Booo!!?

Feb 28, 2021 10:33 PM

Bheka420

Views

119318

Likes

4813

Dislikes

225

Boo

Because they don’t believe in facts or science.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 11

The Who sold us all down the river! If you don’t know read about it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’m so tired of republicans

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

In what context where they booing the WHO? The WHO has objectively behaved badly lately.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In all fairness WHO did try to cover for China.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Not sure what context the CPAC booing was, but the WHO has been terrible about holding China accountable since the beginning of the pandemic

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

F this dude. Support Unions, until they form one in his own company. Can't wait to see the skeletons fall out of his closet.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Yeah well, he is a capitalist.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

On the Nazi stage?

5 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 10

5 years ago | Likes 1053 Dislikes 15

Once again liberals are completely over-reacting. They weren't saying "booo!", they were saying "Boo-urns!"

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

@Covidnineteen do you approve this message?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Republicans are morons but WHO has yet to actually push China for its original data on early Covid victims. Frontline had a great show on it

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Most countries wouldn't have those raw data available. Kristen of WHO already said it's normal to summarize it instead of raw who ask who

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

WHO fully deserves to be booed. We shouldn't automatically assume that everything the idiot party does is stupid.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

I've been seeing things here about just how F'd up the WHO is and how it sucks. Then the Republicans boo it and tada! We suddenly love it.

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 8

Trump should have said “no walls ever!” And the Dems would have raced to build one on both borders.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah... There are definitely legitimate reasons to boo the WHO.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Boo WHO? No need to cry, it's only a joke! Haha

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow, you guys really don’t know what happened!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This guy is not a good guy. I hope those that like him are aware they are laying with dogs that have fleas.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Remember when the WHO wouldn't let Taiwan in because they get funding from the CCP.

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 6

Remember when the WHO wouldn’t accept information about COVID-19 from Taiwan, reported the opposite then had to walk back their words?

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Agreeable statement, but every time I see Cenk Uygur, I always have to ask, "did he apologize for denying the Armenian genocide yet?"

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

And every time this moronic comment comes up I have to ask, did you even read what he wrote or are you repeating a meme like a tool.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It was a meme? I just used to occasionally watch TYT, and wished Cenk Uygur was better.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This comment has no substance. You ignored what I said. Have some dignity ffs.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I think it's partially because of this: https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/14/asia/coronavirus-who-china-intl-hnk/index.html

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Every single person at CPAC should be tried for crimes against humanity.

5 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 17

v

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Republicans have been fucked up for a very long time...

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

When anti-racists, health workers, human rights activists etc oppose you, you either change what you do or decide they're the bad guys.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Greatest Country in the World™

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Remember when the WHO lied about how bad Coronavirus was at the behest of China? I ain't sayin' the GOP are right, but the WHO deserves it.

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 9

Yes, china exerts a certain amount of sway with the WHO.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah. It's dumb to pull funding for WHO but it's also dumb to pretend that it doesn't have deep, even booable depending on context, problems

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

The GOP is trying to deflect blame from the fact that Trump shitcanned our pandemic response, including agents in China in the area this

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

virus seemingly originated from. We could have known how bad the virus was, regardless of the actions of the WHO or China.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

WHO didn't lie, they went off the data they had. China lied to WHO.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

The guy in charge of the WHO is in China's pocket, so he went with whatever they said. So you're splitting hairs about whether it's a lie.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No he isn't, China provides not much funding to who. The problem is if who push China they go from poor data to zero data.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah he is, as is Ethiopia's current links to China.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They never outright lied, just hinted and implied, and at no point said close borders with China, and stuck to the obviously false numbers

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Fuck cpac but the WHO failed it's remit. Bowed down to china did not investigate. Accepted China's numbers. And failed the world.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We have to hold them and Trump to account. Do not allow cognitive dissonance to blind you to the truth.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The WHO is sick. We need to purge outside influence and give them free access to do the job.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

WHO only sounds nice in name. This is appropriate. None of the proper first steps were taken because China has control in the WHO

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

https://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16030051

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

tldr; Conservatives are fearful, gullible morons with poor emotional regulation and go by feeling rather than reason or logic. I am shocked.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

This one is about how their brain structures are warped by fear

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

This is literally a paper about how conservatives basically suffer from mental disorder

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

That literally sounds like the extremists on either side. Hell, there are still people who think Sandmann is racist.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's only from 2017, but there is research stating that extreme conservatives suffer mental malady going back to the early 00's

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Just like how Nazism shouldn’t be allowed to exist, so do they. There I said it. It’s never about difference of opinions.

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 22

It's about differences in brain structure.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Almost like not caring about your fellow man is a mental illness.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That is PRECISELY the point I am trying to make, however it's unethical for us to do anything about it and they can't be taught

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Conservatives are scared of everything so they're mean to everyone.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 12

Now that’s something. Thanks. I’ll give it a read.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The entire neocortex was a mistake.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Isn’t the WHO under the thumb of the CCP as it literally refused to acknowledge Taiwan/accept questions about it?

