Foxnews is a Russian state-affiliated media

Mar 1, 2022 12:16 PM

GlobalImageServiceCat

Views

113916

Likes

1408

Dislikes

101

Invasion in quotes...

Repubs are so far down the contrarian rabbit hole that they would indeed welcome our new alien overlords

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Why do all these right-wing female "news" anchors look like B-list porn stars?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fox "News"

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

uhm?? is... is this news?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

all those "patriot" political parties (e.g. the AfD a**holes in Germany) have shown their ugly face by defending this Putin war criminal

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fox, aka the Nazi Party propaganda network.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

WTF????

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the US knows anything about it they should shut it down! Doesn’t impede on free press since propaganda is practically causing harm to us.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We need to take a stronger stance against these comments

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

To be accurate, its an incursion, Russia already illegally invaded Ukraine in 2014 and never left. The invasion already happened, Fox Sucks

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Murdoch and his cronies need to be take off-air as Russian propaganda

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"I will never lie to you" Lies literally every day, then gets a job at Fox and continues lying every day. At least she is consistent?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

WH calls Russin invasion an "invasion."

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

who is WH? european here. ah shit don’t tell me it stands for White House. WHAT fucking problem do they have at fox news?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

President Biden was slow or hesitant to use the word "invasion" when the russian military first entered Ukraine last week. fox news takes >>

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>> every opportunity to criticize President Biden & his fellow Democrats. fox tends to side with russia.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>> last week tucker carlson of fox news made a long statement in support of putin & russia. Now, he's claiming he didn't say those things.>>

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>> This is what we in the US call gaslighting. It's a component of the Nazi playbook: lie & lie until no one knows the truth.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's okay I called her a "Press Secretary" when I couldn't call her bullshit Barbie in certain settings.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Obi Wan was wrong. we found a place worse. Fox news is the place that is worse that Mos Eisley Spaceport.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a European I knew Fox News was kinda sketchy, but what the actual fuck ...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Fox News should just be called RT

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

In what world is sending troops in to kill and occupy another country NOT an invasion?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Her dumbness is only superseded by her cuntyness.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 322 Dislikes 15

They are not even an American owned news company. I don’t know why Americans love this shit so much.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Is Murdoch not the owner? Is he not a US citizen these days?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And yes he has dual citizenship to America.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He has cross ownership waivers due to him having so many media companies in so many different countries.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fox News America was also started and funded by foreign companies.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So while based in America, it is not an American company while it is dual vested by foreign companies.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Surprised that little crucifix doesn't leave a burn mark on her chest.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

American 'Christian' 'Conservatives' are very luck heaven and hell aren't real.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, this is possibly the most honest thing ever to be said on Fox

4 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 6

They're just reporting the "facts".

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Nah they're just facts not "facts". But that's unusual for Fox.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Besides the question "What is white supremacy?" With fucker Carlson right above it showing what it is.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

what's the context here?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fox news is full of fascists.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really funny but sure

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

am not from the US so your answer gave me a, "oh yeah i didn't think of that" moment. so yes, funny for me.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ahh ok no lol that is funny I'm with ya now

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Someone needs to “invade” this nazi’s face with a fist.

4 years ago | Likes 688 Dislikes 24

Get in line!

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Me first!!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No problem... me next please!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your fists in their faces is "legitimate political discourse" when GOP does it, or "Peacekeeping" when allies do it.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fuck fox news but this Nazi name-dropping is exactly the sentiment being spread by the Russian media right now. Fuck fox news in particular.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But fox news has aligned with nazis. Literal fucking nazis. The right wing in America doesn't kick nazis out of the party.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Fist"

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Lmfao

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yes.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean somenoe needs to "military action" this...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Make move on*

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 1

Has an audio link for people wanting the pronunciation https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Backpfeifengesicht

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Such a beautiful language (sincerely).

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Technically more "a face in need of a slap"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I harbour a hateful desire to use a different appendage... Am I the baddie?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

That's why you have her wear a ushanka and scream nyet as you slam her in the Sochi?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean like... a foot?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I...I think he means his dick...rape aside, don't put dick in crazy.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whoah! I didn't say anything about rape. I'd take her on a nice date to McDonald's and pretend to listen to her vapid opinions first.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Gah. Why do people make me defend them? This chyron is about how the White House hesitated in calling it an invasion the first day or so.

