It's nonsense.

Jun 6, 2025 4:10 AM

LunaAtlas

Views

31897

Likes

955

Dislikes

33

US has a credit score of 715 if anyone was wondering

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shortest answer, because running a country at a deficit isn't a bad thing so long as GDP matches. If you make 2700 a month, and you borrow 2800, you are 100 dollars in debt at the end of the month.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can find the historical context of credit scores, but also: https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/16/business/moody-us-credit countries have their own and the USA's is going down.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Different budget

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

trump is actually creating a new rule to limit debt because of the insane 34 trillion debt. for more info google "trump rule 34"

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's because the finances of a nation (especially one with fiat reserve currency) have less to do with the finances of a person, than the finances of a person have to do with a blue whale foraging for krill. Debt, up to a point (and $34T may be beyond that point) is good for a nation and drives prosperity by being paid back (even if more debt is then bought with that). Debt for a person is an anchor.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On one hand, yes I get it. But also, isn't the majority of that debt owned by people and entities within the US itself? Like for example you can buy bonds, and the government repays it plus interest to you over time?

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Man I would've had a house ten years ago if not for credit scores.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It is not, ar all, nonsense, but tragically, it appears a little beyond many voting Americans' math skills. Every country, including the US, has a credit score: for countries it is the bond rating and, just like your credit score, it influences the cost of credit. The US WACC has been quite low, reflecting the low risk, among other factors. US borrowing is good policy if the cost of capital < the return on capital, you would too, if you understood the concepts.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Why even is my credit score calculated by two companies in the US when I don't even live there?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be fair, for better than a decade, my total debt was more than my yearly income (i.e. I had a mortgage and a car loan, and made less in a year than I still owed).

The difference, of course, is that I took on that debt to buy a house, and then slowly paid it down. I didn't keep borrowing more every year to continue buying toys (Lego, in my case; aircraft carriers in Uncle Sam's).

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two easy and simple words: Wage slaves.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm old enough to remember when the news was predicting we would never recover form a national debt of 2 trillion.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The USA has a credit score too, and it just got lowered from AAA to AA.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

because the united states is capable and does pay the interest on that debt, its not really any different from the average person having a credit card with a limit of 3200$ and having some balance on it that they are paying down.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You put the dollar sign at the front, what kind of barbarian are you?!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do you say thirty two hundred dollars, or dollars thirty two hundred?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not a valid argument, since the grammatical format is $ at the front and c (well, the cent sign) at the back. You don't see in retail stores "Soda 1$" after all. It's "Soda $1". Etc.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are you backed by hundreds of millions of workers?
Industrial and economic output are what the "lenders" see.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It literally is and that credit rating was just down graded. Imgur is full of lazy people that need to read before posting.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I swear, the blanket assumption on the internet is that every cynical statement must be true and insightful.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then maybe they should shoot for funny or intelligent, which they also missed.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Don't worry that you have a credit score that tells banks how profitable you will be to milk dry... Cos China has a social credit score! Just trust me on that OK?! Your life is bad, but its OK cos I'm telling you someone else's life is worse... Dont think about what I'm saying. Certainly don't ask 'even if you're telling the truth, why is that relevant to me and my life?'... But ideally just go full drone mode and repeat the words 'China is worse than here so I must be happy and contented!'"

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What is a credit score? Is that an American thing?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most countries have credit rating agencies that compile information on how much people are borrowing and how reliably they've repayed past debt. The US agencies have formulas to give you a numeric "credit score" that gives lenders and landlords an at-a-glance estimate of how risky it is to lend to you. There's nothing inherently wrong with credit scores and nearly every complaint Americans have about it are actually problems with the credit industry itself rather than the scoring system.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Country debts are very different from people debts.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Until Trump, that debt was constantly rotating out, and everyone knew they were going to get their check on time; it wasn't a $34T bill sitting there unpaid and going delinquent.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Trump hasn’t defaulted on debt though, so your comment is a lie.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The critical bit is "everyone knew they were going to get their check on time"; Trump hasn't defaulted, but his actions have resulted in the US losing AAA status on the Moody's and Scope ratings, which is fair to describe as a weakening of trust/confidence. Not catastrophic, but definitely not good.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well yeah, but a default would be catastrophic in comparison. Just don’t lie. Trump is an anal wart so there’s no need to make shit up.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I recently checked my credit report. There's shit on there that I've never been a part of.

