May make time travel possible?

May 4, 2019 9:48 AM

Joyika

Views

125276

Likes

2931

Dislikes

100

This masks the fundamental problem that it requires "exotic" matter to work. Researchers basically going "matter that does what we want".

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Um, yeah...Gellar fields. You need them. Ask the last crew of the Event Horizon why. https://youtu.be/xuJnIJHgQ44

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Old news

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think I may have seen this exact illustration in a Popular Science magazine like a couple of decades ago.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Without breaking any physics laws" - Requires negative mass/energy. Choose one.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ludicrous speed!

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What do have on this ship, a Cuisinart?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Krups

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Eventful

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A wrinkle in time method?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Aubrey de Grey PhD, the man who put together all the scientific knowledge on aging and realized we can live forever with youth and health1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which therefore makes faster than light travel rather pointless, because even if you could do it, it would be cheaper not to. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Until we can shield ourselves from meteors and debris, this is kind of pointless...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This sounds like when Brian Cox was describing wormholes, something like: It's easy to do, it just takes materials that doesn't exist

7 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

That sounds exactly like my undergrad lab report conclusions

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

And just a smidge of...unobtanium

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

"I've invented a way to world end hunger, now all we need is an infinite food source to make it work."

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Nah, ending world hunger is possible with the food we produce now. The problem is lack of food, it's how it's distributed.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why make or distribute food when we can synthesize matter with a machine that doesn’t exist?? Check. Mate.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

can you imagine what it would feel like? getting sucked off through a hole?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And then you’re born

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fools! Just use a Stargate! v

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

You can go quite far, and you don't need a car, or even a ship!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's all fun and games until someone gets possessed by a Goa'uld

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Except it requires things which don't exist according to current physical laws.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*things that should exist based on our current understand of physical laws, but that have not yet been observed

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's nothing in our current understanding of physics that says that negative energy matter should exist.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s like using a curved mirror to look outside when driving. The mirror shows you moving faster than you are... but you don’t arrive sooner

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You’re just moving the location of visible light. Actual objects or its origination would not move closer than the actual speed.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

”Will” -> ”might”

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"Will" -> "won't"

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Really should have put a 'hypothetically' in there somewhere.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Based on the description-I picture an inchworm crawling on a piece of paper & the paper moving instead of the inchworm.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There aren't any space cops so we should break physics laws to go faster.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Sounds like Futurama when they discover that scientists increase the speed of light dunce you can’t go faster than that.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is this legit or am I getting my hopes up for nothing

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It requires a type of matter that doesn't exist (matter with negative mass, in large quantities) in order to work. Theoretically legit tho.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Its legit if you allow creative interpretations of Einstein's theories that invent particles we have no reason to believe exist, but could?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It is, however, the absolute best option for FTL travel we currently have.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Will" enable us to?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty presumptuous considering the fairytale exotic matter that's supposed to make this thing work.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If FTL was possible, it means it's very unlikely that anyone else in the entire universe has ever developed it, because where are they?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That assumes both that they'd want to come *here*, and that they've had time enough to go *everywhere*.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't have to come here. Unless there is some trick for entropy, their power consumption will be visible.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now, this may come as a shock. But space is REALLY fucking big. So mind bogglingly big. Asking why an alien race with FTL has not been 1.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

here is like asking why you haven't been to see grain of sand five trillion six hundred and thirty two billion and nine.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Second: Time is really long. An FTL civilization would cover the universe in a cosmic blink of an eye. Even if civilizations are unlikely to

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

colonize, it only takes one.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also takes that one being anywhere near us. Surviving long enough to develop such technology and Survive having developed it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First: Space is really big, but FTL travel would use an enormous amount of energy. It's not something you could hide.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Assuming our current assumptions hold weight. Or that the energy would be emitted in a form we recognise.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Frontlines book series

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Love those. Sci-fi is built by the lowest bidder and taken for granted. Cafetaria food is still shit, but now on a space ship. Feels real.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure they made a documentary about this: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119081/

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Im down

7 years ago | Likes 431 Dislikes 0

What’s the matter compressor?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is why, in 2208, scientists increased the speed of light

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It came to him in a dream, and he forgot it in another dream.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Good timing! I just finished turbo charging the matter compressor!"

