The Washington Post Response to being Unable to Endorse Kamala Harris because of Jeff Bezos

Oct 29, 2024 2:27 AM

Sensiblyinteresting

Views

56178

Likes

1469

Dislikes

58

Sound on

Op, please seek professional help. You're fucking broken.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

When newspapers become cowards.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was shocked that 2.5M people subscribe to the Washington Post (or any newspaper) in 2024.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bezos is a spineless ass. I canceled my subscription to that rag, but, of course, I couldn't get my money back. I guess Bezos needs it?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Call your bank/ cc company. They should charge it back

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

my god that idiotic invisible accordion

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If only this were satire and not real.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Happy for the message the cancellations send, but we can't really afford to lose any outlets attempting "real" journalism. WaPo is Bezo's toy. Its financial ruin won't hurt him at all, but will hurt the public... and, will hurt a bunch of the (good) journalists who will lose their jobs. What is left? NPR/PBS? NYT with its clickbaity conservative OpEds? The Guardian?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Get the free ap news and reuters apps!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is great but down voting because no “politics” tag

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

Operative phrase here: "Be able to read".

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Hey coffin, I heard you were looking for a nail. I got one for ya!"

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"ABLE TO READ"

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

NO BALLS

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I read Bezos Op-Ed.

He said, "Every day, somewhere, some Amazon executive or Blue Origin executive or someone from the other philanthropies and companies I own or invest in is meeting with government officials."

You see, tho, Trump is not a government official; he is neither an employee or holder of any office of the public trust. But your Blue Origin fascist, met with one of the candidates for president, but not the other, then decided not to endorse, 10 days before the election.

2 years ago | Likes 482 Dislikes 10

Translating from Capitalist to Human: "I'm toeing the line now to protect my money, democracy can die, I don't are, all that matters is growing my personal wealth, I actively make decisions to kill humans every day like the choice to not end hunger or homelessness, or the way AmazonBasics steals and copies products, I do not care about humanity surviving, I don't care about democracy, I will run the death camps myself if I have to."

For the lawyers, that's not literal... just the literal effect

2 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Oct 29, 2024 4:30 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yeah, i've been in the same kinds of meetings, and watched the government officials bending over to fellate the rich companies while the poor ones get boilerplate letters.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Right, that's why Elon Musk is now on track to get a special position with Trump's staff, should he get inaugurated, that will allow Musk to unilaterally remove and adjust government oversight over company regulations. Maybe the politicians you worked for weren't as easily and openly bribed as Trump, particularly by the biggest companies and richest assholes on the planet?

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

In matters of fascism, there are no neutral sides. You are either actively against them, or on their side one way or another. Anything else is just rationalization for bad behavior.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He's not a government official, but the move not to endorse is likely because they expect him to be again soon and they don't want his administration retaliating against them. Amazon and Blue Origin either have and/or could potentially get, a huge amount of money in government contracts that a Trump administration could easily cancel or at least make extremely burdensome for them.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Let me rephrase "trump is a petty asshole that holds grudges about any perceived slight".

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one forced him to buy a newspaper in Washington of all places. He could have bought Home and Garden instead. What a jackass excuse.

2 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 1

He would have ended up getting more worth out of buying home and garden because he could just shill amazon products from it.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Probably a side effect of the no balls

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Yeah, his entire Op-ed is garbage...

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

That makes perfect sense because he himself is garbage!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

media should not endorse any candidates. Period.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 44

Let's start this trend after we hold off this dictator wannabe

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Thanks Russian bot

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

You see, the job of a journalist is not only to report the events, but also to explain what they mean to the reader who isn't reading politics on the net 8-12 hours a day. A well reasoned endorsement is just that.
Should they go "Kamala or Perish!! WARGHARBLARTGHL"? No.
Should they go "Here's the track record and considerations we think make Harris a good choice for America?" Sure.
Expect more from journalists and reporters.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

you see, explaining events is very much different to "a well reasoned endorsement"

they don't have to be neutral. Endorsing will be understood by many as " we are smarter than you, believe what we tell you to vote "... useless

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Democracy dies in darkness

2 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 3

as shown by the imgur censorship

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well it does in 'murika.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Source for the full video?

