2D Transistors

May 15, 2021 9:54 AM

TamilTechNews

Views

99494

Likes

1781

Dislikes

17

https://news.mit.edu/2021/2d-transistors-microchip-0513
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJwT0j1VGps

transistor

microchip

electronics

nanotechnology

physics

Science, you are one crazy mother... and I love it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I guess that's as small as we can make common computers then? We're not aligning quarks before quantum computing...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good news......BUT THAT DOESN'T HELP BUYING A NEW GPU!

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

End users who buy 1 at a time aren't the priority.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's interesting watching technology coming to the the of it's physical limits. Pretty soon it's quantum or stagnation

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 2

What I love about this is that some production assistant had to write all those 4’s for real

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

This new technology will require an extra layer between every metal contact factoring in that designs already have multi level contact point

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This will not play out as simple as advertised. The net benefit may not actually be smaller

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have the technological understanding of a concussed aardvark, so I missed a lot of this, but still very neat. +1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/5 the way finished with my masters in electrical engineering, and I still feel like I'll never understand this kind of shit. Wow.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What we need is software that's better at handling multiple cores. I can encode a project from Premiere or AE and use 100% of a single core

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

while the other 7 just sit there and watch

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NANOMACHINES SON!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

cuz the current ones are getting stuck in the covid needles?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope the nanobots that destroy life make something pretty

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“The solution proved to be a simple one” Just make it smaller lol

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All I'm seeing is Moore's Law continues to hold true because we find new solutions when the old solutions reach their physical limits

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The obsession with followings moores law is stupid and is holding humanity back from developing actual advances in technology

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For those wondering of the applications, it would mean we would finally break the 5 GHz barrier on consumer CPU's.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's what transistors were when I made them. JFET's are 3D junctions. This needs more 'splaining.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are still bias in the z axis. Have to be.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

VIAS, not bias

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have been wondering why they didn't make 3D circuits 20 years ago (I knew someone who worked at Intel then but not in design).

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If I remember correctly it was about costs. Intel was very successful by improving their existing methods and published several news over >

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the years where they debated the pros and cons of staying course vs. shifting their resources towards a different approach

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I remember reading that the stacking approach was delayed until the micronization wasn't worth the effort anymore

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's a limit to this. Imagine having your computer crash due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats a quantum computer friend

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's where we have to go. The current architecture where components are built so close together will have this problem

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I swear I saw people say that transistors are getting so small that cosmic radiation is causing computer errors.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Transistors on IC's are already 2D. Utterly stupid headline.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

Go ahead, downvote an IC designer.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Imgur hates actual science. That's why This Week In Clickbait always gets so much love.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Well, since you asked nicely .

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maybe. Just maybe. It’s the lack of additionally information that makes you come off as a penchant dickhead, rather than an expert?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Maybe the people who write headlines who don't have a fucking clue about technology are the REAL dickheads. Amateur writers.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Maybe just maybe headlines aren't meant for communicating high level ideas.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted May 15, 2021 5:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

"The solution proved to be a simple one" - that's obviously when the article becomes more complex.

5 years ago | Likes 213 Dislikes 0

They use a different material that requires an inbetween material to make up for the metal gap. Its not complicated but it wont work well

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Semiconductors are made out of nonmetals, and are generally poor conductors of electricity. What's cool about semiconductors is this can 1/

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Be changed to make them highly conductive, and this is the opening and closing of logic gates that makes computers work. The researchers 2/

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Reduced these gates down to the width of a single atom, but at such small scales the difference in electrical properties between the 3/

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Metal of the circuits and the nonmetal of the gate wouldn't allow electricity to flow. The solution was to glue them together with a 4/

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Semimetal, effectively blending their properties. It's like washing oil with water, you use soap to bind the oil and water together.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

It’s never been simple since the invention of mechanical computers

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, just make it smaller. How difficult could it be? /S

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Well... We're pretty much at the physical limit of how small they can be. So, the next big challenge is to figure out the best ways to...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... pack more of them into a small place. This seems to be one of those innovations.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It usually is simple, just hard as fuck to get there.

5 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

I feel like a lot of specialists look back at whatever the last big leap was and think "how the fuck did we ever miss that before?"

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Oh hell yeah.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It astounds me to think that one day we'll look back on whatever unlocks teleportation or FTL travel or viable large-scale terraforming like

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that too. Like 'Jesus christ we were so stupid the solution was right infront of us for like 500 years.'

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The problem is there's billions of possible simple ways for things to work, you gotta find the right one

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Not really because some are real hard to confirm. Take cern for exemple. Massive and massively complex. But sometimes, yes:carbon pen+scotch

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I saw something on reddit the other day about 2nm technology. A linked video said that the connections being so thin is a problem, as well

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

Link to the reddit thread?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

as leakage inside the transistor. I am looking forward to reading this to find out how they get around the limitations.

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

Heehee *leakage*

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What gets me is that that's not even 10 atoms thicc. (Si = 210pm = 0.210nm)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2nm is a marketing name as if it were planar, but as it's a 3D Transistor it's obviously a lot bigger

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If they would stop using silicon, and transition to synthetic diamond, leakage wouldn't be a thing.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm interested if it is viable for synchronous circuits. Clock distribution will be hell when we keep shrinking signal/noise.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2nm isn't actually 2nm transistor size. They still haven't gone below 22nm-ish transistor size. They have purely uptimized the x/2

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

connections between the transistors. So they become much more power efficient.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The proces they use is uses extreme ultra violet light to make a transistor pattern. Extreme ultra violet light can only be made with a

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

sapphire, which they superheat, so that it generates plasma, that emits sub 185nm lightwaves. Which they etch into the silica disc over

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Spoiler: they don't. They're doing stuff a QM PhD could tell them was a waste of time but they do it just to be funded.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the 2nm stuff is mostly marketing afak they're layering bigger transisters and saying theyre smaller

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Yep. Shape of the gate to make for less off-state leakage was interesting, too.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

^ this. The act of layering allows for the lower power consumption and increased performance as if it was a traditional chip at 2nm.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's a different way of measuring it, so not entirely marketing

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0