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What's the matter compressor? ...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Nothings the matter Fry now that I've turbo charged the matter compressor!"

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Matt Groening is a time traveler.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*adjusts glasses* actually the planet express ship moves the universe around it and doesn't have any warp capabilities.

7 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 1

By contracting and expanding space behind and in front of it, like the above picture. Its called bubble theory

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It’s funny I read this in the professors voice but this is like episode 2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'll take things that will never exist for 400 Alex.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

I would not be so sure. Who knows what is possible in 200 years or even 2000 years.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They will never create tech that could actually allow all the worker bees to escape.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who's they?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Time travel has always been possible, but we can only go 1 way, and as of yet, we can't survive the trip. Thats the key.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Thank you. Came here to say exactly this...and downvote idiocy.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We all travel through time, none of us survive the trip. Dude.....

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*Points at Keanu Reeves* Somebody has figured it out.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is how good old fashioned regular warp drive works. No need to add silly names to it.

7 years ago | Likes 601 Dislikes 21

It's named after Miguel Alcubierre. A Mexican physicist who was inspired by Star Trek to create a mathematical framework for warp travel.

7 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

So, Alcu Drive it is.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

alcuhaul

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Bierre drive?... Beer Drive.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wiki: "Alcubierre stated in an email to William Shatner that his theory was directly inspired by the term used in the show". Has Citation

7 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 2

Well that doesn't explain anything at all. Thanks for nothing!

7 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 14

Probably the name of the theorist

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's been the name for a pretty long time

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's the name of the guy who proposed it as an actual scientific theory.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I thought star trek warp driver reduced the mass of the ship in question. They extended warp field to push a moon.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alcubierre gets his name on it cause he did the math.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Lol. The guy who created the idea was inspired from star trek.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Alcubierre was the IRL scientist who presented the first mathematics that it might be possible

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

unless you're watching the last jedi. in which case you just go really really fast

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I prefer Fujikawa myself

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think I got that reference.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shaw Fujikawa. I forgot the first part. And if you did, then well met.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you come up with a way to stick it to the universe you can name it whatever you want.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Warp drive is the silly name.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Warp drive is quite fitting. As they are literally warping space-time to travel infinitely fat distances.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As I told the other guy, it's still the nickname for the real title

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Like your mum's waistline?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Naw she’s fat as hell. Not fitting anything on her. She so fat Thanos had to snap twice.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because the drive warps the space-time-continuum?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean, that's true, but Alcubierre drive is the real name, so warp drive is therefore the layman term

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then name it Mcfattypattygogowarpydriver?

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Warpy McWarp Face.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And if I remember correctly, converting mass into energy to hit warp 2 would require more than 10 times the mass in the known universe.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

From Science of Disc world 2.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Fun fact, discworld is sorta... discworld 2. Terry Pratchett wrote another book featuring a flat planet... ish before them.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Science of discworld is a semi separate spinoff though, hence my specificity

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know I own literally everything he ever wrote. It just reminded me of it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That data is outdated. We're on the new scale now.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

They can just use your mum

7 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A very common plan but the line is usually too long

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Some guys at NASA redid the math and brought that number down significantly

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Fuzzy math

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Down to what? Only half the mass of the Universe?

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Few tonnes

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That sounds much more feasible, until further reading told me it needs to be some whack exotic matter with negative mass...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With numbers please dont throw around the word significant unless we got some more numbers

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

15

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Half of infinity is still infinity.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just the small problem of wiping out all life when you arrive at a location with a massive radiation blast from particles collected en route

7 years ago | Likes 332 Dislikes 6

Well time is a variable so just arrive @ your destination before you leave and there’ll be no “along the way” to accumulate particles during

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

This is a jump not a time travel.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only a problem for poor people who can't afford Warp drives.

