Yep.

Mar 2, 2026 10:04 PM

sleeperkid

Views

20027

Likes

606

Dislikes

12

Yep, it’s for mass coordination of thousands of drones simultaneously, and the robot dogs of course. Terrifying.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ain't nothing new under the sun. One of the things "AI" (quotes because "AI" is such a broad term) is actually good at is pattern-matching and that IS a useful surveillance tool…hell, back ion the 60's IBM built what was at the time by far the most powerful computer specifically for the NSA to "search text for keywords from a watchlist."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_7950_Harvest

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a pro Ai artist I have to make a small correction. I like making videos of Pikachu with giant titties that is all

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm convinced they are going to use AI controlled drones to kill our citizens because the AI won't refuse an illegal order like that. We're pretty fucked.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The NSA is having a field day.

6 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Remember to read all the safety rules about your new laser pointers, and the damages they could cause if pointed at you eye or a camera sensor. Permanent damage is no laughing matter - wear your laser safety glasses!

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Generally this is true on all countries.
So big and fast investments with no good beginning ROI are mostly always military projects

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We know.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean i love making videos of pikachu but i just do it on my own computer.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This administration is so incompetent it legit scares me they're adding AI to the mix. They also can't blame anything on AI but you know they will.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a perfect scape goat: "AI said to, so we did" "you can't blame AI, it's a machine" It even fits perfectly in their preferred style of doublethink rhetoric.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are holding every media you have ever produced, biometrics, and 300 variable models of you for voting and behavior prediction, manipulation, decision Ops. Democracy is over in the name of Right-wing/rich "national security." https://tesi.luiss.it/26642/1/082622_CAMPIONE_CHIARA.pdfhttps://tesi.luiss.it/26642/1/082622_CAMPIONE_CHIARA">IARA.pdf">https://tesi.luiss.it/26642/1/082622_CAMPIONE_CHIARA.pdfhttps://tesi.luiss.it/26642/1/082622_CAMPIONE_CHIARA.pdf https://qz.com/1239561/cambridge-analyticas-parent-firm-proposed-a-massive-political-machine-for-indias-2014-elections 1/

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://www.theguardian.coer-wylie">https://www.theguardiam/news/2">er-wylie">https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/ma">n.com/ne">m/news/2">er-wylie">https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/may/06/cambridge-analytica-how-turn-clicks-into-votes-christopher-wylie https:/">a>018/ma">n.com/ne">m/news/2">er-wylie">https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/may/06/cambridge-analytica-how-turn-clicks-into-votes-christopher-wylie https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43581892 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09771-9 https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/election-year-risks-ai https://www.nbcrightnow.com/politics/anthropic-ceo-says-it-cannot-in-good-conscience-accede-to-pentagons-demands-for-ai-use/article_980d8dc6-bc2d-5f06-bb5a-d7cab940e3b9.html

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And We The People Will Have To Pay For it.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poor Kegsbreath has a memo out that the military is to start using AI to help with everything they do. The first AI partner is googles AI and next is Microsoft’s. It has AI built into the new updates to the computer networks and has constant reminders to use it.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Palantir will. Have a database on the entire developed world within a few years

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Found it interesting there is, what looks like, a massive new data center in Buckley base but not inside the super secret squirrel sector. It does have a second line of control so maybe they just ran out of space?

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I work in a data center owned by a bank amd the majority of or servers over the last 5 years have become Big Data. Just scrapping your info from everywhere and using it for profit.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of them are just blacksites in plain view.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great. Reinforce the premise of the fictional TV series Person of Interest.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well yeah. Trump just canceled a partnership with a big AI company because they refused to allow it to be used for mass surveillance. You know shit is dire when the AI company is arguing in favor of ethics.

6 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Naturally, they immediately found willing replacements for Anthropic AI.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but have you seen the baps on Pikachu?

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well it may be true I believe Microsoft said that if they don't get massive buy-in from the public it's all going to crash

6 months ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

If AI isn't making life easier / more affordable for us, let it die then. Fake ass AI funny videos aren't something that is / should be sustainable.

6 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Theres been funny videos on the internet since its inception those legends still live on. Badger badger badger. Do you remember an ai video?

6 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hope so. This AI is a dead end. It can only get worse at ita job

6 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Even if it does its job spectacularly, that's actually worse. It's literally a "crash the economy machine". Do AI chatbots buy anything? No. So if they have all the jobs, who are the customers?

