Jane Sanders is an imgurian?

May 4, 2017 8:12 PM

michaelllclark

Views

179360

Likes

3945

Dislikes

335

How else is a doctor suppose to live like kings and have yachts and hookers

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or has a staff with someone knowledgeable in memeology.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Now you're just giving me hope in regards to my employability.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Yes everyone knows all memes ever come from imgur and anyone who uses them must be from here too.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'm glad you recognize this fact. *nods sagely*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hit deductible last year and had procedure on lumbar. Got a bill from December for another $561 this week.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You are speaking crazy!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't know, but that image wasn't made with imgur's meme maker. It's also not exclusive to imgur.

9 years ago | Likes 736 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 5, 2017 10:52 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Swing and a miss op

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 4

Imgur owns all memes, didnt you hear?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe because she used it incorrectly and displayed a popular opinion, like most imgur users do?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imgur has a meme maker?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Yes, IDK how to use it on android, but any meme made on imgur will have 'made on imgur' in the lower right corner.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think imgur has it on Android since I've tried to make things with the app before and had to resort to iFunny instead

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

>ifunny

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't know Imgur had a meme maker, how to access it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GoFundMe - if you see a link for it on this site, 99% chance it's to cover american medical costs. The remaining 1% is for pet vet care.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Looking at it from an investment perspective some some healthcare providers, mostly hospitals, are incredibly profitable. Buy voting stock!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... yeah sure I've got an extra $500,000 I've been looking to spend on something

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

single payer please.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Is she still being investigated by the FBI?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Isn't Trump?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Except the part where the government has NO POWER to force a private business or practice to change their pricing.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

No one on earth the should have to pay for anything to keep them from dying.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Jesus, y'all also believe in the geocentric model instead of the heliocentric model? This site isn't the beginning or center of most things.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Living in EU might not be perfect but atleast my latest hospital bill was 35,70€ (=39,12 $) .

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You mean Epi-pens shouldn't cost $600 in US and only $15 across the border in Canada?

9 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2017 8:27 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

"A human life has no dollar value, unless you can get people to have to pay you just to live."

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

jebus fuck, that's a good one. Who said that?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Me. Though it's entirely possible I'm half-quoting someone else and not realizing it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Where in Canada do you get them for $15? I haven't seen any under $85 here.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

CAPITALISM!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is very far from what the word capitalism once meant.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But it is what it means now

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, maybe, whatever, dude.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Get the offbrand, or get the epinephrine itself. Much easier and cheaper, plus you can administer multiple doses (which is sometimes needed)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think there was ever a offhand epipen until the real ones raises in price.correct me if I'm wrong though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you buy an epipen, youre paying for the delivery system. Epinephrine has been around for years.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

my insurance payed $590 for a bag of saline (salt water)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For example.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not according to our records

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Hello there fellow kids

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 9

Nah man, she actually used the meme right.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What??

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 5, 2017 4:42 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No I know, the girl then says to Steve Buscemi, "What??"

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

These assholes don't even know the entire meme.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No I know, the girl then says to Steve Buscemi, "What??"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Boycott the medical industry. Don't use it unless you absolutely have to.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But the when you have to it charges you your life savings and 2 of your limbs to fix anything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why not both?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If healthcare is affordable, do you need affordable healthcare insurance?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Of course. If you get Brain Cancer and need 10 surgeries, the fact that the Surgeries cost only 5k each instead of 20k is still 50k. A lot

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, yeah but 5k each is still not really "affordable" for the average person. If we made healthcare truly affordable doctors would make 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

like 50k a year. That shouldn't happen. Healthcare should be cheaper than it is b/c hospital directors shouldn't make as much as they do 2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

but it still shouldn't be affordable to the average person without insurance. However, every single person should be covered by insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Coo coo..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We get insurance because some things just cost a lot & cutting 10k in half is still 5k which I can't pay as lump sum. Insurance spreads risk

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Thank you. Insurance is fiscal risk mitigation, not a guarantee of being magically cured of everything

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

uh-huh, but that doesn't explain all those other countries where parasitic insurer middlemen barely exist and healthcare still happens.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You're talking about single payer most likely and of course that is the long term goal. But not while citizens need to front huge cost.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'ma have to figure out what this "single payer" thing really means. In New Zealand I just walk in and out of a hospital for "free".