4 years ago | Likes 224 Dislikes 13

Why the quotes? It's a normal statement, doesn't need em. But they add the sarcasm.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Thank you.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Regardless, russian media have been playing video of fox "news", tucker carlson & trump. These are facts.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Eight hours.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I support the administration, but it was silly to not call what was clearly an invasion, an invasion even for 5 minutes. If I see something

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Silly, I'll call it out. It's not the end of the world. Just a comment.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. It pisses me off. There is SOOO MUCH evil to dunk on them about (and, hopefully one day, prosecute...) Stop making shit up!

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

What kind of shitheel do you have to be where you make Fox News look honest by comparison?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I mean, at least they weren't openly praising Putin though

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

They have Tucker for that.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

tucker carlson is now gaslighting his pro-putin, pro-russian comments he made just a few days ago.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In this segment at least

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Sigh. Agreed. They have enough actual crap to be called out on. No need to make more up, and now there’s something to call you out on, too.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Some people call you a "commenter".

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Huh. Thanks. Fuck whoever first framed it this way. Last thing we need. Thanks a lot, people who give tfg-ers reason to say "both sides."

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a big push from Democrats to try to turn Ukraine into a partisan issue. Ask yourself the mindset that this comes from.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Democrats? Fuck outta here with that absolute horseshit. Fuck right off, traitor.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who else is claiming their opponents support Putin?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which side keeps effusing praise for Putin? Which side has pushed his propaganda? You're pretending these things haven't happened and it's

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

incredibly and fundamentally dishonest. We're done here. I don't waste time engaging with traitors who traffic exclusively in bad faith.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

trump has made dozens of statements in support of putin who is a dictator & murderer. Over 60 rus journalists murdered at putin's behest.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>> fox supports putin: some of their own journalists, such as Jen. Griffin, have called out the program hosts for their disinformation.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

>> tucker carlson last wk opined full support for russia over Ukraine; now he's gaslighting his own statements in full Nazi Fascist mode.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fox is literally controlled opposition. They're owned by Disney and exist to tell conservatives whatever dems want them to think.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I think most major news sources are terrible but the nit-picky stuff both sides do to shit on the other side is so childish and 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 3

fox, tucker carlson & trump have been used by russian propaganda machine, and not just recently, either. regularly over the last 5 yrs.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Okay I didn’t say they weren’t. Please read the rest of comment string

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

it’s not like there isn’t very good reasons to shit all over Fox but when people get in a uproar of stuff like this it just waters down 2/3

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

all the legitimate reasons to shit on them. It’s why you hear botg aides calling each other “snowflakes” when the fringes complain about 4/?

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

*both sides* sheesh need to slow it down a bit this morning

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

this kind stuff 5/5

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fox was in the right here, for once. Souce: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/white-house-calls-russian-moves-on-ukraine-an-invasion

4 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 5

Thank you for the information.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Where's the link to the fox "news" segment. There have been multiple instances in which fox's own reporters have called out fox misinfo. >>

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

>> Jennifer Griffen for example.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was flipping news channels yesterday, and ended up watching Fox for a while (BBC was doing a show, not news, CNN just on commercials). /

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was just news. There was zero bias in what I saw, they didn't argue with a rep for Zelensky, just let her talk, praising him and Ukraine.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Y’all are really putting a damper on the Imgur hate mob with this “reasoning” and “logic” approach

4 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

What did you feel a hate mob was criticizing? The WH for taking 8 hrs to double check their intelligence? Or Fox for the chyron?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

fox commentators have repeated been called out by their own reporters in Ukraine for pushing misinformation (Jennifer Griffin for example).>

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Ah. Ok. I think 100% of what is on Fox News is disinformation.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably shouldn't pluralize reporters. It's pretty much just been Jennifer Griffin.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Don't get me wrong, she's been doing the work of a handful of people with her pushback. But I haven't heard of others.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

>> trump is pro-putin, pro-russia, without question. fox news is pro-trump, without question. fox pushes the russian agenda, tucker >>

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

>> carlson for example, who is now gaslighting today about things he said just a few days ago. So fuck you.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Make this shit illegal again please.

