Every damn time.

Jun 3, 2018 11:00 AM

TheBloodyLady

Views

223709

Likes

5779

Dislikes

299

Without fail

Edit: Oh boy, you folks sure know how to take a world history joke way too seriously don't you? Thanks to everyone who laughed and had fun, and didn't take this as a political statement. This is a meme, not a standpoint on religion, politics, or anything else you might think it is. It's a meme. A joke.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I love how upset everyone is for this!

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

I'm not saying religion is responsible for all the badness in the world. But the world would certainly be better off without it.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"They will know of our peaceful ways! BY FORCE!"

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

I understood that reference.gif

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I laughed and upvoted, but nearly all jokes are based on a partial truth and make powerful statements.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Hey1 We're just three fun-loving, adventurous types who like to meddle in troubles bigger than ourselves. Ten points to Yahwehndor!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 18

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

v

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Glorious

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most people: "B-but here are several examples where this doesn't..." Grow up. It's a funny meme and has fairly high historical validity.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

This accurately describes half the comments section, thank you darling

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Probably because everyone has the mentality "im right, you're wrong" and some damage people take this to the extreme

8 years ago | Likes 541 Dislikes 17

Oh, that’s the joke, nobody would have figured it out if you hadn’t said it.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

When you can laugh on jokes about other religions, but you can't stand a joke about your own religion, time to check what hypocrisy means..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Why should I listen to you? you will either agree with me or say something stupid."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I think it's a survival trait. If I didn't view the people across the ridge as barbarians, who would I conquer so I'd have land for my kids?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually I would have left those barbarians alone, except they disguised themselves as my neighbor and then stole my chicken.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or maybe some causes like ending slavery or ideologies that put people in death camps like communism and fascism are worth fighting.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

What does that have to do with religion? I really want those things as an athiest

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did he say it wasn't? Also, not that I disagree with you, but morals are subjective too.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Get your fucking logic outta here

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

no you

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

https://imgur.com/WO5NUBV

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol so logical

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, it is you who are wrong!

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's the children who are wrong!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is obviously an attack on religion and not at all a joke, how dare you! It's not like those religions fight and cause trouble!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sarcasm?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sarcasm.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

'Honestly, I've been asking myself the same question for years now'

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

if i could remove on thing from our world, it would be religion.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Can’t we all just get along and accept the Norse Gods as the one true Gods.

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 8

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't wanna have to spear myself to a tree if i want better SAT scores.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hang yourself* (Don't actually hang yourself, please).

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The religion or creed doesn't really matter. All of it just boils down to 'us' vs 'them'.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

There is the slavery, subjugation of women and killing those that leave the religion. You know which one and only one that does all of that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Enh, it's more the people using the religion as an excuse/rationalization than the other way around. People have used all 3 to do so.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep. Tribalism. Humans are pack animals and mostly followers. Very easy to control and manipulate. See: The Miligram Experiment

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Of course it matters. What's easier to use to convince people to slaughter someone? "I don't like them." or "Omnipotent entity said so."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Hitler was none of those.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 28

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

History exists before Hitler and the 1900's, darling.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He was a vegetarian... Same difference.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hitler was a Christian.

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 20

Catholic, wasn't he? The catholic church was super down with the Nazis...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, He claimed to be a Christian in public life, but he hated Christianity. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

He used to promote a twisted form of Christianity in order to secure his own ends, however.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Came here to say this. I would imagine most people who commit or are implicit in acts of genocide use religion as a basis to garner support1

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Without actually engaging in private belief. Or their fanatics who do. Either way, people suffer immeasurably so who gives a fuck if they 2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

He publicly claimed to be Christian and his followers even wore belt buckles saying God with us. At the very least a Christian themed party

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

And it seems in private he was proud of his belief. One can be part of a group and still criticise them.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

So what god were they referring to with "Gott mit uns"?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Look at the Wikipedia article. He used a twisted form of Christianity as a tool, all the while stamping out Christian influence.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

He didn't though. Just because something was good didnt make it Christian. And vice versa. He tried to make things like HIS interpretation

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mostly Harry though.

