Someone should tell the founders of the Confederacy that they weren't fighting for slavery

Apr 10, 2020 10:56 PM

Altanese

Views

1736

Likes

52

Dislikes

6

Specifically stating the slavery vs abolition argument as a reason to leave the Union

Stating the inequality of races as an obvious fact everyone knows

Arguing AGAINST states right to not-return fugitive slaves

"We are specifically doing this for slavery you guys, just in case it wasn't clear"

Lots of reasons the North sucks for opposing slavery and advocating racial equality

How dare they help slaves escape, clearly they are the evil ones

Lincoln hates slavery, therefore we hate Lincoln

Could this have aged any more poorly?

Look at these outrageous demands

'servile insurrection' is nicer than 'slave rebellion'

Black people had no say in the creation of the Union and therefore should never hold any say in it

Poor oppressed slaveholders

But yeah tell me more how it was just 'states rights' without explaining what rights, specifically, those states wanted.

civil_war

slavery

history

states_rights

confederacy

What is this excerpted from?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

From the documents of secession of several states https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I once got in an argument over this and quoted Jeff Davis, and the “it was states’ rights not slavery” guy said “well Davis was wrong!”

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I don't know much but let me guess based on context: Davis was a governor or otherwise major proponent of secession?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jefferson Davis? The President of the Confederate States?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Got it, I wasn't too far off :+1:

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The secession documents need to be better covered in history classes. Even just going over one state's would be good enough to show what the

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

States seceded for.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

On a structural critique of this post, list the states next to the excerpt.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was it states rights? I bet it was states rights! (to slavery obviously but you know)

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're correct. It was states rights (to own slaves) issue.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The only way I can interpret people missing that "to own slaves" part is that they're intentionally hiding it. It's stupidly obvious.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes but no. It's an educational system that allows states to set up their own specific curriculum. That influences the textbooks that are

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0