Just a reminder

Sep 15, 2020 9:32 PM

rosevox

Views

81752

Likes

2279

Dislikes

76

What Belgium did in the Congo is some of the most horrific NSFL shit I've ever heard. We really don't acknowledge it enough.

6 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

There are a lot of people in Belgium who are completely unaware and think he was some kind of hero.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But as long as you keep killing your own people other countries don't really care.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They still love that guy on the right...

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

People still love Donald Trump and Reagan.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

200k dead! i wonder if we should reelect this guy

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

But Biden won't legalize weed, or give us that thing we've already rejected twice. THEY'RE BOTH JUST AS BAD!!! - morons

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

6 years ago | Likes 246 Dislikes 3

Thank you for making my day

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My username approves this message

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Mousey Dong

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now do it as a percentage. Pol Pot wins.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Using the logic of this graph old honest Abe would be up there too

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was Lincoln a dictator tho?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, I meant using the logic of this chart minus the dictator part

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

PHEW! I was worried for a second there.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well if you include warlords I think Genghis Khan armies killed around 40 million

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

...during conquest and uprisings, he wasn't a dictator or fascist

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do the Soviet soldiers who got thrown into the meat grinder of the eastern front count as Hitler's kills or Stalin's? Joint effort there

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

In this chart, neither

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

23mil 22 drops, 78mil 76 drops

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And Genghis is where???

6 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

In terms of percent of world population killed he's way ahead of any of them.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In absolute numbers he's... probably ahead of Stalin. Assuming you count famine deaths, but famine deaths are in Stalin and Mao numbers too.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For one, he was a conqueror, not a dictator. The table is quite specific. He was also quite tolerant of the cultures of the lands he >

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

> conquered. Granted he did destroy Baghdad which set Islam back a lot, but that's how conquerors do.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

"set Islam back a lot" ie, the mark used by most historians for the end of the Islamic Golden Age.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just like Nov. 3rd, 2016 can be marked as a point at the end of the US.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Maybe omitted because this focuses on 19th-20th century. Also I doubt accurate statistics exist from the 13th century.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Right here!

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You've got my vote.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You shall not be killed by horses

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He wasn't a fascist or a dictator or far right or left and he allowed ALL religions, woman were equals, etc.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perhaps the issue isn't simply the amount of deaths, but also how they were caused, and with what intent...

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The low end estimate for kills too. High end estimate for Mao last time I had seen it is something like 130 million.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

...and ALL done after the end of WWII...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ummmm Tojo and Japan in WW2 was more like 37 million - so

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

Yeah I was thinking this too. They were savage in every country they conquered - especially China

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

That's because the point of this is anti-communist propaganda. There's no part Socialism that requires mass killings. It's Authoritarianism.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

Sure. Thats why they include King Leopold II

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Communism is organised genocide

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ok, Boomer.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Maybe Communism requires authoritarianism?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It doesn't.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know right? Such a stretch to use socialism as a common thread that resulted in the death of over a hundred million in the 20th century.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” -George Santayana

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Only people who don't know anything about Socialism would try to.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

56% of adults 35 or younger are financially literate. 74% of seniors can pass the citizenship test-only 20% under 45 can. 1/

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

24% of adults 37 and younger can answer 4 or 5 questions correctly on a 5 question financial literacy quiz. The US ranks 14th in 2/

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Considering Russia alone lost 25 million in WWII this chart is not remotely accurate only giving Hitler 17.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

To be clear, I think Mao was bad enough that you don't need to lie about him, especially in the same graphic you're undercutting Hitler.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Seems to be counting genocide and mass murder deaths only for Hitler, which is somewhere from 17 to 20+ million.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Hitler killed Hitler

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Stalin and Mao are WAY TOO LOW. You can kills people pretty easy with famine.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Didn't the Japanese kill way more people during the second world war during their occupation of China and south east asia?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No Idi Amin? Guess I’ll ask Professor Google ...

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is absolutely not a defence of Mao but it's worth pointing out that the majority of deaths attributed to him came from the famines...

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

...that were unintended consequences of his terrible mismanagement of the country. In other words, perhaps not comparable in intent to...

