Didn't Even Make It 24hrs.

Jun 28, 2017 6:33 PM

franksfiles

Views

69508

Likes

1202

Dislikes

56

“I’m a firm believer that for our salvation we not only have faith in Jesus Christ, but we also obey the commands of God and that we confess Jesus as Lord,” he says in the post. “But one thing I do not support is the violation of our constitutional right to have the freedom that’s guaranteed to us, that guarantees us the separation of church and state, because no one religion should the government represent.”

Later, he says he’s “back at it again,” and asks for people to donate money to help repair his car.

Sauce: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/06/28/why-one-man-keeps-ramming-his-car-into-ten-commandments-statues-on-government-property

I'd happily send him $5. If I had $5

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

'Later, he says he’s “back at it again,”'

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you go to read the article and you see "You obviously love great journalism..." DOGJAMIT!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When I tried to read it the words never loaded , only the title did.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's the hero we need.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 20

The last time he did it he was diagnosed as schizo and blamed it on voices. Also spits on portraits in federal buildings and theatened Obama

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Never said he was the hero you wanted

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Whoever's facebook that is to have those two posts one after another is someone I don't want to meet.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

separation of church and state is in the fucking constitution, since yall love that document so much

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair it was erected by private donations and many other religious groups have applied to have statues erected including /1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Church of Satan, Hindu, atheists, and PETA. I have a feeling it's more of a funding issue that preferential treatment towards Christians.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your politics are ruled by money, why shouldn't a religion with more money have indoctrination / advertising on public land.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Footage of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzUT6NBFAWw

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What a bored-sounding warcry

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I figured the guy was just emulating Moses breaking up the tablets. I mean if it works for Moses, am I right?

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Nono. Then he'd be plagiarizing the movie and thou shalt not steal, right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does he take PayPal?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Is he going to be prosecuted for destruction of public property?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But it seems like a private statue. As it can't be a public.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Does he have a go fund me or something?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Or you can do like they did in Oklahoma...plan a statue of Satan on the capitol grounds since they allowed the 10 Commandments...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm a christian and destruction of property should obvs be illegal, but.. If he wanted to do this professionally I'd support his GoFundMe

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You forgot to mention the fact that this is not the first, but the second ten commandments statue this guy has driven through.

9 years ago | Likes 438 Dislikes 0

Well i gues this guy's name is Moses

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only in the south can you have a hobby of mowing down monuments.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

good for him

9 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 20

20 points?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well Moses smashed two stone tablets, and they were given to him by God.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Let's see if he goes 10/10

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I agree with the guy, but this was still a really stupid thing to do.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

So the "left" doesn't want it, but a Christian continues to take it down? That's interesting.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tannerite would have been cheaper

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

But then the media would call him a terrorist.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Walking up and pushing it over would have too

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think shooting towards a state capitol is a good idea

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you don't understand what separation of church and state means. One would think he would have learned after the first time.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Guy got his point across rather well. That shit doesn't belong there. Gonna cost him a fuck load of money and time though

9 years ago | Likes 241 Dislikes 43

I wonder if he takes requests, there's one in my town I wish would disappear

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Do you have access to a car?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Im not crashing my car into anything, I just got it all fixed up

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't necessarily have to be your car.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm still annoyed in god we trust in on our currency. It's bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

At least its just god not like In White Jesus We Trust. I mean its bullshit I just like to tell people(thats not true) It refers to Odin.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Cut it off all your bills. Its still legal tender if its missing some pieces

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

51%

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Moses did it first (minus the car).

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not Christian, but was destroying it strictly necessary?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

kinda

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Is anything?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Arkansas. What the fuck are you thinking putting this shit up...