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*cue some fuckwit droning on about how it's not really "free"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's single payer, that is the final goal, but it will never go down right now. So we move incrimentally.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 @OP That's not how insurance works. The idea is a risk pool. Risk pool. People may or may not have a financially devastating illness.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

2/2 There is no way to simply make that "affordable" unless it was a free national system.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Let's have a free national system then!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And make the Mexicans pay for it!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shit. If only there where other nations who managed to do this.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There really aren't. Everyone in this thread is misunderstanding the quote. Other nations still have expensive healthcare (maybe not AS 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

expensive as the US) they just have single-payer insurance where the government foots the bill. If you had affordable healthcare, 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

insurance would no longer be necessary because people could afford to pay out of pocket. That would actually be a terrible system, though 3

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

because hospitals would only be able to pay doctors an average wage. Doctors SHOULD be rich. They're fucking important. 4/4

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Medical Technology and personal costs much, because it pushes the edge of what is possible on multiple frontiers. What is weird from an ¹

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No "maybe", the US literally has the least efficient system of all 1st world countries.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The government can't just make health care affordable. It can stop making it more expensive though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stop taxing medical devices and driving the costs up, for one thing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem is that if an incredibly complicated and high risk surgery is made "affordable" then the people who perform said surgeries 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

won't get paid very much money. IMO doctors are an extremely valuable part of society and deserve their high salaries. We need healthcare 2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Insurance doesn't lower costs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not arguing that it does. I'm arguing that it's a necessity for medical costs to be high so that doctors can make the money they deserve

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's ridiculous, no other developed country pays their doctors as much as the USA, and it's not justifiable.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

heh, it also makes it seem that the reason Americans can't get enough healthcare is the doctors are too greedy for money??

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

insurance b/c those procedures HAVE to be expensive. The person performing it has an incredibly specialized skillset gleaned from YEARS of 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

...And you can go to any other 1st world country and pay a fraction for what are usually better (as ranked buy the WHO) doctors.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

expensive schooling. Furthermore, we want to encourage the best and brightest to go into that field with high salaries. The average person 3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

shouldn't just be able to pay an oncologist out of pocket because an oncologist should be much richer than the average person. 4/4

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's not the life saving surgery that's costing the tax payers so much, its the ER visits instead of a GP.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, it's both. More so the ER visits. We don't need cheap healthcare we need UNIVERSAL healthcare insurance. Whether that should be done 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thousands of skilled surgeons work all over the world for various rates of pay. All you get in the US are the ones that care more for money

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look, I'm ALMOST a socialist but even I still retain enough capitalist ideology to think that people's value to society should be 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

reflected in their salaries. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah yes, if it's "value to society", coupla hundred grand for a surgeon seems reasonable - and maybe regular floggings for derivative traders

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: The new GOP's new proposed bill makes complications from being sexually assaulted count as a pre-existing condition.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Next week: Classifying children from the rape as a "condition" so they are ineligible for coverage.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Those two things are completely unrelated. The point is that you can't wait until you need health insurance and then go get it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Any complications that might arise in my niece who was raped at 5 years old, when she goes to get health coverage, won't be able to.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's very likely not going to be true. Either way, it isn't because she was raped, it's because she didn't have insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Good to know 5 year olds need to have their own insurance at 5 years old in case something horrible happens to them. Get real, dude.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They need to be convered, yeah. Regardless, my point is that rape is a political distraction that has nothing directly to do with this.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Some companies have refused coverage to people because they took anti-HIV drugs (pre-existing condition) after they were raped.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree, insurance is a horrible middleman between you and your doctor

9 years ago | Likes 142 Dislikes 8

No insurance makes Dr.s money. If your car insurance included a new car every three years with a $50 copay, would car dealers moan about it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As someone who worked in healthcare.. no. People without insurance tend to never pay what they owe, they lose money on them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a Dutch guy: not so much. They can advocate for cheaper contracts with hospitals, get some competition, you just need some rules.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

the insurance industry is so big in the US that the companies will buy off any attempt at change

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I think the chance to make their product mandatory and becoming too big to ever fail (bailouts incoming!) is an option they'll gladly take.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the complete opposite of true. You CANNOT negotiate effectively for prices on healthcare on your own behalf because you NEED it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How do we get rid of them

9 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The one fucking you is the doctor / hospital. Trust me I have relatives on both sides of the equation.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

There's a reason insurance companies are the richest companies in the U.S. There's a reason one of them falling can cause an economic crash

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Insurance companies make a flat percentage across the board, look it up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What?? Im put myself $300k in debt, then working for 4 years barely making minimum wage, then making around $100k / yr. *I* am fucking YOU?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Go with Direct Primary Care then. Look it up. No insurance. Just pay your doc directly. No middleman.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

I hate primary care because you can't pick your own specialists - you have to go to the ones they refer you to.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You have to under insurance anyway?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No... not really, as long as the doctor you want to see is under your insurance you can. Never been an issue for me.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And most doctors I've gone to take basically every insurance. It's just if you have a PCP that essentially requires you to see someone else

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's because of insurance. Get away from that and it all changes. Trust me. It's what I do.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except you can't control whether you get cancer and they can charge $50k per session for chemo.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 5, 2017 6:24 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You don't understand what insurance is, how it works, or what medical care costs in the US. Come back when you do.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

That's why you have more affordable catastrophic insurance. Or you can move. Whatever.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everything's expensive, though. Got a few shots; $1200. Rehab+surgery for minor injury: $150,000.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the point isn't it. Currently healthcare/insurance is a for profit business. It shouldn't be.

