Happy for the message the cancellations send, but we can't really afford to lose any outlets attempting "real" journalism. WaPo is Bezo's toy. Its financial ruin won't hurt him at all, but will hurt the public... and, will hurt a bunch of the (good) journalists who will lose their jobs. What is left? NPR/PBS? NYT with its clickbaity conservative OpEds? The Guardian?
He said, "Every day, somewhere, some Amazon executive or Blue Origin executive or someone from the other philanthropies and companies I own or invest in is meeting with government officials."
You see, tho, Trump is not a government official; he is neither an employee or holder of any office of the public trust. But your Blue Origin fascist, met with one of the candidates for president, but not the other, then decided not to endorse, 10 days before the election.
Translating from Capitalist to Human: "I'm toeing the line now to protect my money, democracy can die, I don't are, all that matters is growing my personal wealth, I actively make decisions to kill humans every day like the choice to not end hunger or homelessness, or the way AmazonBasics steals and copies products, I do not care about humanity surviving, I don't care about democracy, I will run the death camps myself if I have to."
For the lawyers, that's not literal... just the literal effect
Yeah, i've been in the same kinds of meetings, and watched the government officials bending over to fellate the rich companies while the poor ones get boilerplate letters.
Right, that's why Elon Musk is now on track to get a special position with Trump's staff, should he get inaugurated, that will allow Musk to unilaterally remove and adjust government oversight over company regulations. Maybe the politicians you worked for weren't as easily and openly bribed as Trump, particularly by the biggest companies and richest assholes on the planet?
In matters of fascism, there are no neutral sides. You are either actively against them, or on their side one way or another. Anything else is just rationalization for bad behavior.
He's not a government official, but the move not to endorse is likely because they expect him to be again soon and they don't want his administration retaliating against them. Amazon and Blue Origin either have and/or could potentially get, a huge amount of money in government contracts that a Trump administration could easily cancel or at least make extremely burdensome for them.
You see, the job of a journalist is not only to report the events, but also to explain what they mean to the reader who isn't reading politics on the net 8-12 hours a day. A well reasoned endorsement is just that. Should they go "Kamala or Perish!! WARGHARBLARTGHL"? No. Should they go "Here's the track record and considerations we think make Harris a good choice for America?" Sure. Expect more from journalists and reporters.
His wife is working to make the world a better place, trying to spend all the money she got from helping to MAKE Amazon. No one seems to notice that bit, that she helped make it.
I think they're complaining nobody holds MacKenzie Scott culpable for Amazon and it's bad actions. I will say, even if she shares some of the blame for helping it succeed up to a point, she did at least change course into Philanthropy instead. Unlike Bezos, she's not at all responsible for muzzling WaPo's presidential endorsement, since that happened after she left.
Amazon was fantastic when it first started as a book seller, and then as extra stuff. During those early years you could get FANTASTIC deals, and everything was quality, and anything that wasn't, you could see from the reviews. NOW...it's fucking horrible, on SO many levels. And yet, we NEED it.
It's enshittification. First they make it nice so everyone want to use it and their userbase grows. Then, when growth slows, they switch to profits by extracting revenue and increasing savings everywhere, slowly turning everything just a little bit shittier. But people won't flee until the trust thermocline is breached, then they'll leave in droves.
Also a few writers and editors resigned. They did mention that other papers like USA TODAY and the LA Times are refusing to endorse candidates as well.
According to most recent numbers on Wikipedia, that's more than their entire print edition subscriber base, or 8% of their entire digital subscribers... In just one weekend.
I really want to know the amount of people who cancelled Amazon Prime because of this(amongst other reasons). Those numbers tick up and hurt their stock Jeff boy will be looking down the barrel of a very angry board and potential institutional investor lawsuits for his dumb fuckery.
8% is a pretty substantial hit for 1 day. Plus that figure is many hours old, i think they're probably decimated by now. Considering that gaining 4k subs was considered a good year, a 200k loss in 1 day definitely sends a message
You could even say it’s devastating, last I checked, most newspapers are running pretty close to redline. Losing 8% of your subscribers is probably cutting straight from ‘we’re making running costs and a tiny profit’ right into ‘well we’re spending more than we’re earning.’
It's not like the WaPo is ubiquitous with every day culture either. You won't see a vast majority of those people resubscribing, unlike, say, Netflix can when the next season of Stranger Things drops, or HBO when House of the Dragon season 3 drops
Cavy
Op, please seek professional help. You're fucking broken.
apacheian
When newspapers become cowards.
tarataqa
I was shocked that 2.5M people subscribe to the Washington Post (or any newspaper) in 2024.
sowhat4
Bezos is a spineless ass. I canceled my subscription to that rag, but, of course, I couldn't get my money back. I guess Bezos needs it?