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure if someone checked mine they'd just pull a shotgun from under the desk and shoot me.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My credit's so bad they won't even take my cash.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a cosmic joke that the banks that have destroyed the economies of the western world are the same ones that decide that the people they've screwed over are too risky to lend money to.

1 year ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 1

Rules for thee...

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could not agree more. The irony is totally lost on the banks...

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And yet an 18 year old with no job and no plan is fine to lend 40k to for school because they got the government to make it so there's no getting out of a student loan. Ever.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

they dont get all the money at once and they need to maintain a set gpa in order to keep the gov paying out that loan, but hay, you cant pay it back if you have been broke from the day you were born

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The national debt has nothing to do with personal debt. It's a convenient vehicle for the reich wing to shift wealth to the wealthy.
By making it sound like the country is broke, it's easy to convince people we can't "afford" things like universal healthcare.
Except... we decide how many dollars exist. We could decide to fund anything and everything we want, and it is not possible for us to run out of money. There are consequences, but not the dire ones the right claims.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hyperinflation can get pretty dire.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because things are going so well currently

It's nearly impossible for our economy to fall into hyperinflation. At least for now. Once this current admin finishes brutally murdering international trust in the dollar that situation will change.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I suspect if we decided to just start printing money to "afford" whatever we desire with no thought to the effects, things would get worse than they otherwise would. Statements like yours are analogous to someone saying, "why does it matter if I get shot in the head when I already have a broken leg?"

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not even close. You've simply assumed my suggestion would be implemented by people trying to make it fail and wilfully ignoring economic advice and abolishing all taxes and eliminating several more safety valves.
Printing money is already what we do (see for example quantitative easing), and taxes are one of several policies to control inflation. The people currently in charge are using these tools to extract wealth from most people and concentrate it in the hands of the few.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What I'm really arguing for is that we spend whatever it takes to get to a functional society, and if we need to inflict some economic pain along the way to control inflation then start at the top. Financial transaction taxes, wealth taxes, etc.
Get more money into the hands of people who need it and will spend it more or less immediately. That makes for a healthier economy.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, an independent study I read about years ago found that 80% of negative reports were posted in error by the reporting credit agency.

1 year ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

Every year get your credit report, and dispute everything. Even the stuff that’s valid like your current credit cards. You’ll be surprised how often the credit company doesn’t respond and suddenly your score goes up.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

How/where do you dispute things on it, btw?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You have to request your full report from each of the three agencies. You can do this once a year for free so don’t let them charge you. There will be dispute instructions included with the report you are mailed. Basically you just circle everything and mail it back. Any debt that has been sold is unlikely to be provable especially if it has been sold multiple times.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Excellent, thanks a lot.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because America runs on hypocrisy. The "Land of the Free" was never free for most people. A hypocritical nation created on stolen land and built by a stolen people.

1 year ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 10

Land of the fee, home of the slave

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's the land of freedom to exploit people by thieving capitals. They just let people think it was for all. Working as intended really.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Ranking 25th on the freedom scale.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

To be fair, you are describing the origins of most modern first world countries. It’s just a question of how far back in history you want to look

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"To be fair...", yeah you can fuck off too.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The land of the "it's free real estate, mate" /s

1 year ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Isn't that minted on Australian coins around British monarchs?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nonsense. Credit scores are an outstanding reflection of personal responsibility. And the United States has a credit score too. Too. It is called our bond rating.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 20

Credit scores are just another poverty rating. Rich people aren't worried about balancing groceries and medicine with a car payment. Nonpoor people can afford to pay off their cc each month, while that higher interest rate on low income households perpetuates their debt.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