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

They wanted to put up a satanic symbol as well but they were told no

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As they should be. We don't need any symbols associated with religions

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree. It doesn't matter what religion I believe in there should be no religious symbols at the state capitol

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a benefit to both sides to be separated. I don't see why the religious side doesn't see this.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bible belt doin Bible belt things

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As someone who lives there...only the oldies really are that bible-thumpin. People my age either don't want it or don't care enough to know.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds about right for most of the nation. Unfortunately the "oldies" are the ones who vote.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

here especially it seems like the old'uns seem to out number the new generation. anyone with an out from this state leaves. it's stagnant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Religion + politics = no. It's in our constitution

9 years ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 25

*squints at Reps*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No it isn't

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Trust me, that won't stop them, if you let them.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Indeed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wondering if all those constitutional purists also love the second amendment as well...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

Stictly "as a purist", the 2nd Amendment doesn't allow for what most people think it does.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The establishment clause refers to Feds.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

And?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wrong. Everson vs The Board of Education (1947) incorporated the states in the establishment clause.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The intention of church and state was to keep the state out of church and not allow religious testing for elected or appointed positions.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 57

There is no difference. If you allow church to infiltrate government, then their ideas are favored over other religions/sects

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

Every letter of the constitution was influence by judeo-Christian values.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The government promoting one religion over another is kind of a big deal with the founding fathers intentions.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

And when they wrote the Second Amendment, they only had musket balls.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

And when they wrote the first amendment they only had ink and quill. Guess the first amendment doesnt cover cell phones.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Whoosh.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're wrong. Reynolds vs United States 'that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion, 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency, 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

is a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty. 3/3 Also Everson vs Board of Education (1947) 3/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, 4/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1/2 I'm just really starting to wonder how Conservatives managed to get their reputation as the "real Americans" & "patriots." Because these

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 5

Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes trun to some people

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 days they seem to just have outright contempt for about 90% of what the constitution and the founding fathers were about.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

They created their own reality in their mind... everyone else knows they are not real patriots or real christians either.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

I must have missed the part where any other mainstream party did either?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 19

Fuck false equivalence. Dems are not the ones running on a platform of religious encroachment, wrt abortion, creationism, homosexuality, etc

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Sure, buddy, I'll believe all that when I see it. Republicans have had plenty of opportunities to get stuff done and don't.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Touché

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If people stopped treating every issue like the Superbowl things might finally improve. THEY'RE ALL SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE SAME DAMNED TEAM!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Kinda of funny that some of the same people scaring others about Sharia law is the same one who wants 10 commandment and prayers in gov.

9 years ago | Likes 336 Dislikes 36

If by funny you mean "Hahaha we are f***ed, folks," I agree!

9 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 7

I'm not usually a grammar Nazi but this made me uneasy.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

some of the poeple is same one who wants

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

"But it's the true religion, so I don't mind"

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

My own grandmother is like this, makes it really difficult to eat supper when she bitches about "rag heads" and sharia law all the time.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

My ma worked there when she was army, locals took bullets for her. she refuses to have any misguided BS around her.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Kinda or kind of. Also, *are *want

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Not too funny, as even when you try to explain it to them they do not see the parallels.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

But its their religion, so its better

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I'm glad this statue was destroyed. You cannot compare sharia law to the 10 commandments as they are not the same in stature or punishment.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 27

The bible prescribes death for disobeying your parents. Christians are killing their children en masse. Same with Islam.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

It's this kind of thinking that caused the Travel Ban.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sauce, please?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where are these kids and people being killed exactly? I am talking about current affairs I don't care about 25yrs-1m yrs ago that was the

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Past. It's regressive to think in any way christians are as bad as Islam. I don't have affiliations with either religions.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

aren't *

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait, what? Where are Christians killing their kids en mass?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

The LRA in Uganda off the top of my head

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, the language made it seem like the Pope or the leader of the Red River Baptist Association is advocating mass child murder.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You want to represent the Old Testament on Government grounds you gotta take the whole book.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Those 10 Commandments come from the Old Testament. Where God killed children en mass and it was vengeful as fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Remember the story about the kids that were making fun of the one guy on the road because he was bald? Yeah, god sent a bear out to kill 'em

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

To be fair, the 10 commandments follow basic Western moral principles. Sharia law does not. Not against your claim, but your argument.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 39

The 10 commandments are based on Greek, Persian and summarian commandments so your argument is not based on historical facts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, basic Western moral principles such as "thou shalt have no other gods before me"

