Don't worry. Democrats are going to bring in Rahm Emanuel to set straighten out the party, especially for fundraising. We'll, have a Republican vs diet Republican again soon enough. Like Bill Maher advocates for. Straight Republican policy, but "educated" against those dumb animals on the other side.
I'm also sure the countries at war appreciate the non-voters sitting this one out as their way of protesting Biden for not doing enough to end said wars.
Will be tough for them to see all those people murdered for Netanyahu's ambitions knowing they have a direct connection to why it will be allowed to happen wholesale. They probably are so pigheaded right now that they'll never be able to actually recognize the amount they are responsible though.
76,456,532 non-voters didn't elect Trump. 76,456,532 Trump voters elected Trump. How can the democrats entice roughly 4 million unenergized voters next time?
Oh, I don't know, maybe by stopping their efforts to undermine democracy so that people can feel like their vote matters? Promote Ranked Choice Voting, support 3rd parties and coalition building, end gerrymandering, agree to open primaries, put cop cams on politicians (OK, this one is just something I want and not likely to get more voters voting), let people have a direct non-binding vote on all legislation and see how well their elected officials listen to their constituents?
It's hard to blame the indifferent when the wolves have taken the herd. I guess everyone needs someone to blame. I feel betrayed by the people who actually voted for this, not by the ones who didnt.
"All that matters to me is my family in Palestine, both candidates said they were pro-Israel so I could not, in good conscience, vote for either" This is on the Dems and their obsession with courting moderate republicans.
No, when you feel both are bad, you vote for the least-worst of them. Biden and Harris at least made noises about pushing for a cease-fire and resolution. Trump said he'd let Israel do whatever. Voting is never about having the perfect candidate, but how hard you'll have to push, and where you're starting to push from, once they're in office. Anyone who didn't vote is culpable for what happens to Palestine under Trump
If all they did was vote for her, maybe. But voting is just one action of one part of democracy. If they're not for what she does and speak up, then they're not culpable. Again, it's about how hard you have to push, and from where. Harris would've needed pushing on Palestine, but getting her to move her position would've been far more likely that what will happen with Trump.
No, Harris literally sent two republicans to Michigan to explain how pro-Israel she is. "Don't wait for the perfect candidate" is a fucking stretch when the imperfection is "They're providing the arms that are being used to slaughter my family" And to further drive this point home, Why havbn;t the democrats done anything given how they're still in power? They made changes to aid policy RE: Ukraine, why can't they change policy RE: Israel ?
One side made the promise of going full fascism while also saying they'll make sure Israel will complete the genocide. And to your question as to why haven't the dems haven't done anything in power? Usually, Republicans vote no on anything that would make the dems look good, like that bipartisan border bill that got killed because Trump told them to.
Who do you think would've been more open to a change in policy after election: Harris or Trump? Do you honestly think there's no difference between Harris and Trump in terms of working towards a cease-fire and sending aid to Palestine? Also, there's a difference between being "Pro-Israel" and pro-genocide. Harris was trying to thread that needle, being one but not the other, while Trump is clearly pro-genocide.
You should watch S06E05. Quimbi releases Sideshow Bob from prison to avoid having him labeled a political prisoner, but is then accused of being soft on crime. Everyone votes for Sideshow Bob including Homer and Krusty because he promises to reduce taxes
It's as though you somehow think that 150M isn't a representative dataset for the US and that the other 60% of voters would have all voted for the person you want to win.
They wouldn't.
Angry at Trump voters who are clearly voting against their own interests? Sure, that I get.
But being angry at non voters or Trump voters who aren't voting against their own interests is stupid.
Not voting for your interests is not the same as voting against theirs. Not every non-vote is for trump. Not every trump vote is against personal interests. You're not being honest with yourself or the rest of us when you spout this anger across the internet. If you're gonna be angry, at least direct it at something that matters. Even if that's non-voters. Work towards legislation that requires citizens to vote if that's what you believe, but getting angry at the agnostic is not helping.
