Jezebella
568
15
2
I saw this on a friend's page and answered 100 and thought I would get to move on with my life, but then the answers started rolling in. One person even actually said 30. Am I wrong?
Jan 15, 2017 4:04 AM
Jezebella
568
15
2
I saw this on a friend's page and answered 100 and thought I would get to move on with my life, but then the answers started rolling in. One person even actually said 30. Am I wrong?
Cptnlnsan0
Everyone loses : their time for looking at this post
OgreCyques
X= -100+70-30; X = -60
coffeefirstthinkinglater
Yes you are wrong. Not by any fault of your own though. Cost profit ratio comes into play so answer between $30 and $170 could be correct.
Ralphy07
I would say $200.00
compfreak530
It's 100$ the owner still losses 70$ worth of merchandise. He gets his 70 in cash back in exchange
SgtTempyst
It's $170, seeing as the original $100 was lost, then $70 in groceries. The $30 he gave back is part of the first $100.
Adasyd
Correct.
misspenguinsparkle
100
HUFLPUF
Slightly more than $100 because of the fixed costs it took to operate the store.
panchita86
I think $100. $70 worth of goods and $30 cash.
AGreatNameForARockBand
You are not wrong.
maclaglen
$200. Actual value may differ based on operation costs and legal fees after he stabs the woman to get his stolen money and merchandise back
Jezebella
lol
VeryAngryCupcake
Hes out 70 in merch and 30 cash 100 total
Odentay
These questions are worded specifically to trip people up. Hes down 100$ in the till regardless of what she spent
ImgurNeedsMoreSmartass
How much were the goods actually worth?
Jezebella
I think that the price set on them, regardless of increase, wouldn't be specific to the thief so it wouldn't be related.
theguywhoknowseverythingandnothing
70