: http://charlescjohnson.com/about/
This is the same kind of idiot news reporting that put Nick Denton and Gawker out of business. I don't like that he's banned on twitter like Milo Yiannopolous was. Twitter is a private business and can ban those it wants to but for any company based on providing a platform to speak to the world overt censorship is risky business.
Either way, he's defending a rapist out of some mislead/zealous beliefs and ignorance to the facts of the case at hand.
JustCallMeMrPigg
He has a fair point, regardless.
DangerMeme
The Heritage Foundation...now there's a great endorsement.
WoeToHice
Why in the sacred halls of fuckdom would you want to drive traffic to GotNews.com?
Butane9000
In a way I am, but I am also informing people who would go there and not realize the idiocy inherent at the website.
WoeToHice
People who would go there and not realize the idiocy are not going to be swayed by your post on Imgur.
WoeToHice
Even if you sway a few, it won't be enough to compensate for the traffic and mindshare you'll be giving to this guy and hist "news" site.