Oops?

Jul 8, 2026 11:39 AM

PileOfWalthers

Views

15720

Likes

260

Dislikes

10

Turns out doing this...

...will result in that?

https://www.amny.com/new-york/manhattan/evacuations-midtown-beams-buckle-skyscraper-07072026/

No Dana


Only Zule

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They failed to account for extra elevators and entrances for the commoners.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That seems like an expensive oopsie

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, there's your problem right there...

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So, here's the important part about why this is such a shitshow, because some right-wing folks are like "OH SEE THATS WHY YOU CAN'T MAKE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, CHEAP AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS TO BLAME" - and, no.

Pfizer, who owns the building, was planning to build *1,600 luxury high-rises*, and only *later* said "maybe 400 will be affordable housing" via trying to reduce costs in taxes. So Pfizer wanted expensive apartments but cheaped the fuck out on construction.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The company is Metro Loft, not Pfizer: the pharma company sold their stake in that building when they moved.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That 219E 42nd is doing some heavy lifting and I mean it...

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now they can add even more floors without the building getting too high!

3 weeks ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

aaaaaaaaaahh!!!! The angle of that window look weird! Run!

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Someone will sue because the older building didn't have a label saying "Do Not Stack More Than 10 Storys High."

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lookin' a little rough, there.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They said "affordable" housing not "livable" housing.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well they're not meant to be luxury flats. If we make sure the tenants are of light build and relatively sedentary and if the weather’s on our side, I think we have a winner here.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Architects Sketch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVm-xfu_dro

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Deconstructivism

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That wasn't done by jetfuel

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The comments here are wild. Guys the idea of adding floors to an existing building isn't new, and has been done successfully for decades. That's not what caused the steel to bend and the structure to become compromised. The contractor wanted to save money and used cheap, non-union labor that had no clue how to shore up a building and get it ready for more floors. This has nothing to do with what they planned, just pure greed and ignoring regulations.

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

You must construct additional pylons!

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Adding 19 floors to a 10 floor building? Oh for god's sake.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The structural issue happened to the other building.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can't see how adding 19 floors to a building that's 60+ years old when it was only originally designed for 10 can't end in tragedy. Adding a handful to one that's only a fraction of an increase is nothing compared to tripling it. Good old NYC grift has allowed this I'm sure.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter what you see or what you say you're sure of, what matters is how accurately those in charge of its construction determined its capacity and tolerances. How it will actually go? Who knows. But definitely not anyone on Imgur.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Five floors of one of the buildings is in collapse.

Evidence shows they don't know what they're doing.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Assumptions were made.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That'll buff right out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yeah, you go hit it with a hammer to buff it out. I'll wait outside. Watching from a safe distance. While eating popcorn.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Has anyone ever played Jenga?

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams." well non union worker can bent them apparently

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Johnson also alleged that the building’s developers chose cheaper, non-union labor to cut costs on steel installation and other parts of the project." Welp, There's a big part of the problem right there.

3 weeks ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 2

The current engineers are at least in part to blame for not factoring in the latent waste, fraud, and abuse in New York construction. Many such cases.

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Things seen today doing structural assessment

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm just wondering how long until it surfaces they asked AI if the modifications was possible...

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Using computers to calculate structure load tolerance has been standard for decades.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but that is done by (at least expected to be) professionals checking and feeding materials and loads into dedicated programs, while others check local regulations and do building inspections. Not ask a glorified search program "Can i build ontop of another building?" and go with what ever result the AI halucinates up.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously. Which is why they don't do that.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean the same way those lawyer firms that got caught doing it wouldn't do that?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, I mean in the way architects and engineers go about planning and designing buildings. Not that they're perfect of course and mistakes do happen, but its silly to think some single person asked an LLM how to make the building expansions and they just went with that and no other input.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They've had to clear a large zone around this, because they have no idea which way it's going to come down. Will it pancake, or tip?

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But two 110-story buildings collapsed neatly on their own footprints after each sustaining single aircraft strikes they were designed to survive.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

Falling debris from the two towers caused structural damage and fires in WTC 7, leading to its collapse later that day.

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

just the 21st floor. they said its not at risk of total collapse only just partial collapse. the main issues were the 21st floor area with beams and sagging floors.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It isn't supposed to do that.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They replaced the facade and all the windows down there, that definitely should have made it more structurally sound!

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF ADDITIONAL WEIGHT CAN'T BEND STEEL BEAMS!!!

Wake up Sheeple!!! (heavy /s for the sarcasm impaired)

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Throw some jet fuel on it to heat them up and bend them back. Blacksmiths aren't extinct they know how to fix it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Who could have predicted that a building that hadn't been designed to be three times its original height might buckle under all that additional weight.