8 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 42

Why is Jesus always so angry with me

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Username checks out

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

No really it is, it really is

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 15

What about imperialist christians intentionally splitting ethnic groups apart and placing them with long-standing rivals in order to

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Encourage instability and in-fighting, resulting in an anti-western society with extremist leaders pushed to the front that destroy any

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Progress their ancestors made in order to solidify their rule and rewrite history?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 2

I was like "haha yeah typical Harry" then realised you meant Islam.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Religion is not inherently evil, but many evil people have proved very, very good at using religion as a tool to wield hateful power.

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 12

Eh, depends on the religion. Jainism might not be inherently evil but the abrahamic religions certainly are.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's inherent purpose is control of other people through lies and threats. How on earth do you think that isn't evil?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Religion is a human invention. It's not evil, but boy is it a great excuse for destruction and death.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Counterexamples: most religions contain some very evil ideas. Stoning for apostasy, sex out of wedlock, eternal pain for homosexuality.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s what the Bible said people would do

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

then again, if you spend any time learning what some of the religions teach, you see they are inherently evil.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 16

I'm not religious, but (while they are intermixed with stonings and godly fury,) all three of these religions are built on the golden rule.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

You mean "love everyone, unless if the cunt is not part of our religion, or is different in any way or form?"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What does that even mean?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Crack open a bible and read it. Its full of stupid shit.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Treat others the way you want to be treated, be humble, be wise with money, you reap what you sow..regardless of the literal legitimacy 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

of the Bible’s events, you’d be ignorant to say it’s all shit. There’s some valuable life lessons in there and even though all the 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm in seminary, I've read it. Still not sure to what you're referring to.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Are you nitpicking only the good stuff in bible, ignoring everything bad?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's not inherant in the religions. It's the extremists and the evil in general. There are good and bad of each

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 18

That's like saying people that follow cults are evil. If you are convinced dying a martyr is a good thing to do, you do it.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"good" is in the eye of the beholder.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's mostly tribalism, maybe? And the major religions inculcate their followers with a feeling of "We are the VALID tribe."

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

That's why organized religion isn't a good thing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It can create group probs but it helps some members of society cope. We need to make humans acknowledge WE are responsible for our own shit.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then humans would stop waiting for God to sort it all out, including punishing/rewarding people after death. Let's do it ourselves now!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"The problem isn’t fundamentalism. The problem with Islamic fundamentalism are the fundamentals of Islam."

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

What are the fundamentals of Islam? (Legitimately asking)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1-To bear witness that there is one god and Muhammad is his prophet, 5 daily prayers, paying alms to the needy, fasting during ramadan, and

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6-fundamentals don't you think?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a bit confused on why you think they're scary.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4- belief in the prophets (Muhammad, Jesus, Abraham, the whole Lot - yes that was a joke), and the last is belief in God' predestination-

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5-that specifically means that while you have free will, since god is omnipotent, the outcomes of your decisions are foreknown. Pretty scary

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3-not often focused on when taught in religion courses. They are: Belief in God, belief in Angels, belief in Holy Books (Quran > OT and NT),

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2-if possible, making the pilgrimage to Mecca. Those are the foundations of Islam at least. There's also the "6 articles of faith" which are

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Religion encourages you to disable critical thought and compassion for people outside of your belief group, though.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

As much as this is a joke post. All 3 of these religions teachings promote charity and good work to all people regardless. People just suck.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yeah there's good and bad on each side

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why would you get downvoted for that?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Idk tbh

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? No! Let me cherry pick my facts to support my own confirmation bias!

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Claiming that religions are about charity and good work to all is also a massive cherry-pick.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not all religions, but the three in the meme do all call for charity and volunteer work.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This guy gets it

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

forget about Hindu/sikh extremists butchering people in modern day india or myanmar buddhists burning children?Spreading ignorance helps no1

8 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 27

Don’t forget that atheists killed over 100 million people in Germany, Russia, and China in the 1930s to 1960s. People just suck.

