I did a minor search and found H.R. 2616 and 2617 seem to be related to this topic. But, I don't really know if it's a full match up. Both of the bills, especially 2617 are pretty gross.
It's the rotating villains. One day we'll all realize what is right in front of our eyes: the Dems are part of the coup. They play controlled opposition when their actions show they support what is happening.
I'll be dead in a mass grave by the time anyone wakes the fuck up and your streets will look like half-life 2. Good fucking luck with rebelling against that. I hope everyone fucking burns from climate change.
After two hours of searching the dems that voted for this were Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), Donald Davis (D-N.C.), Cleo Fields (D-La.), Laura Gillen (D-N.Y.), Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.), and Eugene Vindman (D-Va.). Google is that broken. Two fucking hours to find the names of the asshole backstabbers who want us fucking dead while claiming to be our only friends.
Marie Perez is the representative for my district. I promise you she knows without a doubt she's getting primaried. Fuck her sideways. With a pitchfork.
Those damn trans people, just trying to exist, and be members of society. Always ruining nothing, but making this world a better place. US government making a target on them for no reason other than hate. I apologize if I get this wrong but almost every member of the lgbtq+ (sorry if I left out anyone) is amazing and I'm happy to stand beside you
Look into open primaries and ranked choice voting in combination. It's my favorite system proposed. Everyone votes in every primary and you get like 4 candidates from any party depending on who gets enough votes. You could have 2 dems, a rep, and an independent or any kind of combo. It's great because you generally end up with the craziest hardline people rallying their base and winning the primary, then they run against each other. It's basically designed for crazy-maxing (I'm trademarking this
The two party system is a bit of a myth. It is not written into the Constitution nor any way required by law, legislation, or mandate. There are other parties in the US; however, for many generations, the majority of voters only vote for one of those two parties with a vote otherwise considered "wasted". A viable 'third party' has been attempted from time to time but ends up just "diluting" the power of one of the two. The main reason the two parties are so ubiquitous is money.
The two party system isn’t explicit, but it is an outgrowth of the way our elections are structured. First past the post is always going to favor 1-2 strong parties.
The system that is isn't the only system that could be. We made the system, we can change it. We just need to stop treating the system as if it is an immutable fact of life.
People in this country don't know how to organize to assert their political power over the system. They still beg of the very system that oppresses them as if it is ever going to save them.
When you realize that The American Revolution started over less than what we’re putting up with, you will realize no lesson is coming. Just Nazi America.
I don't. That pacifism shit was coming from a place of privilege. We didn't need to fight for ourselves and were safe in sticking up our noses at those who are forced to defend themselves against violent oppression.
Pacifism only helps the oppressors by ensuring that no one stands up to them in the moment. It's caring more about optics than actually helping stop oppression.
Here are the names Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas Rep. Don Davis of North Carolina Rep. Cleo Fields of Louisiana Rep. Laura Gillen of New York Rep. Vicente González of Texas Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington Rep. Eugene Vindman of Virginia
What do mean historically done nothing? Don’t act as if we’re living in a one-issue world, and be mindful that politicians aren’t likely to take risks if they are unlikely to get anything to show for it—that is, bc they don’t have the power to do so yet.
The point is, if we let single-issue politics get in the way of kicking Republicans out of power, nothing will change—and on a lot more issues than this one. The time to die on this hill is after we have a governing trifecta. Dems are more likely to be receptive THEN than now, when they’re trying to protect and add as many seats in Congress as possible. Mind you, the same was true in the 50s & 60s about civil rights, and in the 99s & 00s about health care. Critical mass needs to develop.
So are we done pretending that the Democratic party is worth a damn yet? No, no, I'm sure if we voted for them more, they totally wouldn't betray the people they're supposed to represent at every opportunity.
It only takes a few bad apples to make the entire collective bad. -- ACAB doesn't give a shit about the few good cops int he world either. If Democrats will preen that they protect trans people, while enough of them vote to make that preening meaningless, than the preening is meaningless.
ACAB is ACAB because cops will cover and refuse to report other cops to internal affairs for misdeeds. Thats not how a poltical party works. There is no law broken for voting against the parties interests and people who vote against something aren't covering for someone who votes for it.
They do it all the time for optics. One sacrificial vote protects elitist interests. And then the rest can gawk and awe "Well we all voted against/for it!"
So you named two who occasionally say nice things. Here we have 8 who voted to further endanger the lives and well-being of trans kids. Fuck them. Fuck this diseased husk of a political party.
200 people couldn't bring themselves to convince 8 to *not* work with the fascists to enshrine their oppression of a minority group into law? Yes, that means the party as a whole is diseased.
oh my bad I forgot you had a psychic link to all 204 people who voted against this and therefore factually knew that they knew ahead of time the 8 would vote this way and none of them, despite opposing it, bothered to try and convince them to vote differently. I mean its an insane claim and almost certainly not at all true but the confidence you display means it must be so
GhostoftheNorth
Did the christian scum come up with that bill?