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

...Stalin and Hitler.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

If those kills include war deaths, then some US presidents have got to he on that list.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I have tried to educate people on Imgur about Mao's record and got downvotes, they said- nah, he only killed like 2 million. Morons.

6 years ago | Likes 295 Dislikes 20

So theres the record of that occuring? can I see?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

You gotta use infographic. Makes it more true automatically.

6 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 1

And entertaining!

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah. With Imgur's collective IQ, that doesn't surprise us.

6 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 11

They only care about Hitler because they are brain washed.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To be fair, about 20 million of those were unintentional consequences of his "Four Pests" campaign.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

"Only" 2 million. "Only" 10x more than everyone you've ever met.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Excuse me, i have a degree from reddit so I know what I'm talking about when I say he killed like, 350, tops

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Damn loch ness Maonster

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Where's the post?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't he kill a fuckton by ordering people to kill birds? And that was one action. Mao is horrifying, especially with how his cult 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

still endures. People still who survived the cultural revolution still weep for his loss. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The "Four Pests", yeah: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_Campaign

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

China has been asshoe for a while now.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most of the people he killed were not deliberatly murdered like with Stalin or Hitler

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He killed many millions just by not understanding agriculture and causing a famine.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Even Stalin's death count is mostly incompetence and starvation, rather than industrialized genocide like Hitler.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Some may make the argument that the mass starvation of Ukrainians wasnt accidental tho I know that's controversial.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There were intentional elements to the holodomor, that's indisputable

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But, most of Stalins kill count is through unintentional starvations

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The entire reason Chinese people eat everything they can get hands on is because of Mao. Famine he caused is why you don't have birds in 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

They ate each other, cannibal parties under Mao.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Chinese cities, the people literally just eat all the birds. You see Chinese tourists just catch birds to eat them. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

You realize China isn't under a famine anymore, yeah?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I know but it left a imprint on the culture to eat literally anything that moves.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Eh? I mean China has a hard time popularizing potatoes there, try as they might.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Need reliable source. Otherwise just BS

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 16

We got a denier in our midst folks.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Plenty of primary sources in the references: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_China

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I consider these as reliable source, thank you. But the numbers don’t add up to this post.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Follow the link to the famines (55M high end) and the cultural revolution (20M high end).

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nvm, I’d agree Mao’s ruling killed a lot. I just can’t quite agree with a bunch of journalists and ‘scholars’ estimating stuff.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's the implication offered by so many that any step away from laissez-faire is somehow an endorsement of slaughter than gets downvotes.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You think what we have is laissez-faire?!?!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, just too far in that direction.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

LOL, sure buddy, sure.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm certainly not denying that there's a ton of corrupt politicians and that we have a horrible crony capitalism.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I"d argue that these are better for anti-authoritarian arguments that anti-socialist arguments.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Not that they're not true, but that these stats are so often used in bad faith, as strawmen.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Do these also count famines?

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Highly inflated numbers of them too & attributing famines to rulers who were still establishing power and industrializing is a huge stretch.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Murder is murder.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

K, didn't say it wasn't, no reason to lie about it though saying Mao killed more and Hitler killed less then in reality.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Murder by withholding life sustaining needs is the same as a bullet; one could argue worse because it's also torture.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Okay, good thing that happened as a result of decades of war, natural disaster and inefficient administration as opposed to the 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

CCP was shipping most of its food the USSR in exchange for weapons. "They will die far from the cities so few will know"-Mao

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes but to be fair the famine in China was a direct result of the Great Leap Forward masterminded by Mao.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

And deaths of Nazis during ww2, these numbers come from the pro fascist "little black book of communism"

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Mao would be like 4th or 5th without them.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yes, most of which can be attributed to idiotic farming practices embraced by stalin and then Mao.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Hard to believe the first one was just 9 years old and killed so many people

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

By your logic Hitler is 3?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 5

Uhm, greed kills, not capitalism...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Capitalism is greed.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So is killing 70 million people in the name of communism. Even nature has a form of capitalism built in, survival of the fittest, etc.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's not greed. That's Authoritarianism. And Nature does not have capitalism.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While we need more global redistribution, the percentage of people dying of hunger was higher before capitalism and is steadily decreasing

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Severely flawed logic. So the people who starved in china and other communist/socialist countries is also the fault of capitalism?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

No one's claiming that. Nice straw man.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

? Why capitalism? What about people who won't get their shit together, tribalism, and biology?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Stop being poor?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The way of the universe. there will always be high and low energy states. You can do something about it by participating politically.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Where is Trump?