Sensiblyinteresting
Call your bank/ cc company. They should charge it back
CobainsSarcoma
my god that idiotic invisible accordion
lastmanonearthbutidroppedmyglasses
TheLiteraryMachine
They look like Minecraft people...
KrondorMocker
https://helpcenter.washingtonpost.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000177571-How-to-cancel-your-digital-only-subscription
LompHoofd
onecowboytoo
If only this were satire and not real.
blubberymuffin
Happy for the message the cancellations send, but we can't really afford to lose any outlets attempting "real" journalism. WaPo is Bezo's toy. Its financial ruin won't hurt him at all, but will hurt the public... and, will hurt a bunch of the (good) journalists who will lose their jobs. What is left? NPR/PBS? NYT with its clickbaity conservative OpEds? The Guardian?
whisky432
Get the free ap news and reuters apps!
wavefront2013
This is great but down voting because no “politics” tag
MyCommentsUsuallyHaveTypos
Operative phrase here: "Be able to read".
emu314159127001
"Hey coffin, I heard you were looking for a nail. I got one for ya!"
Snow44444
"ABLE TO READ"
netboygold
NO BALLS
bippityboppitybuttsex
I read Bezos Op-Ed.
He said, "Every day, somewhere, some Amazon executive or Blue Origin executive or someone from the other philanthropies and companies I own or invest in is meeting with government officials."
You see, tho, Trump is not a government official; he is neither an employee or holder of any office of the public trust. But your Blue Origin fascist, met with one of the candidates for president, but not the other, then decided not to endorse, 10 days before the election.
ThingsThatDontJustifyGenocide
Translating from Capitalist to Human: "I'm toeing the line now to protect my money, democracy can die, I don't are, all that matters is growing my personal wealth, I actively make decisions to kill humans every day like the choice to not end hunger or homelessness, or the way AmazonBasics steals and copies products, I do not care about humanity surviving, I don't care about democracy, I will run the death camps myself if I have to."
For the lawyers, that's not literal... just the literal effect
KrondorMocker
https://helpcenter.washingtonpost.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000177571-How-to-cancel-your-digital-only-subscription
[deleted]
[deleted]
kadaeux
Yeah, i've been in the same kinds of meetings, and watched the government officials bending over to fellate the rich companies while the poor ones get boilerplate letters.
neithermenoryou
Right, that's why Elon Musk is now on track to get a special position with Trump's staff, should he get inaugurated, that will allow Musk to unilaterally remove and adjust government oversight over company regulations. Maybe the politicians you worked for weren't as easily and openly bribed as Trump, particularly by the biggest companies and richest assholes on the planet?
Ultratoxic
In matters of fascism, there are no neutral sides. You are either actively against them, or on their side one way or another. Anything else is just rationalization for bad behavior.
cbale2000
He's not a government official, but the move not to endorse is likely because they expect him to be again soon and they don't want his administration retaliating against them. Amazon and Blue Origin either have and/or could potentially get, a huge amount of money in government contracts that a Trump administration could easily cancel or at least make extremely burdensome for them.
Evi1Gav
Let me rephrase "trump is a petty asshole that holds grudges about any perceived slight".
WowThatUsernameIsSoOriginal
No one forced him to buy a newspaper in Washington of all places. He could have bought Home and Garden instead. What a jackass excuse.
Longinus212
He would have ended up getting more worth out of buying home and garden because he could just shill amazon products from it.
Sensiblyinteresting
Probably a side effect of the no balls
bippityboppitybuttsex
Yeah, his entire Op-ed is garbage...
SecondSince
That makes perfect sense because he himself is garbage!
pompoikpoik
media should not endorse any candidates. Period.
smitmp02
Let's start this trend after we hold off this dictator wannabe
OffTheGrid99
Thanks Russian bot
MacEifer
You see, the job of a journalist is not only to report the events, but also to explain what they mean to the reader who isn't reading politics on the net 8-12 hours a day. A well reasoned endorsement is just that.
Should they go "Kamala or Perish!! WARGHARBLARTGHL"? No.
Should they go "Here's the track record and considerations we think make Harris a good choice for America?" Sure.
Expect more from journalists and reporters.
pompoikpoik
you see, explaining events is very much different to "a well reasoned endorsement"
they don't have to be neutral. Endorsing will be understood by many as " we are smarter than you, believe what we tell you to vote "... useless
ruint
Democracy dies in darkness
TsubakiTragic
as shown by the imgur censorship
papromic
Well it does in 'murika.