9 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 9

#capitalism ?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

There are something's capitalism should have no association with. This is one of them

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Most insurance should be nationalized. Insurance is just socialism by subscription, but for profit.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

CAPITALISM

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So which businesses should be for profit?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 31

Ones without inelastic demand

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Plenty of businesses exist not for profit. They're either called... Not for profit or non profit.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ones that don't decide which human life is worth treating?

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

So you don't think the most capable humans should be in the "determining which human life is worth treating" game?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

You think Paul Ryan and Donald Trump are our "most capable". Holy shit that explains your creepy statements.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You are lost. Try reading things.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Nice ad hominem.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I assume most doctors don't grind through nearly a decade of education in order to make money. Plus, your argument ignores the fact 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That healthcare outcomes are the same in other western nations using single payer. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't say non profit I said not for profit. There are plenty of industries that can be just not the ones that put life after profit

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

You said not for profit, I asked about for profit. Simple negation. Shouldn't the most talented humans see healthcare as a viable career?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 14

I'm from a socialist democracy with an UHC. Healthcare is a viable career here without it being pro profit.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I suspect socializing healthcare would work in US if done at state level which would be closer to size & homgeny of countries such as yours

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Of course. but do you think insurance companies should be on the stock market and care more about dividends then the life of a person

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Basic premise of insurance: most people pay a little more than they should so that the few who experience abnormally expensive problems 1...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

most health insurance companies are actually not profitable, and many already are non-profit companies

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Now they are losing. They had record profits prior to the enactment of the ACA

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

the few left standing have done well because so many others have gone bankrupt, they can charge what they want

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Also, I said the majority of companies, not the majority of the market. A small number of profitable co's own most of the country

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

My country has free healthcare but taxes are higher because of it(finland).

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You have free healthcare INSURANCE. There's no such thing as free healthcare. Normally I wouldn't be this pedantic but in the context of 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

this specific argument it's an important distinction and a bunch of people in this thread don't seem to be getting it. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

What are you talking about? That's only in Finland, other countries have single payer system, and nothing is "free" as the guy said..taxes

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sanders' original post said that we should make healthcare affordable rather than making healthcare insurance affordable, implying that 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

medical bills should be so cheap so as not to need insurance. But everyone in the comments is saying "YEAH! I agree! Let's have 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does this free health care 'insurance' allow you to get medical treatment for free?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. The government just pays for your bill rather than you. Someone is still paying.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So the answer is yes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or rather, that the universal healthcare system is tax-funded, and people pay into it what they can so everyone gets coverage.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

As someone who keeps a healthy lifestyle I just cant grasp paying for people who dont. cancer sure, kids absolutely but your obesity cause..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

illnesses should fall on my shoulders. Your poor decisions shouldn't impact my life or finances

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't want to pay for them either, really. That said, if I'm nearly killed by a drunk driver, I don't want to pay $600K just to live.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

catastrophe insurance costs about $100-$150 a month limiting costs to about $5000 any american can afford this, if not budget for it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People say those systems are free all the time, and it gives the wrong impression. In the US, the form political platforms on wrong those.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ironically the health insurance is part of what makes it so expensive lol

9 years ago | Likes 330 Dislikes 20

Which is why single payer is the way to go doctors and hospitals want it. Insurance companies don't and they are the ones paying lobbyists

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats just because you (the 'murica public) allows it to be like this. There *are* other ways - sincerely Europe.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How can health insurance make it expensive if the only way to pay high insurance costs is if the healthcare itself is high?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just like trying to get a car painted at a shop that only does insurance repair jobs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you an idiot? You sure sound like one with that idiotic statement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Wrong. Price gouging services and materials behind patents that should not exist is what makes most of it unaffordable.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I've been told that historically employment healthcare was a way to add perks to the job at a time wages were controlled. Accurate?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And since that time, costs have spiralled out of control since "someone else was paying".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, not even a little bit. Literally every first world county has health insurance. Even single payer is just a single large insurance pool.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most of the waste is from hospitals overcharging you, drug and medical device managers overcharging you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A not-insignificant amount of waste is from both our insurers being frighteningly inefficient (although they're getting better)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also our doctors and nurses make a fuckton more than they do in any other country, even relative to the median wage.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both of those last two are still dwarfed by hospitals screwing you though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes it adds costs but not nearly as much as most think. Healthcare companies make like 4% across the board.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not ironic. Purposefully done.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mostly. Your hospitals don't need to compete with price. Private sector is ~10-100x cheaper in Europe where they need to compete w/ public.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Glass ceilings man

