FUCKERS!

May 25, 2026 3:35 PM

509tigerfish

Views

14148

Likes

252

Dislikes

25

Did the christian scum come up with that bill?

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Let me guess—it was tucked into a bigger must-pass bill about something totally different

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I just call them by their preferred pronouns anyway.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Care to clarify what the bill even is?

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I did a minor search and found H.R. 2616 and 2617 seem to be related to this topic. But, I don't really know if it's a full match up. Both of the bills, especially 2617 are pretty gross.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good to know they're focusing on the important shit we as a society are facing (heavy /s)
Fucking assholes

3 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

For real. Their obsession with this is unhinged.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do believe it is this simple…

3 months ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

This clip brings me endless joy

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Same. I watch it every time I come across it!

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It’s a holiday weekend, the house is not in session

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Anyone got the names of the dems that voted for this? motherfuckers need to know who not to vote for and to primary the shit out of.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It's the rotating villains. One day we'll all realize what is right in front of our eyes: the Dems are part of the coup. They play controlled opposition when their actions show they support what is happening.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I'll be dead in a mass grave by the time anyone wakes the fuck up and your streets will look like half-life 2. Good fucking luck with rebelling against that. I hope everyone fucking burns from climate change.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

After two hours of searching the dems that voted for this were Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), Donald Davis (D-N.C.), Cleo Fields (D-La.), Laura Gillen (D-N.Y.), Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.), and Eugene Vindman (D-Va.). Google is that broken. Two fucking hours to find the names of the asshole backstabbers who want us fucking dead while claiming to be our only friends.

3 months ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 3

Marie Perez is the representative for my district. I promise you she knows without a doubt she's getting primaried. Fuck her sideways. With a pitchfork.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And this asshole is especially a pile of shit and proves my point https://www.advocate.com/politics/national/eugene-vindman-trans-student-betrayal

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Usually fairly easy to find House votes using https://clerk.house.gov/Votes .

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Hahahahahaha holy fuck what a shithole

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

For a country that gets a chubby every time someone mentions "freedom", I don't think they understand what the word really means

3 months ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 5

guaranteed.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

hey did yall know there is a b in dumb?

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

To those that do, it means that it is freedom for them; not everyone else.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Cut their heads off.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Trans trans trans trans trans fuck you

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some countries evolve forward.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Those damn trans people, just trying to exist, and be members of society. Always ruining nothing, but making this world a better place. US government making a target on them for no reason other than hate. I apologize if I get this wrong but almost every member of the lgbtq+ (sorry if I left out anyone) is amazing and I'm happy to stand beside you

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

SAUCE https://www.linkedin.com/posts/noh8-campaign_noh8-activity-7463763755445796864-p7lC?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADi-A5oBduYlZH8MXxcvNsA6mi4gkshjBRk

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

and for those who aren't interested in clicking a link with embedded tracking data that tells the website that you're in the social circle of who ever generated the initial share:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/noh8-campaign_noh8-activity-7463763755445796864-p7lC

3 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

The US needs to retire the two-party system, and come up with a viable realistic alternative.

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I see you enjoy satire.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Look into open primaries and ranked choice voting in combination. It's my favorite system proposed. Everyone votes in every primary and you get like 4 candidates from any party depending on who gets enough votes. You could have 2 dems, a rep, and an independent or any kind of combo. It's great because you generally end up with the craziest hardline people rallying their base and winning the primary, then they run against each other. It's basically designed for crazy-maxing (I'm trademarking this

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The two party system is a bit of a myth. It is not written into the Constitution nor any way required by law, legislation, or mandate. There are other parties in the US; however, for many generations, the majority of voters only vote for one of those two parties with a vote otherwise considered "wasted". A viable 'third party' has been attempted from time to time but ends up just "diluting" the power of one of the two. The main reason the two parties are so ubiquitous is money.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's a symptom of the first past the post system. It's *always* going to degenerate into a 2 party system eventually.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

or possibly 3.
Though ranked voting also can devolve into a small number of parties.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The two party system isn’t explicit, but it is an outgrowth of the way our elections are structured. First past the post is always going to favor 1-2 strong parties.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately the way we're set up that's almost impossible, at least for the Executive.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The system that is isn't the only system that could be. We made the system, we can change it. We just need to stop treating the system as if it is an immutable fact of life.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 months ago (deleted May 26, 2026 3:43 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

People in this country don't know how to organize to assert their political power over the system. They still beg of the very system that oppresses them as if it is ever going to save them.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I think you don't know how Congress works.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Fuck the Democrats who voted for this shit. They need to be taught a fucking lesson.