If everyone able to vote had voted? Possibly. I know someone who decided not to vote. Apparently they normally vote republican, but really had a bad feeling about Trump. But that's why I consider them a coward. They know Trump is awful and will make this country worse, but they can't stand the idea of voting dem, even though they knew deep down it was the right thing to do. The fear of voting for a liberal woman scared people from doing the right thing.
the fact that you guys use "liberal" as if it means "far left" is one of the biggest problems you have. If the US was a car and the direction you're steering in is equal to the direction of the political party that is being voted for, you'd either go full on republican which means 100% right, or your brainwashed brain thinks "I'm a leftist" and you vote democratic resulting in the car steering 60% right. Never have you guys actually steered left.
Which is why I'm going to blame the stupid and ignorant voters, the party that didn't run a good enough campaign, the media for sanewashing a wannabe dictator, and the piece of shit party that got him this far. Blame all around for all.
This last US election gave the people a choice between Classic Reagan and Diet Reagan, despite frequent warnings there was no policy or platform pivots towards anything popular by the Democratic party. What's the Dem's plan to energize voters next election?
The Nazis had lost seats in the election where Hindenburg and co made hitler chancellor and fucked it all up. In fact if you look at the statistics https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_1932_German_federal_election the voters that stayed home compared to the previous year were nazi voters.
Yeah don;t blame the candidate that refused to court these voters. Blame the voters that saw "I will keep Israel armed and enable genocide. MAGA!" and "I will keep Israel armed but I'm not a fascist" if your most important issue was your family getting obliterated in Palestine, I can understand staying home and not voting for either candidate.
There's nothing worse than complete obliteration accompanies with torture and rape. Both parties held the same position, so neither party got the vote. In 2028 when the democratic candidate is farther right than Ronald Reagan, liberals will still be obliviously making points like this as if it’s just LeFtIsTs WaNtInG PuRiTy and not the entire voter base abandoning a democratic party that has chosen to spend 2 decades abandoning them, and the lesson still will not be learned.
With the current estimates, there are about 244.7m eligible voters, and a turnout of about 155.5m voters. That's just 89, that didn't vote. Did you measure the total population by any chance, thus including children and felons who cannot vote?
Are you subtracting total voters from total population? Because that's the only way I can get anything like that number. So yeah I guess fuck all those toddlers who didn't vote.
I've been arguing with a non-voter because they believe all responsibility lies with the DNC and not any voter that sat out or voted against their own interest without doing a modicum of research.
You're probably not gonna budge them, because it's always easier to blame others than to take any action oneself. You can't argue someone out of laziness.
Feeling entitled to votes from those with a differing ideology while simultaneously scolding them for not giving up the only leverage they have with no concessions is a curious form of outreach.
Lol, what leverage? And the ideology of "not having fascists run the country and turning us into Nazi Germany part 2" sounds like it'd be pretty good. But I guess not everyone thinks that way.
If there's no leverage associated with withholding votes then why are people upset about not getting them? Until the people force the democratic party to pivot to a legitimate platform of improving conditions and not just being slightly less bad than the GOP the voting base they need to win will remain unmotivated.
Thelrishlnquistion
I said it before, apathy and laziness will be the death of America, and it seems I was right
ArgentXero
Don't worry. Democrats are going to bring in Rahm Emanuel to set straighten out the party, especially for fundraising. We'll, have a Republican vs diet Republican again soon enough. Like Bill Maher advocates for. Straight Republican policy, but "educated" against those dumb animals on the other side.
CityYeti
I was wondering when your yellow belly would show up.
ArgentXero
I only showed up because it was you. <3
BORGALOOGIE
psycho3d
blusterkeaton
We get a failure to vote notice if we dont vote here in Sydney. We get fined $55aud as well.