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 8

Yes, I'm sure the concern about Taiwan is why all these fascists were booing the WHO. Just because the WHO may be shitty doesn't give these

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

people a pass about being somewhere on the spectrum between stupid and corrupt.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The entire planet is under the thumb of the CCP. Including the US. They are building the world's next pre-eminent superpower. In much the

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Same fashion all the previous superpowers built their empires. Economic dominance, rapid militarization and industrialization, and of course

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

A big hefty dose of genocide, ethnic cleansing, oppression, etc... No different from the British Empire, the Soviet Union, or the USA.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

This is all from their own playbook, too. China's been doing this in-house for millenia.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Who hasn't?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's MORE under the thumb of the CCP when Trump withdrew funding.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

Are you implying that pulling from WHO was a self fulfilling prophecy of sorts?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He was right that we were playing them far more then China but they're capitulating to the CCPs whims. Thet already down played the threat

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Of the Corona virus coming from China until it became an international shitshow.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I know the criticism, but honestly it's time for a three party system guys. Honestly, it's not that bad, we've got 4 of them up here.

5 years ago | Likes 619 Dislikes 29

More than 2 major parties, no gerrymandering, no donations (bribery) for politicians, its not that hard to fix

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except that we’re asking the time y people who directly benefit from it being fucked up to fix it

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If we can split the Dems into left and a centrist parties we can guarantee the extremist GOP will win everything for 50 years!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That works up there because you have a parliament &proportional representation. We have a winner-take-all system so whoever splits is fucked

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Gotta start at grassroots and get them in locally to start. They always want to start with POTUS-won’t ever work that way. Gotta do the work

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Interesting

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

i mean, i approve... the dems can stay... what other 2 parties are you suggesting, once the republican party is abolished?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This requires electoral reform. Proportional representation would be so goddamn good for America

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The only way to end the 2 party system is to get rid of, or at least change, the electoral college that's currently in place

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're asking for the impossible you'd need the existing 0ower structure to agree to make things harder for themselves. It takes amendment

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most Americans want a more than the two parties. It's the parties themselves that stop that from happening.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A tiered voting system would really help

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would require a rewrite of the constitution. I'm down for a parliamentary system.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5... Quebec is a fickle mistress

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I want a moderate party. No extreme ideas, but as close to center as possible.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

The Overton window says hi.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, I'm aware the Democrats are center right currently...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We already have that. It's the party that won the 2020 presidency. Personally, I'd like a more liberal party.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The only thing stopping this is tons of fucken money

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can't have enough corrupt parties to make a functioning system. The problem is how they're funded and regulated, not how many there are.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, parties are an anachronism for when we were technologically incapable of producing an actual directly representative democracy.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There will be. Unfortunately it will be the Trump Party. But if it splits the GOP vote then that would be good too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We can remove the idiocy by requiring publicly funded elections with no outside money. And Reinstating the federal Fairness doctrine

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Ranked Choice Voting would be nice

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fine, we can have the nutbar Republicans, the sensible Republicans and the party that has all the power. I think that would be fine.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The voting system here is one that simply doesn't support any number of parties other than two. There's been analyses and studies.

5 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

You're absolutely right, though. The problem is that the first step necessary for us to adopt a three party system is for us to convince 2/3

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Of Congress to agree to support a change that will make it easier for people to vote them out of power and force them to share power

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

With their rivals forevermore under an effective pseudo-parliamentary system.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Alaska, a fairly conservative state, actually adopted Ranked Choice Voting last year. Fucking hell yeah.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Just throwing this out there. How about abolishing parties and candidates have to stick to what they believe will be the best for people?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How would you "abolish parties"?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, I can’t. More of a hypothetical/philosophical question. If we wanted a 3rd+, why have parties in the first place?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont think there's anything inherently wrong with making political alliances... but first past the post leaves everyone dissatisfied.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US has several parties. Can't force people to join them .

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

You're misunderstanding. The problem is the primary voting system that forces people to choose between two candidates at the general.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You can write in.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are a fuckwit, you know that? Have you considered why write-ins are so ineffectual in many states?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yes, because the parties and their platforms are largely unpopular or are already covered by on of the more popular parties.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great. Change the voting systems around the country 1st, and I'm in. Otherwise, no, it's really not.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is why I've been hollering at everybody that's an activist and focusing on the wrong things to start with RCV at a state level.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes! I hear so much about things like term limits and other bs, but Ranked Choice Voting would be the best first step

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Out of curiosity, which "up here"? Canada only has two national parties that form government (occasionally someone becomes opposition) 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

and provinces often fall into some form of Right Party vs. Centre-Left Party, with the occasional deviation. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