8 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 15

If you think commies murdered over 100 million people because they were athiest, I have news for you..

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Nooo no1 wants to hear ur logic and facts. We r a race of scapegoats n easy answers. If we have to think at all its unacceptable. A la trump

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 11

implying atheism was the catalyst to killing people...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

One could say the same thing for any belief system

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Since when atheism became belief system?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They belief in nothing, which is a belief system.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Jesus. Nazi's literally had "Gott Mit Uns" on their belt buckles, but people be calling them atheists.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Germany wasn't athiest, neither was china. Russia specifically had no state religion but most of the people still were. The reason people 1

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Can point to a religion and point to deaths is because its an instituition that openly advocates and funds violence. There is no athiest 2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Church or instituition. Nobody says athiest can't commit violence, they are just pointing out the problem of an organization that pits 3

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People against eachother.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait when did we do that? China, Germany and Russia were all Christian, right?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Read a history book. The 1900s were a very interesting time.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I graduated with a B in History and I've literally never heard of this. Can you provide a source for those 100 million?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

he is probably refering to dictators and communism getting people killed, but being too stupid to realise its not thanks to atheism.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

China, all Christian? There's not way you're not being sarcastic. It usually helps to put a /s

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah sorry, China was the one with 73% being registered as 'Folk religion' with 15,87% as Buddhism.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hitler used Christianity in his government. He professed to be a Christian along with his many generals and SS. Orthodox Christianity was

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

Where was it that the NT agreed with any of the Nazis agenda?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

majority religion in Russia.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Lip service, not any kind of legitimate representation

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Except when it was the Facisists, or the Communists, or the Chinese empire, or Mongols, or the Macedonians, or the Assyrians or the...

8 years ago | Likes 713 Dislikes 91

You do know the Assyrians were pretty much a pseudo-theocratic monarchy? Ashur presided over and actively justified their conquests.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't invalidate the meme

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mongorians!!!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

facism and communism are followed with the fervency of a religion

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wow, it's almost like this was a meme or something.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

I'd say this isn't a matter of Stone missing the joke, so much as actually using it as a jumping off point for discussion. *shrug*

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2018 5:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Only a fool discounts the past simply because he did not live in it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you are younger than thirty and think you have lived through a somehow significant period of history then yes.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2018 5:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

There were somethings more than thirty years ago that were religious based. Not the majority.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2018 5:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Waco TX...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fascists and communists were kind of a big deal.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2018 4:03 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yes the were and are still in our time line. Unless China stopped being Communist and Neo-Nazis all ceased to exist. You are the reason

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2018 4:03 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

we keep repeating the same mistakes over and over again. People like you disregard the past treating it like it as irrelevant. And thus you

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really? North Korea is super muslim I guess?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2018 4:03 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Oh I'm sorry, are the magnates in South America profiting off of the suffering of others also super Muslim?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2018 4:03 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Or how about the coal companies are they Christian organizations? Or maybe the Khmer Rouge? They MUST be super abrahamic in nature right????

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Remember when Pol Pot recited Deuteronomy while executing POW's?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What are these “Facisists” you are talking about ?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Easy sitters

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

World/global history is a lot to handle, eh?

8 years ago | Likes 208 Dislikes 3

Canadian, Eh?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Actually I'm from Michigan

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could barely digest "history of the world I guess" and that was written for idiots like me

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 7, 2018 10:25 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well if were talking about world history they played a pretty major role in the 20th century, even disregarding death tolls

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Created a near perfect utopia for all but 300 million of their citizens. Unless the survivors wanted more food, then that was a problem.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

When Mao took over China he made the total WW2 death toll look tame.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Google "holodomor", "gulag", "khmer rouge" and "cultural revolution"

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This needs more upvotes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh my sweet summer child

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Tribalism can be secular, religious, or some combo.

