26-inch thick armor.

Oct 21, 2021 2:42 PM

iceage2012

Views

161631

Likes

1685

Dislikes

16

26-inch thick armor from a Japanese Yamato class battleship, pierced by a US Navy 16-inch gun. The armor is on display at the US Navy Museum.

This makes me think about Francis Ngannou’s punching power. Like a Ford escort.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Accurate flex but ok

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Armor was 25 inches thick ..close though.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am a machinist/welder on aircraft and this terrifies me.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so if they come up with 52-inch armor all we need is 32-inch guns. I figured it out with science.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The largest gun ever fired in anger was the 31.5” schwere Gustav

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But... 16 is less than 26?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand the physics, but it still seems unreal a gigantic ship made of 26-inch-thick steel can float

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Big guns are even scarier than small guns

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

that's shell has 184,831,155 ft/lb of energy. The .50bmg bullet that can penetrate light tank armor, has 11,000

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not thick enough.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-040.php relevant techical document on the test.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

War is hell. Fuck war.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you think there were crazy conspiracy theorists back then claiming this kind of thing was all staged? I really don't know and am curious.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well considering no Yamato class was ever sunk or captured after a battle against US ships, and this plate was actually from a leftover-

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

turret the US picked up post-war and shot at in testing conditions... It isn't the result of a battle like the post suggests but doesn't-

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

litterally state. Information is funny like that.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son of a bitch in Space!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So that's pre atomic steel, cost a fortune?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Warthropies beat capitalism

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I guess they needed 27-inch thick armor

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is this from Yamato or Mushashi?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neither, it was from a third of the class that ended up converted into the carrier Shinano (this shot is from post-war testing of parts)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neither. A spare part used for post-war weapons testing from the third Yamato class ship (converted into Aircraft carrier Shinano)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Old style Battleships and their big guns are frightening: “I’m gonna hurl this 32inch rock sized shell 5 miles at you”

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh, have the Japanese demanded it back? No? British Museum stops sweating...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Will it be ok ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To give some scale of the shell responsible

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"you should see the slug" -26-inch thick armor

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Big Bada Boom

4 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No need to be so technical, you nerd. /s

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bada baig boom

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck the Japanese Navy in WW2 (unmuted)

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

Meanwhile the US military *only* used incendiary and nuclear weapons on civilian targets.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

One served a military purpose

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

And here I thought the Japanese weren't brutal at all in WW2!!! /s

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

26-inch = 66,04 cm in human measurement

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

= 3 bahn ahn yahs.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, so that's 66.04 Napoleons, a famous mass murderer.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should have sprung for the 27-inch.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Similar devastation

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

That looks like a Kurogane scout car.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good eye. And hats off to FG writers for that detail.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I checked with my fellow re-enactor and actually they said its not, and they're right. Toyota AB Phaeton but shorter like a kurogane.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, my God

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good lord. 2240 pound (1020 kg) shell with a muzzle velocity of 2300 ft/s (700 m/s). That's like getting hit by a Buick going Mach 2.

4 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

Anyone that's awesome at science.. could you do the math on what's the force that it hits at being that size shell? Like in joules?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

E = 1/2 mv² so 1020 kg @ 700 m/s is 250 MJ, or about 430,000 .357 magnum rounds.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's about 60 kg of TNT just in kinetic energy, although that means the shell's payload matters for damage effects.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Buick weighs way more than that, 2200lbs is Miata sized.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

With the impact concentrated into an area the size of one of its hubcaps.

4 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

2700lbs this one is the super heavy round

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine the sound that hit made

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

"You sunk my battleship."

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

“plink” ???? ? er…. Perhaps not…

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Yamato and Musashi were both sunk by aircraft. Neither was ever engaged by US battleships.

4 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 8

Yamato "class" warship not the actual Yamato. But you are correct. Just trying to help ?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The Yamato waaass a remarkable torpedo pincushion when it went down.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Yamato Class”

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

This plate was originally from a turret for the third Yamato class BB, which was turned into the carrier Shinano

4 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

shinano sunk by USS Archerfish, correct?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And if I remember correctly the Navy didn’t believe the commander’s claim

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gallant Lady - book about the Archerfish, read it years ago, Operation Petticoat [tony curtis] also good movie sorta based on Archerfish

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay, so this is from testing spare parts after the surrender? Makes sense.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Exactly

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Correct, but this plate is from neither

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

hah! i love it. facts matter! lovely story. made up.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

There was a third Yamato class that was aborted and converted into a carrier. The plate is from one of the spare turrets intended for it.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Yes, facts matter, and the fact is that this IS from a Yamato class battleship, just not the two @agathos mentioned

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

an important point, i think

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

I woke up on the nitpicky side of bed this morning, so I can't call the Shinano a Yamato class battleship. A Yamato class hull, sure.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True, I think you've got something there

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How is this possible?

