Good vs Evil

Jan 3, 2018 8:27 PM

StVanquish712

Views

101801

Likes

1885

Dislikes

119

FP Edit: I made it to the FP on my cake day ... send nudes to congratulate me!

The background art is by Albrecht Dürer from the 16th Century.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Enantiodromia. You’re welcome.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And +1 for this post.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We ought not accept evil, but should tolerate the opposing POV. Down the line, you might realize that your POV was the evil one.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

But what if you're evil from the beginning. I mean dark side is always sexier...and we have cookies.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You're right. I'm sold. Cookies!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anyone here in the comments defending bigotry is either transparently a bigot or truly doesn’t understand what free speech means and covers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True but that doesnt mean one should be intolerant

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 11

I think the problem is that people think you can't disagree with someone without being "intolerant"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of what? Everyone is intolerant of something. For me it's people that stop at the top of escalators.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Depends on the thing. I think it's fair to not tolerate murder or talking in the theater.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yes, you should. You should be intolerant of evil.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Society depends on intolerance.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

'Tolerant' and 'decent' have become synonymous, but they are not. I can be polite all day long, but not to evil assholes.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

This would be a much better quote if the meaning of intolerant didn't mean something entirely different from how it is used

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

What do you mean?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How so?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

-me after my racist blog gets found out and i am being called out on twitter

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against...the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.

8 years ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 19

Depends on what you mean by "defend." If the only way to stop intolerance is with violent censorship then you're not tolerant.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

False dichotomy. Thank you drive through.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Not sure how that's a false dichotomy. Tolerance isn't about being nice to everyone, it's about accepting their rights.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definition of dilemma

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But isn't being against bigotry the greatest bigotry of all? /s

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Hence the paradox. But again. A necessary evil

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the tolerant paradox. In order to keep our free and tolerant society, we must ensure that Nazis, racists, facists, are not tolerated

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Not really a paradox. It's perfectly reasonable to not tolerate *ideas*, it's awful to not tolerate a whole group of *people*.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was about to bring this up. You can not tolerate intolerance. That is the paradox

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Because intolerance, if tolerated, will overrun tolerance and we'll have another facist dictatorship

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not a paradox, it's a way to control speech and ideas. Who decides what someone says is hateful? I could make a joke about anything 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Here’s a good rule of thumb. Is your joke or message that some group doesn’t deserve to exist? Than you’re a bigot. Mystery solved

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Using your own logic, are you not saying that the intolerant, as a group, don't deserve to exist?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and be branded a bigot.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

I'm not talking about jokes and stuff. I'm talking about people like Bannon who are threats to a progressive society. I'm not saying 1/>

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

2/> should be jailed or whatever. They should be educated and shown why they are wrong. And not educated by force

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Karl Popper. Not me.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

I have to say I disagree. With Karl Popper. And possibly you.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Tolerance if not fought for will lose, because it's not as appealing to be tolerant. To be tolerant you have to do a lot of things that 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just aren't as attractive to people as being an asshole. Intolerance offers nothing but quick, easy, utterly flawed but pleasing answers.2/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Popper suggests fighting for tolerance by acting intolerant. Then the lines are blurred, because who decides what is considered 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are welcome to. I urge you to examine what it is he, and John Rawls mean re paradox of tolerance before you make up your mind though

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Be more accurate if you replace 'evil' with 'everybody', and 'good' with 'opposition'...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ironic

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Religion Of Peace.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's why Trump is president. people were done with the evil preaching tolerance

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The context really matters here. Are they talking extremist groups like the Nazis or people who want to be treated fairly under the law?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The real problem is that the quote assumes objective morality.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Which, turns out to be the case. Not sure which evil he is talking about here but he opposes LGBT rights (looked him up).

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Sounds good, but I'd be willing to bet this quote was used to justify some seriously heinous shit

8 years ago | Likes 670 Dislikes 59

Just like any other thing you could say.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, is that not what people who complain about "PC culture" say?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

AKA people longing for the "good old days" when certain demographics "knew their place".

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's exactly that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The church wouldn’t do such a thing, infidel.

