Well, I learned something today

Sep 4, 2022 11:09 PM

Hotsauceman

Views

144429

Likes

1429

Dislikes

17

Link to story: https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/v7v75a/tree-planting-schemes-england

I've seen photos of areas that have been re-forested, by private citizens, & I know I was pretty impressed.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

stick farming

4 years ago | Likes 174 Dislikes 1

2 things are important: 1) Picking a tree indigenous to the area; 2) Regularly caring for the tree while it's still a sapling.

4 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 0

Yeah, trees are a lot of work

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correct! Local tree is a must. I planted 20 Ha of trees, some oak from mountain area, did not go well in my area, plain. Local oak thrived.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3) Ensuring the soil becomes a forest compatible one (fully recovered with leaves so dirt never exposed directly)

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Best way is mixed tree populations so they can compete and support each other, and mixed brush lanes for animals and erosion cover.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I’m my town they spent all the money planting trees under the powerlines. In a few years they will need to start cutting them down. SMH

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Free twigs for firewood!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, this is all this bullshit ever is. Planting is nice but if you provide no care those trees are as good as dead.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Need to add microbes to the roots when planting to give them half a chance at making it. Plus water saplings often.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wrong trees for the local environment in som areas. This is pure theatre in the U.K., no real thought to it or aftercare. It’s a con to make

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

people feel like their government cares for the environment. It does not.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Planting trees also doesn’t do much. It doesn’t sequester any carbon. When it dies it’s broken down and the carbon just gets released again

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the surest way to reforest a plot of land is to just not touch it for a few years.. if trees are meant to grow there, they will

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

King of the Hill did an episode on this exact topic back in 2008.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

post script: "back in 2008" hurts to type. It feels like a moment ago, not 14 years.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Stop. Please!!!!

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There’s an episode of 99 Percent Invisible (podcast) about bogs and other famous examples of tree planting programs gone wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

99% invisible did an episode about how planting trees in Scotland did massive damage to the peat bogs & planting wrong trees releases carbon

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Irony being prior to humans turning up, all that mooreland was forested.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Perhaps they need to use these instead ?

4 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 1

That’s what the vegans will use when they finally come for us

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aye zupoze

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I've rewatched the movie a lot, and I still can't understand what he says there, even knowing what he says, amazing

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Honestly human population reduction IS one of the best ways to mitigate climate change. It's just, yaknow, horribly unethical.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So...let's get the Chinese govt. started on that shit right away. And the American govt. They're both pretty unethical.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh I'm sure they'll consider that modest proposal with all due seriousness.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hopefully indigenous flowers so they don't become invasive

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

BLAM!!! "... not invasive..." BLAM! "... not invasive..."

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes, of course.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's actually kind of cool because I'm looking to restore native grasses to my land and birds and eat em all I guess because no grasses

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Kudzu

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Two things. 1: How American. 2: Are they available in sunflower seed?

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Please don't snack on the cartridges, that's saltpeter, not salt.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's how you get flowery zombies

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I thought it was how you killed flower zombies ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't kill the flowery zombie because the flowers make them docile.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like they are constantly drinking chamomile tea ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, the sweet flowery aroma on them calms them. The smell of aggression from people set them off. There's a story outlay on imgur about it

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most carbon credit programmes which plant trees are usually heavily CO2 producing - they often enable the justification of new hydrocarbon1/

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

extraction, with there being no consequences should the forests planted/saved from being turned into lumber fail - carbon debts are 2/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Therefore being created where no one is policing the carbon debtors.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Carbon offset" schemes can be at least as dodgy. If you see it offered, call the business and ask what their 20-50 year plan for it is.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

King of the Hill did an episode on this if I remember right.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When was it?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Season 13 ep 2. Earthy girls are easy

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

John Oliver did an episode on "Carbon Offset" recently: https://youtu.be/6p8zAbFKpW0

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Done by a Conservative council, yeah, seems legit

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am right now listening to the 99% invisible podcast episode 503 which is about this very incident, in england

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Global warming, Climate change…..now, Climate crisis?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they're to close to each other, need room to breathe as they grow up

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

That's not true. You should plant reasonably close together (to shade out weed competition) and then thin as they grow.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"This one group did it wrong so nobody should try"

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

Not what they're saying at all.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately what some will walk away with though.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Just planting trees isn't good enough, and a lot of people are getting away with it". Fixed it for you.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you don't know how to make it work, leave it to someone that does. there's not enough money in this to be wasteful.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so fucking tired of companies.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have had 20 planted in my kids school last month. It's fantastic. They have a gardener who will look after them

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you tried, not mowing?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So I now mulch my grass unless it is really bad. I’m also in the process of adding bee-friendly plants

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The lumber/paper industries used to plant 3 trees for every 1 they cut down. Not sure if that’s for attrition or not.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All we have to do is exterminate what rot fungii and lower O₂ levels and give it 500My for a carboniferous recharge

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Poor choice of trees? pick something local. What people usually call 'weed' and consider undesirable is what should go there

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Except for invasive plants that have nothing that eats them in the area, and thrive and take over everything else. Avoid planting those.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because it's native and thrives even between concrete cracks

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The labelling of certain plants as "weeds" or as "undesirable" is entwined with the history of racism.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh, grass land a natural prairies are better natural carbon sinks than forests anyway.

4 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 9

Or plant industrial hemp, it can sink up to 12 tons of co2 per acre.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Algae beds and mushroom plots as well.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It'is more the waste of resources and lack of addressing the actual problem in the name of looking good opposed to what is being planted

4 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

Yeah we don't have prairie over here!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are correct, where trees are planted can have adverse effect. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52200045

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No they are not. It depends on the location where the tree is planted. Trees also help prevent grass from hibernating. And there are 1/?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many other benefits trees can provide that vast grasslands cannot. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

99% Invisible had a good story about this. https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/for-the-love-of-peat/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ahh, that's where I first heard it. I know BBC had talked about it as well.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not great for habitat for animals that need help.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That's not how ecology works at all. Literally every biome is a great habitat for animals that need help.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every biome? lol the anthropogenic ones kinda suck. Also I was thinking of birds though.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Au contraire. Wild meadows are an important habitat, esp. for pollinators and other flying insects whose numbers have declined by over 75%.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

X Doubt . Citation needed.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Google it. This is imgur not a college classroom.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nope. You're wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0