4 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 2

Humans are very good at finding ways to destroy

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

big ba-da boom

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest SOB in space! (and on Earth as well)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Caliber with decimal places moved to the right.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

per other linked documents... 2700lb projectile going 1992 feet/second. Wow.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

F=MA

4 years ago | Likes 295 Dislikes 1

Fucked = My Ass that bit of armor at least.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

P=MV

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I used to remember that by saying “pomentum” in my head.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space' -Gunnery Chief in Mass Effect

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

E=M*V^2 and P=F/A

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Oh i didn't realize yours was kinetic energy, too. Yeah, and pressure

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

E_k= (1/2)*M*V^2

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Fuuuuuuuuuu.... I forgot the 1/2..... Good catch....

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

FEMA?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kinetic Energy=m*v²/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a bit more complicated than that. Hardness and shape of the projectile and hardness, ductility of the target matter a lot.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Don't forget about hardness

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you get the speed fast enough all matter is basically just different viscosity liquids when it interacts.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

1 At the velocities we're talking about here, tungsten penetrators remain rather solid compared to something like lead. For reference I'm

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

2 currently reading Terminal Ballistics from Zvi Rosenberg and Erez Dekel. It's a bit more complex than a Mass Effect quote.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Captured plate from an unfinished battleship, shot during postwar testing

4 years ago | Likes 173 Dislikes 2

Ya know... Physics.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

B.F.G!

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

minimum velocity with this projectile at normal) estimated at 1839 feet/second -----that's how. It also didn't pass through but was lodged

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's about 1200 mph the bullet is traveling

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

things that go BOOM

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Obviously 16 inch > 26 inch, when you add momentum.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aliens

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The barrel is 60 foot long.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The equivalent of a solid steel compact car, packed to the headliner with high explosive, moving at several times the speed of sound.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-040.php relevant test info.

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Really big guns... Firing REALLY big bullets:

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is starting to make sense.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Boom boom boom iashkjsasay eyoooo eyoooo

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One thing to clarify. The armour is 26 inches thick. The gun is 16 inches in diameter.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Very big bullets.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

That...adds perspective.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They also used like 600+ lbs of propellant to get them moving, so, quite a bit of OOMPH behind those things.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wow, is that per bullet/shell?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, per shot. Each bag in this pic is 50kg, for example (different shell, but only pic I have on hand)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

F=ma

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Through physics, all things are possible.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

16in is the diameter of the round.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Magnets?! I dunno. No one knows how magnets work

4 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Well, most physicists and electrical engineers know how they work

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Science?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son of a bitch in space!

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

wE Do NoT eYe bAlL iT

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YOU ARE NOT A COWBOY SHOOTING FROM THE HIP!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Speed beats armor.

4 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 2

Mass tends to help some

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To an extent. Look up calibers like the 5.7 or the 7.5fk burno small bullets super fast. Pistol rounds that defeat body armor.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but the v has the 2 above it in the kinetic energy equation.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Velocity is king.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Actually: it’s a vector quantity that measures displacement (or change in position) over the change in time. :)

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Fellow physics person!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well you sound like you know. I was going on what I was told in the RN. Smaller calibre but higher velocity, gets job done

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A very fast pebble? No. Force! The product of mass and acceleration

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Accelerate a pebble to almost the speed of light and yiu get a ton of force. So yes a fast pebble.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you found a cannon from WWII that can shoot pebbles at the speed of light you'll probably win a lot of awards

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, when two bits of metal love each other very much...