This isn't true. Of course it is easier for wealthy people to have healthy finances. But income and credit score are only moderately correlated. A low income person can maintain a quite good score. And in the absence of such a scoring mechanism, we'd need one. It's way better than loan sharks.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I notice you keep repeating this ignorant shit but haven't offered a single rebuttal to arguments against you. Things like why does the score go down when things are paid off. Or why isn't rent reflected? Seems your a one trick pony in this debate and that trick is just carrying water for rich people.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

They're also known to have inaccurate information and difficult to correct, Fuck off.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

~kinda. The USA is like the Ottoman Empire. In it's early days it *was* the land of the free in comparison to it's contemporaries. However, over time that "advantage" has eroded until it's reversed and the nation is too high on it's own supply of propaganda to modernize to keep with their values. The Ottoman's had the same issue. They were very progressive and forward looking in their early days but didn't adjust to the world around them and so entered a slow decline. Coasting on momentum.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

......in its early days it was a slave nation...

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As was every great power of the time. As I said, compared to it's contemporaries. The Dutch republic was the only other nominal democratic nation of the time, and they had a defacto monarch in the House of Orange. The Dutch republic was also already involved with genocide in modern day Indonesia by that point. Hell, the thing that people forget about the slave trade is that the African nations/tribes were eager participants at the time. They enslaved each other all the time.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The credit score is not there to protect you against loaning too much. It's there to protect those who lend to you from you defaulting on your loans. Proper countries have systems to protect the civilians, America protects the companies.

1 year ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 4

How dare lenders not want you to default on loans. It would be great if everyone just stopped paying their debts right? Up until everyone stopped lending and you couldn't get money.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

India uses a form of the buddy system.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Proper countries also consider repayment history and assess the risk of default. That's not some big American capitalist conspiracy, it's just how all banks work.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There's a sweet spot that must be had.

Without some sort of credit rating system, people can keep going to banks and taking out loans far more than they can afford. This does have a negative effect on people who keep their money in those institutions. Their money is what's lent to borrowers, after all. Indiscriminately handing out loans is bad.

There's lots of stupid shit with this system, too. Like denying mortgage loans that would actually cost them less than their rent.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm with you on the first two, but the last is pushing it. There are two significant factors with a mortgage that are considerably less of a factor than renting. The most obvious is the fact that maintenance costs on a home are baked into the cost of rent, but they obviously aren't accounted for in a mortgage. The second is the amount/likelihood of risk and investment assumed by the lender as opposed to a landlord. An eviction is generally cheaper/shorter than a foreclosure.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The USA is judged by credit scores as well.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Came here to say this well. People are living in a bubble.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yep, and it's not AAA

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The real historical context? Laws were passed that stopped banks from denying loans on race, so they needed a new system. Enter credit scores, where the original scores were based on what assets like houses and businesses you had.

Guess who had houses and businesses because they had gotten loans previously?

HOAs basically had the same origin.

1 year ago | Likes 438 Dislikes 7

FREEDOM!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Huh. And here I was told because consumers were too irresponsible in the 1920s.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This post is illegal in the states of Florida and Oklahoma.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I will forever be bitter that credit scores became a thing the very year I was born

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Trump is pissing away over $45M to message his ego with a military parade on his birthday

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People keep saying this like it's a bad thing, but credit scores (1) are based on repayment history and total debt, not wealth and so (2) are *vastly* superior to how banks made these decisions before we had FICO scores.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Isn't the whole point of a credit score a digit that reflects if and how much you can pay off your debt to whomever you loaned it from? Credit cards don't make you wealthier, but they do allow a debt collector to get their money (by forcing you into more debt). A house or business can be sold to pay off debt. Credit scores don't reflect how rich or responsible you are, they reflect (or should reflect) how much debt payment can be collected from you in a pinch.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

A credit score is a digit that reflects your risk as a borrower

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The risk of lender and borrower are similar right? If a borrower can't pay back the lender doesn't get paid. The exception is systems where borrowers can be forced into prostitution/slavery to pay off their debt. But technically we don't live in such a system.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It helps keep the rich rich, and the poor poor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88v_r9osaAU

1 year ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

100%

1 year ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

That being said, it was an attempt to get around the old-boy network, and today, it's based on you being able to pay your bills reliably. And having assets, this is true. I'm not saying it's great, but it's somewhat better than just walking into a bank and having the manager have full discretion. "Well, he looks like a reliable fellow!"