8 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 0

Nationalism is responsible for a lot more deaths in modern times that anything else.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Depends on your definitions, does that include communism and it's expansion to include more into the "Nation", ie the USSR/China?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are also a lot more people to kill today than there have ever been, plus wars are bigger, it doesn't come down to a few fights

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There may be a lot more people to kill today than in the 1910’s, 1920’s and 1940’s but many more died during those years due to nationalism

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Further back dude :-)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, none of those used religion as a casus belli afaik.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The Nazis and Imperial China both used religion as explicit justification. The USSR was a bit more complex. Don't know about the rest.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Y'know, holy wars become an inferior casus belli when you have imperialism.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Europa universalis reference?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeeup.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What? Both religions did. Both jews and muslims founded their's in blood. And christians have crusades.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nazi (fascist) Germany was a majority Christian nation. Communist Russia was a majority orthodox Christian nation. Those are systems of

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 78

Couldn’t be farther from the truth, but who needs facts.

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

Communists are very anti religion and always were.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Except that the Christian Leaders in Germany totally renounced the Nazis and even actively plotted against them

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Communism and fascism were installed in majority Christian nations to actually remove Christianity...and all religion. State control.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Roman's tried to control christianity as well. And the more they tried, the more it grew. So they merged with it, Constantine...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...converted to christianity and viola...Roman Catholicism was born.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you hate religion so much you'll spread lies and misinformation?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

government, but religion play still play a role, especially in Nazi Germany.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 57

Nope

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

Well that's pretty well argumented, pal

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

if you want to tie a religion to the Nazis they got most of their shit from Nordic Pagan religions. Hitler gave lip service to 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Christianity to try and appease Germanic Christians, but he never incorporated any Christian values into his regime. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

The USSR didn't want religion

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

They wanted Atheism, which was their unofficial state religion. It led to some pretty fucked up shit being done to try and convert people

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Only for a brief period of time. Once Christianity sided with them. That was all cool.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Later however, they brought the Russian Orthodox Church back to help boost morale of the country

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, this. They only dabbled in atheism for a short bit. Once the church came around everything was cool.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fascist and Communist regimes are not kind to religion. For them nothing - no authority - can be above the govt. Religion gets in the way.

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 4

Hmmm, what does this imperative of authority, combined with, near as makes no difference, omnipotence and omniscience remind me of?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think you are helping my point? Religion and fascist/communist regimes both claim to be the ultimate authority and thus are in conflict.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's my point, they occupy the same space in essentially the same way, the only "conflict" is nomenclature.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

At the same time it would be overly reductionist to ignore the role of German Christianity in anti-semitism. Then again, 140 character limit

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Crazy how a guy like Hitler can fool a majority Christian nation into thinking he's doing Gods work. Must have controlled the school books.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With the help of Theodor Herzl, the father of Israel...who actually created the dialectic of anti semitism. His diary...you should read it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Point well taken. I guess I was just challenging the premise that the regimes themselves are Christian

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Hen again a lot of polish catholics were killed off too, many priests ended up in concentration camps.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yeah, those first three were actually Atheist groups, weren't they?

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 36

Fascists were secular, not necessarily atheist. Chinese Empore was Confucianist/Legalist.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

China and Russia officially so. They persecuted all religions specifically because 1) they had no practical purpose and 2) source of

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

influence and defiance that was extremely difficult to control. The first large scale gulag was a seized monastery

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Not always

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

One of them were.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

IDK about the Chinese, but fascists are Catholics and Communists are a religion with an omnipotent, omniscient albeit earthly deity.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Which fascists are Catholic? Spain was, but Mussolini wasn an atheist and Hitler wanted to eliminate Christianity post-war. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Also, Soviet personality cult =/= Religion.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

In what way?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

All of them. Spain, Italy, Germany... The Germans wore "Gott mit uns", to which god do you think they were referring to?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nazism specifically wanted to get rid of Christianity, whether the majority liked it or not. Mussolini was an actual atheist.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's the traditional motto of the German Army. That had nothing to do with Nazism, it had everything to do with history and tradition.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Fascists were a blend of Christian, atheist, new-age, and cult. Communists were officially atheist, but many held onto their local ...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

... religions, even where paradoxically that local religion became oppressed. The Chinese empire was Taoist, Buddhist, Confucianist, ...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... and a plethora of other religion. Keeping in mind that China isn't simply a nation-state with a mostly homogenous population.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even if thise groups were having a religion, that doesn't change that their wars weren't religion wars

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The nazis tried to use the church for their propaganda, but their god was Hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Hitler was Catholic

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Atheistic neo-pagan, most likely. See "The Myth of the Twentieth Century".

