With all of the debate, it's time to look at the strings.

Nov 24, 2017 8:17 PM

Abracanawbra

Views

169733

Likes

3321

Dislikes

87

net_neutrality

netneutralitynow

comcast

And it's going to get worse:

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Awesome post +1

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

From 16 years ago!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now here's to you, Mrs. Robinson.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Remember when US occupied Japan, one of the first things they did was dissolve the zaibatsu?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now we understand why big business wants to shut down Net Neutrality.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what you're saying is I should watch note Netflix?

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

Watch it while you can without paying extra

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Needs to be updated even if everything exactly the same. 2011 is not 2017.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We currently enjoy open internet, but they will control what we see here, too, just as soon as Pai dismantleds net neutrality.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

So says the green peacock in the corner

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean you don't have to believe the bs people put in your ear. Also that's a diverse amount of stuff. is there evidence they carebout views

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Free market, and less government oversight. I thought you wanted this America. That's deregulation for you.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

This.......so so so much this. Short-sighted, over-optimistic, deluded, abysmal thinking.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Please tell me The Sun isn't the biggest newspaper in Europe, that seriously says bad things about us Europeans

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It's almost like we're returning to monopolies again but our leaders are either bought out by it or unaware of it happening.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can we talk about CBS' "notable properties" for a second?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No mention of Sinclair?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Suomi mainittu! Torille!

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Mitenkäs sen bruttokansantuotteen sais kasvamaan 36 miljardia..?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To the square!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Good except GE doesn’t own Comcast. Comcast owns Comcast.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Under history. Search page for GE. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And if you do so, you'll see where GE sold 51% of NBCU to Comcast in 2011, then the remaining 49% in 2013.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So, where does it say that GE owns any part of Comcast?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ah, downvotes; the safe haven of the cowardly.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's right, you know. Comcast is an independent company that owns universal. U used to be jointly owned by the to companies.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Suomi mainittu!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yay Finlaaaand!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Today I learned.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nothing from this

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Great post. I’d love to see this with current stats

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What the fuck happened to the anti-trust laws and related legislation that was supposed to stop this?

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Money.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It started in the Reagan era, went from there...congressional whores got bought and paid for by lobbyists while we the people took it in the

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

30 years ago ATT was broken up because it was "too big." And so we come to this.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lax enforcement, lobbying, and the belief that government intervention is bad for the consumer due to the magic of markets. (1/x)

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

The trick, of course, is that inefficient or failed markets are significantly worse for the consumer. So, how far do you regulate? (2/x)

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Though to be fair, the economic tools used today are far more sophisticated and generally accurate than the ones used previously. While 1/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there have been some positive advancements in answering the question "how far do you regulate?" worth pointing out. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quite true. The issue, of course, is that high school economics still relies on price floors and ceilings to educate about regulatory (1/x)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I totally agree with pretty much everything you've said, and can totally get behind a stricter enforcement threshold for antitrust action, 2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Greenspan was on record saying that fraud enforcement isn't even necessary, because 'markets will correct for it,' which was boggling. (3/3)

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

OH well if the market corrects why don't we all just rape each other

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The "how far to regulate" is a core American confusion. It's not how much, but how well, and written by whom. The US regulatory process is..

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

3) -interest money out of politics, and sensible regulation can finally start to serve the public interest again, not monopolies.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2) notoriously corrupt and broken. People talk about "Industry self regulation", but the US takes it a touch too literally. Get the private-

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well, Alan Greenspan has admitted being wrong about a lot of things.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think GE owns NBC Universal? Comcast is a publicly traded company, and I believe they own the whole NBC Universal family.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Just checked- GE used to be the majority owner, but Comcast took majority in 2011, and it became wholly-owned by Comcast in 2013. (1)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This infographic is about 5 years old by now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, makes sense. Thanks

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think a bunch of those may be outdated or inaccurate, but don't care enough to look further. The post's point still stands though. (2)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The size of these companies makes the "don't consume media from these sources" argument irrelevant. If you do manage to totally avoid...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... all media from the big 6 (which is near impossible) they will never take a big enough financial hit to ever make a difference.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Still better than Canada, there are like 3

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

Canada is a US province soooo

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

Fuck off. We won the war against you, don't forget who burnt down the original Whitehouse.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even then they are deeply in bed with these 6.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

At least we have the CBC.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Australia there is 2. Newscorp and Fairfax.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also about 1/9th the population

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Per-capita media diversity, maybe? I’d also argue (maybe) that this is ever so slightly less relevant with modern internet.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bell, Shaw, newcap, Rodgers? Have any articles you can pass along?