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 14

havent hit a teardrop worths yet

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Four more years!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Where does Trump want to be on this list?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Was waiting for this comment...

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I know right?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Serious answer: You can arguably connect 200k from covid to him. Aside from that, not much more. Bush Jr did more in Iraq.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It was a hilarious joke till you ruined it, EroticZombiePants if that is even really your name.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My question is who gets counted as "killed" here cause hitler's number doesn't even cover soviet losses in the war.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

These figures definitely don't take into account war mills. I think it's just deliberate mass murders and negligence deaths as well.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*deaths. Damn autocorrect. Don't even know how it got mills from that.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like firing a bunch of rockets blindly at london counts as deliberate mass murder but idk

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Compared to everything else I dont think the number of deaths from that is that significant.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And at the same time you could make the argument that the allies bombing civilian buildings falls under the same criteria. So now (1/2)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We'd have to count bombing campaigns of the war. (2/2)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mao killed more than all the others combined, let that sink in.

6 years ago | Likes 320 Dislikes 9

He's winning!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

" China "

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Communism

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

Authoritarianism

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

When you give the government the amount of power necessary to enact communism, Authoritarianism always ensues.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

But, as can be seen from the chart, communism isn't a necessary factor in enacting authoritarianism.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

But Hitler had a higher kill rate, he just needed more time.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Hum.. no? 17mill / 11 years = 1,54 millions per year -- 78mil / 33 years = 2,3millions per year

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That was about 10% of the population of China, most of them during the Great Leap Forwards.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

and the same government is still in power there. Let that sink in too!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and the mao numbers are only rough estimates as his regime went to great lengths to hide the mass starvation of the people.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what does that sink want this time?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

China is assho

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But more out of incompetence than malice.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm not pro ccp or Mao by any means, but these aren't even comparable. Incompetent policymaking vs malicious atrocities.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

This graph also uses the low estimate for his kills. High estimate is almost double.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

China still has over a billion people too

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a sick KD. What do you get for that kind of kill streak?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Realistically though, raw numbers are a bad comparison. Need something like "kills per capita under rule" to truly compare.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

That's Pol Pot's time to shine!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or over time. Hitler may not have had as many, but he was speedrunning that shit.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Tell that to the families of those who died.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Not defending Mao cause he was an asshole who killed millions, but these numbers aren't sourced or accurate 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

the one that stands out to me is the 17 million number for hitler, just the invasion of the USSR killed more then that

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Deaths between two military forces arent counted normally in these types of statistics. Can't say I understand why.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Except when we count German soldiers dying to USSR troops, thats pretty common... hmm. Wonder why.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just seems like counting a famine cause you thought killing all the birds was a good idea but not counting an invasion is a bit cheeky

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The majority were due to catastrophic mismanagement of the agricultural system, which caused a huge famine. Google "the great leap forward"

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

A cautionary tale of not approaching things scientifically. Stalin had similar under Lysenkoism.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well I think decentralized systems where you allow local experts, like the farmers, manage them selves provides the best yield and stability

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course that’s not always the case. Look up the history of the TVA some farmers can really screw then selves

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, most of Mao's killings were due to incompetence, not specific malice.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Incorrect. Most of those deaths are related to the Cultural Revolution, where he recruited young idealists to stamp out enemies of the state

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Anyone with "old ideas," religious, cultural or emotional, was killed as reactionary counter-revolutionaries. About 50M total, per the book

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The Black Book of Communism. The rest were as a result of the Great Leap Forward. This wasnt mismanagement, but an attempt to apply Marx's

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ideas about putting production in the hands of the people, away from mass production. It's an excellent example of where Marxism is wrong.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There's probably a moral distinction to be made between deaths from intentional genocide versus irresponsible agricultural policies...