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

I'd say hate in this context.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Physics. When two objects of identical density collide, they will penetrate each other an equal distance, depending on the energy of +

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

+ impact. So if you get 26 inches of steel moving fast enough, it'll penetrate 26 inches of steel. And get destroyed in the process. From +

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+ there you change the variables; density, shape, &c.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Big bada boom. Giant bullet go very fast.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The faster something travels the harder it hits when you try and stop it. Even a string can penetrate this armor if it goes fast enough.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/46_cm/45_Type_94_naval_gun but not quite as massive as the ones fired by the Yamato class ships

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1K+ KG rounds, APCBC at that. What the hell! Imagine the energy on that round hitting something, a hot fucking shitstorm

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That shell weighs about the same as my car

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Now imagine if your car were suddenly propelled at 1,568 mph (or 2,523 kmh)

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And relatively bad quality armour.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

"...originally intended to fire the relatively light 2,240-pound (1,020 kg)...shell" and then they went with a bigger one

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why you ask? Because America

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Weird for me to think about that one of those 6 barrels is more than 3x the diameter of the 4.5" MK8 gun I worked on, that was big enough...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think the gun used in this penetration test was the 16”/50 caliber Mark 7

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You’re correct.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok that 45 puts my 1911 to shame ?. There’s .45 ….. and then there’s 45 ?

4 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

Iowa class guns were 50 cal. The mk vi 45’s were used in the older SoDak and North Carolina class ships.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That decimal magically disappears and so does the target.

4 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Gone, like a fart in the wind.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

On a gun like this calibre refers to length, its 16" Diameter and the barrel is 16x45 inches long. No I don't know why its done like that

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

cause longer barrels extract can more power from the powder charge so its an important number

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When the speedy metals go ZOOM it penetrates the stationary T H I C C metals.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The shells weigh 2,240 lbs. that’s how.

4 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

Dang!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2700. These were the super heavy shells for the Iowa’s.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And 1.2m of recoil.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And flying out the gun at twice the speed of sound.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That is fast for something that heavy!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Si vis pacem, para bellum …

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like holding a pair of binoculars

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The lords caliber 45 ACP baby! (jkjk)

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Huge fucking gun, Japanese metal not so great at the time

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

They didn't fold it over 1000 times.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: folding it ten times gives 1024 layers. Folding 1000 times gives you a blade as wide as the solar system

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats what the evaluation board also thought, until they did test shooting and it was actually good. Read the wiki article on the subject

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Because the fleet was a turn-key purchase from Vickers and manufactured in Britain.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

The Yamato was built at Kore. They were using British steel tech, but domestic materials and labor.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I mentioned in the other replies that I wasn't clear at all. I was referring to the metallurgy.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The old fleet yes. Then they decided to make their own ships.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because ships from every country at that time would fair better against that round? Get bent.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's not what I said, and right back atcha.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most of the Japanese fleet was purchased from vickers and made in Britain. The steel isn't a problem, its the AP shell that hit it.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the yamato was not built in Britain

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I didn't say it was. I said a large portion of their fleet was purchased. Obviously prior to ww2 the first battleship they bought was Kongo

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I should edit my response to be more clear

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought the Japanese had their own domestic ship armour production (based on British specs) by the start of the conflict? This particular/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

specimen was made in Japan, or else the Americans won't had bothered to test it.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really should have been more clear. The first of Japan's modern warships were made in Britain. The Yamato was designed using British techn

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They did! I wasnt clear at all with my last statement. Lack of characters per comment, stream of consciousness, and all that.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2021 7:12 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1/His swords were still made with low grade metals compared to Europe, India, or mainland Asia. Their method of smelting produced lots of

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ impurities in the metal, hence all the folding that had to be done to remove the slag and even out the impurities. The same processes for

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/steelmaking and working were performed everywhere else (Europe, Africa, India, Mainland Asia, etc.), japanese sword making was neither

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh, no? He would exactly know how shitty it was. Why do you think it took so much work to make a decent sword?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There's a reason katanas had so many layers. They had to fold the shit out of the steel to make it resemble anything useful.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Him and other legendary japanese sword makers are praised for making good weapons out of shit steel.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The funny part is they may be good for shit steel, but in testing they are still way worse than a European steel sword.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well yeah. That's my point. Is that these particular artisans had to make do with sub-par materials.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hattori Hanzo would have been dead for almost 550 years at this point. So the metal he worked with was likely rather different to the 1940s.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Jesus i wasnt being serious. I was also thinking of the one from kill bill.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Japan's sword making techniques were born out of how shit their domestic metals were

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

1/Japan's sword smithing techniques were unremarkable and used everywhere else when working with that sort of metal. Their ores weren't even

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0