Wow....ouch

Oct 6, 2018 8:53 AM

inquisitivefluff

Views

205903

Likes

5046

Dislikes

89

Nobody noticed the absurdly thick frame?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now there is 200 little paintings

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

For the next Banksy piece, once you win the auction, some guy comes out and stabs you in the face. Starting the bid now at 5 million...

8 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 0

Reframe the pieces as set in frame, and now it will sell for more. Between price, and the story which will become legend. Quite clever.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

that's not destroied. that's the most valuable set of strips of paper we've seen since the bandages on king tut...

8 years ago | Likes 2738 Dislikes 23

*destroyed

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

destroied? damn

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

If the buyer is smart he'll put it on for auction right away. Double value?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

According to The Guardian, the price may have gone up to £2mil. plus due to the media coverage and its new place in art history

8 years ago | Likes 217 Dislikes 0

You witty mother fucker.

8 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 1

Destroyed*

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

aye.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe Banksy himself was among the audience to push the button at the right moment.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

He did post a picture of it on his Instagram.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Then we just need a picture of the audience, calculate the point of view of the camera and voilà, Banksy!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

im pretty sure he has people doing that stuff for him to hide his identity, hes no fool :P

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pink sweater gets it.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

It's probably worth even more now

8 years ago | Likes 1247 Dislikes 5

Banksy to the owner

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

it is

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Heres the video https://youtu.be/z4ZudVf2PNc

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The buyer's reaction upon hearing this news

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

It is worth nothing. But doesnt meam people wont pay stupid money for it

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 46

Did you know every bit of money is worth nothing In that case?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Then it's not worth nothing. Value of art is what people are ready to pay for it

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

According to one definition of value.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Everything is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Nothing more, nothing less. There is no intrinsic worth in anything.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

This mindset would have been quite useful during the slavery years.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think this irony of his irony is what might irk Banksy a bit.

8 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 0

Y'know, I don't. His next work will be called "Semen on the Floor (Capitalism)"

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

He's not retarded. I'm sure he knew exactly what would happen. I think he's just showing how ridiculous art collectors and critics are.

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

And they eat that shit up just further proving his point in a never ending cycle

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

agreed, I'll bet he thinks it is hilarious.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

There is no way any art appraiser wouldn't notice a shredder in the frame. Between a slit in the wood and the weight. This was set up.

8 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 5

It looks backlit. If it was battery powered I could see it getting a pass

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe Banksy was the appraiser...

8 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Wouldn't the piece have been examined out of its frame for authenticity, etc.?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It's a Banksy piece right? What appraiser would dare damage it by removing the shredder? That's part of the art.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Look at that massive frame tho

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I imagine the appraiser knew about it and was instructed to inform no one, for sake of the art

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

it's more likely that sothebys was in on it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's one fast way to never work at an auction ever again.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

With the nature of banksy's art I doubt it. Its pretty clear that the shredder and timing of the shedding are part of the piece.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Holy shit, what a boss

8 years ago | Likes 1532 Dislikes 31

doesn't anyone else this this is an a$$hole move? You bought it, and "F*ck you, i rigged it". It's not about the $$$ going up

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 27

i fukken hate banksy. a poser. no one calls him out, he sucks.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 17

The person didn't pay for it yet, they had just won the auction

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

banksy president !

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 14

'My first order as president: jobs are illegal because capitalism BAD here is a cartoon i drew about it'

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah fuck no,

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Doubled it in value

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...So...the buyer got what they paid for then...cus thats kinda his thing...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Sounds like banksy. He makes his art in protest of consumerism, westernism and shitty high class events like this

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Statement against pretentiousness? Only to then become heralded as more significant and expensive? That’s meta

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

street art isn't meant to last forever. especially graffiti. shit is supposed to get covered up or tagged. its the point of graffiti

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I wonder who started the shredding mechanism once it sold? Someone must of had a remote control? I assume.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

Wow such a great artist. Such rebel. Paper shred after bought with monies. What will master Binksy stencil next?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

"Oh look! This picture has the name of that douchebag who stencils his useless opinions everywhere. tAKe MY MonEY!!" -retarded art people

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Sotheby's was in on the gag.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

they'll just frame them back together and it'll be worth even more, because it has more authenticity/story

8 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 1

Yeah you're right. The fact that the sale of any art piece is world wide news means that painting may be worth more now for the stunt

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

No. That would totally ruin it. Think about it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 36

Just watch.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it'd go against Banksy's intentions, for sure, but I'd still bet on the side of the art market seeking profit

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

why would you think it would go against his intentions?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

well, clearly I don't know for sure, but it sure looks like a finger in the eye of the resale/'investment' art market

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

It might be a statement, akin to Manzoni's tinned shit. Doesn't mean it was unexpected or that it meant to truly destroy value.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Should have used a cross-cut shredder.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The shredding became part of the art. It actually ended up making the piece MORE valuable. By up to as much as double what was paid for it.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

You base that on...?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The internet.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bag it up

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Manray did it first with his "indestructible object", art is weird sometimes

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Thank you for this.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Unpopular opinion, banksy is way overrated and never was the pinnacle of street art.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Correct, he's just prolific and got some media staying power.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

also kind of an asshole. I don't care if its "art", making a buisness transaction and then setting destroying your half of the deal after

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

getting the money is despicable. IF he gave the money back then whatever, but this is no different than scamming somebody and then going

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"ITS JUST A PRANK BRO"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 15, 2018 12:48 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Damn right

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

twitch streamers make like 100000$ a month. Money is stupid, let people do what they want.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He once gave his paintings to an old man and had him sell them for 20$ in Times Square. Only sold 2 to a couple getting their first apprmnt

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Contemporary art.. 1.3M. Seriously ?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Who's Banksy?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Bruce green

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Watch exit through the gift shop in pretty sure it's on Netflix

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Did Banksy make the frame too, how did nobody expect/think this would happen?