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Fair point.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

The first 5 aren't basic western moral principles.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'll give you the first 3 are not (Catholic commandments). But honor thy parents and don't kill are western morals.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Those western morals that came from Africa or the middle east?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never said they originated in the West or only practiced in the West. But respecting parents and not killing are practiced by the West

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First 4 are all about God and his crazy narcissistic tendencies, I mistakingly included 5, honor thy father and mother.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why I said Catholic, there are different interpretation of the 10 commandments in different Christian sects. Catholic version 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Almost every society befor the rise of Christianity had laws against murder try agian.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also the commandments aren't just a Christian ideal, Moses is the Jewish people's Boy. They love that dude.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ten Commandments predate Christianity.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Take it easy dude. I never said it was only a western ideal. But No murder is a valued ideal by the West. Let's be friends

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Church and state

9 years ago | Likes 258 Dislikes 21

Jefferson's wall

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

He didn't write the constitution Madison did.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He did write the letter to the Danbury baptist church which is where the phrase is coined.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

church.................................................................................state

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

*slate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The intention of church and state was to keep the state out of church and not allow religious testing for elected or appointed positions.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 57

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 29, 2017 7:04 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Bible is optional tradition, you can request whatever you want or nothing. Roosevelt didn't swear on a bible, Adams and Pierce swore on ..

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Law books standing in for the constitution, and on and on and on and on

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

not even close, buddy.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Original intent is irrelevant. It cuts both ways.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Plus the founding fathers invented the phrase to explain part of the second amendment and it's exactly the original intent

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You get downvoted for being right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Sauce for that?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Gonna take a moment to respectfully remind everyone that the phrase "Separation of Church and State" does NOT exist in the US Constitution.

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 18

But... But the internet told me so. Oh I feel violated

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

It was a paraphrase by Jefferson of the establishment clause. It is what he believed that clause should do.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

right i dont think that a statue qualifies as establishing a state religion or prohibiting the free exercise of any given religion.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 22

While technically correct, that was how the establishment clause was interpreted by Founding father Thomas Jefferson.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Not at all, that's just how the founding fathers including Jefferson explained the free exercise clause in the first amendment.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

So by not at all I mean, that's exactly what the founding fathers said part of the first amendment fucking is.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʟᴇᴛᴛᴇʀs ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ᴇᴀᴄʜ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴅɪsᴄᴜssɪɴɢ ᴛʜɪs ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴛʜɪɴɢ.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

YUUUUP

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 29, 2017 2:51 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 21, 2017 7:40 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You compared sodomy to elected office? Wake up

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Rarely reinforced, but incredibly fucked up that they exist in the first place.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nobody has ever denied the holy spirit and been elected to office

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But yet we cant outlaw Sharia Law!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 22

Wut?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

sharia law is outlawed by not-being-fucking-law-here and most of what's in it that concerns you is illegal alrdy, you dolt

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People bitch about Sharia Law the same way that people claim the Earth is flat or vaccination cause autism. Unfounded sensationalism.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The constitution guarantees you the right to practice whatever religion you want. Not to vandalize artwork in a fit of righteous indignation

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

It's mealy-mouthed to call it "artwork".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Promoting one religion over another (By putting up a statue of its commandments) violates the constitution.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Sometimes when the government ignores laws, Citizens take matters into their own hands. They pay the price, it is still a crime. However...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is pure patriotism. And justified.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No it doesn't

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

If government started putting up statues of Angels and Jesus and came out saying "But it isn't a LAW! We aren't Promoting one religion!"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The founding fathers who wrote in their letters that this WAS the intent and function of the first amendment. BUT let me put it this way.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would you claim they aren't Promoting one religion over another? How about Mosques and the Quran. Oh Those arent okay. Just Jesus? Okay.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Strictly as written, it isn't a law promoting one religion over another. I am not endorsing a statue or religion, just promoting knowledge.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It is a hotly contested point, But the First Amendment establishes the Separation of church and state (Confirmed by the Founding fathers)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of things were confirmed by the "founding fathers". But claiming the Constitution says something it doesn't, doesn't actually help.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2