NChomsky
120021
397
5
COMMON PRACTICES OF THE US HEALTHCARE MONSTROSITY. These practices affect patients across many insurance companies & health systems. The problem is how these business practices intentionally create barriers between patients and the medical care their doctors recommend.
Prior authorization requirements:
Requiring pre-approval for treatments, medications, or procedures, which can delay or deny necessary care while patients' conditions worsen.
Claims denial practices:
High rates of initial claim denials for legitimate medical services, forcing patients and providers to spend time and resources on appeals.
Network restrictions:
Limiting which doctors and hospitals patients can see, potentially separating them from established care relationships or specialists.
Coverage rescission:
Canceling policies when patients become seriously ill.
High deductible plans:
Offering plans with deductibles so high that patients avoid necessary care due to cost.
Formulary restrictions:
Limiting which medications are covered, sometimes requiring patients to try cheaper alternatives before accessing prescribed treatments.
Administrative burden:
Creating complex paperwork and approval processes that deliberately consume significant time from healthcare providers.
Surprise billing:
Patients receiving unexpected bills from out-of-network providers, even when receiving care at in-network facilities.
JohnWickdidnothingwrong
Look.
We know what makes them take notice.
mksu
This is all very deliberate on the part of the media.
CedricDur
Media being biased and reductive? Shocked.
Blunderwriter
I like the optimism. But will it change health care in America? Hate to poop on the party but I doubt it.
WitchIrkalla
HighMagosSquidward
It's not even just an insurance problem, we need to overhaul the entire medical system. The insurance paradigm allows medical systems to charge exorbant prices because of the expectation of insurance coverage, which creates a self-replicating problem. If you doubled the insurance coverage of the average person, medical pricrs would simply double in response. Pricing regulations need to exist and be enforced.
RayneOfSalt
Universal Healthcare is such a difficult concept that only 154 nations have implemented it.
TattoosAndTENS
Per the new Executive Order: I will miss all these people when they’re arrested at the protest, diagnosed with “mental illness” by State doctors, thrown in “wellness camps”, and…you know.
TheAnswerWasAlwaysMoreLube
The next step will probably be that you can loose citizenship for "treason" by being in a protest. And then sent to one of the deathcamps.
TattoosAndTENS
Oh that’s already a thing.
KommanderKayriel
Death to Nazis. Free Luigi!
rudiboy2000
In the UK we pay national insurance. A percentage of our pay. This means that we get FREE healthcare in hospital and at our GP. We pay a nominal fee for prescription medicines no matter how many items there are. There could be 1 there could be 10. One nominal fee. We pay a nominal fee for dental care no matter how many fillings. A nominal fee for a check up.
If you need care at home, you get this free. It’s called a care plan. If you need a special bed or equipment this is free. I feel for you.
bourbonandbaddecisions
The NHS predecessor was founded in 1948. While they were rebuilding their country after WWII this was a priority. Could have easily been written off as an unnecessary expense post war. But wasn’t.
tacoperrito
My family in the states regularly belittles our NHS. Yet when I say okay so let’s say you live a healthy life, eat well, exercise, don’t smoke or drink, don’t live outside your means, buy your house, put money into savings and book one of you gets cancer - is it fair that you could lose everything because of something you couldn’t have prevented?
The NHS is amazing and should be preserved at all cost
rudiboy2000
People belittle it here. Let them go to the states then they’ll see how lucky they are.
DrAnimalWelfareScientist
Having used both systems I think the NHS is amazing but it's criminal how underfunded it has become, the low staff pay that's harming a dedicated staff, and immigration changes that have made staffing shortages worse. If you have decent US insurance it can be faster, particularly to see specialists, but the risk of being without is too great and the potential of medical debt causing bankruptcy no matter if you have it or not is disgusting. The best system I've experienced is the Austrian one
NChomsky
Pushing to cut funding to public programs is one well-understood technique that rotten capitalists use destroy programs in order to force them into the disgraceful private sector, where they end up becoming 10 orders of magnitude worse. They squeeze the LIFE out of the programs to the point where they're just lifeless carcasses that get tossed right back to the public sector like "here, you fix it now".
CaptSchmidtGaming
ya know... the fact that we don't have universal health care in the richest nation in the world suggests that there are actually 2 nations being ran under 1 American Umbrella.
Stolf
Israel citizens get free universal healthcare via U.S. citizen taxes. Cool, huh? HUH?!?
CaptSchmidtGaming
Who are you mad at?
Stolf
Our entire species, at this point
Eleshar24
It may help the protestors to get their lingo in order. "Free healthcare" is not going to help their cause because indeed, healthcare isn't free anywhere. In Europe, our systems are better described as "public healthcare" and "non-profit healthcare". We have a plenty of fully private healthcare providers as well as private insurance providers, but the point is that the system is generally universal, i.e. it is highly difficult to not have healthcare insurance: when you are employed, 1/2
Jarjarthejedi
If you really think that changing the terminology will change the idiot's response to the ideas you have been living under a rock buddy. Literally EVERY TIME people have demanded that language be changed to cater to those who seek to prevent the thing from taking place they just pivot to making the new language the evil that needs to be fought against. Pick better battles.
PastureofMuppets
If you think sound bites that the media can grab and twist to fit their narrative shouldn't be more carefully thought about you are naive. Messaging does matter. The moment short-attention-span-listeners hear someone say "free healthcare" they decide people "want things for free" and tune out.
So it IS better to say i want healthcare to be a right, i want universal healthcare, i want healthcare to be not-for-profit, to not have insurance company death panels, etc.
Jarjarthejedi
Oh yeah. Got to keep trying to make sure everything you say can never be twisted by dishonest people who will openly lie if it suits their needs. That's the real priority here! Forget about trying to actually improve things, make sure you spend all of your time and energy trying to police your language so that liars who are going to lie about what you say have a slightly more difficult time of it. Right. *rolleyes*
Eleshar24
the insurance is automatically paid from your salary, when you are unemployed, child, retired, student,... it is paid by the state. Healthcare providers cannot deny lifesaving care even if somehow you are uninsured. Every EU country has a different system, but the keywords are "universal public non-profit", not "free". 2/2
NChomsky
The protesters are highlighting a fundamental difference in priorities. When Americans say "free healthcare," they mean free from the predatory practices I listed above. Europeans may pay through taxes, but they're freed from the 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗲 of insurance executives overruling doctors, or patients rationing medications to afford rent. Understand? "Free" means liberation from a trash system where healthcare decisions are made in corporate boardrooms rather than examination rooms. >
Eleshar24
The protesters don't need to convince the MAGA village idiot (becuase they never will), they just need to stop being such an easy targets of "free healthcare = CoMmUnIsM!!1!11!!111".
NChomsky
Protesting Americans understand that doctors and hospitals need funding. What they reject is the moral obscenity of shareholders profiting from human suffering through deliberate care delays and denials. When a diabetic dies because they couldn't afford insulin that costs pennies to produce, that's not a "market solution" my friend. That's a POLICY CHOICE. "Free healthcare" is shorthand for "healthcare as a human right, not a commodity to be optimized for quarterly earnings."