8 years ago | Likes 323 Dislikes 14

they had to know

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, it doesn't seem very obvious for it to self shred like this. Paint bomb or something, maybe, but I didn't see this coming.

8 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 3

It’s a stunt

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

It's like people don't pay any attention to how or why he does anything.

8 years ago | Likes 243 Dislikes 2

Exactly!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I certainly don't

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Just in: imgurian who saw something happening, can't imagine anyone being so stupid they didn't see that coming.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The art was made and frames 12 years ago from what I've read. Theories homie was in the room to trigger it.

8 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 1

That was my thought, too. A true artist

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

After 12 years I'm surprised it worked still.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Can someone explain what is going and why? Not for a friend but for me because idk what the fuck is going on.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Look below the frame, the rest of the picture is being shredded

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Artist destroys his half of a 1m$ business transaction shouting "ITS JUST A PRANK BRO"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Banksy painting sold for £1m at auction. Then a shredder built into the frame went of and started to shred the painting

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But why? I is s/he making a statement about how his/her art is not for sale?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He's a graffiti artist with notable anti-establishment and anti-capitalist themes.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I bet the piece would look hella badass if the strips were staggered and re-framed

8 years ago | Likes 959 Dislikes 9

Are the strips permahanging or did they just fall onto the ground?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Either way, the piece is complete now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah then you could sell it in your Etsy store.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

I dig it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In the art world it would be either worthless or the most expensive piece in human history.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

I feel like a De Koonig would still be worth a lot more.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a fine line between a Banksy and a Charlie.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Hella...are we saying hella again? You must be doing a Greico thing.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Lots of people still say hella. Depends where you live.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yup" I'm from California

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Roger that, I was just making an always sunny reference.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wouldnt that ruin the point of the man's work? I mean, art seems kinda ethereal and weird to me but this is what the man DOES.

8 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 10

He later posted this with the caption "going going gone!" so I'm pretty sure it was intentional

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, the shredder was in the frame by accident

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I think you can argue the shredding was part of the work. It seems like something he would do. Now it's the completed piece

8 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 1

Right. Got -6 somewhere else in this same post because people dont get it.

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 13

People like the screwing with rich people aspect but forget who Banksy is. It happens.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Tbh I have no idea who Banksy is but if I spent that much on something you bet I'd make the best of the self destruction.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Goddamn. Imagine being so fucking rare that your art goes for MILLIONS?!

8 years ago | Likes 731 Dislikes 7

yeah, but only after you’ve died of starvation.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I can draw something, it would be the only one in the world. Thats how rare it is. But im no one. Rarity

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

We're all that rare, we're just not all that smart.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He once set up a stall in the street selling pieces of his art. People thought they were copies and bought them at around £10. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

People bought them b/c they liked them. He later announced that they were originals worth many £££s. I love this story. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

banksy makes all these twats look like assholes as big as he himself. he's laughing so fukken hard, the fukwad.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

My art is even more rare. Wonder how much I can get for it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He's not rare, he's a fad.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 22

He's been around since the late 90's. Fads don't tend to last 20 years.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

30 ftfy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Late 90s to 2018. So say 1998 to 2018. How many years is that?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Strangely enough rare artwork is often less valuable than works by prolific artists. People want to collect what they like. If there’s only

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One they lose interest quickly.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And there’s no competition to drive up prices.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1.5M is *super cheap* for art like that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It depends where you live. I've seen Banksy pieces in situ in Bristol and London, but they aren't for sale

8 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 0

So you're saying they're "priceless"?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Effectively. Many things are if you think about it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is a couple in my local town. Some idiot defaced it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I used to live round the corner from one in Bristol. It was hilarious watching tour guides and flocks of tourists taking pictures of it

8 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 6

I work in an office in bristol right next to a few Banksy paintings. Constant flocks of photographers

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Likewise! "The Well Hung Lover" just off Park Street :)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes! Saw it every day leaving the University.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why's it hilarious? O_o

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 9

Because people came to see the graffiti and not the city?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

At least in my mind that is the exact type of culture that banksy constantly makes fun of. Hes unintentionally "become the thing he hates"

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

because he lived around the corner from one and it's normal to him I guess

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 2

And because people love to jump on the bandwagon of whatever is new for the sake of being "with it."

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 28

The art market seems pretty bs to me. Things are valuable only bc of who did them, not bc of any objective merit. Although that's true 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 5

Objective merit?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For a lot of industries. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Things only have value because someone wants them. There are plenty of meritorious art works that are cheap, and vice versa.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Quite my point.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same point but I was extrapolating to everything- houses, chairs, plants. That makes it valid, not bs

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I find the underlying reasons for the demand to be BS. Hence I said I believe the art market is BS. As I said it is for a lot of industries.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of it is also the story behind the art. The Mona Lisa wasn't as popular and expensive until a janitor at the museum stole it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What sort of objective merit would you suggest? Art is the practical application of pure subjectivity. An auction is pretty much the only 1/

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

2 reasonable gauge for "value" that could possibly exist - competitive offers.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Effort and skill required to create the piece might be one thing (though not objective). Modern art generally requires neither.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 6, 2018 6:53 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Value itself is inherently subjective, as it's a function of personal interest and personal finances. The skill and effort does not 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0