RobertAG25772
Let me guess—it was tucked into a bigger must-pass bill about something totally different
MasterKhajiit
I just call them by their preferred pronouns anyway.
eronth
Care to clarify what the bill even is?
thebonesofmyancestors
I did a minor search and found H.R. 2616 and 2617 seem to be related to this topic. But, I don't really know if it's a full match up. Both of the bills, especially 2617 are pretty gross.
LittleChickadee
Good to know they're focusing on the important shit we as a society are facing (heavy /s)
Fucking assholes
FractalShoggoth
For real. Their obsession with this is unhinged.
galapas
I do believe it is this simple…
Milolockert
This clip brings me endless joy
Totallyscrewedinaustin
Same. I watch it every time I come across it!
moosegooseknockle
It’s a holiday weekend, the house is not in session
RetrogradeLlama
Vixess
Source: https://equality.house.gov/passage-of-hr2616
foxpotate
Anyone got the names of the dems that voted for this? motherfuckers need to know who not to vote for and to primary the shit out of.
wejustdontknow
It's the rotating villains. One day we'll all realize what is right in front of our eyes: the Dems are part of the coup. They play controlled opposition when their actions show they support what is happening.
foxpotate
I'll be dead in a mass grave by the time anyone wakes the fuck up and your streets will look like half-life 2. Good fucking luck with rebelling against that. I hope everyone fucking burns from climate change.
foxpotate
After two hours of searching the dems that voted for this were Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), Donald Davis (D-N.C.), Cleo Fields (D-La.), Laura Gillen (D-N.Y.), Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.), and Eugene Vindman (D-Va.). Google is that broken. Two fucking hours to find the names of the asshole backstabbers who want us fucking dead while claiming to be our only friends.
reverendfixxxer
Marie Perez is the representative for my district. I promise you she knows without a doubt she's getting primaried. Fuck her sideways. With a pitchfork.
foxpotate
And this asshole is especially a pile of shit and proves my point https://www.advocate.com/politics/national/eugene-vindman-trans-student-betrayal
Fargus57
Usually fairly easy to find House votes using https://clerk.house.gov/Votes .
Bundalicious
Hahahahahaha holy fuck what a shithole
FrozenSTi
For a country that gets a chubby every time someone mentions "freedom", I don't think they understand what the word really means
TsubakiTragic
guaranteed.
nimeton0
BurningVeryImportantThings
hey did yall know there is a b in dumb?
SGAtlantis
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1azFvdXR0ZTc5Mm9rcnh4a3BqbjV2djA5aHBhM2d0ZzAzODY5MGRlaCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/N7FeGLHjVsDQY/200w.webp
omgzwtfs
Roqinn
To those that do, it means that it is freedom for them; not everyone else.
Grimlinnan
Cut their heads off.
alexandremingatos5
Trans trans trans trans trans fuck you
Zammurkele
Some countries evolve forward.
NorrinxRadd
Those damn trans people, just trying to exist, and be members of society. Always ruining nothing, but making this world a better place. US government making a target on them for no reason other than hate. I apologize if I get this wrong but almost every member of the lgbtq+ (sorry if I left out anyone) is amazing and I'm happy to stand beside you
509tigerfish
SAUCE https://www.linkedin.com/posts/noh8-campaign_noh8-activity-7463763755445796864-p7lC?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADi-A5oBduYlZH8MXxcvNsA6mi4gkshjBRk
TheMoonBnuuy
and for those who aren't interested in clicking a link with embedded tracking data that tells the website that you're in the social circle of who ever generated the initial share:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/noh8-campaign_noh8-activity-7463763755445796864-p7lC
nimeton0
The US needs to retire the two-party system, and come up with a viable realistic alternative.
thelastboomer
I see you enjoy satire.
BoooBoooooBOOOOOOOOO
Look into open primaries and ranked choice voting in combination. It's my favorite system proposed. Everyone votes in every primary and you get like 4 candidates from any party depending on who gets enough votes. You could have 2 dems, a rep, and an independent or any kind of combo. It's great because you generally end up with the craziest hardline people rallying their base and winning the primary, then they run against each other. It's basically designed for crazy-maxing (I'm trademarking this
Rijacki
The two party system is a bit of a myth. It is not written into the Constitution nor any way required by law, legislation, or mandate. There are other parties in the US; however, for many generations, the majority of voters only vote for one of those two parties with a vote otherwise considered "wasted". A viable 'third party' has been attempted from time to time but ends up just "diluting" the power of one of the two. The main reason the two parties are so ubiquitous is money.
UprootedGrunt
That's a symptom of the first past the post system. It's *always* going to degenerate into a 2 party system eventually.
Rijacki
or possibly 3.
Though ranked voting also can devolve into a small number of parties.
ropetopus
The two party system isn’t explicit, but it is an outgrowth of the way our elections are structured. First past the post is always going to favor 1-2 strong parties.
PballQhead
Unfortunately the way we're set up that's almost impossible, at least for the Executive.