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Charges or collections? Because there tends to be a huge difference between the two

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah but single payer has huge advantages in that domain. Especially for a market like america.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pharmaceuticals. Enough said.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Pharmaceuticals are only about 15-18% of healthcare costs and are by far the most cost efficient way to take care of people

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The cost of drugs or equipment doesn't play huge role in that. Europeans do fine with sameish prices.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cost of drugs in the US is actually a reason why it's so expensive here 1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fair enough. Your system is far more fucked up than I knew. I highly appreciate act of providing quality sources.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Education is the only way to begin to remedy the problem. One solution other countries might not work singularly for the US but it's a start

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 8, 2021 4:08 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Insurance is a part of that (from my understanding), Because insurance bargains down the price the hospitals inflate the cost of goods.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 8, 2021 4:08 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I wasn't advocating for more Health Insurance. Without insurance you can request an itemized list of goods/services and negotiate from there

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

On Valentine's Day, wife got an ear infection. $1500 for an ER doc to say "oh, that's infected." Waited an hour for 1 min convo. $1,500.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

this is because insurance companies refuse to pay, so the doctors raise prices then insurance just pays half then thinks they got a deal

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 8, 2021 4:08 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

make insurance able to be sold across state lines, or force them to be non profit private companies so no shareholders to answer to

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 4, 2019 10:21 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Huh...I always thought they negotiated the price down...I didn't realize they refused to pay.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

they refuse to pay the billed price so they "negotiate" the price down and end up paying what the doctor would have normally charged

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Make healthcare more affordable and insurance doesn't have to be expensive.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

In the US, its a symbiotic relationship of greed. They both over price to yield the highest reward for their shareholders.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Hospitals don't have shareholders...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Clearly don't know how things work. Thanks for playing though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In guessing you've never heard of Hospital Corporation of America. For profit hospitals are a thing and they're expensive.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Shareholder=|=Stakeholder

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

There are for profit and non profit hospitals . They are based on state laws on how they operate within those guidelines.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Listen, you didn't know that they did, so you're unaware, not a jerk. Gave you an upvote. Ignorance should be educated, not punished.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

...yes they do. They are for profit and have investors.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Investors are not necessarily shareholders.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Then why ist it working in Europe? You should not put your free market stuff in the medical area, because everyone Nerds it, so they can 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Charge what they want.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*needs

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why is it ironic that a parasitic bureaucracy makes things more expensive? I thought that was the assumption.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

Well, thats not entirely fair. For people with rare diseases insurance is an excellent way to afford treatments.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Also having a functional healthcare system without insurance is a great way to remove the concept of "afford" from just being not dead.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

The cost of "Orphan Drugs" can be quite steep, Insurance companies are not without sin, but they do save lives.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're confusing Pharma with insurance companies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Imagine one big insurance company that encompasses an entire state, and then call it "the Kansas department of health." No CEO, no sales dep

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I think it's ironic because at a basic definition, insurance helps people pay their medical bills.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

the concept of receiving medical bills is the problem.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was just explaining why it's ironic. Of course the whole thing is broken.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How much lower would medical costs be if it didn't included an army ofpencil-pushing, non-medical bureaucracy?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It wouldn't exist. A health care system needs people to evaluate risks and costs. We don't have unlimited resources. Private or government.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually, money is the driving factor most things in life. Couple that with the fact that most money is of the fiat variety, and you can

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Meant to say, "How much lower would medical costs be if it didn't include paying for an army of pencil-pushing, non-medical bureaucracy?"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because people blame the insurance companies, whom are merely responding to market incentive. THey don't blame the government that 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

created those awful incentives in the first place 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

the concept of "markets" should not be anywhere in public health discourse

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

so, doctors should be conscripted into work then? Yeah slavery really promotes quality work output

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think at a core level we want to treat Health Care as if it were beyond the "market", however terrible things happen every time a governme

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It took years to get a half assed business friendly version passed with years of rage after, this seems like an unpossible pipe dream

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:32 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Love how every other developed country on Earth has had it for decades and in the USA it's an impossible pipe dream. LOL

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I know, it's pretty screwed up to me too but I guess I'm in the minority.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. It's pretty fucked up that we have money to throw at a neverending war but can't get Little Timmy's leg fixed.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Every other developed country doesn't have affordable healthcare, they have single-payer healthcare insurance. It's still expensive but 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the government foots the bill. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, I thought that is what you were saying is a "pipedream". We need Single Payer in the US like, yesterday.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, I'm not the guy who said the pipedream thing. I'm another guy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And also, yes we definitely need single-payer or some other form of universal coverage. But I do think health insurance is necessary and 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry to bust in on your convo.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0