$

Jun 17, 2022 3:23 PM

mfrybeasley

Views

93968

Likes

1358

Dislikes

40

"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."

—Abraham Lincoln

Capitalism is dependent on slave labor.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So that's why they renamed Human Resources to Human Capital.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A nation's true wealth is in it's labor force.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I guess those Soviet anti-capitalist posters were too much ahead of their time.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

that's actually how I feel. Without the fucking soviet union, workplace democracy would be a popular idea. They really besmirched the idea.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Really puts it all in perspective when we see politicians refusing to labor

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Listen guys the Golden age was when the boss pissed off the workers his fucking house burned down and shit changed right after. Just saying.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're a lot more symbiotic than anyone really wants to believe...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, yes? The the whole point of "capital" and "management" etc. is to enable the actual labor force to reach their full potential.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Back when Republicans were the sane and moral party.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sick of "capitalism." I want "laborism," where the labor is valued and not just owning stuff.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

1 share of the business to every worker, no more, no less. No selling or buying shares. Call it whatever you'd like, let's just get it done.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The next sentence: "Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights. Nor is it denied that there is, and ->

4 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

probably always will be, a relation between labor and capital producing mutual benefits."

4 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

Doesn't really detract from the statement. He views currency merely as a measure of value for the labour, but capital has no value itself.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

So Lincoln was, ultimately, a moderate (no matter what his detractors said at the time).

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

This doesn't really detract anything from the first. It's never a question about the nature of capital, just who should benefit from it.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

You'll never find anyone greedier, more fragile, and more narcissistic than a billionaire.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

At some point, Imgur twisted plutocracy and capitalism into synonyms. The big part of "true" capitalism is in the name: capital 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

without the government breathing down the neck of capital like a dragon waiting for a snack capitalism will devolve into a plutocracy

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

By definition, capital should flow. It should move. It should be invested, shared and spread. Hoarded wealth by 0.1% is NOT capital! 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Well, it's not exactly the fault of imgur or 'kids today' with monsterously wealthy calling themselves capitalists and their supporters

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes it is, just because you don't like what the capitalists do with their capital doesn't make it not capital, or capitalism

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Capital is, by definition, moving money. Imaginary investment fortunes aren't capital.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The thing about complex profit is that it is generated by combining labor. The value of labor of a complex product in itself is not the 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

2/2 sum of it's labor because somebody has to put that labor together and organize it. That's profit. Product doesn't exist with labor alone

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Why couldn't the workers organise themselves?

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Because then you wouldn't get billionaires, D'uh!

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Because when I have an idea, 10 people don't just spontaneously organize around that idea as group.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

You've never been to a hackathon, have you? Or heard of open source?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A few things: Open source existing doesn't mean it's better than commercial alternatives. Secondly, you've never tried pulling off a 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Also, third: most open source ideas are never made into reality because people need to be convinced of contributing their time into it.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

4 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 1

How fucken pathetic is this dude?

4 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Same as the Russians. After the sanctions their oligarchs were crying that they wouldn't know how to live without their family money.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Slit that pigs throat and throw his family out on their asses and into the gutter. Nationalize their assets

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Get him up against the wall.

4 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 1

There’s on in the spot light, he went to ‘space’ for fun, get him up against the wall!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Give him something real to cry about.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is not a dramatization is the best part.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I need to see this video. please and thank you. For reasons. *unzips*

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

"hedgefund manager and philanthropist" - I'll take "what is an oxymoron" for $800 please, Alex

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"I don't need the government giving away my money," says the billionaire who lives in the country the tax would go to.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

If I could, I'd put like a personal extra tax on his disgraceful arse. Guy's a joke.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Jokes are funny. This guy is infuriating. Unless he weeps like a baby for being sliiiiiiiightly less rich.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"The Party of Lincoln" won't like that lol

4 years ago | Likes 226 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Hell even the "liberal" party won't like that. Captialists hate facts like "rich people are only rich through the exploitation of the poor"

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

seeing as "liberal" as far as political philosophy goes, means support for free market capitalism and private property rights

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No they don't hate the fact, they hate it when people bring up the fact

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

that explains why I get downvoted for bringing up anti-capitalist facts so often lmao.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

yeah a lot of people on this website are pretty woefully uninformed in leftism or political philosophy in general

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0