3 months ago | Likes 184 Dislikes 9

When you realize that The American Revolution started over less than what we’re putting up with, you will realize no lesson is coming. Just Nazi America.

3 months ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

They were taught a lesson... That giving the Republicans what they want lets them keep their jobs

3 months ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

Start with that Federman traitor.

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Yeah, John needs to take a long walk off a short pier.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I miss when I was a pacifist

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

me too - now

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I don't. That pacifism shit was coming from a place of privilege. We didn't need to fight for ourselves and were safe in sticking up our noses at those who are forced to defend themselves against violent oppression.

Pacifism only helps the oppressors by ensuring that no one stands up to them in the moment. It's caring more about optics than actually helping stop oppression.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They're owned by the same cunts that own the republicans.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here are the names Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas
Rep. Don Davis of North Carolina
Rep. Cleo Fields of Louisiana
Rep. Laura Gillen of New York
Rep. Vicente González of Texas
Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington
Rep. Eugene Vindman of Virginia

3 months ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 2

Are they actual hateful pieces of shit, or if they vote no, they'll be replaced by a republican next election?

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

AFTER the elections of THIS year. Right now we need them to take control of the House so we can stop other bad stuff and maybe pass some good stuff

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

What makes you think they'll actually do anything?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For the next 2 years, not very much. But then elect a Democratic president—give them a trifecta—and then anything’s possible.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, the hope is that those who has historically done nothing will actually do something this time?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What do mean historically done nothing? Don’t act as if we’re living in a one-issue world, and be mindful that politicians aren’t likely to take risks if they are unlikely to get anything to show for it—that is, bc they don’t have the power to do so yet.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The point is, if we let single-issue politics get in the way of kicking Republicans out of power, nothing will change—and on a lot more issues than this one. The time to die on this hill is after we have a governing trifecta. Dems are more likely to be receptive THEN than now, when they’re trying to protect and add as many seats in Congress as possible. Mind you, the same was true in the 50s & 60s about civil rights, and in the 99s & 00s about health care. Critical mass needs to develop.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So are we done pretending that the Democratic party is worth a damn yet? No, no, I'm sure if we voted for them more, they totally wouldn't betray the people they're supposed to represent at every opportunity.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

Some Democrats, sure. Democrats as a whole…why do you want AOC and Warren out of office?

Primary, primary, primary.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

It only takes a few bad apples to make the entire collective bad. -- ACAB doesn't give a shit about the few good cops int he world either. If Democrats will preen that they protect trans people, while enough of them vote to make that preening meaningless, than the preening is meaningless.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

ACAB is ACAB because cops will cover and refuse to report other cops to internal affairs for misdeeds. Thats not how a poltical party works. There is no law broken for voting against the parties interests and people who vote against something aren't covering for someone who votes for it.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They do it all the time for optics. One sacrificial vote protects elitist interests. And then the rest can gawk and awe "Well we all voted against/for it!"

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

sounds like someone went down a rabbit hole and now thinks everyone else should be mad as a hatter just like them.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So you named two who occasionally say nice things. Here we have 8 who voted to further endanger the lives and well-being of trans kids. Fuck them. Fuck this diseased husk of a political party.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

8 voted to endanger trans kids, 204 didn't. This means the democratic party as the whole is diseased because of the vote of 3% of it. Super logical.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

200 people couldn't bring themselves to convince 8 to *not* work with the fascists to enshrine their oppression of a minority group into law? Yes, that means the party as a whole is diseased.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

oh my bad I forgot you had a psychic link to all 204 people who voted against this and therefore factually knew that they knew ahead of time the 8 would vote this way and none of them, despite opposing it, bothered to try and convince them to vote differently. I mean its an insane claim and almost certainly not at all true but the confidence you display means it must be so

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1