7 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

Ez, arrive next to your destination instead of pointing straight at it

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

If its contracting and expanding space then its not collecting anything, am I missing something?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Details, details

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that peski energy requirement.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Problem? Have you not met people? Hell, I hope somebody's bringing one of these things here right now.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Particles collected? Wouldn't they just pass through the warp bubble like it was regular spacetime? Why would they ever collect?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless you can reabsorb the radiation and covert it to power for your next jump... Don't know how, but could be awesome.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He look! A planet with... BOOOM.. well without life

7 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

It's now a free real estate

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Haha, I imagine Capt Donald Trump saying all this.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

makes for nice weapon for exterminating life on large scale. world rebelling against your empire? send an alcubierre drive missile at em

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Want to wipe out all life in the universe? Build von Neumann probes with warp drives, and send them out to spread through the stars...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

wont there be a need for a drive as the rate they cover a given volume increases exponentially?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*muffled "fucking heretics" in the distance*

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Faster but vastly more expensive then a relativistic ballistic missile, perhaps also easier to detect. But it should work.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Much harder to intercept and to mitigate the effects

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How does one mitigate the effect of impact from a RKM? Something that is near invisible on approach.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Time. A RKM is not moving that fast. The amount of time difference between a warp missile and a RKM is on the order of years. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, it requires negative energy, that makes it kinda hard to build

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

won't it mean energy traveling back in time?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, just a lower energy state than vacuum energy.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you build colony ships, that's not a bug, but a feature.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

forreal... wont even need to take blankets with us

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Glynn Stewart's Space Carrier Avalon books take care of that issue with the Alcubierre-Stetson drive. Uses two bubbles of 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Warped gravity to capture and then slow bleed the particles collected as part of the deceleration process. In an emergency decel

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The computer forces the "KILLALLTHINGS" pulse on a vector with no life for thousands of light years by collapsing outer bubble from 1 point

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Step 1: Convert matter equal to the mass of Jupiter to energy to form the field Step 2: Figure out a way to shut it off when you arrive.

7 years ago | Likes 1617 Dislikes 4

We worked out how to build heavier than air flying machines just over 100 years ago, give us some time to work on it dude. We got this.

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

It took us 200,000 years to get to that point, though.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Technology advances exponentially. Computer power literally doubles every 18 months, look at the change that's happened since we created 1

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

engines for cars etc, then look at how incredibly the Internet's changed things in the last 30 years. By the time I die our way of life 2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

will be unrecognisable to that of today. Not saying we'll have warp drives by then but I bet they're not really that far off.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's only 2 things!

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

igotthatreference.gif

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They usually say it requires exotic matter which is better known as matter that is not known to exist.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This will take a long time for scientists to figure out. - Captain of the Enterprise: Scotty, you have two hours to find a solution!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of the later stages of the Bugatti Veyron. "Ok, so all that's left is figuring out the steering and brakes."

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think you'd probably want to figure out how to shut it down at least a little before you arrive....

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Step 3: wipe out all life at the destination on arrival with the bow wave of radiation it accrues.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don’t you need exotic matter with negative mass for the other end?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, and we don't know if it exist.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It used to start with "Convert matter equal to the mass of our sun." So. You know, progress

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You forgot Step 1.5: Create a means of generating negative energy, which we aren’t sure if even possible.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nibblers poop dark matter

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

also, figure out how to create negative energy. assuming it is possible

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also need an antigavity particle, which may or may not exist

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's down to a couple hundred pounds

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Step 3? Wouldn’t that ship be going through spaghettofocation? So I think survive that?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pull the plug?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just shunt in all into the nearest planet. That should hold it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's say we could "stop", I'd question how you return. I mean one calculation off and you shot past your goal.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That part's true even for conventional rockets. Thats why we let supercomputers do most of the calculations these days.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but FTL? better have a few super duper computers. And even then you might end up off a light year or two.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All of the people pointing out hurdles: you do realize that's exactly what people have said about every scientific breakthrough ever, right?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Flight: step 1: build a craft out of metal that floats in the air! Step two make your own wind! What idiots!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Internal combustion: step one, build something that can create and contain explosions. Step two, make it more reliable than a horse. Hahaha!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup, but if someone doesn’t point out the hurdles, you run right into them. Doesn’t mean don’t get on your horse, just be ready to jump.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sort of. Flying things existed in the world for millions of years but we have never seen an object move faster than light. This concept