6 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's simpler than that. AI is intended to replace human labor so they don't have to pay workers. Everything else beyond that is extra bonus.

At the end of the day, they just want to get rid of labor.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The theme seems to be that everything tax payer owned is expendable. Troops, planes, bombs. Everything privately owned is sacred. I think it’s because private equity owns our government. The military exists for their security, and global enforcement. It’s paid for by the funds they can’t steal from the tax payers. These data centers will remain private. They will contract services to the government, and will never experience oversight, or taxes.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Duh

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is simple to test -- follow the money. Whoever writes the checks, that's who the data centers are for.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well right now nobody's writing the checks and that's why the economy is going to get real bad real fast when the banks start demanding their hundreds of billions in loans be repaid.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

AI is tricking humans into building them power bases, so we won't be able to stop them from destroying us in the near future.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I took all my stuff from the cloud and transferred it onto one external hard drive. I no longer need to pay for cloud storage because capitalistic companies want to bleed me of my money on a monthly basis. Check your monthly subscription bills and you will be surprised how much you can save.

6 months ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

My unsolicited advice? Get a second Hard drive & back up that hard drive, my good dude. Keep the second back-up somewhere physically different. Remember the golden rule of digital archiving: "If it doesn't exist in 3 independent places, it doesn't exist."

6 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The thing is that is a bit of a pain in the ass, and it can be worth paying a reputable company to do that for you.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hear ya, but for me it's a small price to pay for knowing my stuff is completely secure. "There is no 'cloud', only someone else's computer."

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If your options are a convoluted conspiracy that would require hundreds (if not thousands) of people to keep quite about to pull off OR it's just some stupid waste of time, money, and resources by idiots who think they are geniuses then it's almost always that second thing.

6 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I tend to agree. AI started out as LLM and stumbled a few times, going nowhere beyond novelty Chat Bots. My favorite story being the LLM tasked to tell Huskies from other Dogs, fed 100,000s of pics for a %60ish hit rate before they realized it was looking for snow in background. Backing waxed and waned until it was rebranded as AI and during a Start Up Boom, right pitch/right time, gained traction and Capital. The rest, they rewrote as speculative history, Ground Floor Investment Boom happened.

6 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Now the Monster is too big for the cage. Venture Capital Firms can't be seen investing in Failing Tech, so, not being able to control the Tech, they redefine Failure. "We need more infrastructure. This is growing faster than we imagined!" It is now at the point that $o much is Inve$ted, nobody can pull out or cut their lo$$e$ without a Major Cra$h. $o the Myth is now the Product.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My favorite is similar.

AI developed to detect skin cancer. It has a very high success rate. On closer examination it was discovered that it was looking for scale rules in the picture. No information on how good it may have been at detecting bananas.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The same point. LLMs were sold as AI to boost investment. And the investment outgrew the Tech. Now that LLMs have gone nowhere beyond ChatBots, the Investment is now a Investiture in the New Gen of AI which is not viable. Rather than ride the Crash when the Bubble Bursts, we see the Bubble being inflated with Data Centers and RAM Hoarding and the like. Now Governments are Onboard. This will be another "Too Big To Fail" Scenario. We saw how that went. Cut your Losses!

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's easier than that, the COMPANIES want the surveillance. Being able to sell the data to the military is just a side benefit to selling to advertisers.

6 months ago | Likes 202 Dislikes 1

Strange as it may seem, I'm fairly ok with that so long as they don't give the government the info. Go ahead and try and sell me stuff I can't afford

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The line between "the government" and "companies" is pretty fucking blurry

6 months ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

It's only The Government when its bribes given in the senate region of the united states, otherwise its just sparkling oligarchy.

6 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Its amazing how people will accept dame near anything (social engineering, surveillance, etc) from companies. Pay for the privilege even. Bu tell them the government is doing the exact same thing and they lose their shit.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The end goal of fascism is and always will be hyper powerful nationalized industries protected by the military industrial complex. The goal is techno fiefdoms who pay tribute to the government to be left to run their kingdoms anyway they want.

6 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Ah. I've been referring to it as techno-fuedalism. But fiefdoms also work.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've never really understood the advertising mentality. I can't remember the last time I saw a commercial and was like, "Ah yes, that's a product I am definitely going to go get now." Maybe I'm just too poor and basically buy what is cheapest and not name brands so I'm not the target audience.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 months ago (deleted Mar 11, 2026 5:52 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's called Subliminal Advertising, and it can be damn effective.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0