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 13

idk if its a moral distinction but for whatever reason.Is the Hall Of Cost more heinous or is it just more well known is one concern of mine

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

yeah, by that standard they should include the USA famine caused by the dust bowl

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What about intentionally irresponsible agriculture policies? Mass starvation was intended in Ukraine and other areas by the soviets

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Don't forget Lysenko's fucked up ideas.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe he's referring to the Chinese "great leap forward", which is responsible for the majority of Mao's total.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

That was murder. Mao killed a TON of people by being a dumbass tho.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is a fucking stupid graph. This is just anti communist propaganda. Mao was a failure, but capitalism has been as big of a failure

6 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 23

Why don't you coun't all the people who died from drug overdoses or homelessness etc under obama, trump, bush, any US prez. Fuck this

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 18

Really? Capitalism is a failure? It is theist successful economic theory going.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Is your version of "success" Being one of the richest countries in the world and not being able to feed your own people? Not mine.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Thats how capitalism works, every person for themselves.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is to say, it doesn't fucking work

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dont see any rich people complaining.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think that that is more a failure of the political system rather than of capitalism.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, but in communism (at least marxist libertarian communism) the representative democracy is gone too. Everyone gets one vote for

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everything, and so the gvt is just bureaucrats keeping track of things. Gets rid of that bs. Not saying it's perfect, just better.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So what if it is anti communist propaganda? We don’t need more communism and we need to make sure people know how bad communism is.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

We don't have any true communism, far left politics are demonized by people who have been told to do so their entire life. Pick up a book

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

There is no "this time" Marxist communism has never been implemented in any country.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I teach philosophy bro I be read some books, and yes far left should be demonized the same as far right.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I’ve*

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you read political philosophy though? do you understand that far right is just extreme free market and what you're presumably talking

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

about is actually authoritarian gvt and you can be authoritarian and right or left or dead center (radical centrism)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And that most modern leftists are libertarian leftists.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Go ahead and tell em

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So, if every capitalist country that is producing the surplus would go to communism like the soviet union. Would more or less people die?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Less. The reason communism is failed is because they didn't have surplus. For example, in Maos china they weren't able to produce food

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Effectively enough, but we have robots, machines. We're afraid of robots taking our jobs!!! LET THEM!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think it's less "captitalism kill" and more "capitalism doesn't save as many as it could".

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sure, but that's just "the glass is half full"-rhetoric in place of a statement about the idiocy of people dying of thirst while we, 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the people with the glass of water, debate if it is half full or half empty and that that is factually a problem of incentives in capitalism

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That only holds true if the assumption is made that every country in the world is capitalist.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

For the most part they are, but I also literally only mentioned us politicians.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They mostly are. Even places like China now adopt a ton of capitalist policies to stay global market competitive.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What other economic system is practised, outside of Socialist Cuba?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There's Juche, in North Korea. Auth-right self "sufficiency" that has a communist veneer.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Communist Veneer is a little odd for an Auth- right country, but I agree. still not anything like marxism though.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now I feel concerned that I learned about Hitler and Stalin in school but not a thing about Mao Zedong

6 years ago | Likes 1204 Dislikes 6

Weird, I never thought about that either

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's probably mostly because you lived in a country that hyper-focuses on European history and mentions the rest of the world in passing.

6 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 1

Im surprised too but actual extermination camps during war is a bit different than starving people out.

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

Beyond that a lot of the starvation was epic ineptitude for both Stalin and Mao tho Stalin extra fucked Ukraine on purpose

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Hitler, Stalin, and Mao all killed a shit ton of people intentionally. Stalin and Mao killed a shit ton more unintentionally.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Hitler never collapsed Germanys ecosystem.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I definitely learned about mao, 8th grade, USA. Didnt hear much that i recall about king Leopold though?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Enslaved the entirety of the Congo pretty much and worked them to death in mines.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eddie izzard said it best. Hitler killed people next door. After a while we won't stand for that. Pol pot/ Mao killed their own people

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Mao himself have higher deaths count than all other regrouped. Damn !