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

I wasn’t considering internet providers but that’s an important part too!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shaw actually sold off their media business to Corus last spring - so I was thinking Bell/Rogers/Corus.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Newcap is almost solely radio, really it's Bell, Rodgers and Corus, and then 5 or 6 middle pack media companies. I work in radio.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Sun is not the top newspaper of Europe

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Is Europe a country?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it says continent.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I get my news from Nick Jr. 5/7

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Saying "they control" it implies there is some dastardly villain pulling levers behind the scenes. They're unthinking profit driven entities

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 7

I'm with you. And I f you don't like them then ignore everything they produce. That easy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Have you seen Sinclair recently?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

or Soros, or any of the other people belonging to the supposed "NWO". They are the James Bond villains, pushing their own agendas.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Not necessarily. Newscorp, Murdoch's empire, has very clear political tendencies, executed at Murdoch's direction.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

...you are aware that pretty much everyone else on that table is biased in the other direction, right? Everything is political now.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sure, but there's always a matter of degrees.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People actually crunch the numbers on things like this, it is mathematically quantifiable.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Still doesn't help that there's a false equivalency if you're one of those putting Fox & Friends and CNN on the same level.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unthinking doesn't account for their overreaching influence on law policies.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

A result of the government allowing itself to be driven by money, giving incentive to companies to invest in laws like they invest in R&D.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

as long as someone has something to gain they'll fuck over someone else to get it

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the problem with capitalism is its a game that can be won, without any kind of practical reset switch

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(please ignore my username im not actually a communist)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't give no fucks about labels because discussion don't give no fucks about labels.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unregulated capitalism or any kind?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well any kind's a broad statement. It's easy to criticise systems but hard to come up with a good one. Hopefully theres a version that works

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok narrow it to a kind of capitalism. *gonna through hive mind as a contender for workable system, PS: All hail the new AI Overload.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well the thing with capitalism is its all about who can gain the most money. A bunch of people will make companies all 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

competing but over time some will make mistakes and go bust or be bought out by others, until your left with one mega corperation 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would argue that was supposed to be governments, until they made a "mistake" and weakened their position.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree that power consolidation happens, but I wonder what is its engine. Which begs ehat the engine for power atomization. How to balance?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why the internet is very important, we're now able to create our own content and have the public decide whether they want to watch

8 years ago | Likes 227 Dislikes 2

And the media giants HATE it. Hence their earnest crusade to take control of it and turn it into yet another mediated subscription service.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And those fuckers are trying to take that away from you too.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They'll soon control the narrative online, too, just as soon as Pai kills net neutrality. Time to build our own decentralized mesh network.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Disney bought the production studio behind a lot of the top youtube content like Epic Rap Battles of History...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Check it out, they are buying ISPs like crazy too. Eg: GE owns a huge or majority stake in Comcast.

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

GE does not own any Comcast. But, who cares, right? Just throw out B.S. to support your opinion.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, NBC Universal is wholly owned by Comcast. GE sold the remaining 49% it controlled in 2013.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Don't bring facts into this debate!!! They have no place here

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So what do we listen to?!?!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mrs. Robinson, duh.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's time create our own ISP

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If we can keep Net Neutrality then it won't matter who owns the ISP's, the problem is that we need to fight over Net Neutrality every year

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Wrong, if Net Nuetrality dies, it'll matter who owns the isps due to content, but with NN, it'll matter due to reach and consolidation.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yes, and no. Obama passed Net Neutrality. We need to fight this, and then elect officals that will safeguard the internet.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Title I was implemented during the Bush administration. Title II was the Obama administration

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And ATT trying to buy Time Warner is a huge fucking deal.

8 years ago | Likes 412 Dislikes 3

Sinclair broadcasting bought tribune and no one bats an eyelash

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Time Warner was already bought by Spectrum. I used to work for them till they did that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

How do people still get confused over this? Time Warner Cable was spun off from Time-Warner Entertainment and purchased by Charter Cable.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My bad i thought i saw cable up there

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vertical vs horizontal takeover, it doesn't change a thing... Unless they completely wall off say HBO, deal requires too much debt for that.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The White House is blocking it. Probably the ONLY thing that I agree with them on.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wish someone would buy the fox parent company. Then shut fox down. Or make them lie less.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Your partisanship is showing just a bit.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Im a registered Republican. My statement still stands.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Remember when ATT was a comm. monopoly for the longest time? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Time warner doesn’t exist anymore. It’s spectrum

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Time-Warner as in the media company still exists.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not the same company. Confusing I know but Spectrum was Time Warner Cable which Time warner split from years ago.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Can't post a link because it's too long but just google Time warner vs Time warner cable.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Thanks for the clarification.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Post some deets so we can all be informed.

8 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 4

Thanks for posting this. I'd love to see an updated infographic. I can't believe this is nearly eight years old.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Not a lot has changed, until the att - time Warner deal.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Att is trying to buy time Warner for $85bb. The FCC is trying to block it. A simple search would tell you that.

8 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 19

But isn't Tim Warner now Spectrum?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn.. 85 babillion. If I had their kind of money I'd burn mine.

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 1

Obviously

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FCC is not involved. DOJ antitrust department.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

What OP meant is why is it important you nincompoop!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Really? OP posts this whole thing and has no idea why the merger is important? Thanks for that. Dipshit

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I think you missed the whole point of the post LOL

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0