Novityfurs
1977
213
55
Jun 19, 2025 4:06 PM
Novityfurs
1977
213
55
crapybarra
You all are being misled. It was transcribed incorrectly and so you are reading it wrong.
It is: Of course, I reject the premise of your question?
cptcr
he's asking a question?
crapybarra
It was a Simpsons joke but i guess some folks missed it
Boxzsak
Only 3 days shy. Would have been really cool if you had timed it out to be a year to the day from when you joined and posted interesting content to that transition to ragebait twitter screenshots. Food for thought on your next one, I'm not gonna tell you how to run your accounts, just thought it would be a cool concept.
houghten
let me take a wild guess: he persisted in rejecting it anyway and moved on to something else and/or had Hirono forcibly removed.
lackinglife
I saw a small part and the man was dodging giving an answers like he was neo
DuffyMx
all of those affiliated to the party of the stupid man on top, dodge like agents.
CaldariBob
They THINK they do, but none of them are that adept.
Reinhoolahoop
Did he take a breathalyzer test before the hearing?
RubberMonkeys
Senator, you can't believe what you read in books. Except the bible. - drunkseth
DogGuyInCatWorld
Did he really say that?
RubberMonkeys
Yes, but I believe it was during slotkin's time.
RubberMonkeys
/a/O8oStXp
IgnisInvictus
Answer the fucking question Pete.
TheRealSauceBoss
Even better, "Answer the question, MAJOR." I really, REALLY hope someone drops that on him soon.
pinpuller2365
They need to start doing exactly this. With those exact words.
ActionJohnnie
First tell him to sober up.t
[deleted]
[deleted]
Jarjarthejedi
How in the world is "would you kneecap a peaceful protestor?" a bogus question? What kind of stupid garbage is that? This ain't some leading question, or trick, it's literally "do you have any ethics whatsoever" and this asshole is deflecting AND YOU'RE DEFENDING THAT? What is wrong with you?
PeeterGrant
If you are asking questions you don't already know the answer to in this scenario, you are doing it wrong.
SomeDetroitGuy
What a shit take. Trump literally ordered the military to shoot protestors 4 years ago. We have the military (illegally) being deployed against protestors now. It is ABSOLUTELY the public's interest if the head of the military is going to order the military to shoot at protestors.
TheSlouchOfBethlehem
It's meant to expose hypocritical fuck-stickery, which is a valuable service.
CaldariBob
He hasn't been a "nominee" since end of January, Sparky. He's the Secretary of Defence, and the questions he's so desperately trying to dodge are the result of his own incompetence for that position.
yikesaroni
what is the problem with saying 'no' here though?