3 weeks ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 4

The plan was to carry the vast majority of the additional weight on steel beams run through the building and down into their own piers. And very little of that steel structure is actually complete. Someone drastically underestimated the amount of load that would be present during construction.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still $2,300 a month in rent. Also, you need to take out life insurance and make us, the corporation, your beneficiary in order to rent.

3 weeks ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

And sign an agreement that your family can't sue, in the incredibly unlikely event that something happens to the building resulting in your death.

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Also agree that you can't join a class action, only binding arbitration by a judge of our choosing.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It’s actually the taller building that has the collapsing beams.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is not a repairable problem either. The beams have been damaged, and they can't know how many, or how close to failure each one is at this point. This is likely going to be a full demolition, which might be what they planned for all along. Now they HAVE to destroy it, and WOOPS! ALL OFFICE SPACE!

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

And yet there are people who are trying to save this building instead of taking the fucking weight off.

If Mamdani doesn't put the kibosh on this before it gets people killed, it's going to become a massive political liability.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

FWIW, the building that has the problem is the one that’s adding four floors. That’s even more concerning for the other one IMHO.

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Baffling!

3 weeks ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

People who can actually do load calculations.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

To be fair, many older buildings were constructed with materials that could far exceed the actual load on the building as constructed. In the days of less sophisticated structural engineering and testing, buildings were designed and built with significant room for error.

I suspect there were rigorous structural studies done on the feasibility of adding stories and the structural support needed. This could be the result of inconsistency in the original building materials.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I got impression the 4 stores on the taller building was actually the issue here, the 19 stores on other side was fine..? So I guess someone fucked up their math or inspections of the support pillars.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can clearly see the yellow areas need better support so they turn green!

3 weeks ago | Likes 148 Dislikes 0

And then the supports turn red or yellow from the load, so you have to build supports for those supports, and then the floor under them turns yellow, so you have to...

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The bees are happy

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They gotta plant some trees and bridge over a support beam.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Greetings fellow viking

3 weeks ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

SKOL! I miss playing Valheim with the boys. At one point our server/world had 12-13 people playing...and when that many people are in a world at once boy does the game ramp up the damage numbers to where getting hit is instant death.

Sadly right when the fire zone got added we failed 3-5 invasion attempts to make a beach head so we could start base building there. With that many players you get hit one by anything you instantly die. And units don't really despawn game died for us there....

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even if you attempt to go with 6 or less people the enemies don't really despawn. So all that territory is just filled with a crap ton of mobs to fight our big numbers with out the player count damage scaling. I think we succesfully managed to destroy at most 2 spawners in the area before the game died...We had a grand hall built into a roofed dock shipyard that me and 1 other player spent hours building and harvesting materials form...shame it just sits there...

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Roofs are always my downfall

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Gotta get some stone pillars under the trusses as support

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Iron beams. And, of course, mods to allow for free building, because fuck gathering that much iron.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

…did they not hire an engineer?

3 weeks ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 1

Ai baby

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Probably. But engineers are only as good as the information they have. There are a million places things can go wrong between engineering and reality, and in actual construction sometimes people take shortcuts. If a given section that was supposed to be riveted just wasn't - and is now under fireproofing material - you might never find out until it fails.

3 weeks ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

They probably fired him because he told them their idea was outside their budget.

3 weeks ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

Yea yea, we have one structural support beam we don't need TWO.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The contract was given to a non-union company which means it was probably the poorest bid possible.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Manager asks LLM how many million pounds the bottom will support, LLM goes looking at scrapes for mentions of "million pounds" finds a lot in UK infrastructure projects, decides 55 Million pounds (Sterling!!) is the most commonly mentioned number. Gives answer of 55 Million pounds. Manager goes, awesome, the structural survey from 1998 said it was only good for 20 million and dropping due to corrosion and age, guess we can throw that out now....

3 weeks ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

That's definitely not what would happen.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is sad how plausible this is.

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

There's a big gap between hiring an engineer and listening to what the engineer tells them

3 weeks ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Just because someone is an engineer doesn't mean they are a good engineer.

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The crux of why engineering is expensive. The cost is high, but not as high as hiring a bad engineer.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Worse. They hired an architect.

3 weeks ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 2

hello RCE.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

May god have mercy on their souls.

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Hired Vandelay Industries?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ChatGPT add 19 more floors. Make them larger. Minimal costs. Fast.

3 weeks ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

This didn't happen to the building that's having 19 floors added.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yet

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did they forget to add "Make no mistakes"

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

“Yes. You can absolutely add 19 more floors and make them larger. Would you like me to send you a diagram of what this would look like?”

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"I got you, and I fully support you. Let me just do that real quick."

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0