You think the NBA will stand up for what is right?

Jun 2, 2021 1:12 AM

AjaxGBR

Views

56299

Likes

1023

Dislikes

22

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/congressional-body-urges-nba-stars-end-endorsement-chinese-sportswear-2021-06-01/

How much is enough for crying out loud.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait until they learn about American slave labor. They'll all have to move to Belgium or some shit.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Urged by whom?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Much like the rest of America, the NBA will stand up for what is profitable, not what is right.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why should businesses when governments don't?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To set a good example, and apply pressure to said governments

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Money before all else...ALL ELSE... Pathetic

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But muh monay!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LeBaby at the thought of having to give up slave money

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately no i don’t think they will. Not till we consumers stop watching and stop buying apparel.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Does one give away their right to criticize black slavery and oppression if they knowingly do the same to the chinese slaves? no shame.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They didn't due to genocide I have little faith they will now.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not be sponsored by Nike? Are you mad?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But what about their yacht and mansion payments?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why can't you take their money and still speak out. You still get a lot of money, and you end up doing the right thing too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No more than players calling out their shoe sponsors for doing what the NBA is doing. Smoke and mirrors!

5 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

How is the NBA using slave labor directly?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Indirect or direct, knowing it and not taking action is being ok with it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dont know let$ $ee what happen$. $urely they will $tand up for what$ right......

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Boycotts work

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

USA needs to end its own slavery first

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why would the NBA stars stop supporting a country that gives them Nike money?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Haha lol

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

NBA urges people as to how a nation that endorses forced labor watch more basketball games and pay for their cash flow than the free worlds

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm $ur€ ₮h€¥'££ ₫o wha₮'$ righ₮.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lebron sure likes social justice issues, until it hurts his bottom line.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

That's on par for every company and person.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Lebron won't even say whether he's been vaccinated or not. He's not giving up money from China. Great player, lousy person.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

NBA is losing interest in the US. Soon they'll all be playing in China anyways.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Anyone see Cena's apology? Humiliating, embarrassing.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

It's John Xi Na***

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

No business will do the right thing unless it's also the profitable thing

5 years ago | Likes 664 Dislikes 3

The triple bottom line hopes to change that. Make businesses think about “profit” in terms of the environment, the community and also $$

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True, that's why the sanctions for doing the wrong thing should be so high that simply getting caught once makes it the expensive option.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When doing the right thing costs more it's essentially a tax on conscience. Love throwing that in libertarians faces.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Legally the company must act in the best intrest of its shareholder. So if they do something that reduces profit they can be sued.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The argument then is weather avoiding slavery and reducing profits is good for the company. Normal people would say it is. USA law.......

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So then never.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It won't be profitable until people care enough. Consumers are the ones who make the choice

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And China is aware of this

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we start boycotting them they will have to choose between western market or Chinese market. If they choose chinese market it's too late.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That means they are effectively making more money from China than USA, at that point its game over for all of us. CCP wins. FATALITY.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

It doesn't mean they're evil, it's a matter of using laws to align what's good with what's profitable.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Agreed. It needs a big enough movement to get them to change their stance. But I am not holding my breath

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ya don't waste your breath. Our companies tell the govt what laws to write so that's only a theoretical solution.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying it's right, but corporate boards have a legal responsibility to act in the shareholder's best interest. see fiduciary duty

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

by extension I believe CEOs and CFOs do as well. This is for publicly traded companies of course, there are rules for private ones with inv

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stop watching until they change, makes it pretty profitable pretty quickly.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Go further, make them afraid to make this mistake again. Stop watching entirely and tell them why. Don't come back. Pick a new sport.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we take the NBA and Hong Kong as the example, if North America reacted on mass, in my scenario the NBA are forced to stand up to China,1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

in your scenario they're obligated to stick to their decision as they've already lost North America they can't afford to lose China too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but in my example other companies will see this example and know they can't simply apologize after getting caught.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had a huge debate in the early 2000s about how we needed to incentive people to do the right thing or it'd never happen.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Was it with an alien? Humans need incentive, like, in general

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

was an attorney with his own office name on a building and held onto the romantic belief that the world would figure it out regardless

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I get it, he made it, so anyone can. And if they don't, it's their fault, not the system's.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Mnh maybe i didn't really get a lot of pretensiousness from him tbh.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0