SpaceParachute
Source for the full video?
LyvPhreeOarDye
It's actually not from WaPo it's the opening of last nights Colbert. https://www.cbs.com/shows/video/QVXZ_OM_t6lqb_hkOZJ4JH94GBw14Zex/
friendsofsandwiches
His wife is working to make the world a better place, trying to spend all the money she got from helping to MAKE Amazon.
No one seems to notice that bit, that she helped make it.
cepacolusmaximus
how could she? as a Female?
friendsofsandwiches
she's rich?
FlamedLion
Reminds me of the "Bitch your sitting in the Jacuzzi right next to me." Bit
RetrogradeLlama
Ex wife
honeybear2118
Put some respect on her title! Ex, indeed. Good riddance to that creep
nemesisx00
Making one of the capitalist horsemen of the apocalypse isn't exactly something to be proud of...
brobinson2001
Hitler not only killed Hitler, he also killed Hitler's killer.
applesforjuice
Nobody? Not even, idk, the courts who awarded her billions of dollars in the divorce or every single person I've ever heard talk about it?
marsilies
I think they're complaining nobody holds MacKenzie Scott culpable for Amazon and it's bad actions. I will say, even if she shares some of the blame for helping it succeed up to a point, she did at least change course into Philanthropy instead. Unlike Bezos, she's not at all responsible for muzzling WaPo's presidential endorsement, since that happened after she left.
friendsofsandwiches
Amazon was fantastic when it first started as a book seller, and then as extra stuff. During those early years you could get FANTASTIC deals, and everything was quality, and anything that wasn't, you could see from the reviews. NOW...it's fucking horrible, on SO many levels. And yet, we NEED it.
marsilies
It's enshittification. First they make it nice so everyone want to use it and their userbase grows. Then, when growth slows, they switch to profits by extracting revenue and increasing savings everywhere, slowly turning everything just a little bit shittier. But people won't flee until the trust thermocline is breached, then they'll leave in droves.
friendsofsandwiches
A louis rossmann connoisseur.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Leaps
Being bald is not a character flaw, please stop acting like it is.
ArchangelZeriel
I would have said "discount lex luthor looking ass" because it's not that he's bald, it's that he looks like a (specific) comic book evil plutocrat.
RetrogradeLlama
200k subscriptions cancelled so far per NPR.
MechKelly
Also a few writers and editors resigned. They did mention that other papers like USA TODAY and the LA Times are refusing to endorse candidates as well.
l0calh0st
200k so far
Heisanevilgenius
So far, 200k
KrondorMocker
https://helpcenter.washingtonpost.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000177571-How-to-cancel-your-digital-only-subscription
ProfFurryPaws
According to most recent numbers on Wikipedia, that's more than their entire print edition subscriber base, or 8% of their entire digital subscribers... In just one weekend.
TexanSailor
“Whoopsies! Is the consequences of my actions!”
Except one asshole made a decision and people lost their jobs.
He’s gonna get his payout even if he has to burn the paper to the ground to do so.
somtin
I really want to know the amount of people who cancelled Amazon Prime because of this(amongst other reasons). Those numbers tick up and hurt their stock Jeff boy will be looking down the barrel of a very angry board and potential institutional investor lawsuits for his dumb fuckery.
mcclough
We canceled our Prime. Wrote in the comment box “Tell Jeff Bezos to sell the Washington Post and pay his fair share of federal taxes.”
bloodtaker3
I canceled but wasn't given a chance to say why. I felt cheated
ANDY0UARE
Correct, 200K have cancelled out of 2.5M subscribers.
CallMeTrix
Ya. That is a substantial loss, way to not even comprehend what you're trying to scoff at.
kadaeux
Losing 8% of your subscribers in a short span of time is very much not a good thing. And not something a company ignores if it wants to continue.
McSkeevely
8% is a pretty substantial hit for 1 day. Plus that figure is many hours old, i think they're probably decimated by now. Considering that gaining 4k subs was considered a good year, a 200k loss in 1 day definitely sends a message
Kiares
Cheers for proper use of decimate.
FingerPuppeteer
That's about 8%.
Pretty big drop, even for big companies.
Snooj
Especially for a newspaper.
kadaeux
You could even say it’s devastating, last I checked, most newspapers are running pretty close to redline. Losing 8% of your subscribers is probably cutting straight from ‘we’re making running costs and a tiny profit’ right into ‘well we’re spending more than we’re earning.’
ownzyou123
It's not like the WaPo is ubiquitous with every day culture either. You won't see a vast majority of those people resubscribing, unlike, say, Netflix can when the next season of Stranger Things drops, or HBO when House of the Dragon season 3 drops