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not defending Murdering Mao, but take this with a grain of salt. Doesn't seem to be counting people killed in nazi invasions for one thing

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also missing hirohito for Japan since he was in charge while Japan was going around massacring nearby Asian countries (see rape of nanking)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah I learned about it but not until I got into college. He was a truly horrible, evil man. Wasn’t even trying to make his country better

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well we stopped hitler before he reached mao level numbers. But hitler had greater velocity in murders and would have outpaced mao if he

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Captured Russia. Via mass and slow starvation similar to what was happening to the polish at the time.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mostly the people starved, as opposed to being slaughtered deliberately

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They print the books in China

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised you learned about Stalin in school. Where did you go to school?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If Disney has anything to say about it you never will.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My textbook ended before Mao took power.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You expected to learn in school? Especially something controversial that weighs heavily on modern events?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And his name has dong in it

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read the Wikipedia page on the Great Leap Forward. Wild stuff.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I learned a bit but most of history was focused on the west. Very little about anything other than US and Europe (unless it involved them).

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Asia and Africa don't count homie. #eurocentrism

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As you should be

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of Mao's killing was due to incompetence and not specific malice.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Eddie Izzard addressed that in Dressed to Kill. Kill your own people and we pretty much let them do it, cross a boarder, Hitler, silly man.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Realy . Wow we learned about even in Eastern KY. That his was the worst by far .

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

World history cut off at a certain point in HS for me. We did not study anything post-WW2.

6 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 1

Neither did we, the official explanation from the teacher was that too many crucial documents are still classified.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We spent the last like month learning post ww2. Ya know, when everyone checks out mentally

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Well considering the books were printed in the 50's...

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I was born in the 50s.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did you go to school in Texas?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nah Florida and Indiana

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Florida has schools?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I know, shocker

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought they were all kept in tanning beds till they turned 13 and then chose between smuggling cocaine or a Disneyland internship.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Look up the 'Great Leap Forward'. They fucked up rooooyally.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Trofim Lyshenko effectively killed tens of millions in ussr and China with his bullshit "science" check out behind the bastards podcast

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Leaders subscribing to what fits them ideologically rather than real science, glad that doesn't happen anymore...oh wait

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The great leap forward and cultural revolution were very yikes. He was also an impressively ineffective leader.

6 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 0

He invented "traditional chinese medicine" because he count provide actual medicine to his people. Acupuncture, chi bull shit, all of it

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

I mean Qi bull shit

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Some form of blood letting had been around as acupuncture but the modern acupuncture was Mao's TCM

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Telling a bunch of farmers to suddenly and without training to switch to forging iron was a bad idea who knew lol

6 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

And their iron is still the worst in the world many decades later. A whole country dedicated to "close enough".

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Ah yes let's melt useful stuff to make brittle back yard iron we can then turn into useless stuff.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All those ghost city skyscrapers that started falling apart a year after being built

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

which really sucks, it's all self regulation with minimal care of quality. Seems like their gov is trying to shove regulations but no avail

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We didn’t fight and beat that guy so. It’s almost like we don’t need a movie.

6 years ago | Likes 485 Dislikes 3

Great way to put it lol

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m saddened by how good of a point that is

6 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 0

This guy gets it

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

lol well its almost like american history is more heavily covered in school than international. Its assumed folk with 12 grades of edu 1/

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

or less wont need to think about international history or if they do, their thoughts wont matter much lol. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Was going to say Korea war but yeah you can't call it a win

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't fight or beat Stalin either

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And we fought stalin?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We not, but others did.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cold War.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You didn't learn about that in school? What country was that?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Never learned that too, neither Stalin. Swiss here

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

China.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm US too. Never learned about Mao and took AP world history. I think it depends on the state. Mine was VA and FL

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

NY, graduated HS in 2000. Definitely went to an unusual school though, that covered a bit more than the basic curriculum.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good ole’ USA ?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

US here, we definitely learned about him.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Also US (Tennessee) here, I definitely didn't.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

US here, we definitely didn't..

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

US here, no we did. It's in the history books. I did well on that test.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Different states have different requirements about what you get to learn

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe you did, I'm not denying that. But the US is a big country. I know for a fact we did not at my high school

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What state? We did in Texas, we had to take world history and Mao was covered.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Utah. Not once did I hear about Mao til after high school. Even in my "World History" class

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What year did you graduate. I graduated about 5 years ago and didn't get taught past ww2.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

KY here. It came up but we didn't spend a ton of time on it.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0