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 6

Heretic!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exterminatus is the only solution...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Something something you western infidel

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All quipy little one or two sentence "morals" are generally so vague as to be able to support anything. The real world is complicated.

8 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 2

The world is simple, so is the universe... it's people that make everything complicated.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The world is *not* complicated. It's very simple: it sucks. To be fair though, *how* it sucks gets very, very complicated.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I hope this comment gets enough upvotes to uncollapse. It's really very good.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My ego thanks you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your statement above is the perfect example of intolerance ... you haven’t even checked to see who this man is and what he stands for .....

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 46

>who this man is and what he stands for. Took a look. He's pretty homophobic. So yeah, I don't think I agree with what he stands for.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

this is the uneducated, Wikipedia researched, intolerant bullshit that had let “tolerance” become expected ...

8 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 48

What a load of bullshit. This is the mindset that justified the inquisition. How modern people are praising it is beyond me.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

he is alive total, served in Philly, is only the second Native American Archbishop ... that is the epitome of intolerance

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 42

You're right, I was being flippant without doing research, but it is a common tactic to label something as evil to justify greater evil...

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

So take a deep breath, I think we're on the same side

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Well his own words can be applied to his stance with the LGBT community so...

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

The thing is that good and evil aren't really real, it's all relative

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So basically the whole Trump WH and conservatives in general?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sounds like 2017

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oooooh this is deep, getting the popcorn for the comments.....

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Hey that's what's happening currently in our society, neato

8 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 25

Um...no it, it really really isn't

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

So what, were just going to pretend that Charlottesville didn't happen? Nazis want tolerance of their ideas, leftists want them silenced.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I literally can't tell if your sarcastically defending nazis or not and that is exactly what's wrong with America right now

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don’t think a lot of tolerance was preached at any point. If anything he’s gotten more tolerant. There isn’t a Muslim registry yet.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 22

That's always happening. The left uses the alt right to attack any republican, the right uses antifa and Berkley college to attack democrats

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 11

Your lack of situational awareness is disturbing

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

"I disagree, but I need a really condescending way to say it so even people who side with me don't want to be associated with me..."

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Trying to silence people is new though. That's why people freak out about attacking the free press. It's NOT normal

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

Oh know this has all happened before, back in the 60's and 70's a lot of hard core conservatives and racists honestly supported getting

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

ride of the first amendment to silence political opponents. Such as communists, socialists, and civil rights advocates

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah, it also happened with Sedition act and during Civil War, but it's at least extremely uncommon and not normal.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What? Not it's not. It's become topical again but definitely not new.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Okay, it's uncommon. It happened with Sedition act, during Civil War, and McCarthyism, but overall it is very not normal.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It becomes topical every decade or two. In the early 2000s there was shitloads of it in the post 9/11 frenzy towards any who opposed war.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bullshit, this has no basis in fact, it just sounds good.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Hail satan!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

like when that fuck Erdogan said "Democracy is like a train: when you reach your destination, you get off"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Weird, because Roslyn here is quoting one of the Dune novels...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, Calvin and Muad'dib

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha. Brilliantly warped. Thank you!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've got a few saved. I use them in comments when appropriate, but i really should make a post of them.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd seen the first one before, but didn't realize it was a series. Please post!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The irony of the a priest saying that. How did the church spread it's power? Ah yes through the quality of its violence not it's "wisdom".

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't be intolerant of intolerance

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Soooo... ANTIFA and BLM

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering Chaput's own views on gays, the guy seems pretty intolerant so what is he really saying here?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Evil preaches tolerance so he's going on the opposite direction to Bugs Bunny it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Look up the Jungian term, “enantiodromia”. Chaput was stating a law of nature without realizing he himself is vulnerable to it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wow. Just wow.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Considering he is an archbishop in a country with free speech, do you find it wrong that he encourages people to be frank in their belief?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean he's not wrong. All he said was that tolerance isn't how you make things better, and in fact it is a sin to tolerate evil. I don't >>

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>>agree with everything he considers to be evil, but his outlook on being active about discussing what you think is right is commendable.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The ones who claim to be the most tolerant are usually the least tolerant. Go to a US college and say something the left disagrees with.

