Denver Protests

May 29, 2020 6:31 AM

Gerfendor

Views

1205

Likes

65

Dislikes

31

Not sure if this is even the right meme? But seriously, stop being dickwads and protest in a sensible manner. Graffiti and destroying the surrounding neighborhood lends no strength to your argument. You should be protesting for injustice not to support your anarchist agenda.

denver

floyd_riots

Peaceful protesters have also been pretty much ignored

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not an unpopular opinion at all

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Ordinary people do fucked up things when fucked up things become ordinary

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's always the right answer.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People have peacefully protested for years, like kneeling. It got them jack all. You step on people enough and they'll bite back.

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 9

Just want free stuff and want to burn something

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Maybe, but fuck target and Wendy's. Exploitative shit corporations

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

But but but... FROSTYS

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is not an unpopular opinion though.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

The comments would say otherwise lol

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Angry people are always the loudest. Most people who agree probably just scroll on, ignoring it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Gandhi would be disappointed.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The forefathers would be proud.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

They sure would.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am all for civil disobedience. There is no chance of winning with force against the state.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The ending of segregation, women's right to vote, and several legal reforms beg to differ. Riots work.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Those were won more through the power of ideas firmly stood for then by violence.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Completely false. They were won as concessions because of serious threats to state power.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

No. Just like that. That is exactly what should done. More of this please.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly like that, actually. Plus a thousand other ways. Not looting tho, unless you like the convo to be about that instead of racism etc.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If only looting and property damage weren't effective protest tactics, I'd agree.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Effective? To which end? I mean, you do see how much of your national conversation already is about that instead of police brutality?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

From the Boston Tea Party to the protests against the 1999 World Trade Organization summit in Seattle, looting is economically effective.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The Boston Tea Party was and act against the state not random innocent civilians.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because no more WTO (or G7, G8, G20) meetings were held since then? Because global trade policies were changed because of violent protests?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Read how the sons of liberty acted in Boston tea party before you comment. It’s opposite of what you argue.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0