Theshnazzyone
Almost all of them 30 and younger, not gonna get lower rent or affordable housing now. but man, the price of eggs.
powwerbottom
Narrator: "The price of eggs, in fact, would be much higher"
ISayShenanigans
I'm also sure the countries at war appreciate the non-voters sitting this one out as their way of protesting Biden for not doing enough to end said wars.
Theshnazzyone
Will be tough for them to see all those people murdered for Netanyahu's ambitions knowing they have a direct connection to why it will be allowed to happen wholesale. They probably are so pigheaded right now that they'll never be able to actually recognize the amount they are responsible though.
ISayShenanigans
Nah, they won't have time to recognize it. We're heading into the second Trump term! Something new to protest every week is around the corner!
HairyChairstepper
Fucking idiots
Subsound
Daskapable
76,456,532 non-voters didn't elect Trump. 76,456,532 Trump voters elected Trump. How can the democrats entice roughly 4 million unenergized voters next time?
zechor
Oh, I don't know, maybe by stopping their efforts to undermine democracy so that people can feel like their vote matters? Promote Ranked Choice Voting, support 3rd parties and coalition building, end gerrymandering, agree to open primaries, put cop cams on politicians (OK, this one is just something I want and not likely to get more voters voting), let people have a direct non-binding vote on all legislation and see how well their elected officials listen to their constituents?
Subsound
Bold to assume there will be a next time to vote.
idrinkcheapbeer
It's hard to blame the indifferent when the wolves have taken the herd. I guess everyone needs someone to blame. I feel betrayed by the people who actually voted for this, not by the ones who didnt.
DocTanner
"We're on 'The Simpsons'; ALL our bellies are yellow!"
hetnkik999
"I'm not voting because Kamala is supporting Israel. Having a Christo-fascist dictator who will ruin the country is the much better option."
Fuck off, fuckers.
CityYeti
Couldn't have said it better myself.
StubbDubya
Not to mention things will get much worse for the Palestinians under Trump.
hetnkik999
It will also go in the history books as to how the Ukraine was lost to Russia.
CityYeti
People will remember the history of how the fuck he got elected again and wonder why people didn't fuckin vote for her.
jackal12345
Dredd really hit the nail on the head
NickRivieraMD
cant see how they get from 28 to 9. How did the winner get only 1/3 of the votes that were cast for the candidate that won?
jackal12345
Mega City 1 doesn't have the 2 party system. Judge Dredd is a british comic.
NickRivieraMD
got it, ty
ShadeMeadowsArt
THIS
hellospacemonkey
They want to complain about the president and say it is not their fault no matter who got elected.
marsilies
If they didn't vote, EVERY problem is their fault, no matter who won. Their non-participation lead to the outcome.
DukeSliscus
"All that matters to me is my family in Palestine, both candidates said they were pro-Israel so I could not, in good conscience, vote for either" This is on the Dems and their obsession with courting moderate republicans.
marsilies
No, when you feel both are bad, you vote for the least-worst of them. Biden and Harris at least made noises about pushing for a cease-fire and resolution. Trump said he'd let Israel do whatever. Voting is never about having the perfect candidate, but how hard you'll have to push, and where you're starting to push from, once they're in office. Anyone who didn't vote is culpable for what happens to Palestine under Trump
OctopusGrift
If Kamala won would the people who voted for her be culpable for what would have happened to Palestine on her watch?
marsilies
If all they did was vote for her, maybe. But voting is just one action of one part of democracy. If they're not for what she does and speak up, then they're not culpable. Again, it's about how hard you have to push, and from where. Harris would've needed pushing on Palestine, but getting her to move her position would've been far more likely that what will happen with Trump.
DukeSliscus
No, Harris literally sent two republicans to Michigan to explain how pro-Israel she is. "Don't wait for the perfect candidate" is a fucking stretch when the imperfection is "They're providing the arms that are being used to slaughter my family" And to further drive this point home, Why havbn;t the democrats done anything given how they're still in power? They made changes to aid policy RE: Ukraine, why can't they change policy RE: Israel ?