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 10

He was raised Catholic, but he professed his own neo-pagan progressivist beliefs while he lead Nazi Germany.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

You could write an entire book about Hitlers religious beliefs. Its very complicated but he was irreligious but combined with strange ideas.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Communists sure, but not much fascists and imperial China

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 3

Nah, all that makes communism different from a classical religion is that their deity is earthly.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Ugh...where as us capitalists are just thrilled to worship inanimate objects. /s it's not black and white numb-nuts.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's what I said - it's silly to conclude that the rejection clergy's authority equates to atheism.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imperial China was religious, but the Cultural Revolution of Communist China was atheistic and sought to purge "The Old Ways."

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Atheists, but not irreligious. They worshiped Mao as if he's a living god. It's a personality cult gone terribly wrong. Just like NK today.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well didn't Hitler want people to put the government above their religion, and eventually phase it out entirely?

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

1/2 Hitler also started his own religion. One of his biggest political opponents was the Catholic Workers' Party, so he was careful early...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 to avoid antagonizing the religious in Germany as he did not want to appear godless or communist.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hitler just wanted whatever would get him off the most at the given moment.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hitler wanted to return to Neopaganism some what, but it's also important to remember that eastern orthodoxy effectively placed state 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

ahh okay. my history teacher never mentioned the neopaganism. I really hate seeing similarities between myself and Hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Over church with king outranking patriarch/pope in terms of religious authority.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 4

I figured that almost every conflict started because some people had some things, and other people wanted those things. But I could be wrong

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, when Neil Degrasse Tyson says you're right, you're probably right!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A much more elegant way to put it that gets to a better point: I HIGHLY reccomend "On War" by Clausewitz

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, I'd say it's pretty interesting to note that war occurs as a result. When's the last time you tried to kill someone you argued with?

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

I've never had enough money to do so, let alone had enough money to make a bunch of poor people die fighting to emphasize my point

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Armed conflict is just the last step of escalation, we usually find a solution before that

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Do you mean non-family?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean..... We've all considered it when talking to a flat earther or anti vaxer.....

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Oh just this morni- I mean, never.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

On a national scale? Pretty often, historically. On a personal scale? Burning people for witchcraft is a more recent thing than most wars.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yes, but we can at least agree that it seems trivial or contrived, right? Maybe even psychopathic?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Welcome to monarchy.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only true if because of over 5000 years of violent history. The last witch burning was in 1878. Since then more people have died 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Due to violent conflict than all the 4800+ years before that...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup. We can probably also assume that the other 195k years humans were around but weren't into recording history were a bit violent too.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

brush over the 100+ million ppl slain by secular communism in the last century. That’s more than all religious conflicts combined in history

8 years ago | Likes 264 Dislikes 79

Got em

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

Phew. Somebody else did it, too. We are off the hook.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That includes famines, mate.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

What is that a more humane way to kill people so it doesn’t count, mate?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Counting famine deaths as victims of secular communism is disingenuous, is what I'm saying.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No communist rulers ever used famine as a weapon or simply let people starve to hide the problems of communism?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If by "communist rulers", you mean fascist dictators.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Don't forget that secular communism specifically persecuted all religions. They were seen as parasites, only consuming and not producing and

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

a difficult to control source of defiance

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

You mean like many on Imgur?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

HEYOOO

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tribalism can be secular or religious. Look at the Them v. Us mentality of new Nazis. They are anti-semitic, anti-brown people, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

The Taiping rebelion (religious) may have caused that many deaths alone. Compared to total world population older conflict are even worse.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To call the communist government deployed by the Chinese and Russians secular shows a massive disregard for what the word secular means...