TheDoctorCrankenstein
The system that is isn't the only system that could be. We made the system, we can change it. We just need to stop treating the system as if it is an immutable fact of life.
[deleted]
[deleted]
TheDoctorCrankenstein
People in this country don't know how to organize to assert their political power over the system. They still beg of the very system that oppresses them as if it is ever going to save them.
BenjyX55
I think you don't know how Congress works.
Khanamana324
Fuck the Democrats who voted for this shit. They need to be taught a fucking lesson.
BeaverOnFire
https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1ZjB3anBzZmp6aGVyemtnaHNjOWhxcGh1eTBtZHVpN3FkamV6MGw0MSZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/4r5Xk22tdFhQeKL0EH/200w.webp
GenXHippie
When you realize that The American Revolution started over less than what we’re putting up with, you will realize no lesson is coming. Just Nazi America.
LeoGrun19401
They were taught a lesson... That giving the Republicans what they want lets them keep their jobs
BlancheFromage
Start with that Federman traitor.
Khanamana324
Yeah, John needs to take a long walk off a short pier.
futhor
I miss when I was a pacifist
509tigerfish
me too - now
TheDoctorCrankenstein
I don't. That pacifism shit was coming from a place of privilege. We didn't need to fight for ourselves and were safe in sticking up our noses at those who are forced to defend themselves against violent oppression.
Pacifism only helps the oppressors by ensuring that no one stands up to them in the moment. It's caring more about optics than actually helping stop oppression.
Blackmetalhappiness
They're owned by the same cunts that own the republicans.
thinkybrainpains
Here are the names Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas
Rep. Don Davis of North Carolina
Rep. Cleo Fields of Louisiana
Rep. Laura Gillen of New York
Rep. Vicente González of Texas
Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington
Rep. Eugene Vindman of Virginia
server1a
Are they actual hateful pieces of shit, or if they vote no, they'll be replaced by a republican next election?
thinkybrainpains
Fucking Vindman! https://www.advocate.com/politics/national/8-democrats-abandon-trans-kids
RobertAG25772
AFTER the elections of THIS year. Right now we need them to take control of the House so we can stop other bad stuff and maybe pass some good stuff
AShartInTheWind
What makes you think they'll actually do anything?
RobertAG25772
For the next 2 years, not very much. But then elect a Democratic president—give them a trifecta—and then anything’s possible.
AShartInTheWind
So, the hope is that those who has historically done nothing will actually do something this time?
RobertAG25772
What do mean historically done nothing? Don’t act as if we’re living in a one-issue world, and be mindful that politicians aren’t likely to take risks if they are unlikely to get anything to show for it—that is, bc they don’t have the power to do so yet.
RobertAG25772
The point is, if we let single-issue politics get in the way of kicking Republicans out of power, nothing will change—and on a lot more issues than this one. The time to die on this hill is after we have a governing trifecta. Dems are more likely to be receptive THEN than now, when they’re trying to protect and add as many seats in Congress as possible. Mind you, the same was true in the 50s & 60s about civil rights, and in the 99s & 00s about health care. Critical mass needs to develop.
medimr
So are we done pretending that the Democratic party is worth a damn yet? No, no, I'm sure if we voted for them more, they totally wouldn't betray the people they're supposed to represent at every opportunity.
PballQhead
Some Democrats, sure. Democrats as a whole…why do you want AOC and Warren out of office?
Primary, primary, primary.
YeOlRazzleDazzle
It only takes a few bad apples to make the entire collective bad. -- ACAB doesn't give a shit about the few good cops int he world either. If Democrats will preen that they protect trans people, while enough of them vote to make that preening meaningless, than the preening is meaningless.
Dracology
ACAB is ACAB because cops will cover and refuse to report other cops to internal affairs for misdeeds. Thats not how a poltical party works. There is no law broken for voting against the parties interests and people who vote against something aren't covering for someone who votes for it.
YeOlRazzleDazzle
They do it all the time for optics. One sacrificial vote protects elitist interests. And then the rest can gawk and awe "Well we all voted against/for it!"
Dracology
sounds like someone went down a rabbit hole and now thinks everyone else should be mad as a hatter just like them.
medimr
So you named two who occasionally say nice things. Here we have 8 who voted to further endanger the lives and well-being of trans kids. Fuck them. Fuck this diseased husk of a political party.
Dracology
8 voted to endanger trans kids, 204 didn't. This means the democratic party as the whole is diseased because of the vote of 3% of it. Super logical.
medimr
200 people couldn't bring themselves to convince 8 to *not* work with the fascists to enshrine their oppression of a minority group into law? Yes, that means the party as a whole is diseased.
Dracology
oh my bad I forgot you had a psychic link to all 204 people who voted against this and therefore factually knew that they knew ahead of time the 8 would vote this way and none of them, despite opposing it, bothered to try and convince them to vote differently. I mean its an insane claim and almost certainly not at all true but the confidence you display means it must be so