CityYeti
One side made the promise of going full fascism while also saying they'll make sure Israel will complete the genocide. And to your question as to why haven't the dems haven't done anything in power? Usually, Republicans vote no on anything that would make the dems look good, like that bipartisan border bill that got killed because Trump told them to.
marsilies
Who do you think would've been more open to a change in policy after election: Harris or Trump? Do you honestly think there's no difference between Harris and Trump in terms of working towards a cease-fire and sending aid to Palestine? Also, there's a difference between being "Pro-Israel" and pro-genocide. Harris was trying to thread that needle, being one but not the other, while Trump is clearly pro-genocide.
thoushaltnotpass
You should watch S06E05. Quimbi releases Sideshow Bob from prison to avoid having him labeled a political prisoner, but is then accused of being soft on crime. Everyone votes for Sideshow Bob including Homer and Krusty because he promises to reduce taxes
CityYeti
Bob also cheated in that episode. But yeah, I get your point
thoushaltnotpass
Yes true! The irrealistic part happens when Bob gets pulled back in prison when it's proven he has cheated
kinarism
I don't understand hating on non voters.
It's as though you somehow think that 150M isn't a representative dataset for the US and that the other 60% of voters would have all voted for the person you want to win.
They wouldn't.
Angry at Trump voters who are clearly voting against their own interests? Sure, that I get.
But being angry at non voters or Trump voters who aren't voting against their own interests is stupid.
Subsound
Who said anything about them voting in person?
That's a really weird thing to emphasize.
kinarism
No one?
dontrike
Non voters voted against their interests, they voted to not give a shit even though they should.
kinarism
Not voting for your interests is not the same as voting against theirs.
Not every non-vote is for trump. Not every trump vote is against personal interests.
You're not being honest with yourself or the rest of us when you spout this anger across the internet.
If you're gonna be angry, at least direct it at something that matters. Even if that's non-voters. Work towards legislation that requires citizens to vote if that's what you believe, but getting angry at the agnostic is not helping.
Huhwhatcrazy
If more people voted, Trump just would have won by more votes. Don’t blame non-voters, blame the Dems
ShinyVulvasaur
You might be right but... imho it's not very effective voter outreach to complain so much about nonvoters. Leadership needs to take responsibility.
Subsound
What are they going to do? Not vote for anyone?
Sagromus
Do you think the outcome would have been different if nonvoters voted?
CityYeti
If everyone able to vote had voted? Possibly. I know someone who decided not to vote. Apparently they normally vote republican, but really had a bad feeling about Trump. But that's why I consider them a coward. They know Trump is awful and will make this country worse, but they can't stand the idea of voting dem, even though they knew deep down it was the right thing to do. The fear of voting for a liberal woman scared people from doing the right thing.
Raikupath
the fact that you guys use "liberal" as if it means "far left" is one of the biggest problems you have. If the US was a car and the direction you're steering in is equal to the direction of the political party that is being voted for, you'd either go full on republican which means 100% right, or your brainwashed brain thinks "I'm a leftist" and you vote democratic resulting in the car steering 60% right. Never have you guys actually steered left.
CityYeti
We realize that, but we're not discussing semantics at this point.
Subsound
epicjim
Keep blaming the voter and not the Party who inserted a candidate that no one nominated to run. And you will always lose.
CityYeti
Which is why I'm going to blame the stupid and ignorant voters, the party that didn't run a good enough campaign, the media for sanewashing a wannabe dictator, and the piece of shit party that got him this far. Blame all around for all.
Daskapable
This last US election gave the people a choice between Classic Reagan and Diet Reagan, despite frequent warnings there was no policy or platform pivots towards anything popular by the Democratic party. What's the Dem's plan to energize voters next election?
Sh4dowWalker96
There shouldn't need to be a plan. People should just fucking vote because it's your civic duty for living in the goddamn country.