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is "recent" too

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yea I'm 2 years older than credit scores. I got so angry when I first found that out

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And it's *better*! People should be mad at banks and wealth inequality, not the practice of credit scores.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

so.... its racism with extra steps

1 year ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 3

Classism. Non-white people were just the first targets of the barriers, now it's all poor people on equally disadvantaged footing.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

AND a thin veil.

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

It ain't thin unless you're head thick

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The definition of usa

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Along with bigotry, it's the answer to pretty much any question as it pertains to anything unbalanced or unjust in the US. Wealthy landowners have been making the rules for hundreds of years.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nonsense. Credit scores reflect how consistently you meet your obligations. They also reflect your consistent failures to meet obligations. In the absence of such a system, any smart and decent person would think the system up.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 62

Found the rich white guy!

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I doubt this person is rich. Rich people generally understand finances. Probably a "temporarily embarrassed millionaire"

1 year ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

The people that thought this up and the system to raise or lower your score (which are completely counterintuative) were not decent. They were clever, deceitful, and crafty, but not decent.

1 year ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

So how come paying rent doesn't factor in?

1 year ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Most rent payment information is not reported in a way that banks can have access to it.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I haven't missed a payment in over 20 years. I use about 3% of my credit. My credit score dropped almost 30 points last month because I paid off 1 card (About $100) and used another for it's bonus (about 85$). $85 whole dollars dropped me from 807 to 778. Not sure it has anything to do with meeting my obligations.

1 year ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Why does getting a new credit card raise your credit score? Why does doing a credit check lower your credit score?

1 year ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Why does paying off your debts decrease your credit score

1 year ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

You credit score is a measure of how what a good little borrower you are, not how good you are at financial management. Banks punish you for paying off debts because that’s not profitable for them. Your score goes down and can disappear entirely for “no credit history” because you are actually very good with money.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They don't"punish you for paying off debts." If you spend on a credit line but pay it off every month you will have a strong credit score. It is only those who have no recent history of making payments that will have a decrease to their score.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mine is decreasing. We pay everything through our credit cards and pay them off each month. Paying off our mortgage took it down, too.

I don’t actually care but it is how the system works. Banks want debtors to earn interest. They don’t earn interest from me. My score absolutely is penalized.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't. Paying if a credit card every single month and carrying no consumer debt improves. your score. Not spending on a credit line can hurt your score only because the agencies are unable to say anything about how you behave if you never have bills to pay off.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why does asking to see your credit score decrese your credit score

1 year ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

What‽

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Not just you asking. Need to make a big purchase? Better figure it out quick, because every time someone else checks your score it takes a hit

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Pretty much anytime you ask why something happened in the US, the answer is almost invariably bigotry....

https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1MHZrbHU2dzc0ZTNvY21ybDJvMDhlYnpoY2x5ZWZxZjh2NWJsYzF2diZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/C3oIjra1N9kFq/200w.webp

1 year ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 5

Or money. Often both together.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except for National Parks. Because Teddy Roosevelt wanted future generations to see the same wonders he saw.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

And Nixon with his EPA.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And/or Reagan.

1 year ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

v

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same thing

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Nah, the rest of the world copied Reagan in the 90s. We just recently started copying the bigotry

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

That would imply that there's no bigotry outside of Reagan which is nonsense!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

All squares are rectangles type of "same thing". Racism isn't reagan, but reagan is racism.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0