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

depends on things like exotic matter with negative energy but we don't even know if it actually exist.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just because we have technology doesn't mean we shouldn't be skeptical of grandiose claims.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nor should we be dismissive of ideas that lay groundwork, waiting for practical science to catch up.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Discovery of the New World: step one, sail your ship over the edge of our flat planet. Impossible!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not the best example, as the fact that the Earth is round was known to scientists since the days of ancient Greece.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here’s a thought.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why not add brakes ????

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

We brake for nobody

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Air brakes". It works for Bugs Bunny.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Parachute maybe?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Step 3: Locate sexy alien princess and teach her about this thing human's call, "love."

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Crazy little thing called love.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Discover too late that she is the princess of space praying mantises

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Worth it...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's no such thing as an unarmed spaceship.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

step 0: figure out how to make negative mass. after figuring out if that actually exists.

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Damnit I was gonna comment this. Take your upvote!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

normal matter won't do the trick. this drive has more problems than this little info graphic wants to make you belive

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

It makes a several ton object move faster than light.. Its problems have problems !

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Only relatively speaking though.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You hit it with a hammer

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just jump out, like bailing out of a sled at the bottom of a hill.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's kinda what they're working on

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why not just use coal? It’s the miracle energy source, good for the planet and now spacetime!

7 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 8

Now I want to know how much coal it would take to get into orbit.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tsiolkovsky rocket equation

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, yeah, there is no amount of coal that would get you there, it weights too much.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Beautiful clean coal!

7 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

Good idea, in the empty blackness of space no one will even notice the coal dust!

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

And the coal miners will look up with pride at the night sky and marvel that their efforts are propeling us across the galaxy.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Trump was a steampunk fan all along? If he promised us steam-powered starships, he might get my vote.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If by magic coal could be used somehow, there really wouldnt be much of a downside to using it in space, would there?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Weight and energy density. Plus, you probably need air to burn it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hell, Project Orion was seriously considered. Nuclear bomb propulsion. 100 tons to Saturn's orbit by 1970.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Apollo+Service Module was about 30 tons. Granted this would include liftoff from earth with nuclear bombs, which may have some.. fallout

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or use antimatter

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

When they talk about "using the mass of x" they aren't talking about a chemical reaction. They are talking about antimatter annihilation

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I believe he was making a futurama reference, as the delivery ship functions similarly to the above.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, we are celebrated prodigious poopers.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Doesn't require antimatter, but does require matter with negative mass (which as far as we know doesn't exist). Also it would isolate the

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

section of spacetime you're in so there's no way to know where you are until you turn the field off, making it hard to know where to stop.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I thought the bigger issue was dissipating the generated force when stopping as to not blow up your destination.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup, arriving at the destination would cause such a massive gravitational wave that it would actually rip apart any planet you arrive at.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Here's hoping Aliens won't arrive at earth in one of these

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So why not use warp-torpedos on comets/asteroids with a critical course towards earth or alien ships/planets?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or against Bob? I don't like him, by the way...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why not form a field around an object, and move space around it? Same premise, but no accel/decel

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

That's literally what the Alcubierre drive is

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then why does it need to be in space?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm talking something similar but it's the same as what they are imagining. A sphere, instead of a front and a back. And it wouldn't need

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Acceleration or decel, it would basically just re-locate based on coordinates. A series of 7 points like stargate for example

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is that not what this whole post is about?

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

No, I don't think so. I believe they are still thinking in terms of linear movement instead of 4th dimensional travel.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

There isn't a fourth spatial dimension. If there were, all the inverse square laws (gravity, EM, etc.) would be inverse cube.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4th spacial dimension is the space between spaces. Think about a stationary object, put a box around it, and move the box to get the object

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2