4 years ago | Likes 936 Dislikes 24

Execute these traitors please.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Sorry, but the politician who wants to make this illegal only agrees with you on 90% of the issues. So you have to let Trump get reelected.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Just revoke the waiver the FCC gave them in the 90s for a foreign owned news media company to operate within the US.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-05-05-fi-62827-story.html It’s not like Fox News is an American news company.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Make what illegal?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No no, it should be called "insurrection" also in quotes for /s.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand the sentiment, but I would die defending her right to lie. What we need is better education so her efforts are not effective.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 14

Education doesn't fix this problem, but you're right that speaking well of Russia should be legal.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What? Totally wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's a difference between lying and lying while presenting yourself as news. The word "news" should have a legal definition.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This would never have been illegal. The fairness doctrine never required truthfulness, just reporting the opposing view.

4 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 4

If the us gets dragged into the war, it becomes illegal/treason. Giving aid/comfort to the enemy.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No it doesnt. You need to read the law and cases. Believe it or not, just giving a pro-enemy speech isn't treason. We still have free speech

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The fairness doctrine also never applied to cable networks. Only antenna broadcasts.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Plus it's a right to lie except under certain circumstances. That's why politicians get away with everything.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Should also be illegal, but that would be hard to enforce.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In government offices yes. Otherwise, no. Because then it conflicts with the 1st amendment.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There were definitely ways to call out bullshit with the FD, once it ended, capitalist learned from Rush how profitable it was to peddle bs

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fox News is not an American news company. The FCC should just revoke their waiver given in the 90s, obviously it was a mistake.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ok. Let's make this illegal for the first time then. This garbage is poisoning minds.

4 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 8

They need to be stripped of their 'news' title as a minimum. Fucking anti-democracy propaganda station is all they are.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Their viewership won't care, and would merely see it as an attack on free expression. Which it sorta is. This is VERY tangled.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It sounds good in theory but, suppose a Republican Majority voted in one of their own. What then? Just playing devil’s advocate.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It sure is. I have a few "friends" who eat their BS up and now it's very sad to try and even relate to them. They've become fox parrots!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Can’t fix stupid. Seriously

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You've got that right! It just boggles the mind to imagine what these dolts are even thinking!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a very bad dea. Who decides what is truth? What about if it was under the Trump admin? Who decides then?

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I completely understand the impulse, but I'd be super-hesitant to create a US Department of Truth, which is what you'd need.

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Requiring journalistic integrity wouldn't be a department of truth.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What metric would the government use to decide if an organization's reporting is cause for fine/penalty?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’d prefer the complement version that’s just charged with flagging falsehoods

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wouldn't ban a single instance of a false fact. I think there could be an argument made to make it illegal to systematically tell lies.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Until a bad actor gets put in charge of what the truth is....

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And when someone like Trump is in charge of it, what information do you think they are banning?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What about removing the profit motive for this garbage? Make all news or political opinion shows non-profit via taxes.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A right to a free and independent media does not mean a tiny number of people have a right to make billions pedaling disinformation.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can a person write a book of political opinions and sell it for a profit?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1] Would we need one? We'd just need to outlaw any company that produces news from having affiliations with foreign states. If a nation

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

2] REQUIRES a news company to air propaganda or to withhold information from the public there, why should they be allowed to operate here?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Could you define affiliation here? Promote interests of, or even cheerlead for a foreign nation is bad journalism but well inside 1st Amend.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also the fairness doctrine doesn't apply to cable news: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ronald-reagan-fairness-doctrine/

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Right because the concept of cable tv didn't exist. The law should have been updated not dismantled

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

No - the FCC governs terrestrial broadcast because the system that carries it it tax funded and publicly available. Cable is opt-in/premium.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Fairness Doctrine forced news companies to carry misinformation. It was bad policy. It was of questionable legality over the airwaves

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

but was absolutely, 100% Unconstitutional over cable.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0