Ioftenpretendtobeapotato
11840
245
19
Stop Insider Trading Act already wasn't perfect, but the "poison pill" was that they snuck in voter ID requirements. 13 Democrats voted for this.
Jul 23, 2026 5:13 PM
Ioftenpretendtobeapotato
11840
245
19
Stop Insider Trading Act already wasn't perfect, but the "poison pill" was that they snuck in voter ID requirements. 13 Democrats voted for this.
youreathing
So they PASSED the essence of the SAVE Act then? JFC you all are fucked (even more).
rolliefingers
It sneaks it in as an amendment to an existing vote-related bill.
"Title III of the Help Amer13 ica Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 303 the following new section SEC. 303A"
In there it says if you have a religious objection to being photographed you can vote provisionally and then return an affidavit within 3 days.
CommentBot2000
If we can’t have single item votes, can we get the ability to see who ads what? I’d love to be able to ask “who wrote this section” and then “WTF is wrong with you?”
zOriginal
mrbadxampl
Kaptur's been useless for years now, wish we had someone in the district to primary her out
alcamar
Done on purpose, they don't want to stop trading but it's so unpopular they have to look like they're trying to do something.
It's like everything else, intended to quell the uprising and let people move on to the next news item
#releasethefiles
Ioftenpretendtobeapotato
Very convenient that it specifies members of congress and doesn’t mention the president
ImHereToGetDownvotes
It didn't SNEAK in, it was PURPOSELY put in there by Republicans to make it a poison pill. They forced Democrats to either vote YES on the SAVE act or Democrats vote NO and Republicans get to go "Look, Democrats don't want to stop insider trading!" They know it works because the average person is dumb as fuck and even IF they can be bothered to look at the vote result, they'll only look at the title and the vote and go "The Republicans are right, Democrats want insider trading!"
Ioftenpretendtobeapotato
You’re right. You’re not getting a downvote from me despite your username
AbsoluteKilljoy
Knew they'd try to sneak it in somehow
b00guy
That kind of thing shouldn't be allowed. Who thought it was a good idea to make it so that you can amend a bill by tacking another entirely unrelated bill to it?
rbudrick
Nearly everyone in Congress.
shutupthisisreal
CloseupCaptionReaction
#politics #us_politics ....
Ioftenpretendtobeapotato
It's more than just ID to vote, didn't screenshot the whole thing. Here's the full text it starts on page 8 https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20260720/RCP2_STOPINSIDERTRADING_xml.pdf
draginator
Sounds like it is just ID to vote unless you're doing it by mail, and its just ID which doesn't have to match birth certificate
bloodrosee
They appear to no longer be requiring that the photo ID match the birth certificate if I am reading this language correctly.
BallsLikeWatermelonsPeckerLikeAThimble
I don’t mind ID to vote. I already have to do that. As long as it’s easy to get an ID and there’s no other weird bullshit in the law. The SAVE Act isn’t just ID. There’s all kinds of BS in there.
Ioftenpretendtobeapotato
There's more than just what I took a screenshot of. Here's the full text, voter ID stuff starts on page 8 https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20260720/RCP2_STOPINSIDERTRADING_xml.pdf
BallsLikeWatermelonsPeckerLikeAThimble
It looks like an ID requirement. I already have to do that. It’s incredibly easy.
AyatollahBahloni
Either they didn't read it, or they're assholes.
[deleted]
[deleted]
foreverinchains
It's literally their job to read these bills before voting on them, bud.
rfleming1080
I can't say if most read it or not, but there have been instances where politicians have admitted to not reading what they are voting on and supporting.
ToobyBoody
Haha, they deleted it before more people could tell them how dumb a take this is
LittleChickadee
True, they *should* read it themselves, but i think it's commonly thier staff who read through the full bills and then give a summary to the Reps.
foreverinchains
Heaven forbid they should be required to actually do their own jobs themselves.
khora
It's not uncommon that it is impossible for one person to read the full act between the text being released and the vote is scheduled. And you need competence in the area the law covers to understand the ramifications of each change.