NDP have been power brokers for the better part of what 12 years now? I think we can say 3.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Power brokers" gives them a little more credit than they deserve, especially as they're scared to tempt election and lose their leverage.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ya. I miss Layton. And Mulcair.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

how about DON'T VOTE GOP. there are plenty of legitimate criticisms to level at the Democrats but they don't BOO THE WORLD HEALTH ORG.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of the interesting arguments is always that the new parties will be too extreme... but the answer is those ones will never be in power/1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...but they shouldn’t need to be to have a voice... it shouldn’t be this weird cycle of one or the other party doing w/e they want /2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... the ruling party should need to consult others before they put things through... not the psychotic brinkmanship you guys have now /3

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 actually. Liberal, conservative, NDP, Green, Bloc, People's. And also independents.And because there are so many, we have a minority gov1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which means the ruling party couldn't ignore the people and had to bow to other parties will, hence $2k a month pandemic cheques.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...which were cancelled halfway through the pandemic and many people didn't qualify, and some are even being forced to pay the money back...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...not to mention that the "minimum amount Canadians require to live on" is DOUBLE what people with disabilities receive...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also the 500/week that is the minimum people need to live is more than what people make on minimum wage.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just have to entirely redo how our elections work to allow the existence of a stable >2 party system

5 years ago | Likes 201 Dislikes 2

And? Get to work! It's long overdue!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well the problem that we are trying to fix is also the problem preventing us from fixing it- we are super gridlocked

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My thought, too. If you actually want to "heal" that country, you need to overhaul the electoral system.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ranked choice would take care of a lot of it. but yeah, its an intense change to organize

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

*long, hard, scathing stare at Justin Trudeau.*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

whats up with trudeau?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He promised that Canada would move away from first last the post and then decided against it when it let him continue his prime ministership

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People who say we need legit 3rd parties never seem to realize our election system is what creates the 2 party system.

5 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 2

Admittedly, I'm probably one of those people. I get worried the GOP isn't going to correct itself back to sanity and they'll benefit 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

from party loyal voters. It would be great if Trump decided to make his own party and the GOP could divorce themselves of the insanity.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I would definitely prefer this splits the GOP. But based on the 202 election, I'm doubtful this would happen. Trump just seems to //

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's also what allowed the DNC to split the progressive vote in 2020. Seriously, Biden won super-progressive MASSACHUSETTS

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

get rid of congressional districts and award the number of congressmen for whole state.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

My comment didn't mean there aren't solutions. Just that people always yell "just vote 3rd party!" as if that auto solves it. I agree tho

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Really all third parties have to do to influence the election is rally more votes than the margin of error. Doesn't do much, but it's a >

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yep need ranked voting for this to be possible.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It doesn't have to he ranked voting, Canada is first past the post and we have 4 parties sitting in the house right now. There are other

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

aspects to your system I don't understand though.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but the last libertarian candidate for pres wanted to abolish the FDA, minimum wage, and protections against sexual discrim in pay

5 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 4

Well as a registered libertarian...yeah I’m not opening this can of worms. You guys are so far off it’s embarrassing

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Is current american libertarianism not just laissez-faire anarcho-capitalist with most associations with mutualist thought severed?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And that candidate takes some of the crazy votes away from moderate conservatives

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well then make a party with different values?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's weird to think libertarianism is just socialist endgoals. But that's so far leftist, it got co-opted by the right.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not really...when "socialism" is adopted by the right, it's disingenuous.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ok, but like, no one said the third party had to be "Republican Lite". Honestly, we need to do ranked voting to get more parties.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Libertarians have no grasp of how a country runs nor what the people actually need. They do rails of coke off Atlas Shrugged and that's it.

5 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 2

You say that like it's a bad thing... The coke part

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

That's about the use of that book anyway, so one part down.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

she used the state of politics to hide the fact she was a bad idea machine

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Destroying society is at the heart of libertarianism. It's a literal doomsday cult

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

I look at it as a two-axis system. Left, right, authoritarian, libertarian. The Libertarian left are more interested in stability. The...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

...doomsday cultists are the ones who are fascists, and literally want to drop-kick the country and the world right back into the 1880's.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Libertarian is just a nice way of saying militant republican

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I was kinda thinking that you've already got your crazy party forming, you just need a rational moderate choice for conservatives.

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 3

We already have that. If we're going to get a third party, it needs to be hard left.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I believe they're called the Democratic Party

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

...that's called the democratic party...it's already conservative...ffs...we don't need to go right, people.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Conservatives have been really clear that they don't want that.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Honestly, Biden would be considered a moderate conservative in the 90's, Conservatives have moved the goal post so much since the 80's.

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

All while claiming the left were the ones moving the window.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

he's called Joe Biden. he's the best Republican President in years, and yet he's hated by Republicans.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When asked what her greatest achievement was, Margaret Thatcher responded "Tony Blair". If Trump has a shred of intelligence or (2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

cared, let alone understood, what his legacy would be, he'd say the same about Biden. but GOP voters are either too fucking stupid or (3

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0