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's actually not from WaPo it's the opening of last nights Colbert. https://www.cbs.com/shows/video/QVXZ_OM_t6lqb_hkOZJ4JH94GBw14Zex/

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

His wife is working to make the world a better place, trying to spend all the money she got from helping to MAKE Amazon.
No one seems to notice that bit, that she helped make it.

2 years ago | Likes 275 Dislikes 10

how could she? as a Female?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

she's rich?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of the "Bitch your sitting in the Jacuzzi right next to me." Bit

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ex wife

2 years ago | Likes 197 Dislikes 0

Put some respect on her title! Ex, indeed. Good riddance to that creep

2 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Making one of the capitalist horsemen of the apocalypse isn't exactly something to be proud of...

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Hitler not only killed Hitler, he also killed Hitler's killer.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody? Not even, idk, the courts who awarded her billions of dollars in the divorce or every single person I've ever heard talk about it?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think they're complaining nobody holds MacKenzie Scott culpable for Amazon and it's bad actions. I will say, even if she shares some of the blame for helping it succeed up to a point, she did at least change course into Philanthropy instead. Unlike Bezos, she's not at all responsible for muzzling WaPo's presidential endorsement, since that happened after she left.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Amazon was fantastic when it first started as a book seller, and then as extra stuff. During those early years you could get FANTASTIC deals, and everything was quality, and anything that wasn't, you could see from the reviews. NOW...it's fucking horrible, on SO many levels. And yet, we NEED it.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's enshittification. First they make it nice so everyone want to use it and their userbase grows. Then, when growth slows, they switch to profits by extracting revenue and increasing savings everywhere, slowly turning everything just a little bit shittier. But people won't flee until the trust thermocline is breached, then they'll leave in droves.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A louis rossmann connoisseur.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Jan 30, 2025 7:20 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Being bald is not a character flaw, please stop acting like it is.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

I would have said "discount lex luthor looking ass" because it's not that he's bald, it's that he looks like a (specific) comic book evil plutocrat.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

200k subscriptions cancelled so far per NPR.

2 years ago | Likes 240 Dislikes 2

Also a few writers and editors resigned. They did mention that other papers like USA TODAY and the LA Times are refusing to endorse candidates as well.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

200k so far

2 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

So far, 200k

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

According to most recent numbers on Wikipedia, that's more than their entire print edition subscriber base, or 8% of their entire digital subscribers... In just one weekend.

2 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

“Whoopsies! Is the consequences of my actions!”

Except one asshole made a decision and people lost their jobs.

He’s gonna get his payout even if he has to burn the paper to the ground to do so.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I really want to know the amount of people who cancelled Amazon Prime because of this(amongst other reasons). Those numbers tick up and hurt their stock Jeff boy will be looking down the barrel of a very angry board and potential institutional investor lawsuits for his dumb fuckery.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

We canceled our Prime. Wrote in the comment box “Tell Jeff Bezos to sell the Washington Post and pay his fair share of federal taxes.”

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I canceled but wasn't given a chance to say why. I felt cheated

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Correct, 200K have cancelled out of 2.5M subscribers.

2 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 4

Ya. That is a substantial loss, way to not even comprehend what you're trying to scoff at.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Losing 8% of your subscribers in a short span of time is very much not a good thing. And not something a company ignores if it wants to continue.

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

8% is a pretty substantial hit for 1 day. Plus that figure is many hours old, i think they're probably decimated by now. Considering that gaining 4k subs was considered a good year, a 200k loss in 1 day definitely sends a message

2 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Cheers for proper use of decimate.

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

That's about 8%.
Pretty big drop, even for big companies.

2 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

Especially for a newspaper.

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

You could even say it’s devastating, last I checked, most newspapers are running pretty close to redline. Losing 8% of your subscribers is probably cutting straight from ‘we’re making running costs and a tiny profit’ right into ‘well we’re spending more than we’re earning.’

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's not like the WaPo is ubiquitous with every day culture either. You won't see a vast majority of those people resubscribing, unlike, say, Netflix can when the next season of Stranger Things drops, or HBO when House of the Dragon season 3 drops

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0