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 33

I've done similar, but to the right :)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You went to a conservative college and they banned you from speaking. Highly unlikely.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Not a college, although I did attend one for the first two years of undergrad...you think liberal colleges are bad...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

wow you just have no connection to reality at all do you?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

...You mean college educated people might disagree with something for being factually wrong and morally bankrupt? How intolerant!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

“Dude you can’t say the n word” “See? You lib tards are the intolerant ones!”

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Most unis.* Try Oral Roberts University. Bash the Left there and you'll be fine. Criticize the Right and see how it goes.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Go anywhere and say anything any one disagrees with

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Couldn’t also be that college students are 18-22 years old, could it?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

It's not the students that are the problem. They are mostly sheep, which is to be expected.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

If someone is intelligent enough to get a full-ride thru a good school they're hardly sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They've probably learned to shut the hell up and nod when someone else's money is on the line.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or be white and say you want to learn more about (race you aren't).

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 15

I know us white people are just most helpless victims on earth aren't we

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Look man I just want to be able to ask honest questions so I can be less of an asshole without meaning to. I do it enough on purpose.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Apparently wanting to be a better person is a no-no.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only people who haven't been to college think it's some leftist hippie circle jerk.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

For real I went to a major state school in the south in early 2000s and all you could ever see were those nauseating W stickers everywhere

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly, higher education doesn't teach people to be liberal it just teaches them objective facts that happen to oppose conservative 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

2/2 Propaganda

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I'm left. I'm pro free speech, and that gets me labelled a Nazi sympathiser.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 8

No it doesn't quit pretending this is a thing that happens

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You are aware that there are people who are not you, yes? That other people can experience things you haven't, or do actions you wouldn't?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Obviously. Hitler was really big on free speech. It's the cornerstone of facism, really.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

AntiFascism is, of course, violently opposing free speech, assaulting all who disagree with you, and burning books that you don't like.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think we should speak up against Nazis. Their hateful rhetoric should not be spewed.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And this is somehow considered a radical idea in today's America

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

then attacked by antifa

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Same here. The Neo Nazis hurt themselves by being allowed to speak. No need to abandon free speech because of the few.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

This, I don't get how anyone's speech apart from that directly advocating violence should be criminal

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well even just talking about violence is okay depending on context.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is Social Justice at the moment. Intolerance in the name of tolerance.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 20

There are also social injustice warriors. I'll take annoyingly self-righteous over anyone supporting inequality, supremacy, and oppression.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 13

Most people support equality. They just don't buy into this "oppression" that supposedly exists in western societies.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Ah right. This is imgur, where the only racism is against whites and the alt-right is about economic uncertainty.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Where did I say that? Way to act like a total SJW. Always has to be an extreme with you people.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

You say to the person who called SJW annoyingly self-righteous. Your suggestion was just a tired Alt-right talking point; common on imgur.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

You can't just use tolerance to mean everything. Everyone is intolerant of something. I'm sure you don't tolerate people attacking you.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

and it's perfectly reasonable to criticize people for being discriminatory towards entire groups due to inaccurate preconceived notions.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No this is the Strawman "social justice"

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

How is this a strawman? There are decently sized groups that advocate censorship in the name of social justice.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

No.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What do you mean no? This is an easily verifiable fact.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Great response man!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and there's a decent amount of people who advocate the same in opposition to them.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

So what? That just means they're not the only people advocating censorship but in no way means they aren't advocating censorship themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Was that supposed to be a counter argument? We don't want censorship of any ideas/speech, SJW or not.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Far too many people think it's only one side. Which only contributes to the power of both sides.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well that's just the most hugely incorrect statement ever the worst people in history never preached tolerance the best did so fuck off mate

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 17

I think it's more about how the kkk or westBoro Baptists whinge about being allowed to do their thing even tho "their thing" is being cunts

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Knowing the dudes a bishop makes me think it's probably some anti gay nonsense I hope you're right but I've heard the alt say this bullshit

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Good point, and lmao your username

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you sir v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Chaput IS against gay marriage, but on this particular subject, I like what he says. People should openly oppose things they disagree with>>

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>>but in a way that is respectful. If people are too scared to voice their opinions, we will end up with a society worse than if we argued.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0