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 12

Secular = denoting beliefs or activities that have no religious or spiritual basis. And yes, the soviets actively stamped out religion

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

It was socialism, not communism, that did the stamping. They removed God from the equation of societal control by dictation and obedience. 1

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Replaced deity worship with state worship. They simply replaced one opiate of the masses with another. 2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And actively replaced it with worship of the state and leader. Show me the secular manifesto which has that in it's tenets.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

"Fuck humans" -Humans

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stalin was a fascist. The USSR abandoned actual leftist and communist theory almost immediately in favor of fascism and totalitarianism.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I suppose Stalin was in a way a fascist, he did kill way more communists than any fascist could ever hope too.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He killed a LOT of innocent civilians because they went against his policies. The soviet economy was organized around state capitalism

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

State capitalism = / = communism or collectivism

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

State driven and state organized economic activity =/= communism or collectivism

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also important to point out that capitalism creates false scarcity to raise housing and food prices. Directly causing hunger & homelessness

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Capitalism is not AT ALL a be all end all.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Really? Because I think the Thirty Years War and the Muslim Conquest of India alone get pretty close to that number

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 7

Religious people keep bringing up false numbers. Religions kill. They invade, kill, promote slavery— all in the name of their chosen god.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Thirty years war is nowhere near that amount. Muslim conquest of india lasted several centuries.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Moot points. They said communism has caused more in the last century than all previous religious conflicts. That's one hundred percent false

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shhh your ruining neck bard's point

8 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 33

*you're

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's okay, he's eating potato chips at the moment.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

A Bard with no CHA. Truly a cursed build.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Do you need a neck DM?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Nah, more of a neck romancer.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I need a Autocorrect DM, lol

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're comparing the last century to the preceding eras as if they are equivalent. Do you think the religious genocides of the past would -

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 23

- have had the same kill count if they had possessed the modern weaponry and population centers of the communist slaughters?

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 19

It doesn’t take tech to kill people by creating a state sponsored famine.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Stalin didn't kill the majority his own people with modern weaponry, he did it with food, or lack thereof.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

And how do you define the means by which he denied them that food? What would he have used to stop the people had they rebelled? -

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

- Modern weaponry.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

They're still right that population is a factor, though. World population has changed drastically.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The forced Irish Potato Famine killed about 1 million Irish out of a total 4 million. Organization is FAR more important

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a %, 20th century was actually pretty peaceful compared to human history. Which is pretty disturbing.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

WW1 and WW2??? Are you sure you want to stick to that statement? Im willing to bet more people died in the 20th century due to violence>

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Than any other century

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's why I said as a percent. And those two events were big spikes, but the 20th century as a whole is different. Back in the day,

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

warfare was constant and you had no choice in the matter.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes. I can link a few studies for you as well, but overall the 20th century including the two World Wars had an average death rate lower 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

2/2 Then the entirety of human history. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/03/pinker-explains-the-long-peace/ ( A good source)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

he did say as a %, whether or not that's true idk.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It’s almost like regardless of any ideology that humans have penchant for killing each other.

8 years ago | Likes 157 Dislikes 5

its almost like people justify what they wanted to do anyway by deciding "god said so"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Woah woah woah, that’s a little too logical.

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Who the fuck do you think you are coming here with all this common sense and logic

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Yes, but religion is about the only cause where otherwise good and moral people do terrible things willingly.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Spoiler alert: There's no such thing as a group of "otherwise good and moral people". We're all shitstains.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I genuinely believe the majority of people are good and moral. It's the shitstains that ruin it for the rest of us.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The majority of Germans allowed the Holocaust to happen. The majority of Russians allowed mass murder to happen. Your point is bad.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Breaking humanity into two groups never works out well. Nobody thinks they're the shitstain.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0