Daskapable
People aren't going to do that. We have ample evidence that voters will stay home and shrug. What's the Dem's plan to energize voters next election?
Sh4dowWalker96
How tf would I know?
KlobberSaurus
18 million people sat it out while the nazis waltzed in.
DrWhy9
The Nazis had lost seats in the election where Hindenburg and co made hitler chancellor and fucked it all up.
In fact if you look at the statistics https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_1932_German_federal_election the voters that stayed home compared to the previous year were nazi voters.
ToSisPoS
90 million Americans sat by and said “let’s give him another go! I wasn’t personally impacted last time so I’ll be fine.”
CityYeti
Goose stepped*
SerialChickenLover
These Nazis are doing more of a duck waddle honestly
cragath
Goose waltzed...?
DukeSliscus
Yeah don;t blame the candidate that refused to court these voters. Blame the voters that saw "I will keep Israel armed and enable genocide. MAGA!" and "I will keep Israel armed but I'm not a fascist" if your most important issue was your family getting obliterated in Palestine, I can understand staying home and not voting for either candidate.
GogglesGreek
DukeSliscus
nd if all you care about is Palestine you're not going to do shit.
dontrike
Yes, blame the voters, that's exactly what you should do.
DukeSliscus
Yeah that worked great after 2016 right? redeploying that strategy in 2024 secured the Dems the... oh
CityYeti
Its possible to blame both, which I will do.
jabadanuts
Word! Refusing to be part of a genocide is defensible.
CityYeti
Yeah, because making it 10 times worse is the better option!
DukeSliscus
There's nothing worse than complete obliteration accompanies with torture and rape. Both parties held the same position, so neither party got the vote. In 2028 when the democratic candidate is farther right than Ronald Reagan, liberals will still be obliviously making points like this as if it’s just LeFtIsTs WaNtInG PuRiTy and not the entire voter base abandoning a democratic party that has chosen to spend 2 decades abandoning them, and the lesson still will not be learned.
dontrike
Cause Trump will definitely stop it?
DukeSliscus
Neither said they would, so neither got a vote.
historycat
140 million sat it out. And then complain that they don't get what they want.
soepie7
With the current estimates, there are about 244.7m eligible voters, and a turnout of about 155.5m voters. That's just 89, that didn't vote. Did you measure the total population by any chance, thus including children and felons who cannot vote?
Rogerwilco1974
I have heard "I live in a forever-red state
There's no point me voting". I don't know how to counter that level of stupid, honestly.
swagb98623
It's like they believe neither party will provide
Sh4dowWalker96
Tough shit. If you don't vote, you don't get to complain.
wadatahmydamie
“Who don’t Democrats do something?” - The people who refused to give Biden more than a razor thin margin in Congress and refused to stop actual evil
Ninjainslippers
Are you subtracting total voters from total population? Because that's the only way I can get anything like that number. So yeah I guess fuck all those toddlers who didn't vote.
CityYeti
I've been arguing with a non-voter because they believe all responsibility lies with the DNC and not any voter that sat out or voted against their own interest without doing a modicum of research.
mjperk
This argument sounds like the difference between "in theory," and "in practice." Ideals are good. They just might not always be pragmatic.
DarkwingDuc
You're probably not gonna budge them, because it's always easier to blame others than to take any action oneself. You can't argue someone out of laziness.
CityYeti
True that.
Daskapable
Feeling entitled to votes from those with a differing ideology while simultaneously scolding them for not giving up the only leverage they have with no concessions is a curious form of outreach.
CityYeti
Lol, what leverage? And the ideology of "not having fascists run the country and turning us into Nazi Germany part 2" sounds like it'd be pretty good. But I guess not everyone thinks that way.
Daskapable
If there's no leverage associated with withholding votes then why are people upset about not getting them? Until the people force the democratic party to pivot to a legitimate platform of improving conditions and not just being slightly less bad than the GOP the voting base they need to win will remain unmotivated.